Skip to content

Benefits

Suggest a benefit

Benefits

1,117 benefits

Each benefit in black type on white, with the strongest support for it.

Benefits by sector and depth of the benefit 1,117 benefits as of 6 November 2026

SectorAllDepth of the benefit
All1117204353703411445

Strongest support by year of the benefit 1,117 benefits as of 6 November 2026

Year of the benefitAllStrongest support
All1117394278112333

The year is the benefit’s, not that of its entry here.

The magnitude of each benefit on SCSP’s scale, biggest first.

Magnitude

Why some benefits have no magnitude (1,030 of 1,117 benefits)

Benefits by sector and magnitude 1,117 benefits as of 6 November 2026

SectorAllMagnitude, from the top band down
All11175102916207

Each column is a band of magnitude on SCSP’s scale.

The inputs of the magnitude, by band 1,117 benefits as of 6 November 2026

InputAllBand, from 1 to 5
Band 1Band 2Band 3Band 4Band 5
Reach616
Duration594
Distribution183
Frequency541
All1934824225251343291

Each input is a band from 1 to 5 that rests on a quoted fact, as the Guide defines them. Press a cell to list the benefits in that band.

Each amount of money in the colors of a banknote of its currency.

Dollar amounts at InforEuro rates of October 2026

28 of the 42 amounts are in dollars or convert, and together they come to US$ 681 million, a range at its lower bound and a yearly figure once. The sum mixes savings, payments, fines and one-off and yearly amounts, so it is a tally, not a total.

Currency

The parties’ claim next to an independent source.

Documents

From the makers’ claim to the first independent source (284 of 687 benefits date both)

Who made the claim, by the strongest support for it 687 benefits as of 6 November 2026

Source by the partiesAllStrongest support
All7533378824286

A benefit with sources by two parties counts once in each row.

The country of each system’s maker with the countries where the system was used.

none1 2 3 to 7 8 to 19 20 or more

Count by

Countries, ranked by benefits 208 benefits as of 6 November 2026

CountryBenefitsIndependently supportedMade at homeMade abroadMade here, used abroad

Counts are of benefits in this database, not of AI use in the world. A benefit used in several countries counts once in each.

Where systems went: the region of the maker by the region of use 208 benefits as of 6 November 2026

Region of the makerAllRegion where the system was used
All2085171562218141

A benefit used in several regions counts once in each.

The maker of each system, the system itself, the model version where the sources name it.

What the sources name

Makers, ranked by benefits 1,117 benefits as of 6 November 2026

MakerBenefitsFound by a body with authorityCountries of useSystems
15ChatGPT, GPT-4, ChatGPT Plus and 9 more
9AlphaFold, GraphCast, Google DeepMind AI hurricane forecast model and 11 more
20Android Earthquake Alerts System, FINDER, Google self-driving car and 14 more
5Apple Watch Fall Detection, Apple Watch heart-rate notifications, Apple Watch Blood Oxygen app and 8 more
7Autopilot, Tesla Autopilot, Tesla Full Self-Driving and 5 more
6Microsoft Copilot, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Microsoft Translator Inuktitut and 2 more
1AI-Based Health Monitoring, AI-Powered RF Signal Locator for Advanced Search, AI-Based Real-Time Elephant Monitoring and 6 more
5Google DeepMind tropical cyclone model, GraphCast, AlphaFold Protein Structure Database
5Pangu-Weather, Nanjing Building 1:1 'living' digital twin on Huawei Cloud: 80-plus…, ADS Pro V2.0 and 3 more
1ALICE, Alice, Projeto Malha Fina: a machine-learning model and 1 more
1ContaCT, Viz HCM, Viz.ai automated large vessel occlusion detection and 2 more
3Meta, Instagram self-harm content detection, Variance Reduction System and 3 more
1Pano AI Rapid Detect platform, Pano AI wildfire detection cameras, Pano AI wildfire detection camera and 3 more
1uAI-HematomaCare, uAI-PulmonaryEmbolism, uAI-CTA-HeadNeckVessels and 3 more
0StudentSphere AI journaling system, Brain-wave driven wheelchair for paralysis patients using EEG, Smart Watch based Integration System for Habituating Face Paralysis… and 3 more
1AI-Driven Predictive Beamforming for Climate-Resilient 5G/6G Networks, Edge-and-cloud AI intrusion-detection system, AI virtual instructor for a 3D electronics laboratory and 2 more
6CAD4TB, CAD4TB computer-aided detection software reading digital chest X-rays, CAD4TB computer-aided detection on ultra-portable digital chest X-ray
1MapBiomas Alerta, MapBiomas annual land use
4UNEP IMEO Methane Alert, UNEP International Methane Emissions Observatory
1CoronaryDoc, EASYASPECT, AneurDoc and 2 more
1AI-augmented reverse-engineering tooling used by Wiz Research: Clau…, Claude Mythos Preview, Anthropic Claude consumer-chat safety monitoring: automated flaggin… and 1 more
1Magic Notes, Beam Magic Notes, AI tool for practitioners in children's social care
1Foncier innovant, Traitement automatisé de l'analyse prédictive, DGFiP Ciblage de la fraude et valorisations des requêtes and 1 more
1AI Enables New Energy Meteorological Power Forecast, Leigong large model for traditional Chinese medicine, RuiPath multimodal pathology model and 1 more
1Mobileye aftermarket warning system, Mobileye-630 aftermarket collision avoidance system, Mobileye Shield+ and 1 more
1AFR Identify, AFR Locate, Facial matching function of the UK Child Abuse Image Database and 1 more
1La Bonne Boîte, LEGO, Analyse automatique de CV and 1 more
2AI-derived computer-aided detection software for lung nodules: AI-R…, AI autocontouring software: AI-Rad Companion Organs RT, AI-Rad Companion Prostate MR and 1 more
1Automated operation device
1AI Guardian, Baidu XiLing AI sign-language interpretation platform, Apollo Go Accessibility Care Mode
1SmartCEM-75 predictive emission monitoring system, SmartCEM-75 predictive emission monitoring systems
5Caption Guidance, Caption Interpretation Automated Ejection Fraction Software, AI echocardiography assistants: Caption Guidance
1Digital green transformation of network infrastructure based on art…, Empowering cloud network operation, Hui Xin smart assistant
3Fitbit Charge 3 estimated oxygen variation, Fitbit Sense ECG app, Fitbit Alta HR resting heart rate
4Pangu-Weather
1Pounce, TA Pounce, CSUNny
2Computer-aided detection, GI Genius Intelligent Endoscopy Module
1Nest Learning Thermostat, Nest Seasonal Savings
2PlantVillage Nuru, PlantVillage Nuru cassava model, eLocust3m
2Samsung generative photo editing on the Galaxy S25 Ultra, Samsung Live Translate on Galaxy phones, Samsung Health Monitor ECG Monitor app
1ShotSpotter gunshot detection system, ShotSpotter Gunshot Detection, ShotSpotter gunshot detection technology
1ShotSpotter gunfire-detection service, ShotSpotter gunfire detection system, ShotSpotter acoustic gunshot detection system
0Bandwidth efficient live interaction, Remote Visual Tracking Using Semantic Scene Understanding, AI vehicle-group decision-making framework for V2X
1Algorithmic video processing developed by Wintics
1510 probabilistic typhoon impact model, 510 impact-based forecasting
1AI4Africa AI-powered AAC tool, AI network-quality prediction system
0AI-enabled 6G-V2X communication framework, AI V2V intrusion-detection system
1ALERTCalifornia AI wildfire detection, ALERTCalifornia camera network
1Abridge AI scribe, Abridge ambient AI scribe
1Acoss data-mining risk scores, ARTIC
1PANDA deep-learning CT screening model, Baguan weather-forecasting model
1Skylight maritime-monitoring platform, Skylight maritime monitoring platform
1Amira
1ArteraAI Prostate, ArteraAI Breast
1ATO advanced analytics: data-mining, ATO myTax real-time analytics prompts using nearest-neighbor compar…
0BrainGate wireless intracortical brain-computer interface, BrainGate2 intracortical typing neuroprosthesis: six 64-electrode U…
1e-Stroke, Brainomix 360 Stroke
1Transradial neuromusculoskeletal prosthesis: osseointegrated titani…, Myoelectric motor execution
1智抗菌平台 / Intelligent Anti-Microbial System, 運動心電圖AI輔助判讀系統
1Yi Jiang Jie, Divine Farmer Agricultural AI Model
0MoralQuest, Cooling the Concrete Jungle: An AI-Enabled Urban Heat Island Mitiga…
1STAR, EchoNext deep-learning ECG model integrated into the electronic hea…
0Tanbeeh, CargoWaves
1MIDS-PNAS, AI-BAC
1DreamBox Learning, DreamBox Math
1AI-powered talent-matching platform, Proposed AI decision-support toolkit for human resources
2ECMWF Artificial Intelligence Forecasting System, Seven AI weather models verified by CMA
1Enco automated captioning software for live local programs, ENCO enCaption4 automated live captioning
3EyeArt, AI diabetic retinopathy screening systems
1Face2Gene
1Pre-Collision Assist, Pre-Collision Assist automatic emergency braking
1Försäkringskassan's risk-based selection profile, Försäkringskassan's risk-based selections
2BoneView, AI fracture detection software: BoneView
2PAWS, PS2 Pal
1Asylum Case Summarisation, Asylum Policy Search
0InsurVision, Anomaly Detection Across 5G Slices Using Federated Learning
1IR-CT-AO, IR-CT-PE
1IRS Return Review Program, IRS AI
1TREWS, Click-based electrocorticographic brain-computer interface
0FCA-Car, FCA-Ped/Cyc
2Lunit INSIGHT CXR
1Automated operation device, Automated operation device on a NAVYA ARMA shuttle
1NIO World Model, Assisted driving
1Quartz Solar AI Cloudcasting, Quartz Solar
1qXR
1Axcelerate software by Recommind, Axelerate predictive coding service
1Relativity Assisted Review, Relativity Active Learning
1Intelligent spam blocking services, CareVia
3FengWu, AI weather prediction models run in real time by HKO
1DERM
0Spatio-Temporal Microclimate Prediction using Deep Learning, AI vehicle-endurance prediction
1Superpower Glass: Google Glass, Tutor CoPilot using GPT-4
1Victor, VitorIA
1Automated operation device
0Tata Elxsi smart remote-healthcare MVP, AI-Driven Digital Twins for Energy-Efficient Telco Networks
1MY-YD-01, MY-CJ-01
1Traveler Verification Service
1UCSF speech neuroprosthesis, UCSF multimodal speech neuroprosthesis
5iVerify, eMonitor+
2eMonitor+
0Uncovering Delays: Leveraging Data Science, RiMAP Virtual Legal Assistant
1Waymo Driver, Waymo driverless ride-hail vehicle
1EA PC-LGI, EA PC-UGI
1Jiupai hydrology model, ZTE Nebula hybrid port-safety vision system
1ZeroEyes AI gun detection
0GeoGPT, OneAstronomy
2Grok chatbot, Grok

Counts are of benefits in this database, not of a maker’s work in the world. A row lists up to three of the maker’s systems, and the first maker named in a benefit counts. 582 more makers have one benefit each, and the Developer filter lists them all.

Each result without the system next to the result with it.

Kind

Comparison

Benefits by sector and how the comparison was made 453 benefits as of 6 November 2026

SectorAllComparison
All453333920

Whom each benefit reached, a person, an organization, society, with the depth of the gain for each.

Who got a share, where the sources place it (183 of 1,117 benefits)

Whom the benefit reached, by the depth of the gain for each 1,117 benefits as of 6 November 2026

BeneficiaryAllDepth of the gain for that beneficiary
12345Not rated
All18763064307235111022

A benefit that reached two kinds of beneficiary counts once in each row. Not rated means that the sources give no depth for that kind.

How soon each alarm in security came, with what followed.

Domain

How soon

Which way

31 of 152 alarms state a time

After the first sign

AIBD-0122: In under 1.4 seconds. Officers found over 75 kilograms of narcotics at secondary inspection.AIBD-0247: After three seconds in a closed crossing. The cameras light a special signal lamp for the driver.AIBD-0349: 5.31 seconds after the quake began. Alerts reached more than 16 million Android users.AIBD-0318: 30 to 42 seconds after each detection. It sent images of armed poachers in Kishanpur.AIBD-0169: Within minutes of a leak. Run times of critical burst mains fell by up to 40%.AIBD-0010: Within eight minutes. A Sardhana police team reached the man's home.AIBD-0380: Within 10 minutes. Police froze 500,000 yuan, then made nine arrests on the third day.AIBD-0159: Within 12 minutes. A police team reached the man's home.AIBD-0161: Helicopters launched about 24 minutes after the smoke was seen. The fire was contained at three acres.AIBD-0375: In about 30 minutes. The cameras identified all 18 teenagers gathering with weapons.AIBD-0209: Within about two hours. A sea drone and a helicopter rescued two Apache crew members.AIBD-0148: Within hours. Police caught the shoplifter from the footage.AIBD-0129: Within 24 hours of the complaint. The city traced the noisy BMW.AIBD-0149: Within a day. Police found a missing 16-year-old in crisis.AIBD-0154: Within about two days. Police detained a masked burglar.AIBD-0206: Under 48 hours from idea to working exploit. Wiz found a critical flaw in GitHub.AIBD-0260: Six days after the FBI notice. Detectives matched the threats to the man, who later pleaded guilty.AIBD-0343: A week after the satellite alert. The operator repaired a leak that released 175 tonnes of methane in a week.
1 s1 min1 h1 d1 wk1 mo

Each dot is one alarm; press it to open the benefit. Equal steps along the axis multiply the time. A punctured dot marks a phrase that gives only a unit, as in “within minutes”.

Whom each benefit helps in the justice system, with how the system’s work was checked.

Courts and tribunals (9)Parties to a case (21)Police, prosecutors and enforcement (63)Prisons, probation and pretrial release (6)People seeking justice (5)Officials and legal work (6)

Each mark is one benefit, placed at the city, state or country that its sources name. Press a mark to open the benefit. 2 benefits with no stated place are not on the map.

Year of the benefit

Who supports the benefit, by the stage of use 112 benefits as of 6 November 2026

Who supports the benefitAllStage of use
All11212042659515

Who had the final say in each benefit, a person who checked the system’s output, the system itself, no one that the sources name.

Who had the final say, by the strongest support 1,117 benefits as of 6 November 2026

Final sayAllStrongest support
All1117333112278394

A person decided means that someone checked the system’s output or chose the action before it took effect. The system acted means that the system took the action first.

Who had the final say, by sector 1,117 benefits as of 6 November 2026

SectorAllFinal say
All1117768150199

What happened to each benefit after its first report, with the date.

What happened later, by the years between the first report and the latest 637 benefits with a known later outcome

Later outcomeAllYears from the first report to the latest
All6371261841061235345

Years are counted from the calendar year of the first report to that of the latest report found. The date on each benefit below is that latest report.

The cost that came with each benefit.

Depth of the benefit

What the sources leave unknown about each benefit.

Benefits by the strongest support and the depth of the benefit 1,112 benefits as of 6 November 2026

Strongest supportAllDepth of the benefit
All1112204351703411442

Years since the latest report found, by the strongest support 1,112 benefits as of 6 November 2026

Strongest supportAllYears since the latest report
All11125932621627025

Years run from the latest dated source, follow-up or attempt on each benefit to the day of this edition.

Where each benefit was tried again, with what it needs to happen again.

Benefits by whether they happened again and how many other settings they were tried in 312 benefits as of 6 November 2026

Tried againAllOther settings it was tried in
All312155924421

A benefit counts as having happened again when any repeat recurred. Its page lists each repeat.

The stage of use of each benefit, with what must hold for it to happen again.

What happened later

Tried in other settings

Benefits by the stage of use and the strongest support 1,117 benefits as of 6 November 2026

Stage of useAllStrongest support
All1117333112278394

Press a cell to read, for one stage, the benefits with that support. Each benefit below says what must hold for it to happen again.

  1. Independently studied

    No magnitude The benefit went to one person, and no groups are compared.

    Claim Use Fall Detection with Apple Watch

    Independent source Wearable saving lives: a case report

    United StatestoNetherlands

    Specific harm prevented Assumed comparison

    Persisted

    WANT reported on 1 May 2026 that the runner had spent two months in rehabilitation and aimed to run the Doetinchem half marathon in October 2026. No later report on the race appears.

    Trade-offs The device shortened the path from an unwitnessed collapse to human help. Survival still depended on CPR, defibrillation, and hospital care, and this case cannot measure the outcome without the alert.

    Limits The authors give no date or place. The identification of the patient, the date and the street are inferred from interviews and a pager message. Men's Health says that the runner also pressed the SOS button himself and that a pulse returned within about three minutes. This account does not fit the timeline in the paper. The case cannot show how quickly he would have been found without the alert.

    A person5

    A person decided Family members found the runner and started CPR. Emergency clinicians provided defibrillation and medication, and hospital clinicians performed subsequent treatment.

    MakerAppleSystemApple Watch Fall DetectionVersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold The watch has connectivity at the scene. The collapse produces a detectable fall signature.

    Tried again It happened again in one other setting.

    Needs The watch has connectivity at the scene. The collapse produces a detectable fall signature.

    As a 69-year-old runner collapsed in cardiac arrest, Fall Detection on an Apple Watch Series 10 called emergency services. It alerted his emergency contacts. He made a full neurological recovery.

    HealthCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  2. Independently studied

    No magnitude The sources report mortality for the whole alert arm and for the high-risk ECG subgroup, not by social group.

    Claim AI-enabled electrocardiography alert intervention and all-cause mortality: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial

    Independent source Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Care: A Systematic Review

    Without the system 4.3% mortality within 90 days

    With it 3.6% mortality within 90 days

    Expanded

    In July 2025 Business Today reported that Tri-Service General Hospital had licensed the AI-ECG system to Quanta Computer in 2023, that it screened residents in Miaoli, Taitung and Hsinchu County, and that other medical centres bought it.

    Trade-offs The alert could lead to more tests and treatment, and the trial team found higher mean medical costs in its economic analysis.

    Limits The deployed model weights, longer-term survival and the clinical actions that caused the mortality difference remain unknown.

    A person5

    A person decided Physicians reviewed the alerts and chose further tests and treatment. The system did not prescribe or administer care.

    MakerNational Defense Medical CenterSystemAI-ECG mortality predictionVersionNot stated

    In a pilot

    Must hold Reliable ECG transfer and clinicians able to assess alerts are likely requirements. Effectiveness in other health systems requires evaluation.

    In a Taiwan trial of 15,965 patients, a neural network alerted physicians to high-risk electrocardiograms. Mortality at 90 days was 3.6%, against 4.3% with usual care.

    HealthCertainty of the reported gain: high

  3. Independently studiedMagnitude 0.48

    Magnitude 0.48

    Claim Baricitinib as potential treatment for 2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease

    Independent source Baricitinib in patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19 (RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial and updated meta-analysis

    United KingdomtoArgentina, Brazil, Denmark10 more

    Without the system 8 days (95% CI, 7 to 9)

    With it 7 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 6 to 8)

    Challenged

    FDA approved the COVID-19 indication on 10 May 2022. In Europe, Lilly withdrew its application on 7 December 2022 after EMA reached the provisional opinion that the benefit-risk balance was negative.

    Trade-offs Serious adverse events affected 15% of baricitinib recipients and 18% of controls in COV-BARRIER. RECOVERY investigators reported 12 suspected serious reactions. Short follow-up leaves rare and long-term harms uncertain.

    Limits The exact software release, a comparison without AI, the observed savings and the number of people helped worldwide are absent from the sources.

    A person5An organizationNot ratedSocietyNot rated

    Shared alikeThe mortality effect was consistent across all six prespecified patient subgroups.

    A person decided Researchers chose the candidate drug. Clinicians prescribed treatment under trial protocols, with oversight from ethics committees and monitors.

    MakerBenevolentAISystemBenevolent PlatformVersionNot stated

    In a pilot

    Must hold The clinical comparisons concern hospitalized patients and the eligibility criteria of each trial. Background treatment differed: remdesivir in ACTT-2, and mostly corticosteroids in COV-BARRIER and RECOVERY.

    Tried again It happened again in both other settings.

    Needs The clinical comparisons concern hospitalized patients and the eligibility criteria of each trial. Background treatment differed: remdesivir in ACTT-2, and mostly corticosteroids in COV-BARRIER and RECOVERY.

    BenevolentAI researchers used the Benevolent Platform’s knowledge graph to identify baricitinib for COVID-19, and in the RECOVERY trial mortality was 12% with the drug and 14% with usual care alone.

    ScienceCertainty of the reported gain: moderateLater challenged

  4. Independently reported

    No magnitude The benefit went to one person, and no groups are compared.

    Claim Remarks on the Rescue of United States Military Personnel in Iran and an Exchange With Reporters

    Independent source 'Ghost Murmur,' a never-used secret tool, deployed to find lost airman in Iran in daring mission

    United StatestoIran

    Specific harm prevented No documented comparison

    No stated timeOne rescued airman, with the claimed AI contribution unverified

    Challenged

    Physicists interviewed by the Post and Scientific American disputed the public technical description. The claim about the rescue has not been formally reversed or withdrawn.

    Trade-offs The rescue is documented, but the claimed heartbeat-sensing mechanism cannot be evaluated from the public evidence. The official reference to 40 miles concerns a camera observation.

    Limits No measurement or technical account in the sources shows that the claimed system located the officer. Officials in their briefing and CBS in its reports name no tool, and CBS does not say that the technology used AI. Lockheed Martin declined to comment.

    A person5An organizationNot rated

    A person decided By the official briefing, rescuers watched the officer's suspected position with a camera from 40 miles away, and his own messages reached US forces, who carried out the rescue. No source says that anyone acted on the tool's output alone.

    MakerLockheed Martin Skunk WorksSystem'Ghost Murmur': long-range quantumVersionNot stated

    In a pilot

    Must hold Public evidence of the sensing method and its role in locating the officer would be needed before identifying reproducible conditions for an AI benefit.

    Two anonymous sources credit the CIA’s Ghost Murmur, quantum sensing paired with AI, with locating a downed F-15E officer in Iran. CBS reports that CIA technology pinpointed him. It names no tool.

    DefenseCertainty of the reported gain: very lowLater challenged

  5. Independently reported

    No magnitude The benefit went to one person, and no groups are compared.

    Claim Use Crash Detection on iPhone or Apple Watch to call for help in an accident

    Independent source 19-year-old rescued from car sinking in freezing water speaks out

    Protective response, prevention unproven Assumed comparison

    Persisted

    WKRC reported on 11 March 2026 that the driver was alive and well and had thanked the Clermont County responders. ABC News (4 March) said that the accident report recorded only bruises.

    Trade-offs The watch contributed an alert, and firefighters and deputies pulled her out. Clermont County dispatchers have not said whether the watch's call was the only alert or the earliest. Okayama University physicians found that 35 of 49 crash-detection calls to the Okayama City Fire Bureau from October 2022 to March 2023 were false alarms.

    Limits Only the agencies' dispatch logs could separate the Apple Watch alert from the Life360 alert and show their timing. Reporters support the rescue and the minor injuries, but their accounts do not show whether the watch was needed, given the other alerts, the dispatchers and the responders.

    A person5An organizationNot rated

    A person decided A dispatcher stayed on the line with the driver, while deputies and firefighters located the overturned truck, broke a window, and pulled her out.

    MakerAppleSystemApple Watch Crash DetectionVersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold The on-device crash classifier recognizes the impact as a severe car crash. The wearer does not dismiss the alert within the countdown.

    Tried again It happened again in one other setting.

    Needs The on-device crash classifier recognizes the impact as a severe car crash. The wearer does not dismiss the alert within the countdown.

    On 22 February 2026 near Batavia, Ohio, a 19-year-old’s truck flipped into the Little Miami River. Clermont County officials say that her Apple Watch Crash Detection called 911. Crews freed her.

    Safety and rescueCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  6. Independently reported

    No magnitude A single rescued swimmer gives no documented distribution across groups.

    Claim Power of anti-drowning technology on display at Stirling Leisure - Inglewood in WA’s first AI-assisted pool rescue

    Independent source AI pool monitoring system helps save life of swimmer suffering medical episode in the water

    IsraeltoAustralia

    Specific harm prevented Assumed comparison

    Persisted

    ABC News reported on 31 December 2025 that the system was still in use at the Inglewood pool more than a year after it started. ABC also reports that Royal Life Saving Australia is studying the system's impact in a research partnership with Lynxight.

    Trade-offs Paul Salmon of the University of the Sunshine Coast asked how pools will prevent over-reliance on the technology and the loss of detection skills in lifeguards.

    Limits Whether the man would have survived without the alert is unknown, because a fellow swimmer noticed the emergency independently and lifted him to the surface. The claim of a faster response comes from the city's own staff.

    A person5

    A person decided A lifeguard responded to the watch alert and helped complete the rescue after a bystander lifted the swimmer.

    MakerLynxightSystemLynxight AI pool monitoringVersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold The system must detect distress and deliver an alert that lifeguards can act on promptly.

    Tried again It happened again in one other setting.

    Needs The system must detect distress and deliver an alert that lifeguards can act on promptly.

    Lynxight, a camera system at a Perth pool, alerted a lifeguard’s smartwatch to a man who had sunk unconscious. Lifeguards rescued him with help from a swimmer. He recovered fully.

    Safety and rescueCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  7. Independently reported

    No magnitude A single patient's benefit gives no documented distribution across groups.

    Claim Stroke Nurse Shares Her Experience After Brain Aneurysm

    Independent source From caregiver to cared for: How an ICU nurse’s training saved her own life

    Specific harm prevented Assumed comparison

    Persisted

    About 14 months after the hemorrhage, The Coastal Star reported that the nurse had returned to full-time work and her usual activities with no lasting effects of the stroke.

    Limits Baptist Health has not confirmed which product, module or release flagged this patient's scan. No source isolates the software's effect on survival.

    A person5

    A person decided The software flagged the scan and notified the stroke team. Clinicians chose and performed the aneurysm treatment, and the precise alert-review procedure is unconfirmed.

    MakerViz.aiSystemViz.ai stroke detectionVersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold Prompt clinical review and access to aneurysm treatment.

    Software, apparently Viz.ai, detected a nurse’s brain bleed. It alerted her doctors. After treatment, the nurse returned to full-time nursing.

    HealthCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  8. Independently reported

    No magnitude One person benefited, and the sources say nothing about groups.

    Claim Repurposing Portfolio

    Independent source Doctors Told Him He Was Going to Die. Then A.I. Saved His Life.

    Persisted

    In its annual report for 2025, Every Cure states that Joseph remains in remission (page 15). The New Yorker also reported his remission in July 2025. In Penn Medicine’s documentary, published on 17 November 2025, Coates says that full remission followed five months after his transplant.

    Editor’s note The clinician had already recognized the connection with myeloma. High scores supported that judgment, while remission followed further treatment.

    Limits No detailed clinical case report, medical record or output of the model for this case is cited, and the authors of the Lancet Haematology vignette label its result unpublished data. Which algorithm or release scored the drugs for Coates is not known.

    A person5

    A person decided Fajgenbaum recommended the regimen, and Wayne Gao assessed the patient and agreed to administer it.

    MakerEvery CureSystemEvery Cure’s early drug-repurposing systemVersionNot stated

    In a pilot

    Must hold Clinicians must assess the proposed drugs, the patient’s condition, and the risks of treatment. A high model score alone does not establish that a drug is suitable. The patient must respond sufficiently to receive any further treatment that is needed. Coates later underwent a stem cell transplant before he reported full remission.

    A consulting physician had considered three drugs for Joseph Coates’s POEMS syndrome. Every Cure’s early repurposing system scored all three highly. Coates responded. He later reached remission.

    Science

  9. Independently reportedMagnitude 0.675

    Magnitude 0.675

    Claim Impact of a deep learning sepsis prediction model on quality of care and survival

    Independent source Integrating artificial intelligence into healthcare systems: more than just the algorithm

    Without the system 11.39% modeled counterfactual mortality

    With it 9.49% observed post-deployment mortality

    Persisted

    The COMPOSER team reports that the alerts kept running in two emergency departments at UC San Diego Health from February 2023 through October 2025. A large language model layer was added to the alerts in July 2024.

    Trade-offs Nurses received about 235 alerts a month across both sites. The sources show no evaluation of unnecessary treatment among patients without sepsis, or of its costs and harms.

    Limits The authors did not measure harms from false alarms in patients without sepsis or financial returns, and the sources include no independent replication of the mortality effect.

    A person5

    Groups that it missed are listedMortality fell significantly at the safety-net hospital and not at the quaternary care hospital.

    A person decided Nurses reviewed an alert and chose whether to notify a physician, note that care was already underway, or record that infection was unlikely. Physicians decided on treatment.

    MakerUniversity of California San Diego research teamSystemCOMPOSER deep-learning sepsis predictionVersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold Reliable data and prompt clinical assessment are likely requirements. Local evaluation is needed to establish whether the benefit recurs.

    Tried again It happened again in one other setting.

    Needs Reliable data and prompt clinical assessment are likely requirements. Local evaluation is needed to establish whether the benefit recurs.

    After UC San Diego Health deployed COMPOSER, a deep-learning model that alerts nurses to sepsis, mortality was 9.49%, against a modeled 11.39% without it.

    HealthCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  10. Independently reported

    No magnitude The benefit went to one person, and no groups are compared.

    Claim 510(k) Summary K172935: Embrace

    Independent source This Seizure-Detecting Smartwatch Could Save Your Life

    Specific harm prevented Measured comparison

    Persisted

    In an independent study at an epilepsy monitoring unit in Montreal, researchers later found that the Embrace2 detected all 16 convulsive seizures that occurred while it was worn and working. Alerts reached caregivers in 15 of 16 cases, with 29 false alarms over the study.

    Trade-offs False alarms and broken connectivity could reduce the value of monitoring, and seizures without convulsions fell outside the demonstrated detection capability.

    Limits The rescue rests on a single news account, and no clinical record of the event has been found. The same article covers a death despite a successful alert, which shows that a timely human response is a separate requirement.

    A person5

    A person decided The device alerted McGrath's mother, and she called the paramedics. The device itself made no call for help. In the case of a 20-year-old reported in the same article, the alert reached his family, but nobody arrived for 15 minutes and he died.

    MakerEmpaticaSystemEmpatica Embrace wrist-worn seizure detectionVersionEmbrace (the article does not state the generation); echoes concern Embrace2

    In routine use

    Must hold Connectivity between watch, phone and caregiver (one of 16 alerts in Montreal failed on a Wi-Fi disconnection). Caregivers tolerate false alarms (29 in 373 monitoring days in Montreal, mostly from routine movements).

    Tried again It happened again in 2 of 3 other settings and did not in 1.

    Needs Connectivity between watch, phone and caregiver (one of 16 alerts in Montreal failed on a Wi-Fi disconnection). Caregivers tolerate false alarms (29 in 373 monitoring days in Montreal, mostly from routine movements).

    An Embrace wristband detected a seizure that stopped a 26-year-old teacher’s breathing. It alerted her mother, who called paramedics. IEEE Spectrum reports that she survived.

    Health

  11. The deployer's account

    No magnitude A single patient's benefit gives no documented distribution across groups.

    Specific harm prevented Assumed comparison

    Persisted

    Mayo reported in January 2025 that two years after the stroke, the woman had returned to an active life. The woman was taking part in the DISCOVERY study of post-stroke cognitive impairment.

    Trade-offs Mayo reports no costs or harms.

    Limits Mayo does not name the software or compare her care with care without it, and it gives no measure of her treatment time.

    A person5

    A person decided Mayo’s clinicians reviewed the images and managed the woman’s treatment.

    MakerNot namedSystemAI analysis of brain CT imagesVersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold Timely imaging, clinical review, and access to emergency treatment.

    Mayo Clinic says that unnamed AI algorithms let its care team find a woman’s ruptured aneurysm in minutes. After surgery, the woman recovered.

    HealthCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  12. Confirmed by U.S. Food and Drug Administration

    No magnitude The source states that no analyses were performed for sex, gender, age, race or ethnicity subgroups.

    Claim Element Science Named to Fast Company's Annual List of the World's Most Innovative Companies of 2026

    Independent source Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data (SSED), P230022: Jewel Patch Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator (P-WCD)

    Without the system Below 2.0 per 100 patient-months

    With it 0.357 per 100 patient-months

    Expanded

    FDA approved the Jewel in April 2025; on 24 March 2026 Element Science said the device was in its early commercial launch phase in select US states, with a broader launch to follow.

    Trade-offs Patients got inappropriate shocks at 0.357 per 100 patient-months. Seven of 305 patients had skin reactions severe enough to be withdrawn. There were 155 device-related adverse events, 25 needing medical treatment, though no serious ones. Only 30 percent of patients surveyed at the first visit reported overall satisfaction.

    Limits The study was open-label with no control group, so no comparison with another defibrillator or with no device is possible. Only nine patients received an appropriate shock, and the Jewel's effect on survival rests on those eight conversions, with no outcome after the shocks reported. Patients wore the patch for weeks, not years.

    A person4

    The system acted The patch reads the ECG and delivers the shock itself. The wearer can hold off a shock during the alarm, and in one of nine events hospital staff switched to an external defibrillator instead of a repeat shock.

    MakerElement ScienceSystemJewel Patch Wearable Cardioverter DefibrillatorVersionNot stated

    In a pilot

    Must hold The patient is 18 or older, at risk of sudden cardiac arrest and without an active implantable defibrillator. The patient keeps wearing the device through the prescribed period.

    In a study at 29 US sites that FDA reviewed, the Jewel patch defibrillator gave 0.357 inappropriate shocks per 100 patient-months. It converted 8 of 9 shockable rhythms with one shock.

    HealthPublished

  13. Confirmed by City of Austin Office of the City Auditor

    No magnitude The audit reports no result by population group.

    Withdrawal Austin's city manager withdrew the plate reader program from the council agenda in June 2025, and APD's program effectively ended on 30 June 2025.

    For Austin police, in arrests that followed license plate reads

    Checking Officers made 286 stops from 13,122 hotlist matches, and the auditor found no incorrect or unjustified stop.

    Withdrawn

    Austin's city manager withdrew the plate reader program from the council agenda in June 2025, and APD's program effectively ended on 30 June 2025.

    Trade-offs The City's contract with Flock Safety may let the company keep some scan data past the seven-day limit and share it with other law enforcement agencies. The auditor warned that such data could be used to investigate immigration status or reproductive care access. Some officer searches lacked the reason that policy requires.

    Limits The audit covered March to December 2024 and checked APD's own audits, not the effect on crime. Prosecution counts came from public information requests and are estimates. APD says arrests can take years to move through the courts. Flock scan totals could not be verified because data were deleted. Matches from Axon cameras were left out because they could not be verified.

    An organization2A person4SocietyNot rated

    A person decided Officers made 286 stops from 13,122 hotlist matches, and the auditor found no incorrect or unjustified stop. The audit does not say how officers verified a match before a stop.

    MakerFlock SafetySystemAutomated License Plate ReaderVersionNot stated

    In a pilot

    Must hold Officers may use the data to detain or arrest only for felonies, Class A or Class B misdemeanors and Class C and D hate or sex crimes. Scan data must be pulled before Flock deletes it after seven days, or the program's figures cannot be verified.

    Austin’s City Auditor found that APD’s license plate readers led to 165 arrests from March to December 2024. About 133 prosecutions followed. The readers helped recover a missing person.

    Safety and rescueCertainty of the reported gain: very lowLater withdrawn

  14. Independently studied

    No magnitude The report describes one patient and compares no groups.

    United StatestoJapan

    Trade-offs The watch kept a record of a low-oxygen episode outside the hospital, which normal spot readings had missed. The authors of the systematic review of 2023 report that readings from the Apple Watch can differ from medical-grade pulse oximeters by up to 15 points.

    Limits This is a single clinical case, and clinicians made the diagnosis with computed tomography angiography. The authors do not describe how the watch's oxygen algorithm works, and they describe no automatic alert. They do not say who reported the reading. A systematic review of 2023 covered five studies of the Series 6 with 973 patients. Its authors found no strong systematic bias against medical-grade pulse oximeters, with outliers of up to 15 points.

    A person4

    A person decided Clinicians treated the home reading as a reason to investigate, ordered CT angiography, and diagnosed and treated pulmonary embolism.

    MakerAppleSystemApple Watch Blood Oxygen appVersionApple Watch Series 7 (event); Series 6 in echo

    In routine use

    Must hold The reading is not dismissed as artifact. Confirmatory testing (CT angiography, co-oximetry) is available.

    Tried again It happened again in 1 of 2 other settings and did not in 1.

    Needs The reading is not dismissed as artifact. Confirmatory testing (CT angiography, co-oximetry) is available.

    The Blood Oxygen app on an Apple Watch Series 7 recorded an oxygen saturation of 88%, which led clinicians in Japan to computed tomography angiography that found a pulmonary embolism.

    HealthPublishedCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  15. Independently studied

    No magnitude One patient, with no group comparison in the sources.

    United StatestoSwitzerland

    Persisted

    At the last follow-up, four weeks after the start of glucocorticoids, she reported that she was well and her resting heart rate and blood tests were normal. No later report on the patient was found.

    Trade-offs No cost or harm of the tracker is reported in the sources. At the last follow-up she reported a weight gain of 2 kg, from fluid retention caused by the glucocorticoids.

    Limits The patient noticed the trend, and clinicians did the diagnostic work. A reading from a smartwatch is not enough to show that an AI inference caused the benefit. One case cannot show that such screening works.

    A person4

    A person decided Clinicians interpreted the trend alongside symptoms, ordered PET/CT imaging, diagnosed vasculitis, and prescribed treatment.

    MakerFitbitSystemFitbit Alta HR resting heart rateVersionFitbit Alta HR

    In routine use

    Must hold A stable personal baseline exists. The clinician treats the trend as a signal rather than noise.

    Tried again It happened again in one other setting.

    Needs A stable personal baseline exists. The clinician treats the trend as a signal rather than noise.

    A woman in Zurich saw in her Fitbit Alta HR app that her resting heart rate had risen from about 55 to about 75 beats per minute. The trend led to an early diagnosis of large vessel vasculitis.

    HealthPublishedCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  16. Independently studied

    No magnitude One patient, with no group comparison in the sources.

    Trade-offs After the lobectomy the man had a small prolonged air leak and left hospital on the tenth day. The authors warn clinicians not to trust fully a device made outside healthcare standards. They cite a study in which only 153 of 2,161 smartwatch alerts of an irregular rhythm led to a confirmed arrhythmia.

    Limits The watch's brand and algorithm are unspecified, so whether AI was involved remains open. The lung cancer was found on a chest X-ray after the procedure, and the watch did not detect it. The claim that surgery would otherwise have become impossible is a conjecture with no follow-up evidence.

    A person4

    A person decided The man took the alert to his general practitioner, and he was admitted to hospital. A cardiologist diagnosed non-sustained ventricular tachycardia from the smartwatch results after inpatient electrocardiograms captured no significant arrhythmia.

    MakerNot statedSystemSmartwatch heart-rateVersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold The arrhythmia is one the watch records while hospital monitoring misses it. The incidental finding is in the field of the post-procedure X-ray and caught early enough for curative surgery. The authors cite an estimated 1 in 25 cancers diagnosed incidentally.

    Tried again It happened again in one other setting.

    Needs The arrhythmia is one the watch records while hospital monitoring misses it. The incidental finding is in the field of the post-procedure X-ray and caught early enough for curative surgery. The authors cite an estimated 1 in 25 cancers diagnosed incidentally.

    A smartwatch of unstated brand alerted a 58-year-old man to an irregular heart rate above 180 beats per minute. In the care that followed, doctors found a lung adenocarcinoma. Surgeons removed it.

    HealthPublishedCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  17. Independently studied

    No magnitude The sources describe one patient and compare no groups.

    Trade-offs The surgeons say that surrounding issues must be considered in implementation, and they do not name them. They report no cost or harm in this case.

    Limits Only the abstract is available. It reports one patient, with no age, sex, operation or outcome given. It does not say what the wristwatch measured or what it alerted on, and it does not name the device. There is no comparison and no follow-up.

    A person4

    Not stated The abstract states that the patient was readmitted to the emergency department for investigation and management of the pulmonary embolism. It does not say who read the watch's data or alert.

    MakerNot statedSystemSmart wristwatch / personal activity monitorVersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold The physiological change from the embolism is one the watch's sensors register. The wearer acts on the device rather than waiting for scheduled follow-up.

    Orthopedic surgeons at Toronto Western Hospital report that a patient’s smart wristwatch, of an unnamed brand, prompted readmission for a pulmonary embolism after surgery.

    HealthPublishedCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  18. Independently studied

    No magnitude The sources report the probands' ancestry but do not compare who benefited.

    Claim 100,000 Genomes Pilot on Rare-Disease Diagnosis in Health Care - Preliminary Report

    Independent source An optimized variant prioritization process for rare disease diagnostics

    Expanded

    Exomiser was run again across the full 100,000 Genomes Project. The run found diagnoses for 463 of 24,015 patients who had been left unsolved by the earlier analysis, after manual interpretation of the ranked candidates.

    Trade-offs The Exomiser team and Genomics England report no costs or harms, and the record has no comparable incident.

    Limits The pilot's diagnostic yield and clinical actionability apply to the combined workflow of sequencing, panels, prioritization and clinical review. They cannot all be attributed to Exomiser. The authors do not say whether Exomiser or the applied panels found the variants in the two patient cases that they describe. Changes in clinical decisions do not show better health or survival across the pilot.

    A person4An organization2SocietyNot rated

    A person decided NHS diagnostic laboratories and clinicians reviewed and confirmed candidate findings before reporting a genetic diagnosis or changing care.

    MakerQueen Mary University of LondonSystemExomiser phenotype-driven variant prioritizationVersionNot stated

    In a pilot

    Must hold Genome or exome sequencing with family data where available. Structured HPO phenotype terms of adequate quality.

    Tried again It happened again in both other settings.

    Needs Genome or exome sequencing with family data where available. Structured HPO phenotype terms of adequate quality.

    In a pilot of England’s National Health Service, Exomiser ranked candidate variants for 2,183 families. A quarter of probands got a genetic diagnosis. A quarter of those were actionable at once.

    Health

  19. Independently reported

    No magnitude The man reports that he is free of disease nine months after surgery, too soon to show a lasting cure.

    Specific harm prevented No documented comparison

    Limits The account is one patient's and his clinic's. No source compares the reading with and without the tool.

    A person4

    A person decided The tool marked the lesion in red and the radiologist advised a biopsy, which confirmed the diagnosis. The patient was then operated on.

    MakerQuibimSystemQP ProstateVersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold A radiologist must review each mark. A biopsy must confirm the finding before treatment.

    Diario de Mallorca reports that QP Prostate marked a tiny lesion on a 58-year-old man’s MRI at Clínica Girona. A biopsy confirmed cancer, and after surgery he says he is free of disease.

    HealthPublishedCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  20. Independently reported

    No magnitude The sources describe two aviators and compare no groups.

    Claim U.S. Army Crew Safely Rescued After Helicopter Lost at Sea

    Independent source Autonomous Corsair maritime drone rescues US military pilots after crash near Oman

    United StatestoOman

    Specific harm prevented Assumed comparison

    Within about two hoursA sea drone and a helicopter rescued two Apache crew members.

    Persisted

    On 18 September 2026, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told Saronic employees that the two pilots are alive because of the Corsair. Stars and Stripes reported that three Corsairs were used to strike the port at Bandar Abbas about a month after the rescue. The cause of the helicopter's loss has not been published.

    Trade-offs No cost or harm in this rescue has been reported. Cancian told Stars and Stripes that a drone gives the same capability at less risk than a crewed platform. In the linked incident 1561, a Navy unmanned vessel capsized a support boat in a test, and nothing suggests that any harm occurred here.

    Limits The Navy and Saronic have not said which functions of the vessel ran on their own or what its sensors contributed. No source shows whether another rescue asset could have reached the crew. Why the helicopter was lost has not been published.

    A person4An organizationNot rated

    A person decided Task Force 59 operated the vessel, and Al-Monitor reported that an operator steered it from afar. A crewed helicopter completed the recovery after the vessel carried the crew to safer waters.

    MakerSaronic TechnologiesSystemSaronic Corsair unmannedVersionCorsair; navigation-software version not reported

    In a pilot

    Must hold The vessel must reach and carry the people safely. The human and unmanned parts of the rescue must coordinate.

    A remotely piloted Saronic Corsair sea drone carried two Apache crew off Oman to a helicopter hoist. Central Command reported that both were rescued within approximately two hours.

    DefenseCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  21. Independently reported

    No magnitude The sources describe one man and compare no groups.

    Claim How Facebook AI Helps Suicide Prevention

    Independent source When every minute counts: Uttar Pradesh Police save youth attempting suicide in 8 minutes after Meta alert over Instagram post

    United StatestoIndia

    Specific harm prevented No documented comparison

    Within eight minutesA Sardhana police team reached the man's home.

    Persisted

    The Times of India reported on 22 October 2026 that Uttar Pradesh Police credit the alerts with more than 4,000 lives saved from 1 January 2023 to 10 October 2026. The figure comes from the police, and no outside audit of it is known.

    Trade-offs Decode reported a false alarm in Kanpur Dehat, where police traced a college student who said that she had posted a video with tablets on Instagram to get views. Neither Meta nor the Uttar Pradesh Police has published an assessment of other costs or harms to the people whom police visit.

    Limits The police have not said whether Meta's classifier or a user's report flagged this post. The police are also the only source of the statewide figures of 3,011 and more than 4,000 lives saved, and no outside audit of them is known. Meta publishes no data on false alarms in India.

    A person4

    A person decided Meta's documentation and NPR describe human review of machine-learning detections before Meta contacts authorities. In this case the police Social Media Center passed the alert to Meerut Police, whose officers reached the man's home and took him to hospital.

    MakerMeta PlatformsSystemMeta proactive self-harm detection on InstagramVersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold Account details resolve to a reachable address within minutes. Local officers are available to respond immediately.

    Tried again It happened again in 6 of 7 other settings and did not in 1.

    Needs Account details resolve to a reachable address within minutes. Local officers are available to respond immediately.

    After Meta alerted police to a 25-year-old man’s video on Instagram, officers in Meerut reached his home within eight minutes. His condition improved after treatment in hospital.

    Safety and rescueCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  22. Independently reported

    No magnitude The benefit went to one person, and no groups are compared.

    Claim Meta Flagged A Suicide Post. Police Had Minutes To Save The Man

    Independent source Teen's life saved in 12 minutes: UP Police act swiftly after social media suicide alert

    United StatestoIndia

    Specific harm prevented Measured comparison

    Within 12 minutesA police team reached the man's home.

    Persisted

    The Times of India reported on 22 October 2026 that UP Police say that they saved more than 4,000 lives from 1 January 2023 to 10 October 2026 by acting on suicide alerts linked to social media posts. The figure is the police's own count, and no outside audit of it has been published.

    Editor’s note The mechanism depends on a visible post and a rapid response. A stable condition after treatment is a narrower result than long-term recovery.

    Limits Reporters establish that a Meta alert led police to his home within 12 minutes and that he was treated in hospital. They do not say whether software or a user report started this alert. The reading of the case as a life saved rests on the police account, and the sources contain no medical assessment of what would have happened without the alert.

    A person4

    A person decided The police social-media center traced the location, local officers reached the home, and clinicians treated the poisoning. Meta's general process also includes human review before escalation.

    MakerMeta PlatformsSystemMeta's suicideVersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold The post is flagged and reviewed while the person can still be treated. Here the alert came at about 8:58 pm and police arrived within 12 minutes. The account leads to a phone number and a reachable address. Decode reports that UP police usually receive a phone number and trace the SIM and live location.

    Tried again It happened again in both other settings.

    Needs The post is flagged and reviewed while the person can still be treated. Here the alert came at about 8:58 pm and police arrived within 12 minutes. The account leads to a phone number and a reachable address. Decode reports that UP police usually receive a phone number and trace the SIM and live location.

    Meta’s system for detecting suicide risk flagged an 18-year-old’s Instagram post for review. Raebareli police reached him within 12 minutes. He was treated after taking rat poison.

    Safety and rescueCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  23. Independently reported

    No magnitude The benefit went to one person, and no groups are compared.

    Claim Try it! Last year, Grok saved the life of a man in Norway

    Independent source Man credits Grok AI with saving his life after ER missed near-ruptured appendix

    United StatestoNorway

    Persisted

    In a comment in August 2026 the man wrote that he was alive and could not complain. He wrote that the surgeons deserved the credit and that the AI had helped in part. He also wrote that the operation lasted six hours and that his appendix had ruptured. In December 2025 he had written that it was about to rupture.

    Trade-offs The likely benefit was renewed medical attention after a visit that sent him home without imaging. Grok ranked a perforated ulcer first, and by the man's account the cause was the atypical appendicitis that it ranked second. The man's account does not show that the scan depended on the chatbot's wording. Pediatricians in Istanbul reported in February 2026 that Grok 3 over-triaged 36.3% of cases in a children's emergency department.

    Limits The story after the operation is self-reported, and Grok drafted the Reddit post. The post and the later comments differ on where the first visit was and on how he got back. In August 2026 he wrote that his appendix had ruptured, and in December 2025 he had written that it was about to rupture. No clinician or hospital has confirmed the CT findings or the surgery, and no record is public.

    A person4

    A person decided A physician referred him to hospital, where clinicians ordered CT imaging and operated. Grok's contribution was advice that the patient could raise with them.

    MakerxAISystemGrokVersionNot reported; the man said he used the browser version on his computer and that the December 2025 chat was a fresh conversation, and the shared transcript names no model.

    In routine use

    Must hold The chatbot's differential includes the true cause. Here it ranked perforated ulcer first and atypical appendicitis second, and the second was right. A clinician agrees to image. The referral here came from his local physician. Whether the request changed her decision is unknown.

    A Norwegian man had been sent home with an acid blocker. The advice of xAI’s Grok was to demand a computed tomography scan. His appendix was removed on 3 December 2025.

    HealthCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  24. Independently reported

    No magnitude The sources describe one herd and name no groups that gained more or less.

    Claim Alert train drivers 'avert collision' with herd of elephants in Assam

    Independent source Assam: AI Technology Generated Alerts Prevent Train From Colliding With Elephants

    Protective response, prevention unproven Measured comparison

    No stated timeA herd of about 60 wild elephants

    Expanded

    By December 2025 the system covered 141 route kilometers of Northeast Frontier Railway and tenders had been awarded for 981 more route kilometers nationwide.

    Trade-offs No cost or harm from the stop is on record. The system covers only part of the network: On 20 December 2025 a Rajdhani Express killed seven elephants at Sangjurai, where the railway said that no such system was installed.

    Limits The crew saw the elephants and also received an alert. The railway has not shown that the AI warning caused the stop or that a collision would otherwise have occurred. The railway counts elephants saved without saying how many elephants were near trains, so its counts cannot be compared across periods or sections.

    An organization2Society4

    A person decided The system sends alerts to station masters and loco pilots. The Sentinel reported in October 2026 that the alerts prompt them to reduce train speed to 25 kilometers per hour when wildlife is near the tracks. In this case the loco pilot and the assistant loco pilot saw the herd and applied the emergency brake.

    MakerNot namedSystemAI-based Intrusion Detection SystemVersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold Train speed and sighting distance allow a stop after the alert. Crew act on the alert. The operator attributes this stop partly to the crew's own sighting.

    Tried again It happened again in one other setting.

    Needs Train speed and sighting distance allow a stop after the alert. Crew act on the alert. The operator attributes this stop partly to the crew's own sighting.

    On 16 October 2024 Northeast Frontier Railway’s AI-based Intrusion Detection System alerted the crew of the Kamrup Express, who also saw about 60 elephants crossing in Assam. The crew braked.

    EnvironmentCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  25. Independently reported

    No magnitude The sources do not follow the identified victims afterward, so they do not show how long the benefit lasted.

    Claim HSI, partners launch first US-based international victim identification surge

    Independent source Homeland Security identifies 311 child victims of sexual exploitation in 'cold cases'

    No stated time311 probable identifications of previously unknown victims, 14 positive contacts

    Expanded

    HSI repeated the operation each year. ICE reports that Operation Renewed Hope III (24 February to 7 March 2025) positively identified 36 victims. ICE calls Operation Renewed Hope IV (2 to 13 March 2026) the largest such operation ever conducted. It produced more than 100 positive identifications. ICE counts more than 600 children identified and rescued across the four operations. These figures come from the deployer.

    Trade-offs The likely contribution was narrowing a difficult search. Mistaken facial matches remained a reason to verify identities before investigators contacted families or suspects. Crikey reports that Australian case material was analyzed with Clearview AI, which the Australian Federal Police was not allowed to use.

    Limits The 311 identifications are probable, and ICE gives no number of confirmed rescues. In its release, ICE does not mention AI. Homeland Security Investigations has not confirmed any product. No figure separates identifications that came from AI from those made with other techniques.

    A person4Society3

    Reached a disadvantaged groupMany victims now found as adults had never been given counseling or services, so the benefit reached an underserved group.

    A person decided An official of Homeland Security Investigations described AI-enhanced images as a starting point for investigation. Much of the identification work was manual contextual analysis of details such as flora, fauna and geolocation.

    MakerClearview AISystemFacial recognitionVersionNot stated

    In a pilot

    Must hold Legal authority to use web-scraped facial recognition (banned for this use in Australia, per ABC). Human investigators to verify tentative identifications before action.

    Tried again It happened again in 3 of 4 other settings.

    Needs Legal authority to use web-scraped facial recognition (banned for this use in Australia, per ABC). Human investigators to verify tentative identifications before action.

    U.S.-led investigators credited facial recognition, reportedly Clearview AI, for leads in a 2023 operation that made 311 probable identifications of child abuse victims. AI image enhancement helped.

    Public sectorCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  26. Independently reportedMagnitude 0.20

    Magnitude 0.20

    Claim Use Case 27: Multi-Cancer Early Screening with Non-contrast CT and Deep Learning.

    Independent source In China, A.I. Is Finding Deadly Tumors That Doctors Might Miss

    Expanded

    Xinhua reported in January 2026 that DAMO PANDA had been deployed in urban tertiary hospitals and in remote county facilities in Zhejiang, Yunnan, Hunan and Shanxi provinces.

    Trade-offs In the first real-world cohort, PANDA gave false-positive findings for 76 patients (0.5%), and radiologists easily ruled out 70 of them. PANDA missed 28 lesions, mostly benign cysts but also one neuroendocrine tumor. A commentator warns that false positives may lead to unnecessary procedures and higher costs, and that training mostly on East Asian data raises generalizability concerns.

    Limits The real-world test was retrospective. No survival gain has been reported. The authors of an independent 2026 review report that no study shows that the use of PANDA improves stage at diagnosis or survival.

    A person4An organization2SocietyNot rated

    Shared alikeWith PANDA's help, radiologists' performance rose sharply regardless of their experience.

    A person decided In the real-world test, clinicians confirmed the lesions that PANDA flagged. The curative treatment followed their workup.

    MakerAlibaba DAMO AcademySystemPANDA deep-learning CT screening modelVersionNot stated

    In a pilot

    Must hold The account does not show what must hold for the benefit to recur elsewhere.

    Alibaba DAMO’s PANDA model exceeded the mean sensitivity of radiologists for pancreatic cancer on CT scans by 34.1%. It found five cancers that the initial standard of care had missed.

    HealthCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  27. Independently reported

    No magnitude The sources name no counted beneficiaries, only Istanbul as the stated target.

    Claim Bakan Soylu'dan polis aracında bulunan patlayıcıyla ilgili flaş açıklama: Hedef İstanbul'du

    Independent source Görüntüler ortaya çıktı: Aracında 52 kilo patlayıcı çıkan polis tutuklandı, Valilik açıklama yaptı

    Specific harm prevented No documented comparison

    No stated time133 packets, 52.5 kg, of factory-made explosive

    Taken to court

    On 20 November 2023 the Hakkari 2nd Heavy Penal Court sentenced the police officer A.K. to 21 years in prison. It sentenced the four co-defendants to 17 years 6 months each.

    Trade-offs The police first suspected drugs and were wrong about the cargo, though officers found explosives. So the flag was a useful lead that pointed to the wrong kind of threat.

    Limits How many attacks or casualties the seizure prevented is unknown. The police have not disclosed the model, its inputs or the part played by other intelligence, so what AI added remains uncertain.

    Society4An organization2

    A person decided Trained analysts used approved queries and passed leads to field officers. The director of the police program described judicially coordinated searches after analysis, while officers carried out this vehicle stop.

    MakerTurkish National PoliceSystemASENAVersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold The flag must be followed by a lawful stop and physical search. The software only prioritizes. Seized material must be forensically assessed and the case prosecuted, as here with a 2023 conviction, for the counterfactual to stand.

    The Turkish police’s ASENA analysis program flagged a car at Yüksekova on 20 March 2022. Officers found 52.5 kg of explosives. The interior minister said that they were bound for Istanbul.

    Public sectorCertainty of the reported gain: very lowLater taken to court

  28. Independently reported

    No magnitude A single rescue of one man, with no group comparison in the sources.

    Claim First Successful Rescue of a Lost Person Using the Human Detection System: A Case Study from Beskid Niski (SE Poland)

    Independent source Bieszczady. Dron odnalazł zagubionego człowieka! Pierwszy raz w Polsce

    Specific harm prevented Measured comparison

    Expanded

    The University of Wrocław hosts the developer. It reports that a team of mountain rescuers in South Tyrol used SARUAV to find a missing person at the beginning of August 2024. The person had died. The university calls this the second automatic detection in a real search, and it states that rescue services in Poland, other European countries and Asia have adopted the system. Only the developer's side reports this.

    Trade-offs Two authors from the Main School of Fire Service in Warsaw wrote that each use of SARUAV needs spatial data prepared for the area. They also wrote that detection works only in the area that the recipient of the system has bought. The detection also required that enough of the man was visible from above in the photographed area.

    Limits The authors document one successful detection and rescue. They do not measure how much sooner SARUAV found the man than a search without it would have. The authors include developers of SARUAV and a member of the Bieszczady Mountain Rescue Service. Researchers at Texas A&M wrote in 2023 that the makers of SARUAV give no details on its training data or the design of its model.

    A person4An organization2

    A person decided Mountain rescuers flew the search, checked the detection, retrieved the unconscious man, and transferred him to the ambulance service.

    MakerSARUAV Ltd. / University of WrocławSystemSARUAVVersionSARUAV, run on images from DJI Matrice 300 drones

    In routine use

    Must hold The person is within the imaged area and visible from above. Processing completes while the person can still be helped.

    Tried again It happened again in one other setting.

    Needs The person is within the imaged area and visible from above. Processing completes while the person can still be helped.

    SARUAV is software that uses convolutional neural networks. On drone images it detected an unconscious 65-year-old man in tall grass after more than 24 hours. Mountain rescuers retrieved him alive.

    Safety and rescueCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  29. Independently reported

    No magnitude The sources describe two families on one road and compare no groups.

    United StatestoUnited Kingdom

    Protective response, prevention unproven Assumed comparison

    Trade-offs The Brentwood driver's wife had two black eyes and bruising, and the other car's passengers were sore from the seatbelts. Both cars were written off.

    Limits One driver credited automatic braking, while the other was unsure whether it was enabled. Without vehicle logs or an engineering reconstruction, the drivers' accounts cannot show how the car braked or how many lives the braking saved.

    A person4

    Not stated Both drivers were at the wheel. Fred Lambert of Electrek suggested that the drivers may have braked themselves. No vehicle logs show whether a driver or the system applied the brakes.

    MakerTeslaSystemTesla Autopilot driver-assistance suiteVersionNot reported; both cars were Tesla Model X, one a Tesla loan car, and no Autopilot hardware or software version is given

    In routine use

    Must hold The system has time to detect and brake, which the Brentwood driver put at about a second. The vehicle's structure withstands the part of the impact that still lands. The Wimborne driver credited the car's other safety features.

    Two Tesla Model X cars stopped as an oak fell across the A31 in Storm Dennis. All eight occupants walked away. One driver credits Autopilot’s emergency braking.

    Safety and rescueCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  30. Independently reported

    No magnitude The benefit went to one person, and no groups are compared.

    No stated timeThe child was recovered within weeks

    Persisted

    On 10 May 2024 Thorn announced that it was moving Spotlight to a new home led by Kristin Boorse, its former Vice President of Victim Identification. Canary NGO Ltd now builds the tool and says that more than 8,000 investigators use it. All later figures come from the tool's operators.

    Trade-offs Spotlight matches faces with Amazon's facial recognition. WIRED notes accusations that police use of that technology endangers privacy and that the technology is inaccurate. The sources report no cost or harm from this recovery itself.

    Limits Thorn's CEO reports the recovery, and no corroboration from police or courts has been found. Matching a photo to advertisements and recovering a child are separate steps. The aggregate identification and rescue counts cannot be substituted for each other or used to verify this case.

    A person4

    A person decided A California law enforcement officer ran the search, and more traditional police work followed the matches before the child was recovered. No other safeguard appears in the sources.

    MakerThornSystemSpotlightVersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold Ads with usable face images must exist for the victim. Legal access to the ad archive and face matching.

    In April 2019 Thorn’s Spotlight, using Amazon facial recognition, matched a missing child’s photo to online sex ads. Thorn’s chief executive said that the child was recovered within weeks.

    Public sectorCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  31. Independently reportedMagnitude 0.39

    Magnitude 0.39

    Claim Evaluation of the Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health-Veterans Enhanced Treatment Suicide Risk Modeling Clinical Program in the Veterans Health Administration

    Independent source Inside VA's yearslong AI effort to uncover veterans at high risk of suicide

    Persisted

    Nextgov reported in July 2025 that REACH VET still scans records monthly with the 61-variable model and that VA is updating it to a 2.0 model. In a cohort study published on 8 July 2025, VA researchers found no association between inclusion in REACH VET and suicide or all-cause mortality. That matches the mortality subanalyses of the 2021 evaluation.

    Trade-offs The Fuller Project reported on 30 May 2024 that the model favors men and that officials left military sexual trauma out of its 61 variables. Nextgov reported in 2024 that research found that the model “considered being a white man more of an indicator of potential self-harm than other factors”. Nextgov also reported that a REACH VET 2.0 adding military sexual trauma and intimate partner violence as risk factors was planned for early 2025.

    Limits The model triggered a package of clinician outreach and enhanced care, so the observed association is not an isolated effect of prediction. Historical and subthreshold comparisons require assumptions about trends and confounding. The retained null mortality findings must not be converted into a claim that deaths were prevented.

    A personNot ratedAn organization2Society4

    Groups that it missed are listedAn investigation found that the model prioritizes White men and leaves out survivors of sexual violence, who are more often women.

    A person decided Once the model flags a veteran, a VA mental health or primary care provider reaches out, reviews the condition and treatment plan and decides whether enhanced care is needed. Care evaluations of identified veterans rose from 46.1% to 87.5% between March 2017 and December 2018. By October 2020, 98% of identified veterans were contacted and had their care evaluated.

    MakerUS Department of Veterans AffairsSystemREACH VETVersionOriginal 2017 model (381 variables reduced to 61, per Nextgov); REACH VET 2.0 announced for 2025

    In routine use

    Must hold Providers act on the list: care evaluations rose from 46.1% to 87.5% of identified veterans between March 2017 and December 2018. The model's variables fit the population. The original model under-weighted factors relevant to women veterans, per Nextgov.

    Tried again It was tried in 2 other settings, with no known outcome.

    Needs Providers act on the list: care evaluations rose from 46.1% to 87.5% of identified veterans between March 2017 and December 2018. The model's variables fit the population. The original model under-weighted factors relevant to women veterans, per Nextgov.

    The Veterans Affairs office that runs REACH VET studied the veterans that its suicide-risk model flagged. They had fewer suicide attempts. Their admissions fell. Deaths did not change.

    Safety and rescueCertainty of the reported gain: low

  32. The deployer's account

    No magnitude The county compares no groups.

    Limits The figures are the county's own and compare one year with the year before, with no control for other changes.

    An organization2Society4

    A person decided The AI puts video of abnormal behavior first on operators' monitors. Operators then decide and report, as they did at once for the two fires that fire engines reached within 10 minutes.

    MakerNot namedSystemAI smart monitoringVersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold Operators must stay on duty to act on the alerts. Emergency services must respond quickly.

    Changnyeong County says that its AI smart monitoring, which puts video of abnormal behavior first on operators’ screens, more than doubled its early responses to major incidents.

    OtherPublishedCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  33. The deployer's account

    No magnitude The sources describe one man and compare no groups.

    Specific harm prevented Assumed comparison

    No stated timeRetirement savings of more than $3 million

    Trade-offs An alert alone would not have resolved the scam: The participant at first refused to believe that he had been deceived. Staff time and family contact were central to the reported outcome.

    Limits Duckett credits AI with the first flag, and a portfolio manager, the fraud team and the participant's daughter with the successful intervention. Neither Duckett nor the firm has described the model's design or shown what would have happened without its flag. The amount at risk rests on the CEO's words and on Fortune's report that the participant tried to withdraw his entire $3 million portfolio. The sources include no transaction record to confirm it.

    A person4An organizationNot rated

    A person decided According to Duckett, the AI tool raised the first flag, and a portfolio manager reviewed it and referred the concern to the fraud team. Fraud staff spent hours with the participant and reached his daughter before the money was stopped. Duckett says that AI by itself would not necessarily have protected him.

    MakerNot namedSystemNot namedVersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold The flagged request must actually be fraud. Duckett gives no false-positive rate, and the scam itself is not described. The firm must be able to hold a transfer while it persuades the customer. Duckett says AI by itself would not necessarily have protected him.

    TIAA’s CEO said that an unnamed AI tool flagged a 76-year-old’s unusual withdrawal. Staff then kept his retirement savings of more than $3 million from moving.

    FinancePublishedCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  34. The beneficiary's account

    No magnitude The benefit went to one person, and no groups are compared.

    Protective response, prevention unproven Assumed comparison

    Trade-offs Storyboard18 notes that Full Self-Driving (Supervised) still requires driver supervision. Tesla did not design it for an unconscious driver.

    Limits No Tesla vehicle data, record from the police or emergency services, hospital statement, freeway location, software version or footage of the pull-over has been published. Tesla has not said whether it designed the stop as a fallback for an unresponsive driver.

    A person4

    A person decided His wife used Life360 to send emergency services, who reached him in five minutes. Responders attended to him before he had the car continue to the emergency room.

    MakerTeslaSystemTesla Full Self-DrivingVersionNot reported; Vohra wrote only that Full Self-Driving was engaged, and Teslarati calls it FSD Supervised on a Cybertruck

    In routine use

    Must hold FSD (Supervised) requires driver supervision, per Storyboard18. An unconscious driver is outside its intended operating condition. Whatever stopped the truck was a fallback, not a substitute for an attentive driver. The account is Vohra's alone. No Tesla vehicle data, police or emergency-service record, hospital statement, freeway location, FSD version or footage of the pull-over has been published. The replies from Elon Musk and Tesla's account acknowledge the outcome without confirming the mechanism.

    Tried again It happened again in one other setting.

    Needs FSD (Supervised) requires driver supervision, per Storyboard18. An unconscious driver is outside its intended operating condition. Whatever stopped the truck was a fallback, not a substitute for an attentive driver. The account is Vohra's alone. No Tesla vehicle data, police or emergency-service record, hospital statement, freeway location, FSD version or footage of the pull-over has been published. The replies from Elon Musk and Tesla's account acknowledge the outcome without confirming the mechanism.

    Rishi Vohra wrote that Tesla’s Full Self-Driving pulled his Cybertruck onto a freeway shoulder after he passed out on 18 February 2026. No vehicle data has been published.

    Safety and rescueCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  35. The makers' claim

    No magnitude The sources report that heartbeat and circulation returned and the patient went to intensive care, but not survival to discharge or any later outcome.

    Specific harm prevented Assumed comparison

    Expanded

    Daewoong completed thynC installations covering 558 beds at Chonnam National University Hospital and Hwasun Chonnam National University Hospital. It was the largest deployment at a national university hospital so far, among several hospital rollouts in 2026.

    Editor’s note The alarm brought staff to a patient who was no longer breathing normally. Earlier recognition is the plausible mechanism, while the available account ends after resuscitation.

    Limits The account comes through the supplier, with no clinical record and no response time that anyone independent has assessed. Staff resuscitated the patient, and the time that would have passed without the alert is unknown. A restored circulation leaves long-term recovery unknown.

    A person4

    A person decided Ward staff responded to the alarm, assessed the patient, performed CPR and assisted breathing, and transferred the patient to intensive care after circulation returned.

    MakerSeers Technology Co.SystemthynCVersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold The case reached the press through a Daewoong Pharmaceutical announcement of 11 February 2026. The hospital's attending director, chief director and nursing manager are quoted. But no medical record, case report or independent review has been published. Only the return of heartbeat and circulation and the transfer to intensive care are reported. Survival to discharge and neurological outcome are not.

    On 14 January 2026 the thynC monitoring system flagged ventricular tachycardia in an 85-year-old on a general ward in Gwangju. Staff resuscitated the patient.

    HealthCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  36. The deployer's account

    No magnitude The NHS page that describes her recovery cannot be read by script, and no quote in evidence says how long her recovery lasted.

    Found by a body with authority Artificial intelligence (AI)-derived software to help clinical decision making in stroke: 1 Recommendations

    Without the system 2·3% (376 of 15 969 patients)

    With it 4·6% (751 of 15 428 patients), a relative increase of 100%

    Expanded

    Four months after the inferred date of the patient's stroke, authors in The Lancet Digital Health reported on the same software in 26 NHS hospitals. Its use was associated with twice the rate of thrombectomy.

    Editor’s note Editor's assessment: the report gives the actual pathway and outcome without a patient-specific counterfactual.

    Limits A transfer within 25 minutes and a good individual recovery do not isolate the contribution of Brainomix 360 Stroke. The 64-minute reduction that NHS England reports comes from a different comparison and does not measure the time saved for this patient. NICE stated in January 2024 that it is unclear how much of the faster access to treatment comes from the software.

    A person4An organization2

    A person decided The hospital team assessed the patient and arranged transfer. Specialists at the John Radcliffe Hospital performed the thrombectomy.

    MakerBrainomixSystemBrainomix 360 StrokeVersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold Rapid ambulance transfer and an available thrombectomy team. Clinicians act on the AI-supported read without waiting for a separate specialist report.

    Tried again It happened again in one other setting.

    Needs Rapid ambulance transfer and an available thrombectomy team. Clinicians act on the AI-supported read without waiting for a separate specialist report.

    A scan supported by Brainomix 360 Stroke identified a woman’s major stroke on arrival. She was transferred in 25 minutes for successful thrombectomy. She recovered well.

    Health

  37. The deployer's account

    No magnitude The sources give program totals and trace no share of the saving to groups of beneficiaries or taxpayers.

    Legal proceedings DOJ reported 35 people charged and 16 convicted by 14 August 2026, after a guilty plea to money laundering the previous day. Neither what AI contributed nor what finally happened to the $4.41 billion in escrow is known.

    Without the system the approximately $4.45 billion that was scheduled to be paid by Medicare

    With it all but approximately $41 million

    No stated timeHeld $4.41 billion in escrow from about $4.45 billion scheduled for payment

    Taken to court

    DOJ reported 35 people charged and 16 convicted by 14 August 2026, after a guilty plea to money laundering the previous day. Neither what AI contributed nor what finally happened to the $4.41 billion in escrow is known.

    Trade-offs About $41 million reached the organization through Medicare, and supplemental insurers paid about $900 million. Enforcement costs and effects on legitimate payments are not quantified.

    Limits The algorithm, what AI contributed, the operating costs, the rate of false positives and the final fate of the escrow remain unknown.

    Society4An organization3A personNot rated

    Not stated Federal analysts, investigators, prosecutors, and payment administrators performed distinct roles. No specific review protocol for software alerts appears in the sources.

    MakerU.S. Department of JusticeSystemDOJ Health Care Fraud Unit proactive billing analyticsVersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold Access to billing data before payment. Legal authority and operational capacity to suspend payments.

    Justice Department analysts found anomalous Medicare billing through proactive data analytics. $4.41 billion was held in escrow. The software is unnamed. The department has not said that it used AI.

    FinancePublishedLater taken to court

  38. The deployer's account

    No magnitude The sources describe two children and compare no groups.

    Persisted

    XRlabs reported that the twins had recovered and returned home. In the release, XRlabs gives no clinical follow-up interval or independent assessment of what the AI contributed.

    Editor’s note These were combined elements of one complex treatment, with no comparison that removed the AI component.

    Limits No source compares the result with planning without AI, and no clinical evaluation separates the model's contribution from the surgical team's work. The reports differ on the twins' age and on the timing of the operations, and they give no exact operation date. XRlabs gives no clinical follow-up interval.

    A person4An organizationNot rated

    A person decided Surgeons and the multidisciplinary team planned and performed the staged procedures. They remained responsible for judging the models, implant designs, and operative anatomy.

    MakerXRlabsSystemXRlabs 'Surgical Intelligence' platform for AI-designed skull implantsVersionNot stated

    In a pilot

    Must hold A surgical team able to act on AI-assisted plans and patient-specific implants. Imaging of sufficient quality to model the twins' shared vasculature and skull.

    Tried again It happened again in one other setting.

    Needs A surgical team able to act on AI-assisted plans and patient-specific implants. Imaging of sufficient quality to model the twins' shared vasculature and skull.

    XRlabs says that its Surgical Intelligence platform designed skull implants for conjoined twins. The hospital credits AI planning in their successful separation in four staged procedures.

    HealthCertainty of the reported gain: very low

  39. The beneficiary's account

    No magnitude One person reports the benefit and the sources name no groups.

    Challenge NHTSA raised the owner's story with Tesla on 15 April 2024 and in writing on 14 May 2024. It said that Tesla's repost conflicted with Tesla's own message that drivers must stay in control. NHTSA published the email with its information request of 5 November 2024. NHTSA questioned the promotion of the story and did not rule on whether the drive took place. No hospital or press confirmation of the owner's account has appeared since.

    Protective response, prevention unproven Assumed comparison

    Challenged

    NHTSA raised the owner's story with Tesla on 15 April 2024 and in writing on 14 May 2024. It said that Tesla's repost conflicted with Tesla's own message that drivers must stay in control. NHTSA published the email with its information request of 5 November 2024. NHTSA questioned the promotion of the story and did not rule on whether the drive took place. No hospital or press confirmation of the owner's account has appeared since.

    Trade-offs A medical crisis can impair the supervision on which this driving system depends. NHTSA told Tesla that the company's repost of the story conflicted with the company's own message that drivers must stay in control.

    Limits The story rests on the driver's post and its republication. The sources include no vehicle logs from Tesla, no confirmation from the hospital and no comparison of the drive with emergency transport. Tesla and Musk reposted the story without verifying it.

    A person4

    The system acted The owner chose the destination and engaged the driving feature. No independent record exists of his ability to supervise throughout the trip.

    MakerTeslaSystemTesla Full Self-DrivingVersionFSD v12 (Supervised), unlocked on the car on 1 April 2024 per the owner and Tesla Oracle; the exact build is not stated (The Driven describes the then-current release as 12.3.3)

    Expanding

    Must hold FSD (Supervised) requires an attentive driver with hands on the wheel and eyes on the road (Hindustan Times; Tesla Oracle quoting owner James Locke). A driver too impaired to supervise would be outside its intended use. The account is the owner's alone. No hospital, emergency-service, police or vehicle-log record of the drive has been found. The photos attached to the post do not show the route, a timestamp or the hospital.

    Tried again It happened again in both other settings.

    Needs FSD (Supervised) requires an attentive driver with hands on the wheel and eyes on the road (Hindustan Times; Tesla Oracle quoting owner James Locke). A driver too impaired to supervise would be outside its intended use. The account is the owner's alone. No hospital, emergency-service, police or vehicle-log record of the drive has been found. The photos attached to the post do not show the route, a timestamp or the hospital.

    By his own uncorroborated account on X, Tesla Full Self-Driving (Supervised) v12 drove its owner 13 miles to a VA emergency room at 2 a.m. on 2 April 2024.

    Safety and rescueCertainty of the reported gain: very lowLater challenged

  40. The deployer's account

    No magnitude The sources do not say how often the system flags households or how often support recurs.

    Persisted

    The government's National Plan to End Homelessness featured the Maidstone and Kent program as a case study and reported results through January 2025. The department also funds a randomized trial of data-led outreach with Xantura in four other councils.

    Editor’s note The reported comparison arose because some households could not receive support. Better prediction without additional response capacity can increase identified need without preventing additional homelessness.

    Limits The less-than-1% versus 40% comparison sets households that received proactive support against a group left unsupported for lack of capacity, and allocation was not randomized. The councils and Xantura have published no sample sizes, comparable baseline risk or observation windows. The government does not state how it calculated its figures. With this design, the effect of AI targeting cannot be separated from the effect of the support itself.

    A person4An organization2

    Reached a disadvantaged groupThe support went to households that the system flagged as at risk of homelessness.

    A person decided Council staff provide the proactive support after households are flagged. Limited service capacity left a comparison group without that support.

    MakerXanturaSystemXantura AI-enabled predictive-analytics platform used for homelessn…VersionNot stated

    In routine use

    Must hold The presenter states that protected characteristics are not included in the live prediction model. The source does not establish causal conditions for reproducing the prevention result.

    Tried again It happened again in 1 of 2 other settings.

    Needs The presenter states that protected characteristics are not included in the live prediction model. The source does not establish causal conditions for reproducing the prevention result.

    Kent County Council reports that a Xantura predictive-analytics platform identified households at risk. Nesta relays the council’s report that 2% of the first flagged cohort became homeless.

    OtherCertainty of the reported gain: very low

Fields to compare

Fields in the comparison

Keep at least one field.

What the marks mean

Depth

Each mark holds a number from 1 to 5, which is the depth of the benefit. Each depth has its own color.

  1. Depth 1. A small gain.
  2. Depth 2. A measurable improvement.
  3. Depth 3. A change that lasts.
  4. Depth 4. A serious harm averted in time.
  5. Depth 5. Survival.

Gray: the sources do not show how far it helped.

Beneficiary

  • Circle: a person
  • Square: an organization
  • Triangle: society

Evidence

  • Found. A body with authority confirmed it.

  • Studied. Independent researchers measured it.

  • Reported. An independent outlet reported it from its own inquiries.

  • Claimed. Only the parties to the benefit say so.

Certainty

Bars after the evidence show how sure one can be that the AI made the gain, in the four levels of GRADE, the scale that medicine uses to rate certainty.

  • High. The real gain is very likely close to the one measured.

  • Moderate. The real gain is probably close to the one measured.

  • Low. The real gain may be far from the one measured.

  • Very low. Nothing firm shows what would have happened without the AI.

How benefits are assessed