AI system
- System
-
Smartwatch arrhythmia detection (brand and model not stated)
- Model
-
Not assessed
- Release
-
Not assessed
- Application developer
-
Not stated (the report does not name the device's maker)
- Role
-
Not assessed
- Configuration
-
Not assessed
- Inputs and outputs
-
Not assessed
- Autonomy
-
Not assessed
- Workflow
-
An asymptomatic wearer whose smartwatch flagged arrhythmias and who took the flag to a physician. A primary care ECG followed by cardiology work-up including echocardiography, MRI and Holter monitoring. An electrophysiology service able to map and ablate a high-burden PAC focus.
- Human oversight
-
Not assessed
- Relation to AI
-
The watch's detection of “heart arrhythmias” is what sent an asymptomatic man to his doctor. Everything after (ECG, echo, MRI, mapping, ablation) was clinical. The report does not say what the watch flagged, whether a notification or an ECG reading, nor which algorithm. The device's contribution is therefore established only as the trigger.
- AI contribution
-
The watch's detection of “heart arrhythmias” is what sent an asymptomatic man to his doctor. Everything after (ECG, echo, MRI, mapping, ablation) was clinical. The report does not say what the watch flagged, whether a notification or an ECG reading, nor which algorithm. The device's contribution is therefore established only as the trigger.
Benefits
- Outcome identifiers
-
Not assessed
- Benefit
-
radiofrequency ablation restored LVEF to 50% at six months
- Category
-
Improved Physical Health
- Status
-
Not assessed
- Beneficiary groups
-
People.
- Beneficiaries
-
Not assessed
- Reach
-
Not assessed
- Distribution and access
-
Not assessed
- Duration
-
Not assessed
- Expected?
-
Yes
- Costs and harms
-
Not assessed
Measurement
- Studies
-
Not assessed
- Study design
-
Not assessed
- Measurement
-
Not assessed
- Setting and sample
-
Not assessed
- Measures
-
radiofrequency ablation restored LVEF to 50% at six months
- Comparison
-
the same patient's LVEF before the radiofrequency ablation that the smartwatch alert led to (a treatment effect, not a with-versus-without-device comparison)
- Results
-
Reference: 15%. Result: 50%.
- Additional value from AI
-
Not assessed
- Limitations
-
Not assessed
- Denominators
-
Not assessed
- Materials for replication
-
Not assessed
Money
- Kind of value
-
Not assessed
- Amount
-
Not assessed
- Currency and prices
-
Not assessed
- Period and unit
-
Not assessed
- Realization
-
Not assessed
- Recipients and payers
-
Not assessed
- Gross or net
-
Not assessed
- Included costs
-
Not assessed
- Comparison
-
Not assessed
- Method
-
Not assessed
- Return and payback
-
Not assessed
People and places
- Participants
-
Developer: Not stated (the report does not name the device's maker).
- Jurisdictions
-
Benefit: Göttingen,
Germany. - Ownership and control
-
Not assessed
- Dependencies
-
Not assessed
- Cross-border connections
-
Not assessed
- Geopolitical implications
-
Not assessed
Follow-up
- Conditions for replication
-
The PAC burden is high enough to be caught by the watch and to cause the cardiomyopathy. The authors note case reports typically exceed 30%. The ventricular dysfunction is still reversible when the arrhythmia is eliminated.
- Replication attempts
-
Not assessed
- Later findings
-
Nothing after the six-month follow-up in the report was found.
- Availability
-
Not assessed
- Institutional decision
-
Not assessed
- Grounds
-
Not assessed
- Action and result
-
Not assessed
- Success criterion
-
Not assessed
Evidence
- Source numbers
-
AIBD-0286-source-0001–0003
- Citations
-
Numbered references below.
- Language
-
Not assessed
- Source relationships
-
Independent
- Original evidence
-
Not assessed
- Access and versions
-
Not assessed
- Supported findings
-
Not assessed
- Evidence links
-
Not assessed
- Evidence strength
-
Not assessed
- Missing evidence
-
Not assessed
Grades
- Assessed benefits
-
People.
- Depth
-
People: 3.
- Reasons
-
People: The alert started a chain that diagnosed a cardiomyopathy. The condition progressed to LVEF 15%. Ablation reversed it to LVEF 50% with resolution of symptoms. The authors present early detection as what allowed the heart failure to be treated before further progression.
- Observed or intended
-
Not assessed
- Rubric
-
Not assessed
- Assessor and date
-
Not assessed
- Alternative assessments
-
Not assessed
- Fill
-
Independently studied
Entry details
- Kind
-
Not assessed
- Related entries
-
Not assessed
- Field
-
Healthcare (cardiology; heart failure). Consumer wearables.
- Purpose
-
Smartwatch arrhythmia alerts are built to prompt medical review of irregular rhythms. The alert here served that purpose. The condition it uncovered, PAC-induced cardiomyopathy, is one the authors say wearables are not usually credited with finding.
- Dates
-
Date basis unassessed: 2025 (precision unassessed). Updated: 21 October 2026.
- Stage
-
Not assessed
- Version
-
SHA-256: 7c943f9c0f73…
References
- Other identifiers
-
Not assessed
- Category mappings
-
Not assessed
- Brief
-
Not assessed
- Revisions
-
4 revisions. Latest: 21 October 2026.
Sources
-
Case report Independent author
Soubh N, Rasenack E, Haarmann H, Zabel M, Bergau L (2025). Smartwatch-enabled early detection and treatment of cardiomyopathy induced by premature atrial contractions: a case report. European Heart Journal - Case Reports 9(4):ytaf151. doi:10.1093/ehjcr/ytaf151 (PMC12209856).
A 34-year-old male with no prior medical history consulted his primary care physician after his smartwatch detected ‘heart arrhythmias’.
At the six-month follow-up, the patient was symptom-free with a recovered LVEF of 50%.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of PAC-related AiCM initially detected by a wearable device.