Skip to content

Kerala's AI cameras flagged ₹351.00 crore in fees, 28.69% collected

India's CAG found that offenses detected by Kerala's AI traffic cameras carried ₹351.00 crore in compounding fees, and ₹100.70 crore, or 28.69%, had been collected.

  • 2 for an organization

    Offenses detected by the AI cameras carried ₹351.00 crore in fees, and the department had collected ₹100.70 crore of it.

  • Not rated society

    The audit does not measure whether the cameras reduced violations, crashes or injuries, and it judges that the uncollected penalties defeated their deterrent purpose.

Depth runs from 1, a convenience or time saved, to 5, a life or a livelihood preserved.

Status
Partly reported benefit.
Evidence

found, the grade of this recordstudiedreportedclaimed

An independent audit report supports the benefit.

The system’s part
Not isolated. The auditors tabulated fees by type of camera and did not compare enforcement with and without the AI cameras. The report calls them AI cameras and does not describe their software or show that it learns from data.
Not yet checked
LimitsCosts and harmsLearns from dataLater outcome
Benefit type
Increased Scalability
System
AI cameras of the Safe Kerala Project (Advanced Automatic Traffic Enforcement System)
Made by
KELTRON (Kerala State Electronics Development Corporation), the implementing agency. The report does not name the camera or software makers.
Used by
Motor Vehicles Department, Government of Kerala
Where
Kerala, India
Stage
In routine use
Date
, when the source was published
Kind
Aggregate result
Broad benefit
Evaluating Information to Determine Compliance with Standards, Identifying Objects, Actions, and Events
Collections
Scrutiny and findings
Last revised
1 November 2026

Sources

  1. Audit report, by authors with no tie to the system.

    Comptroller and Auditor General of India. Report on State Revenues for the period ended March 2024, Government of Kerala, Report No. 2 of 2026 (Compliance Audit Report - Civil), countersigned on 5 May 2026. Chapter II, Subject Specific Compliance Audit on Functioning of RTOs and STA in Motor Vehicles Department of Kerala, paragraph 2.4.6.12, Shortfalls in the implementation of Camera Surveillance System. Table 2.24, report p. 58.

    Table 2.24: Details of collection against collectable compounding fees for the offences detected by various types of surveillance cameras (₹ in crore) Enforcement Collectable Collected Percentage Pending Percentage System revenue revenue collected revenue pending AI Cameras 351.00 100.70 28.69% 250.30 71.31%
    The non-collection of penalty imposed for violations detected by the surveillance cameras defeated the purpose of implementation of the system.
    despite the project's operationalisation on 05 June 2023, significant concerns remain regarding agreement revisions, revenue collection, and the actual effectiveness of the AI camera system

Details

AI system

Workflow

KELTRON installed and ran AI cameras across Kerala under a five-year Built Operate Own Transfer agreement signed on 28 May 2020. The cameras detected traffic offenses from 5 June 2023, and the department levied compounding fees for them.

Money

Kind of value

Compounding fees collected for offenses that the AI cameras detected, out of ₹351.00 crore collectable

Amount

₹100.70 crore

Follow-up

Conditions for replication

Penalties for detected offenses must be collected for the cameras to deter violations. The system must run under a valid agreement, with cameras repaired or relocated where needed.

Entry details

Sector

Road traffic enforcement.

Purpose

KELTRON, as implementing agency, built and runs the Safe Kerala Project's AI camera system to detect traffic offenses across Kerala and reduce road accidents.

38 more questions not yet checked

model, release, provider, role, configuration, inputs and outputs, autonomy, human oversight, AI contribution, beneficiaries, reach, distribution and access, duration, every measurement question, currency and prices, period and unit, realization, gross or net, included costs, comparison, method, return and payback, ownership and control, dependencies, cross-border connections, geopolitical implications, replication attempts, availability, institutional decision, grounds, action and result, success criterion, every evidence question, observed or intended, alternative assessments, related entries, other identifiers, category mappings.

Cite this record

Peter H. Vartanian. (2026). Kerala's AI cameras flagged ₹351.00 crore in fees, 28.69% collected (AIBD-1144). Artificial Intelligence Benefits Database, edition of 1 November 2026. https://petervartanian.xyz/aibd/records/AIBD-1144.html (archived at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AADSII, version 7.0)

BibTeX Data Field definitions