AI system
- System
-
CA-GPT large model on an AI-OCT system (COMPARE study)
- Model
-
A DeepSeek model within CA-GPT, according to Machine Heart.
- Release
-
Exact release not established.
- Application developer
-
Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University (Li Yan's team) with Shenzhen Tsinghua University Research Institute (Zhu Rui's team), on a Vivolight Medtech OCT platform - Role
-
CA-GPT proposed decisions before and after coronary intervention for comparison with expert assessments.
- Configuration
-
Machine Heart reports that CA-GPT combined an open-source DeepSeek model with retrieval from more than one million cardiovascular papers and guidelines.
- Inputs and outputs
-
The system retrieved cardiovascular literature and proposed decisions before and after coronary intervention.
- Autonomy
-
Not assessed
- Workflow
-
A domain model built on DeepSeek with retrieval over cardiovascular literature and guidelines. Deployment on a Vivolight OCT imaging platform with the team's own image-analysis functions. An expert-derived procedural record from one center used as the reference standard. Scoring of decisions on ten pre-specified metrics across pre- and post-PCI phases.
- Human oversight
-
Not assessed
- Relation to AI
-
CA-GPT is the system under test: a large model on an AI-OCT platform producing pre- and post-PCI decisions that were scored against an expert record. Its reported advantage over ChatGPT-5 and junior physicians is the authors' own measurement in a preprint that has not been peer reviewed. The decisions were not acted on for the 96 patients.
- AI contribution
-
CA-GPT is the system under test: a large model on an AI-OCT platform producing pre- and post-PCI decisions that were scored against an expert record. Its reported advantage over ChatGPT-5 and junior physicians is the authors' own measurement in a preprint that has not been peer reviewed. The decisions were not acted on for the 96 patients.
Benefits
- Outcome identifiers
-
Not assessed
- Benefit
-
stent diameter (90.3% vs. 72.2%, P<0.05) and length selection (80.6% vs. 52.8%, P<0.01)
- Category
-
Improved Task Accuracy
- Status
-
Not assessed
- Beneficiary groups
-
Organizations.
- Beneficiaries
-
Not assessed
- Reach
-
Not assessed
- Distribution and access
-
Not assessed
- Duration
-
Not assessed
- Expected?
-
Yes
- Costs and harms
-
Not assessed
Measurement
- Studies
-
Not assessed
- Study design
-
Not assessed
- Measurement
-
Not assessed
- Setting and sample
-
Not assessed
- Measures
-
stent diameter (90.3% vs. 72.2%, P<0.05) and length selection (80.6% vs. 52.8%, P<0.01)
- Comparison
-
Not assessed
- Results
-
stent diameter (90.3% vs. 72.2%, P<0.05) and length selection (80.6% vs. 52.8%, P<0.01)
- Additional value from AI
-
Not assessed
- Limitations
-
Not assessed
- Denominators
-
Not assessed
- Materials for replication
-
Not assessed
Money
- Kind of value
-
Not assessed
- Amount
-
Not assessed
- Currency and prices
-
Not assessed
- Period and unit
-
Not assessed
- Realization
-
Not assessed
- Recipients and payers
-
Not assessed
- Gross or net
-
Not assessed
- Included costs
-
Not assessed
- Comparison
-
Not assessed
- Method
-
Not assessed
- Return and payback
-
Not assessed
People and places
- Participants
-
Developer:
Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University (Li Yan's team) with Shenzhen Tsinghua University Research Institute (Zhu Rui's team), on a Vivolight Medtech OCT platform. Operator:
Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University (study lead, per Machine Heart). - Jurisdictions
-
Benefit:
China. Developer:
China. Operator:
China. - Ownership and control
-
Not assessed
- Dependencies
-
Not assessed
- Cross-border connections
-
Not assessed
- Geopolitical implications
-
Not assessed
Follow-up
- Conditions for replication
-
OCT image quality and lesion mix comparable to the 96-patient cohort. The expert reference record is accepted as correct. Prospective use with clinicians acting on the output, which the study did not test.
- Replication attempts
-
Not assessed
- Later findings
-
Not assessed
- Availability
-
Not assessed
- Institutional decision
-
Not assessed
- Grounds
-
Not assessed
- Action and result
-
Not assessed
- Success criterion
-
Not assessed
Evidence
- Source numbers
-
AIBD-0378-source-0001–0004
- Citations
-
Numbered references below.
- Language
-
Not assessed
- Source relationships
-
Developer, Independent
- Original evidence
-
Not assessed
- Access and versions
-
Not assessed
- Supported findings
-
Not assessed
- Evidence links
-
Not assessed
- Evidence strength
-
Not assessed
- Missing evidence
-
Not assessed
Grades
- Assessed benefits
-
Organizations.
- Depth
-
Not assessed
- Reasons
-
Organizations: A single-center preprint comparing decision agreement. No patient outcome, deployment or event is reported.
- Observed or intended
-
Not assessed
- Rubric
-
Not assessed
- Assessor and date
-
Not assessed
- Alternative assessments
-
Not assessed
- Fill
-
Independently reported
Entry details
- Kind
-
Not assessed
- Related entries
-
Not assessed
- Field
-
Healthcare / interventional cardiology decision support. OCT-guided percutaneous coronary intervention.
- Purpose
-
CA-GPT was built to interpret intravascular OCT images and generate PCI planning and assessment decisions as expert-level support. The reported agreement with expert records is that purpose.
- Dates
-
Date basis unassessed: 2025 (precision unassessed). Updated: 21 October 2026.
- Stage
-
Not assessed
- Version
-
SHA-256: cbb0cf395873…
References
- Other identifiers
-
oecd_aim: 2025-12-13-c088.
- Category mappings
-
Not assessed
- Brief
-
Not assessed
- Revisions
-
4 revisions. Latest: 21 October 2026.
Sources
-
Preprint Developer
Fang W, Wang C, Ma W, et al. (2025). COMPARE: Clinical Optimization with Modular Planning and Assessment via RAG-Enhanced AI-OCT: Superior Decision Support for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Compared to ChatGPT-5 and Junior Operators. arXiv:2512.10702, submitted 11 December 2025.
showed superior performance to junior physicians in stent diameter (90.3% vs. 72.2%, P<0.05) and length selection (80.6% vs. 52.8%, P<0.01)
-
News report Independent author
机器之心Pro (2025). 临床PK完胜ChatGPT-5!国内团队造出首个OCT影像AI系统. Sina (k.sina.com.cn), 16 December 2025.
一项由空军军医大学唐都医院李妍教授团队牵头,与深圳清华大学研究院朱锐团队联合完成的 COMPARE 研究
-
News report Independent author
潘秀玮 (2025). 医生"隔空"操刀,"提香机器人"完成心脏电生理介入手术. 新华网 浙江频道 (Xinhuanet Zhejiang), 13 December 2025.
操作台上的旋钮控制鞘管和导管,医生操作旋钮实现导管的毫米级移动,双机械臂的稳定性让消融靶点定位非常精确
-
Registry label Independent author
OECD AI Incidents and Hazards Monitor (2025). AI Systems Enhance Cardiac Surgery Precision and Decision-Making in China. OECD.AI, 13 December 2025.
the CA-GPT AI outperformed ChatGPT-5 and junior doctors in interpreting OCT images for PCI procedures