An OCT-reading model beats ChatGPT-5 at planning coronary stents

arXiv preprint (11 December 2025): CA-GPT on an AI-OCT system agreed with expert PCI records more than ChatGPT-5 and junior physicians across 96 patients; stent diameter 90.3% vs 72.2% for juniors.

AI system

System

CA-GPT large model on an AI-OCT system (COMPARE study)

Model

A DeepSeek model within CA-GPT, according to Machine Heart.

Release

Exact release not established.

Application developer

Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University (Li Yan's team) with Shenzhen Tsinghua University Research Institute (Zhu Rui's team), on a Vivolight Medtech OCT platform

Role

CA-GPT proposed decisions before and after coronary intervention for comparison with expert assessments.

Configuration

Machine Heart reports that CA-GPT combined an open-source DeepSeek model with retrieval from more than one million cardiovascular papers and guidelines.

Inputs and outputs

The system retrieved cardiovascular literature and proposed decisions before and after coronary intervention.

Autonomy

Not assessed

Workflow

A domain model built on DeepSeek with retrieval over cardiovascular literature and guidelines. Deployment on a Vivolight OCT imaging platform with the team's own image-analysis functions. An expert-derived procedural record from one center used as the reference standard. Scoring of decisions on ten pre-specified metrics across pre- and post-PCI phases.

Human oversight

Not assessed

Relation to AI

CA-GPT is the system under test: a large model on an AI-OCT platform producing pre- and post-PCI decisions that were scored against an expert record. Its reported advantage over ChatGPT-5 and junior physicians is the authors' own measurement in a preprint that has not been peer reviewed. The decisions were not acted on for the 96 patients.

AI contribution

CA-GPT is the system under test: a large model on an AI-OCT platform producing pre- and post-PCI decisions that were scored against an expert record. Its reported advantage over ChatGPT-5 and junior physicians is the authors' own measurement in a preprint that has not been peer reviewed. The decisions were not acted on for the 96 patients.

Benefits

Outcome identifiers

Not assessed

Benefit

stent diameter (90.3% vs. 72.2%, P<0.05) and length selection (80.6% vs. 52.8%, P<0.01)

Category

Improved Task Accuracy

Status

Not assessed

Beneficiary groups

Organizations.

Beneficiaries

Not assessed

Reach

Not assessed

Distribution and access

Not assessed

Duration

Not assessed

Expected?

Yes

Costs and harms

Not assessed

Measurement

Studies

Not assessed

Study design

Not assessed

Measurement

Not assessed

Setting and sample

Not assessed

Measures

stent diameter (90.3% vs. 72.2%, P<0.05) and length selection (80.6% vs. 52.8%, P<0.01)

Comparison

Not assessed

Results

stent diameter (90.3% vs. 72.2%, P<0.05) and length selection (80.6% vs. 52.8%, P<0.01)

Additional value from AI

Not assessed

Limitations

Not assessed

Denominators

Not assessed

Materials for replication

Not assessed

Money

Kind of value

Not assessed

Amount

Not assessed

Currency and prices

Not assessed

Period and unit

Not assessed

Realization

Not assessed

Recipients and payers

Not assessed

Gross or net

Not assessed

Included costs

Not assessed

Comparison

Not assessed

Method

Not assessed

Return and payback

Not assessed

People and places

Participants

Developer: Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University (Li Yan's team) with Shenzhen Tsinghua University Research Institute (Zhu Rui's team), on a Vivolight Medtech OCT platform. Operator: Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University (study lead, per Machine Heart).

Jurisdictions

Benefit: China. Developer: China. Operator: China.

Ownership and control

Not assessed

Dependencies

Not assessed

Cross-border connections

Not assessed

Geopolitical implications

Not assessed

Follow-up

Conditions for replication

OCT image quality and lesion mix comparable to the 96-patient cohort. The expert reference record is accepted as correct. Prospective use with clinicians acting on the output, which the study did not test.

Replication attempts

Not assessed

Later findings

Not assessed

Availability

Not assessed

Institutional decision

Not assessed

Grounds

Not assessed

Action and result

Not assessed

Success criterion

Not assessed

Evidence

Source numbers

AIBD-0378-source-0001–0004

Citations

Numbered references below.

Language

Not assessed

Source relationships

Developer, Independent

Original evidence

Not assessed

Access and versions

Not assessed

Supported findings

Not assessed

Evidence strength

Not assessed

Missing evidence

Not assessed

Grades

Assessed benefits

Organizations.

Depth

Not assessed

Reasons

Organizations: A single-center preprint comparing decision agreement. No patient outcome, deployment or event is reported.

Observed or intended

Not assessed

Rubric

Not assessed

Assessor and date

Not assessed

Alternative assessments

Not assessed

Fill

Independently reported

Entry details

Kind

Not assessed

Field

Healthcare / interventional cardiology decision support. OCT-guided percutaneous coronary intervention.

Purpose

CA-GPT was built to interpret intravascular OCT images and generate PCI planning and assessment decisions as expert-level support. The reported agreement with expert records is that purpose.

Dates

Date basis unassessed: 2025 (precision unassessed). Updated: 21 October 2026.

Stage

Not assessed

Version

SHA-256: cbb0cf395873…

References

Other identifiers

oecd_aim: 2025-12-13-c088.

Category mappings

Not assessed

Brief

Not assessed

Revisions

4 revisions. Latest: 21 October 2026.

Sources

  1. Preprint Developer

    Fang W, Wang C, Ma W, et al. (2025). COMPARE: Clinical Optimization with Modular Planning and Assessment via RAG-Enhanced AI-OCT: Superior Decision Support for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Compared to ChatGPT-5 and Junior Operators. arXiv:2512.10702, submitted 11 December 2025.

  2. News report Independent author

    机器之心Pro (2025). 临床PK完胜ChatGPT-5!国内团队造出首个OCT影像AI系统. Sina (k.sina.com.cn), 16 December 2025.

  3. News report Independent author

    潘秀玮 (2025). 医生"隔空"操刀,"提香机器人"完成心脏电生理介入手术. 新华网 浙江频道 (Xinhuanet Zhejiang), 13 December 2025.

  4. Registry label Independent author

    OECD AI Incidents and Hazards Monitor (2025). AI Systems Enhance Cardiac Surgery Precision and Decision-Making in China. OECD.AI, 13 December 2025.