AI system
- System
-
Eye-tracking during reading with a support-vector-machine classifier (SVM-RFE, 48 features)
- Model
-
Not assessed
- Release
-
Not assessed
- Application developer
-
Karolinska Institutet (Nilsson Benfatto, Öqvist Seimyr and colleagues); two authors hold equity in Optolexia
- Role
-
Not assessed
- Configuration
-
Not assessed
- Inputs and outputs
-
Not assessed
- Autonomy
-
Not assessed
- Workflow
-
Eye-tracking records of under one minute of reading. A labeled sample of 97 high-risk and 88 low-risk 9–10-year-olds. Feature selection (SVM-RFE) within repeated cross-validation.
- Human oversight
-
Not assessed
- Relation to AI
-
The classifier is the whole result. The authors describe it as a first step toward making eye tracking a viable screening method. No cited source shows it used in schools or affecting a child's support.
- AI contribution
-
The classifier is the whole result. The authors describe it as a first step toward making eye tracking a viable screening method. No cited source shows it used in schools or affecting a child's support.
Benefits
- Outcome identifiers
-
Not assessed
- Benefit
-
reached 95.6% (± 4.5%) accuracy with balanced sensitivity and specificity
- Category
-
Improved Task Accuracy
- Status
-
Not assessed
- Beneficiary groups
-
People.
- Beneficiaries
-
Not assessed
- Reach
-
Not assessed
- Distribution and access
-
Not assessed
- Duration
-
Not assessed
- Expected?
-
Yes
- Costs and harms
-
Not assessed
Measurement
- Studies
-
Not assessed
- Study design
-
Not assessed
- Measurement
-
Not assessed
- Setting and sample
-
Not assessed
- Measures
-
reached 95.6% (± 4.5%) accuracy with balanced sensitivity and specificity
- Comparison
-
chance-level classification on the same cross-validation (and random feature selection)
- Results
-
Reference: Chance: 49.1% ± 13%. Result: 95.6% ± 4.5%.
- Additional value from AI
-
Not assessed
- Limitations
-
Not assessed
- Denominators
-
Not assessed
- Materials for replication
-
Not assessed
Money
- Kind of value
-
Not assessed
- Amount
-
Not assessed
- Currency and prices
-
Not assessed
- Period and unit
-
Not assessed
- Realization
-
Not assessed
- Recipients and payers
-
Not assessed
- Gross or net
-
Not assessed
- Included costs
-
Not assessed
- Comparison
-
Not assessed
- Method
-
Not assessed
- Return and payback
-
Not assessed
People and places
- Participants
-
Developer: Karolinska Institutet (Nilsson Benfatto, Öqvist Seimyr and colleagues); two authors hold equity in Optolexia. Operator: None in the sources (research study).
- Jurisdictions
-
Developer:
Sweden. - Ownership and control
-
Not assessed
- Dependencies
-
Not assessed
- Cross-border connections
-
Not assessed
- Geopolitical implications
-
Not assessed
Follow-up
- Conditions for replication
-
Eye-tracking hardware in the screening setting. Reading material and norms for the child's language. Validation on an independent sample, which the cited source does not report.
- Replication attempts
-
Not assessed
- Later findings
-
No later development was found; the Optolexia equity and VINNOVA funding are disclosed in the paper itself.
- Availability
-
Not assessed
- Institutional decision
-
Not assessed
- Grounds
-
Not assessed
- Action and result
-
Not assessed
- Success criterion
-
Not assessed
Evidence
- Source numbers
-
AIBD-0222-source-0001–0002
- Citations
-
Numbered references below.
- Language
-
Not assessed
- Source relationships
-
Developer
- Original evidence
-
Not assessed
- Access and versions
-
Not assessed
- Supported findings
-
Not assessed
- Evidence links
-
Not assessed
- Evidence strength
-
Not assessed
- Missing evidence
-
Not assessed
Grades
- Assessed benefits
-
People.
- Depth
-
Not assessed
- Reasons
-
People: No individually attributable outcome: the source reports cross-validated classification accuracy (95.6%) on 185 children, not what followed for any child.
- Observed or intended
-
Not assessed
- Rubric
-
Not assessed
- Assessor and date
-
Not assessed
- Alternative assessments
-
Not assessed
- Fill
-
The makers' claim
Entry details
- Kind
-
Not assessed
- Related entries
-
Not assessed
- Field
-
Education / learning-disability screening. Dyslexia risk screening of 9-10-year-olds.
- Purpose
-
The method was developed to screen for dyslexia risk from eye movements. The classification accuracy is that purpose.
- Dates
-
Date basis unassessed: 2016 (precision unassessed). Updated: 22 October 2026.
- Stage
-
Not assessed
- Version
-
SHA-256: 1a2a7defa892…
References
- Other identifiers
-
Not assessed
- Category mappings
-
Not assessed
- Brief
-
Not assessed
- Revisions
-
6 revisions. Latest: 22 October 2026.
Sources
-
Peer-reviewed study Developer
Nilsson Benfatto M, Öqvist Seimyr G, Ygge J, Pansell T, Rydberg A, Jacobson C (2016). Screening for Dyslexia Using Eye Tracking during Reading. PLoS ONE 11(12): e0165508 (PMC5147795).
Using statistical cross-validation techniques on a sample of 97 high-risk and 88 low-risk control subjects, we achieve a classification accuracy of 96% with balanced levels of sensitivity and specificity.
-
Peer-reviewed study Developer
Nilsson Benfatto M, Öqvist Seimyr G, Ygge J, Pansell T, Rydberg A, Jacobson C (2016). Screening for Dyslexia Using Eye Tracking during Reading. PLoS ONE 11(12): e0165508 (publisher page).