Karolinska eye-tracking SVM flags reading risk at 95.6% accuracy

Nilsson Benfatto et al. trained an SVM on under-one-minute eye-tracking records from 97 high-risk and 88 low-risk Swedish children; 95.6% accuracy; two authors own equity in Optolexia.

AI system

System

Eye-tracking during reading with a support-vector-machine classifier (SVM-RFE, 48 features)

Model

Not assessed

Release

Not assessed

Application developer

Karolinska Institutet (Nilsson Benfatto, Öqvist Seimyr and colleagues); two authors hold equity in Optolexia

Role

Not assessed

Configuration

Not assessed

Inputs and outputs

Not assessed

Autonomy

Not assessed

Workflow

Eye-tracking records of under one minute of reading. A labeled sample of 97 high-risk and 88 low-risk 9–10-year-olds. Feature selection (SVM-RFE) within repeated cross-validation.

Human oversight

Not assessed

Relation to AI

The classifier is the whole result. The authors describe it as a first step toward making eye tracking a viable screening method. No cited source shows it used in schools or affecting a child's support.

AI contribution

The classifier is the whole result. The authors describe it as a first step toward making eye tracking a viable screening method. No cited source shows it used in schools or affecting a child's support.

Benefits

Outcome identifiers

Not assessed

Benefit

reached 95.6% (± 4.5%) accuracy with balanced sensitivity and specificity

Category

Improved Task Accuracy

Status

Not assessed

Beneficiary groups

People.

Beneficiaries

Not assessed

Reach

Not assessed

Distribution and access

Not assessed

Duration

Not assessed

Expected?

Yes

Costs and harms

Not assessed

Measurement

Studies

Not assessed

Study design

Not assessed

Measurement

Not assessed

Setting and sample

Not assessed

Measures

reached 95.6% (± 4.5%) accuracy with balanced sensitivity and specificity

Comparison

chance-level classification on the same cross-validation (and random feature selection)

Results

Reference: Chance: 49.1% ± 13%. Result: 95.6% ± 4.5%.

Additional value from AI

Not assessed

Limitations

Not assessed

Denominators

Not assessed

Materials for replication

Not assessed

Money

Kind of value

Not assessed

Amount

Not assessed

Currency and prices

Not assessed

Period and unit

Not assessed

Realization

Not assessed

Recipients and payers

Not assessed

Gross or net

Not assessed

Included costs

Not assessed

Comparison

Not assessed

Method

Not assessed

Return and payback

Not assessed

People and places

Participants

Developer: Karolinska Institutet (Nilsson Benfatto, Öqvist Seimyr and colleagues); two authors hold equity in Optolexia. Operator: None in the sources (research study).

Jurisdictions

Developer: Sweden.

Ownership and control

Not assessed

Dependencies

Not assessed

Cross-border connections

Not assessed

Geopolitical implications

Not assessed

Follow-up

Conditions for replication

Eye-tracking hardware in the screening setting. Reading material and norms for the child's language. Validation on an independent sample, which the cited source does not report.

Replication attempts

Not assessed

Later findings

No later development was found; the Optolexia equity and VINNOVA funding are disclosed in the paper itself.

Availability

Not assessed

Institutional decision

Not assessed

Grounds

Not assessed

Action and result

Not assessed

Success criterion

Not assessed

Evidence

Source numbers

AIBD-0222-source-0001–0002

Citations

Numbered references below.

Language

Not assessed

Source relationships

Developer

Original evidence

Not assessed

Access and versions

Not assessed

Supported findings

Not assessed

Evidence strength

Not assessed

Missing evidence

Not assessed

Grades

Assessed benefits

People.

Depth

Not assessed

Reasons

People: No individually attributable outcome: the source reports cross-validated classification accuracy (95.6%) on 185 children, not what followed for any child.

Observed or intended

Not assessed

Rubric

Not assessed

Assessor and date

Not assessed

Alternative assessments

Not assessed

Fill

The makers' claim

Entry details

Kind

Not assessed

Field

Education / learning-disability screening. Dyslexia risk screening of 9-10-year-olds.

Purpose

The method was developed to screen for dyslexia risk from eye movements. The classification accuracy is that purpose.

Dates

Date basis unassessed: 2016 (precision unassessed). Updated: 22 October 2026.

Stage

Not assessed

Version

SHA-256: 1a2a7defa892…

References

Other identifiers

Not assessed

Category mappings

Not assessed

Brief

Not assessed

Revisions

6 revisions. Latest: 22 October 2026.

Sources

  1. Peer-reviewed study Developer

    Nilsson Benfatto M, Öqvist Seimyr G, Ygge J, Pansell T, Rydberg A, Jacobson C (2016). Screening for Dyslexia Using Eye Tracking during Reading. PLoS ONE 11(12): e0165508 (PMC5147795).

  2. Peer-reviewed study Developer

    Nilsson Benfatto M, Öqvist Seimyr G, Ygge J, Pansell T, Rydberg A, Jacobson C (2016). Screening for Dyslexia Using Eye Tracking during Reading. PLoS ONE 11(12): e0165508 (publisher page).