See & Spray saves 28.4–62.4% of postemergence herbicide

Arkansas-Mississippi trials (2021–2022) with Blue River co-authors: targeted sprays matched broadcast weed control within 1% while saving 28.4% to 62.4% of postemergence herbicide.

AI system

System

John Deere See & Spray (machine-vision targeted sprayer)

Model

Not assessed

Release

Exact release not established.

Application developer

Blue River Technology / John Deere

Role

The system identified weeds and directed herbicide spraying to those locations.

Configuration

The deployment used the 2022 See & Spray system at detection sensitivity level 3 with a small coverage buffer.

Inputs and outputs

Not assessed

Autonomy

Not assessed

Workflow

Herbicide-resistant soybean with a PRE residual, EPOST dicamba and MPOST glufosinate. Four site-years (2021–2022) in a randomized complete block design.

Human oversight

Not assessed

Relation to AI

The machine-vision sprayer decided where to spray. The comparison with broadcast programs is a randomized trial with consistent herbicides and rates. Savings depended on nozzle angle and machine settings. Co-authored by the maker's agronomists with university weed scientists.

AI contribution

The machine-vision sprayer decided where to spray. The comparison with broadcast programs is a randomized trial with consistent herbicides and rates. Savings depended on nozzle angle and machine settings. Co-authored by the maker's agronomists with university weed scientists.

Benefits

Outcome identifiers

Not assessed

Benefit

on average saved 28.4% to 62.4% of postemergence herbicide

Category

Improved Environmental Sustainability

Status

Not assessed

Beneficiary groups

Organizations. Society.

Beneficiaries

Not assessed

Reach

Not assessed

Distribution and access

Not assessed

Duration

Not assessed

Expected?

Yes

Costs and harms

Not assessed

Measurement

Studies

Not assessed

Study design

Not assessed

Measurement

Not assessed

Setting and sample

Not assessed

Measures

on average saved 28.4% to 62.4% of postemergence herbicide

Comparison

traditional broadcast herbicide applications in the same randomized trials

Results

Reference: full broadcast applications of the postemergence herbicides (traditional broadcast program). Result: targeted sprays saving 28.4% to 62.4% of postemergence herbicides, with a ≤1% decrease in efficacy and overall control ≥93%.

Additional value from AI

Not assessed

Limitations

Not assessed

Denominators

Not assessed

Materials for replication

Not assessed

Money

Kind of value

Not assessed

Amount

Not assessed

Currency and prices

Not assessed

Period and unit

Not assessed

Realization

Not assessed

Recipients and payers

Not assessed

Gross or net

Not assessed

Included costs

Not assessed

Comparison

Not assessed

Method

Not assessed

Return and payback

Not assessed

People and places

Participants

Developer: Blue River Technology / John Deere. Operator: University of Arkansas and Stoneville R&D field trials (Keiser, AR and Greenville, MS).

Jurisdictions

Benefit: Keiser (Arkansas) and Greenville (Mississippi), United States. Developer: United States. Operator: United States.

Ownership and control

Not assessed

Dependencies

Not assessed

Cross-border connections

Not assessed

Geopolitical implications

Not assessed

Follow-up

Conditions for replication

The specific machine settings and nozzle angles used. Weed species and pressure comparable to the trial sites.

Replication attempts

Not assessed

Later findings

4 November 2025. John Deere reported that customers ran See & Spray on more than five million acres in the 2025 season, cutting non-residual herbicide use by nearly half.

Availability

Not assessed

Institutional decision

Not assessed

Grounds

Not assessed

Action and result

Not assessed

Success criterion

Not assessed

Evidence

Source numbers

AIBD-0199-source-0001–0002

Citations

Numbered references below.

Language

Not assessed

Source relationships

Operator, Developer

Original evidence

Not assessed

Access and versions

Not assessed

Supported findings

Not assessed

Evidence strength

Not assessed

Missing evidence

Not assessed

Grades

Assessed benefits

Organizations. Society.

Depth

Not assessed

Reasons

Organizations: Savings of 28.4–62.4% on postemergence herbicide were measured in trial plots. No grower's costs or outcomes are documented. Society: Reduced herbicide volume is a trial result. No environmental outcome off-plot is measured.

Observed or intended

Not assessed

Rubric

Not assessed

Assessor and date

Not assessed

Alternative assessments

Not assessed

Fill

The deployer's account

Entry details

Kind

Not assessed

Field

Agriculture / crop protection. Soybean weed control.

Purpose

Detect weeds with machine vision and apply herbicide only where weeds are present, reducing herbicide use while maintaining control.

Dates

Date basis unassessed: 2024 (precision unassessed). Updated: 21 October 2026.

Stage

Not assessed

Version

SHA-256: c99ca56d49ec…

References

Other identifiers

Not assessed

Category mappings

Not assessed

Brief

Not assessed

Revisions

4 revisions. Latest: 21 October 2026.

Sources

  1. Peer-reviewed study Deployer

    Avent TH, Norsworthy JK, Patzoldt WL, Schwartz-Lazaro LM, Houston MM, Butts TR, Vazquez AR. Comparing herbicide application methods with See & Spray technology in soybean. Weed Technology 38:e74 (2024). doi:10.1017/wet.2024.70

  2. Press release Developer

    Deere & Co. John Deere Customers Use See & Spray Technology Across Five Million Acres in 2025. Company release as published by Global Ag Tech Initiative, 4 November 2025.