SoundTalks health score falls with high swine influenza A loads

LMU Munich blinded study in a German nursery: swine influenza A loads in oral fluids and bioaerosols were associated with falls in the AI's respiratory health score; no intervention outcome.

AI system

System

SoundTalks (24/7 AI sound-based cough monitor with respiratory health status score)

Model

Not assessed

Release

Not assessed

Application developer

SoundTalks NV, Leuven, Belgium

Role

Not assessed

Configuration

Not assessed

Inputs and outputs

Not assessed

Autonomy

Not assessed

Workflow

Two SoundTalks monitors in a 600-pig nursery airspace. Parallel oral fluid and bioaerosol qPCR sampling. Circulating swine influenza A virus producing coughing.

Human oversight

Not assessed

Relation to AI

The AI produced a respiratory health score that tracked swine influenza A loads measured by qPCR. Alerts were hidden from investigators, so the study measures association rather than any alert that changed what happened. Funding and three co-authors came from Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica. The paper states the funders were not involved in collection, analysis or interpretation.

AI contribution

The AI produced a respiratory health score that tracked swine influenza A loads measured by qPCR. Alerts were hidden from investigators, so the study measures association rather than any alert that changed what happened. Funding and three co-authors came from Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica. The paper states the funders were not involved in collection, analysis or interpretation.

Benefits

Outcome identifiers

Not assessed

Benefit

LMU Munich blinded study in a German nursery: swine influenza A loads in oral fluids and bioaerosols were associated with falls in the AI's respiratory health score; no intervention outcome.

Category

Improved Knowledge Discovery

Status

Not assessed

Beneficiary groups

Organizations. People.

Beneficiaries

Not assessed

Reach

Not assessed

Distribution and access

Not assessed

Duration

Not assessed

Expected?

Yes

Costs and harms

Not assessed

Measurement

Studies

Not assessed

Study design

Not assessed

Measurement

Not assessed

Setting and sample

Not assessed

Measures

Not assessed

Comparison

human-conducted clinical coughing scores on the same pigs

Results

Reference: twenty human clinical coughing scores per batch, with a coughing index of at most 0.4% (batch 1) and a maximum of 1.26% (batch 2). Result: a 24/7 AI respiratory health score that fell as the human-scored coughing rose (Spearman's rho −0.478 and −0.468).

Additional value from AI

Not assessed

Limitations

Not assessed

Denominators

Not assessed

Materials for replication

Not assessed

Money

Kind of value

Not assessed

Amount

Not assessed

Currency and prices

Not assessed

Period and unit

Not assessed

Realization

Not assessed

Recipients and payers

Not assessed

Gross or net

Not assessed

Included costs

Not assessed

Comparison

Not assessed

Method

Not assessed

Return and payback

Not assessed

People and places

Participants

Developer: SoundTalks NV, Leuven, Belgium. Operator: Clinic for Swine, LMU Munich, on a commercial piglet-producing farm in Germany.

Jurisdictions

Developer: Belgium. Operator: Germany.

Ownership and control

Not assessed

Dependencies

Not assessed

Cross-border connections

Not assessed

Geopolitical implications

Not assessed

Follow-up

Conditions for replication

Monitors able to separate pig coughs from barn noise. Pathogen loads high enough to depress the score.

Replication attempts

1 follow-up entries. Benefit recurred: 1.

Later findings

Not assessed

Availability

Not assessed

Institutional decision

Not assessed

Grounds

Not assessed

Action and result

Not assessed

Success criterion

Not assessed

Evidence

Source numbers

AIBD-0197-source-0001–0002

Citations

Numbered references below.

Language

Not assessed

Source relationships

Operator, Independent

Original evidence

Not assessed

Access and versions

Not assessed

Supported findings

Not assessed

Evidence strength

Not assessed

Missing evidence

Not assessed

Grades

Assessed benefits

Organizations. People.

Depth

Not assessed

Reasons

Organizations: Monitors were blinded, so no alert was acted on; the study documents associations, not a changed treatment or production outcome. People: No outcome for the farmer or animals is reported.

Observed or intended

Not assessed

Rubric

Not assessed

Assessor and date

Not assessed

Alternative assessments

Not assessed

Fill

Independently studied

Entry details

Kind

Not assessed

Field

Livestock health. Swine respiratory disease monitoring.

Purpose

Continuously count pig coughs, separate them from barn noise and compute a daily respiratory health status. Yellow and red alerts give an early warning of respiratory disease.

Dates

Date basis unassessed: 2024 (precision unassessed). Updated: 21 October 2026.

Stage

Not assessed

Version

SHA-256: 41f3fd2686ba…

References

Other identifiers

Not assessed

Category mappings

Not assessed

Brief

Not assessed

Revisions

4 revisions. Latest: 21 October 2026.

Sources

  1. Peer-reviewed study Deployer

    Eddicks M, Feicht F, Beckjunker J, Genzow M, Alonso C, Reese S, Ritzmann M, Stadler J. Monitoring of Respiratory Disease Patterns in a Multimicrobially Infected Pig Population Using Artificial Intelligence and Aggregate Samples. Viruses 16(10):1575 (2024). doi:10.3390/v16101575

  2. Peer-reviewed study Independent author

    Yoon CE, Cho DH, Park HL, Song JY, Park S, Lee SW, Go YY, Choi IS, Song CS, Lee JB, Park SY, Kang YL. AI-Based Respiratory Monitoring-Guided Evaluation of Rottlerin Therapy for PRRS in Grower-Finisher Pig Farms. Viruses 18(1):72 (2026). doi:10.3390/v18010072