BrainGate wireless iBCI lets T5 and T10 use a tablet at home

Two men with tetraplegia used a wireless BrainGate iBCI at home for web browsing, apps and typing, with 24-hour home recording.

21ⓘ

AI system

System

BrainGate wireless intracortical brain-computer interface (Kalman filter velocity decoder plus linear discriminant click classifier)

Model

Not assessed

Release

Not assessed

Application developer

BrainGate consortium (Brown University, Massachusetts General Hospital, Providence VA Medical Center, Stanford University)

Role

Not assessed

Configuration

Not assessed

Inputs and outputs

Not assessed

Autonomy

Not assessed

Workflow

Chronically implanted microelectrode arrays with usable spiking signals. Daily Kalman filter and linear discriminant decoder calibration. Wireless transmitters removing the cable tether.

Human oversight

Not assessed

Relation to AI

Machine-learning decoders (Kalman filter and linear discriminant classifier) are the mechanism that translates intracortical activity into cursor movement and clicks. Wireless hardware enabled home use. The decoded control is what produced the tablet and typing capacity.

AI contribution

Machine-learning decoders (Kalman filter and linear discriminant classifier) are the mechanism that translates intracortical activity into cursor movement and clicks. Wireless hardware enabled home use. The decoded control is what produced the tablet and typing capacity.

Benefits

Outcome identifiers

Not assessed

Benefit

T5 typed 196 correct characters in 14.6 minutes (13.4 per minute)

Category

Improved Accessibility

Status

Not assessed

Beneficiary groups

People. Society.

Beneficiaries

Not assessed

Reach

Not assessed

Distribution and access

Not assessed

Duration

Not assessed

Expected?

Yes

Costs and harms

Not assessed

Measurement

Studies

Not assessed

Study design

Not assessed

Measurement

Not assessed

Setting and sample

Not assessed

Measures

T5 typed 196 correct characters in 14.6 minutes (13.4 per minute)

Comparison

the cabled intracortical BCI

Results

Result: Communication bitrates were equivalent between cabled and wireless configurations.

Additional value from AI

Not assessed

Limitations

Not assessed

Denominators

Not assessed

Materials for replication

Not assessed

Money

Kind of value

Not assessed

Amount

Not assessed

Currency and prices

Not assessed

Period and unit

Not assessed

Realization

Not assessed

Recipients and payers

Not assessed

Gross or net

Not assessed

Included costs

Not assessed

Comparison

Not assessed

Method

Not assessed

Return and payback

Not assessed

People and places

Participants

Developer: BrainGate consortium (Brown University, Massachusetts General Hospital, Providence VA Medical Center, Stanford University). Operator: BrainGate consortium (pilot clinical trial); sessions in participants' homes with research staff present.

Jurisdictions

Developer: United States. Operator: United States.

Ownership and control

Not assessed

Dependencies

Not assessed

Cross-border connections

Not assessed

Geopolitical implications

Not assessed

Follow-up

Conditions for replication

Stable array signal quality years after implantation. Research staff available to set up sessions. Participant retains intention-to-move signals in motor cortex.

Replication attempts

1 follow-up entries. Benefit recurred: 1.

Later findings

No later development found.

Availability

Not assessed

Institutional decision

Not assessed

Grounds

Not assessed

Action and result

Not assessed

Success criterion

Not assessed

Evidence

Source numbers

AIBD-0051-source-0001–0003

Citations

Numbered references below.

Language

Not assessed

Source relationships

Developer

Original evidence

Not assessed

Access and versions

Not assessed

Supported findings

Not assessed

Evidence strength

Not assessed

Missing evidence

Not assessed

Grades

Assessed benefits

People. Society.

Depth

People: 2. Society: 1.

Reasons

People: Two identifiable participants gained tablet control, web browsing and typing at home. Use was within supervised research sessions rather than independent daily use, so the gain is material but not yet life-changing. Society: First human demonstration of wireless broadband iBCI use at home; a step toward practical deployment rather than a population-level change.

Observed or intended

Not assessed

Rubric

Not assessed

Assessor and date

Not assessed

Alternative assessments

Not assessed

Fill

The makers' claim

Entry details

Kind

Not assessed

Field

Neurotechnology / assistive communication. People with tetraplegia.

Purpose

Restore computer access and communication for people with paralysis by decoding intended movement from motor cortex

Dates

Date basis unassessed: 2021 (precision unassessed). Updated: 22 October 2026.

Stage

Not assessed

Version

SHA-256: 1444ea654864…

References

Other identifiers

Not assessed

Category mappings

Not assessed

Brief

Not assessed

Revisions

5 revisions. Latest: 22 October 2026.

Sources

  1. Peer-reviewed study Developer

    Simeral JD, Hosman T, Saab J, et al. (2021). Home Use of a Percutaneous Wireless Intracortical Brain-Computer Interface by Individuals With Tetraplegia. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 68(7).

  2. Peer-reviewed study Developer

    Nuyujukian P, Albites Sanabria J, Saab J, et al. (2018). Cortical control of a tablet computer by people with paralysis. PLoS One 13(11).