Skip to content

Prefectures find 病害虫診断AI 80% accurate on new pest images

Kyoto's agricultural technology center reports that the pest and disease diagnosis AI reached 80% or more accuracy on 4,976 new eggplant images. Mie's institute reports recall of roughly 80% or more.

  • Not rated a person

    The reports measure the AI's accuracy on images and users' opinions, and neither reports an outcome for a grower's crop.

Depth runs from 1, a convenience or time saved, to 5, a life or a livelihood preserved.

Status
Reported benefit.
Evidence

foundstudiedreportedclaimed, the grade of this benefit

Only the evaluators support the benefit.

Size

No magnitude yet: scale, reach, duration, distribution and frequency are not documented.

The system’s part
Not isolated. The Kyoto center measured the AI's accuracy against the known pest or disease in newly photographed images, and Mie's institute reports recall. Neither compares growers' diagnoses or crop outcomes with and without the app, and both institutes supplied training images as project participants.
Learns from data

Shown. Mie's sheet says that the AI was developed from more than 700,000 pest and disease damage images collected by experts.

“病害虫診断 AI は、農業研究所などの専門家が収集した 70 万 枚以上の病害虫被害画像をもとに開発されています。” Source

Not yet checked
LimitsCosts and harmsLater outcome
Benefit type
Improved Task Accuracy
System
病害虫診断AI (pest and disease image-diagnosis AI for tomato, cucumber, strawberry and eggplant), built into the app レイミーのAI病害虫雑草診断
Made by
MAFF-commissioned project consortium of NARO and prefectural institutes, including the Kyoto and Mie institutes, with the app operated by Nihon Nohyaku Co., Ltd.
Used by
Growers and extension advisers using the free app (62 trial users surveyed in Kyoto, new farmers and trainees targeted in Mie)
Where
Kyoto Prefecture and Mie Prefecture, Japan (app available nationwide)
Stage
In routine use
Date
, when the source was published
Kind
Aggregate result
Broad benefit
Positive environmental impact (environmental impacts)
Last revised
1 November 2026

Sources

  1. Report, by an evaluator that the makers or users commissioned.

    京都府農林水産技術センター 生物資源研究センター 応用研究部 (Kyoto Prefectural Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Technology Center, Biological Resources Research Center, Applied Research Division) (2022). AIを活用した画像によるナス病害虫診断技術の開発 (Development of an AI image-based eggplant pest and disease diagnosis technology).

    AI の精度検証は、新たに撮影した病害虫被害画像を AI に診断させ、病害 2,613 件、虫害 2,363 件について実施し、最終的には 80%以上の精度を確保することができた。
  2. Report, by an evaluator that the makers or users commissioned.

    三重県農業研究所 (Mie Prefecture Agricultural Research Institute) (2022). 令和3年度 三重農研成果情報: スマートフォンカメラ撮影画像から病害虫を識別できる病害虫診断AI (FY2021 results: a pest and disease diagnosis AI that identifies pests and diseases from smartphone camera images).

    病害虫診断AIによる診断精度は、概ね 80%以上の再現率です。

Details

AI system

Workflow

The AI was developed from more than 700,000 pest and disease damage images collected by experts at agricultural research institutes. Kyoto's center photographed 19,366 disease and 12,375 pest images of eggplant by plant part, severity and time for training. The accuracy check used newly photographed images that were not part of training.

Follow-up

Conditions for replication

The crop and the pest or disease must be among those the AI was trained on, ten for eggplant. The photo must be taken with a smartphone camera in the field, as in the checks.

Entry details

Sector

Agriculture / crop pest and disease diagnosis.

Purpose

NARO and prefectural institutes built the pest and disease diagnosis AI, under a MAFF project, to let growers without diagnostic experience identify pests and diseases from a smartphone photo.

31 more questions not yet checked

model, release, provider, role, configuration, inputs and outputs, autonomy, human oversight, AI contribution, beneficiaries, reach, distribution and access, duration, every measurement question, every money question, ownership and control, dependencies, cross-border connections, geopolitical implications, replication attempts, availability, institutional decision, grounds, action and result, success criterion, every evidence question, observed or intended, alternative assessments, related entries, other identifiers, category mappings.

Cite this benefit

Peter H. Vartanian. (2026). Prefectures find 病害虫診断AI 80% accurate on new pest images (AIBD-1198). Artificial Intelligence Benefits Database, edition of 2 November 2026. https://petervartanian.xyz/aibd/records/AIBD-1198.html (archived at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AADSII, version 9.0)

BibTeX Data Field definitions