Skip to content

UNOSAT reports that analysts left 86% of Flood AI images uncorrected

A UNITAR evaluation relays UNOSAT's own figures that Flood AI served seven emergency activations in a year and that analysts did not need to correct 86 percent of its images.

  • 1 for an organization

    UNOSAT reports that analysts did not need to correct 86 percent of the images that Flood AI processed.

  • Not rated society

    The evaluation does not report whether the flood maps reached responders sooner or changed any response.

Depth runs from 1, a convenience or time saved, to 5, a life or a livelihood preserved.

Status
Reported benefit.
Evidence

foundstudiedreportedclaimed, the grade of this record

Only the evaluators support the benefit.

The system’s part
Not isolated. The evaluation relays the share of the model's images that analysts left uncorrected. It does not compare mapping time or quality with and without the model. For Flood AI it cites a related 2020 journal article on a fully convolutional neural network for flood segmentation in radar imagery, a model that learns from data.
Not yet checked
LimitsCosts and harmsLearns from dataLater outcome
Benefit type
Repetitive Task Automation
System
Flood AI
Made by
UNOSAT (United Nations Satellite Centre, UNITAR), with research partners on CERN's OpenLab platform
Used by
UNOSAT Emergency Mapping Service (UNITAR)
Where
Global (seven emergency activations, sites not named in the passage)
Stage
In routine use
Date
, when the source was published
Kind
Aggregate result
Broad benefit
Identifying Objects, Actions, and Events, Analyzing Data or Information
Last revised
1 November 2026

Sources

  1. Descriptive report, by an evaluator that the makers or users commissioned.

    Douthwaite, B. Midterm Evaluation of UNOSAT Mapping Service: Evidence-Based Information Support to Humanitarian Assistance, Peace and Security Using Satellite Imagery and Geospatial Techniques Project. UNITAR Planning, Performance Monitoring and Evaluation Unit, 1 May 2024. Published in the UN Evaluation Group repository.

    The project's first annual report states that the Flood AI model was deployed as a response to seven activations and that 86 per cent of the images processed by the model did not require correction or adjustment by the analysts.

Details

AI system

Workflow

UNOSAT ran Flood AI on satellite images in seven emergency activations in the project's first year. Analysts validated the model's outputs through a human-in-the-loop protocol before products were released. UNOSAT developed the model with research partners on CERN's OpenLab platform.

Follow-up

Conditions for replication

Analysts must validate the model's outputs before products are released. Research on AI models needs funding, which fell short of the project's request.

Entry details

Sector

Humanitarian disaster mapping.

Purpose

UNOSAT built Flood AI to map flooded areas in satellite imagery faster during emergencies.

31 more questions not yet checked

model, release, provider, role, configuration, inputs and outputs, autonomy, human oversight, AI contribution, beneficiaries, reach, distribution and access, duration, every measurement question, every money question, ownership and control, dependencies, cross-border connections, geopolitical implications, replication attempts, availability, institutional decision, grounds, action and result, success criterion, every evidence question, observed or intended, alternative assessments, related entries, other identifiers, category mappings.

Cite this record

Peter H. Vartanian. (2026). UNOSAT reports that analysts left 86% of Flood AI images uncorrected (AIBD-1167). Artificial Intelligence Benefits Database, edition of 1 November 2026. https://petervartanian.xyz/aibd/records/AIBD-1167.html (archived at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AADSII, version 7.0)

BibTeX Data Field definitions