Skip to content

Checks by monitoring help Flanders prevent overpayments of farm aid

The European Court of Auditors found that the paying agency of Flanders, like Malta's, used satellite checks by monitoring to prevent a number of overpayments of EU farm aid.

  • Not rated an organization

    The Court found that the checks prevented overpayments but gives no count or amount.

Depth runs from 1, a convenience or time saved, to 5, a life or a livelihood preserved.

Status
Reported benefit.
Evidence

found, the grade of this recordstudiedreportedclaimed

An independent audit report supports the benefit.

The system’s part
Not isolated. The Court reports prevented overpayments for the two agencies together and compares no claims checked without monitoring. Its special report of 2020 describes the Flemish algorithm as artificial intelligence trained on Sentinel images and farmers' declarations. The annual report describes the approach only as automated processes based on Sentinel data.
Not yet checked
LimitsCosts and harmsLearns from dataLater outcome
Benefit type
Reduced Risk
System
Checks by monitoring of the paying agency of Belgium (Flanders), with an artificial intelligence algorithm trained on Sentinel 1 and 2 image time series
Made by
The paying agency of Belgium (Flanders), following technical guidelines from the European Commission's Joint Research Centre
Used by
The paying agency of Belgium (Flanders), for the basic payment scheme
Where
Flanders, Belgium
Stage
In routine use
Date
, when the source was published
Kind
Program
Broad benefit
Evaluating Information to Determine Compliance with Standards, Identifying Objects, Actions, and Events, Monitoring Processes, Materials, or Surroundings
Collections
Scrutiny and findings
Last revised
1 November 2026

Sources

  1. Audit report, by authors with no tie to the system.

    European Court of Auditors. 2020 annual reports on the implementation of the EU budget for the 2020 financial year, Chapter 6 'Natural resources', paragraph 6.20 and Box 6.3. Published 26 October 2021.

    During our 2020 Statement of Assurance work, we reviewed two paying agencies' use of checks by monitoring, focusing on the voluntary coupled support scheme for tomato farmers in Malta and the basic payment scheme in Belgium (Flanders). We found that these paying agencies had used checks by monitoring to prevent a number of overpayments.
  2. Audit report, by authors with no tie to the system. Context or contrary evidence.

    European Court of Auditors. Special report 04/2020: Using new imaging technologies to monitor the Common Agricultural Policy: steady progress overall, but slower for climate and environment monitoring. Box 1 and Table 3. Published 28 January 2020.

    An artificial intelligence algorithm, trained using a time series of Sentinel 1 and 2 images (in combination with the information contained in the farmers’ declarations), predicts the probability that each parcel belongs to one of five classes (arable land, grassland, leguminous crops, fallow and non-eligible).

Details

AI system

Workflow

An algorithm trained on Sentinel 1 and 2 image series and farmers' declarations predicted whether each parcel was arable land, grassland, leguminous crops, fallow or non-eligible. Parcels that did not match the declaration got a field visit. Inconclusive parcels were checked on screen first and visited if needed.

Follow-up

Conditions for replication

Every eligibility criterion of the scheme must be checkable from satellite images, since other criteria still need on-the-spot checks of a sample of farmers. Small parcels need other data or follow-up, since Sentinel images give too few pixels for them.

Entry details

Sector

Agriculture (control of EU farm aid claims).

Purpose

The paying agency of Belgium (Flanders) built its checks by monitoring to verify from Sentinel satellite images whether each declared parcel is used as the farmer declared.

31 more questions not yet checked

model, release, provider, role, configuration, inputs and outputs, autonomy, human oversight, AI contribution, beneficiaries, reach, distribution and access, duration, every measurement question, every money question, ownership and control, dependencies, cross-border connections, geopolitical implications, replication attempts, availability, institutional decision, grounds, action and result, success criterion, every evidence question, observed or intended, alternative assessments, related entries, other identifiers, category mappings.

Cite this record

Peter H. Vartanian. (2026). Checks by monitoring help Flanders prevent overpayments of farm aid (AIBD-1034). Artificial Intelligence Benefits Database, edition of 1 November 2026. https://petervartanian.xyz/aibd/records/AIBD-1034.html (archived at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AADSII, version 7.0)

BibTeX Data Field definitions