Skip to content

FMF screening algorithm probably predicts preterm preeclampsia better

The Norwegian Institute of Public Health found that first-trimester screening with an algorithm probably improves prediction of delivery with preeclampsia before week 37 of pregnancy.

  • 2 for an organization

    In the detection rates that FHI took from a FIGO guide for its model, the algorithm detected 74.8% of preterm preeclampsia against 44.8% for maternal factors, at a screen-positive rate of 10%.

  • Not rated a person

    The 173 preterm cases avoided each year are FHI's projection for Norway, which had not introduced the screening.

Depth runs from 1, a convenience or time saved, to 5, a life or a livelihood preserved.

Status
Reported benefit.
Evidence

found, the grade of this recordstudiedreportedclaimed

Two independent assessment reports support the benefit.

Compared with

Screening by maternal factors, which FHI assumed to be current Norwegian practice. Assumed without a measurement.

Without the system
44,8 (40,5-49,2)
With it
74,8 (70,8-78,5)
The system’s part
Not isolated. FHI pooled the algorithm's sensitivity from 16 studies. Its comparison with current practice rests on detection rates from a FIGO guide, since no data allowed a pooled estimate for current practice. FHI writes that the algorithm was developed from data on 58,884 pregnancies and cites a competing-risks model. It does not describe the algorithm as machine learning or artificial intelligence.
Not yet checked
LimitsCosts and harmsLearns from dataLater outcome
Benefit type
Improved Task Accuracy
System
Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) first-trimester preeclampsia screening algorithm (maternal characteristics, mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index and PlGF)
Made by
Fetal Medicine Foundation
Used by
Screening studies in Asia and Europe that FHI pooled, with screening proposed for Norway's specialist health service
Where
Studies in Asia and Europe, assessed for Norway
Stage
Proposed
Date
, when the source was published
Kind
Aggregate result
Broad benefit
Analyzing Data or Information
Collections
Scrutiny and findings, Cross-border records
Last revised
1 November 2026

Sources

  1. Assessment report, by authors with no tie to the system.

    Norwegian Institute of Public Health (FHI). First trimester-screening for the development of preeclampsia with the use of an algorithm: a health technology assessment. English summary page, published 1 December 2022.

    We found that screening with an algorithm early in pregnancy: probably improves prediction of the risk of delivery with preeclampsia before week 37 of the pregnancy.
  2. Assessment report, by authors with no tie to the system.

    Folkehelseinstituttet. Første trimester-screening for utvikling av preeklampsi med bruk av algoritme: en fullstendig metodevurdering. Rapport 2022, chapter 'Organisatoriske aspekter'.

    Utfylling av den nettverksbasert screeningalgoritmen fra Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) utgjør grunnlaget for beregning av risiko for preeklampsi.

Details

AI system

Workflow

Screening at weeks 11 to 14 combined maternal characteristics, mean arterial pressure, uterine artery Doppler and PlGF in the mother's blood. Women identified at high risk received low-dose aspirin from weeks 11 to 14 in the trial that FHI used for the effect of prophylaxis.

Money

Kind of value

Projected yearly saving for the health service from screening with the algorithm and aspirin prophylaxis

Amount

Estimate: ~ NOK 17 million per year

Recipients and payers

Norwegian health service

Follow-up

Conditions for replication

Aspirin prophylaxis must start before week 16 of pregnancy. Laboratories must analyze PlGF before the early ultrasound. Maternity units must reach the algorithm through their electronic patient records.

Entry details

Sector

Healthcare (antenatal screening).

Purpose

The Fetal Medicine Foundation built its first-trimester screening algorithm to calculate each pregnant woman's individual risk of preeclampsia from maternal factors and biomarkers.

38 more questions not yet checked

model, release, provider, role, configuration, inputs and outputs, autonomy, human oversight, AI contribution, beneficiaries, reach, distribution and access, duration, every measurement question, currency and prices, period and unit, realization, gross or net, included costs, comparison, method, return and payback, ownership and control, dependencies, cross-border connections, geopolitical implications, replication attempts, availability, institutional decision, grounds, action and result, success criterion, every evidence question, observed or intended, alternative assessments, related entries, other identifiers, category mappings.

Cite this record

Peter H. Vartanian. (2026). FMF screening algorithm probably predicts preterm preeclampsia better (AIBD-1032). Artificial Intelligence Benefits Database, edition of 1 November 2026. https://petervartanian.xyz/aibd/records/AIBD-1032.html (archived at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AADSII, version 7.0)

BibTeX Data Field definitions