Skip to content

Medicare's AI-enabled model flags eight possible fraud cases

The ANAO found that eight potential Medicare fraud or non-compliance matters, estimated at $5,253,601, came in part from an AI-enabled model. The model was not used after December 2025.

  • 2 for an organization

    The model contributed to eight potential fraud or non-compliance matters, and about 80% of the providers that it flagged were new to the other models.

  • Not rated society

    No money had been recovered from the matters by February 2026, so no gain to public funds is established.

Depth runs from 1, a convenience or time saved, to 5, a life or a livelihood preserved.

Status
Reported benefit.
Evidence

found, the grade of this recordstudiedreportedclaimed

An independent audit report supports the benefit.

The system’s part
Not isolated. The ANAO notes that the eight matters combined results from several models, including models without AI, and that reporting did not separate them. The department identified which providers only this model flagged, but no one compared outcomes with and without the model. The report does not describe the model's technique. A November 2024 risk assessment stated that the system's models can use supervised and unsupervised machine learning.
Later
Withdrawn, 31 December 2025. The department stopped using the AI-enabled model after December 2025 because manual assessment could not keep up with the volume of matters that it generated. Standard statistical modeling replaced it for the same claiming behavior.
Not yet checked
LimitsCosts and harmsLearns from data
Benefit type
Reduced Risk
System
AI-enabled model in the MBS fraud and non-compliance detection system
Made by
Department of Health, Disability and Ageing (built in-house from August 2023)
Used by
Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, Benefits Integrity Division
Where
Australia (national)
Stage
Retired
Date
, when the source was published
Kind
Aggregate result
Broad benefit
Analyzing Data or Information, Evaluating Information to Determine Compliance with Standards
Collections
Scrutiny and findings
Last revised
1 November 2026

Sources

  1. Audit report, by authors with no tie to the system.

    Australian National Audit Office. Artificial Intelligence and Medicare Benefits Integrity. Auditor-General Report No. 5 of 2026-27, published 21 September 2026. Paragraph 19 and paragraphs 5.5 to 5.14 (archived copy of the report page).

    Eight potential non-compliance or fraud matters were created and referred for preliminary analysis using, in part, the AI-enabled model in the MBS fraud detection system. While ad hoc preliminary performance analysis showed the AI-enabled model was efficacious, it was not used after December 2025

Details

AI system

Workflow

The model analyzed Medicare provider claiming data for behaviors known to be linked to fraud. Department officials manually assessed the model's signals and referred matters of concern for further analysis and investigation.

Money

Kind of value

Estimated value of potential fraud or non-compliance in the eight matters identified in part with the AI-enabled model, whose results also drew on models without AI

Amount

Estimate: $5,253,601

Recipients and payers

Medicare, the Australian Government's health benefits program

Follow-up

Conditions for replication

Staff must be able to assess manually the volume of matters that the model generates. Referred matters must be confirmed through analysis, investigation or audit before any money is recovered.

Entry details

Sector

Health insurance fraud and improper payments.

Purpose

The Department of Health, Disability and Ageing built the AI-enabled model to focus manual reviews on the riskier of the many providers whose Medicare claiming showed behaviors linked to fraud.

38 more questions not yet checked

model, release, provider, role, configuration, inputs and outputs, autonomy, human oversight, AI contribution, beneficiaries, reach, distribution and access, duration, every measurement question, currency and prices, period and unit, realization, gross or net, included costs, comparison, method, return and payback, ownership and control, dependencies, cross-border connections, geopolitical implications, replication attempts, availability, institutional decision, grounds, action and result, success criterion, every evidence question, observed or intended, alternative assessments, related entries, other identifiers, category mappings.

Cite this record

Peter H. Vartanian. (2026). Medicare's AI-enabled model flags eight possible fraud cases (AIBD-1009). Artificial Intelligence Benefits Database, edition of 1 November 2026. https://petervartanian.xyz/aibd/records/AIBD-1009.html (archived at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AADSII, version 7.0)

BibTeX Data Field definitions