Skip to content

Mercado Libre credit score predicted defaults better than the bureau

Using 2017 loans in Argentina, BIS economists and a Mercado Libre employee found that the firm's machine-learning credit score predicted defaults with an AUROC of 0.76, against 0.64 for bureau scores.

  • 2 an organization

    The machine-learning score separated defaults better than bureau scores, with an AUROC of 0.76 against 0.64 and 0.68.

  • 2 society

    About 30% of the loan portfolio went to merchants that the bureau rated high risk, whom the authors describe as otherwise excluded from credit.

Depth runs from 1, a convenience or time saved, to 5, a life or a livelihood preserved.

Status
Reported benefit.
Evidence

foundstudiedreportedclaimed, the grade of this record

Only the makers support the benefit.

Compared with

Logistic models with the local credit bureau score, alone or with borrower characteristics. Measured.

Without the system
AUROC 0.64 (bureau score) and 0.68 (bureau score with borrower characteristics)
With it
AUROC 0.76 (machine-learning Mercado Libre score)
The system’s part
The paper compares default prediction by the machine-learning score with prediction by bureau scores on the same 7,300 observations, which isolates the model's part in prediction. A Mercado Libre employee co-wrote the paper, the data came from Mercado Libre and the comparison covers one year of loans.
Limits
Not yet checked.
Costs and harms
Not yet checked.
Later
Not yet checked.
Benefit type
Improved Task Accuracy
System
Mercado Libre internal credit rating (machine-learning credit score) for Mercado Crédito
Made by
Mercado Libre
Used by
Mercado Libre (Mercado Crédito), lending to merchants in Argentina
Where
Argentina
Stage
In routine use
Date
, when the source was published
Kind
Aggregate result
Broad benefit
Judging the Qualities of Objects, Services, or People, Analyzing Data or Information
Collections
Cross-border records
Last revised
31 October 2026

Sources

  1. Peer-reviewed study, by the makers.

    Frost J, Gambacorta L, Huang Y, Shin HS, Zbinden P. BigTech and the changing structure of financial intermediation. BIS Working Paper 779, 8 April 2019, also published in Economic Policy 34(100), 2019. Section 4 (Credit assessments) and Table 5. Pablo Zbinden discloses an employment relationship and financial investments in Mercado Libre, and the data came from Mercado Libre.

    data from Mercado Libre show that credit models using machine learning and data from the e-commerce platform are better at predicting losses than traditional credit bureau ratings

Details

AI system

Workflow

The score drew on platform data on transactions, reputation and industry characteristics. Mercado Libre lent through Mercado Crédito without asking merchants for further documents.

Follow-up

Conditions for replication

Merchants must trade on the platform to generate the data that the score uses. The score's edge over bureau ratings has yet to be shown over a full business and financial cycle.

Entry details

Sector

Small-business lending.

Purpose

Mercado Libre built its internal credit score to assess merchants on its platform for Mercado Crédito loans from their transaction, reputation and industry data.

Not yet checked: model, release, provider, role, configuration, inputs and outputs, autonomy, human oversight, beneficiaries, reach, distribution and access, duration, every measurement question, every money question, ownership and control, dependencies, cross-border connections, geopolitical implications, replication attempts, availability, institutional decision, grounds, action and result, success criterion, every evidence question, observed or intended, alternative assessments, related entries, other identifiers, category mappings.

Cite this record

Peter H. Vartanian. (2026). Mercado Libre credit score predicted defaults better than the bureau (AIBD-0865). Artificial Intelligence Benefits Database, edition of 31 October 2026. https://petervartanian.xyz/aibd/records/AIBD-0865.html (archived at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AADSII, version 4.0)

BibTeX Data Field definitions