What happened
NRG Texas Power runs eight gas turbines at its T.H. Wharton Generating Station in Houston. In October 2007 it asked EPA to let it monitor their NOx with CMC Solutions' SmartCEM-75 predictive emission monitoring system (PEMS). EPA describes the PEMS as statistical hybrid software, with a model of each turbine developed from training data. Temporary certified analyzers gave hourly reference data, and each PEMS ran beside them for 720 operating hours in the third quarter of 2007. EPA also ran the tests itself on the startup and shutdown hours. It found that the output on each unit passed all three statistical tests, with correlations from 0.936 to 0.999. EPA approved the systems on 30 December 2008 and restated the terms on 27 September 2010. In May 2025 EPA wrote that NRG had used the PEMS since 2009 for six units and since 2011 for the other two. Citing a very high passing rate among all units with approved PEMS, it cut the required audits from monthly to quarterly. The letters report no cost figure or change in emissions.
Sources
-
Regulatory document, by authors with no tie to the system.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Clean Air Markets Division. Updated Approval of the Predictive Emission Monitoring Systems Installed on Units THW31 through THW34 and Units THW41 through THW44 at NRG Texas Power's T.H. Wharton Generating Station [Facility ID (ORISPL) 3469]. Letter to NRG Texas Power, 27 September 2010.
The PEMS NOx lb/mmBtu output on each unit passed each of the three statistical tests for all unit operations.
-
Regulatory document, by authors with no tie to the system.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation. Request for Changes to the PEMS Approval for Units THW31 through THW34 and THW41 through THW44 at T.H. Wharton (Facility ID (ORISPL) 3469). Letter to NRG Energy, 21 May 2025.
Based on the very high observed passing rate for RAAs by all units with approved PEMS, EPA has determined that the monthly RAA frequency may be reduced to quarterly while continuing to ensure that the reliability of PEMS data is comparable to the reliability of data obtained using CEMS, consistent with the purposes of part 75, subpart E.
Details
AI system
- Workflow
-
Temporary certified analyzers gave hourly reference data while each model was trained and tested. CMC Solutions built a separate model for each turbine from that unit's training data. NRG later submitted expanded training data and new operating ranges for all eight units.
Follow-up
- Conditions for replication
-
Inputs must stay within the range of the training data, or NRG must report the unit's maximum potential NOx rate. A unit whose combustion system changes must have its PEMS recertified before its data count.
Entry details
- Sector
-
Environment and climate.
- Purpose
-
CMC Solutions built SmartCEM-75 to predict a unit's NOx emissions from its sensor readings so that the prediction can serve as the unit's emissions monitor.
Not yet checked: model, release, provider, role, configuration, inputs and outputs, autonomy, human oversight, AI contribution, beneficiaries, reach, distribution and access, duration, every measurement question, every money question, ownership and control, dependencies, cross-border connections, geopolitical implications, replication attempts, availability, institutional decision, grounds, action and result, success criterion, every evidence question, observed or intended, alternative assessments, related entries, other identifiers, category mappings.
Cite this record
Peter H. Vartanian. (2026). SmartCEM-75 models match NOx analyzers on eight Houston turbines (AIBD-0845). Artificial Intelligence Benefits Database, edition of 31 October 2026. https://petervartanian.xyz/aibd/records/AIBD-0845.html (archived at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AADSII, version 4.0)