Skip to content

MelaFind caught nearly all melanomas at very low specificity

In FDA's review of MelaFind, the device detected 112 of 114 melanomas (98.3%), with 10.6% specificity against 5.5% for the study dermatologists.

  • Not rated an organization

    Dermatologists did not see the device results in the blinded study, so no biopsy decision changed because of it.

Depth runs from 1, a convenience or time saved, to 5, a life or a livelihood preserved.

Status
Intended benefit.
Evidence

found, the grade of this recordstudiedreportedclaimed

An independent regulatory document supports the benefit.

Compared with

Study dermatologists' specificity on the same lesions. Measured.

Without the system
5.5%
With it
10.6%
The system’s part
Not isolated. FDA reviewers compared the device's output with dermatologists' biopsy decisions on the same lesions. Dermatologists did not use the output in either study, so its effect on their decisions is not measured.
Limits
Not yet checked.
Costs and harms
Not yet checked.
Later
Not yet checked.
Benefit type
Improved Task Accuracy
System
MelaFind
Made by
MELA Sciences, Inc.
Used by
Seven dermatology sites in the blinded study (Protocol 20061) and physicians in a web-based reader study (Protocol 20063)
Where
Seven dermatology sites, United States
Stage
In a pilot
Date
, when the source was published
Kind
Aggregate result
Broad benefit
Identifying Objects, Actions, and Events
Collections
Scrutiny and findings
Last revised
31 October 2026

Sources

  1. Regulatory document, by authors with no tie to the system.

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data (SSED), P090012: MelaFind. Approved 2011-11-01.

    MelaFind sensitivity was 97%, which was statistically significantly superior to that of 110 dermatologists who, on the average, missed (i.e., elected not to biopsy) 28% of melanomas in this electronic study (p-value < 0.0001).

Details

AI system

Workflow

Operators cleaned the lesion with alcohol and held the imager steady for 2-3 seconds. Five earlier clinical studies developed the classifier before the blinded study tested it.

Follow-up

Conditions for replication

The lesion is clinically atypical and has no clinical diagnosis of melanoma. The user is a dermatologist who has completed training in the device. Lesions that the device cannot evaluate are considered for biopsy.

Entry details

Sector

Healthcare.

Purpose

MELA Sciences built MelaFind to give dermatologists more information about atypical pigmented lesions when they decide whether to biopsy to rule out melanoma.

Not yet checked: model, release, provider, role, configuration, inputs and outputs, autonomy, human oversight, AI contribution, beneficiaries, reach, distribution and access, duration, every measurement question, every money question, ownership and control, dependencies, cross-border connections, geopolitical implications, replication attempts, availability, institutional decision, grounds, action and result, success criterion, every evidence question, observed or intended, alternative assessments, related entries, other identifiers, category mappings.

Cite this record

Peter H. Vartanian. (2026). MelaFind caught nearly all melanomas at very low specificity (AIBD-0795). Artificial Intelligence Benefits Database, edition of 31 October 2026. https://petervartanian.xyz/aibd/records/AIBD-0795.html (archived at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AADSII, version 4.0)

BibTeX Data Field definitions