Skip to content

Rho flags low bone density on routine x-rays but misses many cases

In FDA's review of Rho, the software met its goals for specificity and AUC on x-rays from three datasets. Its sensitivity was 0.36 to 0.67, and FDA saw a small probable benefit.

  • Not rated an organization

    The accuracy figures come from archived x-rays, and no patient was referred because of the software.

Depth runs from 1, a convenience or time saved, to 5, a life or a livelihood preserved.

Status
Intended benefit.
Evidence

found, the grade of this recordstudiedreportedclaimed

An independent regulatory document supports the benefit.

Compared with

Pre-specified goals for specificity and AUC, with DXA as the reference. Measured.

Without the system
Specificity goal of a lower 95% bound above 0.775
With it
Specificity 0.90 (TNI), 0.93 (OMN) and 0.94 (OAI)
The system’s part
Not isolated. The study measured accuracy against DXA in archived cases. It did not compare assessments of bone health with and without the software.
Limits
Not yet checked.
Costs and harms
Not yet checked.
Later
Not yet checked.
Benefit type
Improved Task Accuracy
System
Rho
Made by
16 Bit Inc.
Used by
16 Bit (retrospective study on x-rays from True North Imaging, OneMedNet and the Osteoarthritis Initiative)
Where
Six True North Imaging centers in Ontario, Canada, and US sites of OneMedNet and the Osteoarthritis Initiative
Stage
Tested in a laboratory
Date
, when the source was published
Kind
Aggregate result
Broad benefit
Identifying Objects, Actions, and Events
Collections
Scrutiny and findings, Cross-border records
Last revised
31 October 2026

Sources

  1. Regulatory document, by authors with no tie to the system.

    U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. De Novo classification request for Rho (DEN230023): decision summary. Granted 2024-04-09.

    The device met its performance goals of specificity and AUC in all three datasets.

Details

AI system

Workflow

The software read frontal x-rays taken for other clinical reasons, with the patient's age and sex. A report went to the radiologist only for positive cases.

Follow-up

Conditions for replication

The patient is 50 or older and has an eligible frontal x-ray. A negative result must not be read as ruling out low bone density.

Entry details

Sector

Healthcare.

Purpose

16 Bit built Rho to flag patients with possible low bone density on x-rays taken for other reasons, to prompt an assessment of bone health.

Not yet checked: model, release, provider, role, configuration, inputs and outputs, autonomy, human oversight, AI contribution, beneficiaries, reach, distribution and access, duration, every measurement question, every money question, ownership and control, dependencies, cross-border connections, geopolitical implications, replication attempts, availability, institutional decision, grounds, action and result, success criterion, every evidence question, observed or intended, alternative assessments, related entries, other identifiers, category mappings.

Cite this record

Peter H. Vartanian. (2026). Rho flags low bone density on routine x-rays but misses many cases (AIBD-0769). Artificial Intelligence Benefits Database, edition of 31 October 2026. https://petervartanian.xyz/aibd/records/AIBD-0769.html (archived at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AADSII, version 4.0)

BibTeX Data Field definitions