Skip to content

NICE assessors estimate that DERM could halve urgent skin referrals

NICE found that DERM detects skin cancer about as accurately as teledermatology or face-to-face review. Its assessors estimated that automated DERM could about halve urgent dermatologist referrals.

  • 2 an organization

    NICE's assessors estimated that automated DERM could about halve urgent referrals to a dermatologist among eligible lesions.

Depth runs from 1, a convenience or time saved, to 5, a life or a livelihood preserved.

Status
Reported and intended benefits.
Evidence

found, the grade of this recordstudiedreportedclaimed

Two independent assessment reports support the benefit.

Compared with

Face-to-face dermatologist review (DERM-003 study). Measured.

Without the system
93.8% sensitivity for cancer
With it
96.0% sensitivity for cancer
The system’s part
Two studies compared DERM's sensitivity for cancer with face-to-face dermatologists and with teledermatology on the same lesions. The halving of referrals is an estimate by NICE's assessors.
Limits
Not yet checked.
Costs and harms
Not yet checked.
Later
Not yet checked.
Benefit type
Improved Organizational Efficiency
System
DERM (Deep Ensemble for Recognition of Malignancy)
Made by
Skin Analytics
Used by
NHS teledermatology services in England, including sites already using DERM
Where
England, United Kingdom
Stage
In routine use
Date
, when the source was published
Kind
Aggregate result
Broad benefit
Identifying Objects, Actions, and Events, Making Decisions and Solving Problems
Collections
Scrutiny and findings
Last revised
31 October 2026

Sources

  1. Assessment report, by authors with no tie to the system.

    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies for assessing and triaging skin lesions referred to the urgent suspected skin cancer pathway: early value assessment. HealthTech guidance HTG746, section 1: Recommendations. 1 May 2025, last updated 17 March 2026.

    Comparative evidence suggests that DERM may be able to identify a cancer lesion with similar accuracy to teledermatology or face-to-face dermatology assessment. Using automated DERM could identify more non-cancer lesions that do not need further review and so redirect more cases to non-urgent dermatology pathways compared with using teledermatology alone.
  2. Assessment report, by authors with no tie to the system.

    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. HTG746, section 3: Committee discussion. 1 May 2025, last updated 17 March 2026.

    An analysis by the EAG suggested that, of eligible lesions, automated use of DERM could approximately halve the number of referrals to a dermatologist within the urgent skin cancer pathway.

Details

AI system

Workflow

DERM assessed lesion images after a primary care referral to the urgent suspected skin cancer pathway. DERM ran alone or with a clinician's second read.

Follow-up

Conditions for replication

A clinician reviews the lesions of people with black or brown skin. Services monitor DERM's accuracy regularly.

Entry details

Sector

Healthcare (dermatology).

Purpose

Skin Analytics built DERM to assess skin lesion images and identify lesions that are not cancer so that they can leave the urgent skin cancer pathway.

Not yet checked: model, release, provider, role, configuration, inputs and outputs, autonomy, human oversight, beneficiaries, reach, distribution and access, duration, every measurement question, every money question, ownership and control, dependencies, cross-border connections, geopolitical implications, replication attempts, availability, institutional decision, grounds, action and result, success criterion, every evidence question, observed or intended, alternative assessments, related entries, other identifiers, category mappings.

Cite this record

Peter H. Vartanian. (2026). NICE assessors estimate that DERM could halve urgent skin referrals (AIBD-0738). Artificial Intelligence Benefits Database, edition of 31 October 2026. https://petervartanian.xyz/aibd/records/AIBD-0738.html (archived at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AADSII, version 4.0)

BibTeX Data Field definitions