What happened
Skatteetaten, the Norwegian Tax Administration, built Fradragsmodellen in-house and has used it since 2014, with the current version from 2022. The model predicts the risk of errors in the deductions that taxpayers claim. It was trained mainly on deduction data, tax returns and taxpayer information. Caseworkers use its predictions to pick returns for control, and they decide whether a control goes ahead. Riksrevisjonen, the Office of the Auditor General, studied the model as one of four AI cases in a report dated 2 September 2024. It reports that the hit rate of controls using the model has risen. It also reports that these controls uncover more kroner on average. As an example, it states that the model's controls had a tax effect of 309 million kroner in 2021. The auditor notes that this is the only one of the four systems that has been systematically evaluated. The auditor gives no hit rates and does not say what controls picked without the model would have found.
Sources
-
Report, by authors with no tie to the system.
Som ett eksempel har skatteetatens fradragsmodell for risikobasert kontrollutplukk av skattefradrag gitt svært lønnsomme kontroller med en skattevirkning på 309 millioner kroner i 2021.
Details
AI system
- Workflow
-
The model was trained mainly on deduction data, tax returns and taxpayer information. The model's predictions supported caseworkers in picking tax returns for control.
Money
- Kind of value
-
Tax effect of the controls that the deduction model picked in 2021
- Amount
-
309 millioner kroner
- Recipients and payers
-
The Norwegian state
Follow-up
- Conditions for replication
-
A caseworker decides whether each control goes ahead. The agency needs legal authority to use its own data for analysis and system development.
Entry details
- Sector
-
Tax compliance.
- Purpose
-
Skatteetaten built Fradragsmodellen to predict the risk of errors in claimed tax deductions and to pick tax returns for control.
Not yet checked: model, release, provider, role, configuration, inputs and outputs, autonomy, human oversight, AI contribution, beneficiaries, reach, distribution and access, duration, every measurement question, currency and prices, period and unit, realization, gross or net, included costs, comparison, method, return and payback, ownership and control, dependencies, cross-border connections, geopolitical implications, replication attempts, availability, institutional decision, grounds, action and result, success criterion, every evidence question, observed or intended, alternative assessments, related entries, other identifiers, category mappings.
Cite this record
Peter H. Vartanian. (2026). Fradragsmodellen picks more profitable tax controls in Norway (AIBD-0709). Artificial Intelligence Benefits Database, edition of 31 October 2026. https://petervartanian.xyz/aibd/records/AIBD-0709.html (archived at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AADSII, version 4.0)