What happened
The CMU-C gave free complementary health cover to people on low incomes until November 2019, when the complémentaire santé solidaire replaced it. From 2014, the Caisse nationale de l'assurance maladie (Cnam) tested data mining for several kinds of checks. Only its model for after-the-fact checks of CMU-C files came to fruition. The Cnam spread the model from 2018, and all of its local funds have used it since June 2019. In a report of September 2020, the Cour des comptes found that the model helped raise the share of selected files with irregularities. The share reached 24% in 2018, including 9% classed as fraud. The Cour gives no rate from before the model and does not describe how it works. It notes that the Cnam's other trials of data mining did not come to fruition.
Sources
-
Audit report, by authors with no tie to the system.
Cour des comptes. La lutte contre les fraudes aux prestations sociales. Communication à la commission des affaires sociales de l’Assemblée nationale, September 2020, p. 51.
La diffusion progressive de ce dispositif à partir de 2018 a contribué à accroître la fréquence des irrégularités détectées sur les dossiers sélectionnés au contrôle (24 % en 2018, dont 9 % qualifiées de frauduleuses).
Details
AI system
- Workflow
-
The model selected CMU-C files for after-the-fact checks by the local funds.
Follow-up
- Conditions for replication
-
The local funds must check the files that the model selects.
Entry details
- Sector
-
Health insurance (complementary cover for people on low incomes).
- Purpose
-
The Cnam built the model to select CMU-C files for after-the-fact checks.
Not yet checked: model, release, provider, role, configuration, inputs and outputs, autonomy, human oversight, AI contribution, beneficiaries, reach, distribution and access, duration, every measurement question, every money question, ownership and control, dependencies, cross-border connections, geopolitical implications, replication attempts, availability, institutional decision, grounds, action and result, success criterion, every evidence question, observed or intended, alternative assessments, related entries, other identifiers, category mappings.
Cite this record
Peter H. Vartanian. (2026). Health insurer's datamining model finds more irregular CMU-C files (AIBD-0687). Artificial Intelligence Benefits Database, edition of 31 October 2026. https://petervartanian.xyz/aibd/records/AIBD-0687.html (archived at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/AADSII, version 4.0)