AI system
- System
-
ChatGPT
- Model
-
Not assessed
- Release
-
Not assessed
- Application developer
-
OpenAI - Role
-
Not assessed
- Configuration
-
Not assessed
- Inputs and outputs
-
Not assessed
- Autonomy
-
Not assessed
- Workflow
-
A patient with a long list of concrete symptoms (gait, incontinence, sensory loss, reflex changes, seizures) and no settled diagnosis. Entry of the symptom list into a general large language model (LLM). A GP willing to test a patient-sourced hypothesis and access to genetic testing.
- Human oversight
-
Not assessed
- Relation to AI
-
By her account the chatbot produced a list of candidates that included HSP. She decided to take it to her GP. The GP ordered genetic testing, and the test made the diagnosis. The prompt, the model version and the full candidate list are not reported. Only news reports quoting the patient are among the sources. The health board declined to comment on the case.
- AI contribution
-
By her account the chatbot produced a list of candidates that included HSP. She decided to take it to her GP. The GP ordered genetic testing, and the test made the diagnosis. The prompt, the model version and the full candidate list are not reported. Only news reports quoting the patient are among the sources. The health board declined to comment on the case.
Benefits
- Outcome identifiers
-
Not assessed
- Benefit
-
A Cardiff teacher put her symptoms into ChatGPT after a coma; it listed hereditary spastic paraplegia, her GP called it plausible and genetic testing confirmed it in August 2025 (BBC, WalesOnline).
- Category
-
Improved Physical Health
- Status
-
Not assessed
- Beneficiary groups
-
People.
- Beneficiaries
-
Not assessed
- Reach
-
Not assessed
- Distribution and access
-
Not assessed
- Duration
-
Not assessed
- Expected?
-
No
- Costs and harms
-
Not assessed
Measurement
- Studies
-
Not assessed
- Study design
-
Not assessed
- Measurement
-
Not assessed
- Setting and sample
-
Not assessed
- Measures
-
Not assessed
- Comparison
-
Assumed alternative: four years of diagnoses by doctors (anxiety, depression, epilepsy)
- Results
-
Assumed comparison. Reference: she was told she was anxious, depressed, had epilepsy. Result: Genetic testing then confirmed the AI suggestion.
- Additional value from AI
-
Not assessed
- Limitations
-
Not assessed
- Denominators
-
Not assessed
- Materials for replication
-
Not assessed
Money
- Kind of value
-
Not assessed
- Amount
-
Not assessed
- Currency and prices
-
Not assessed
- Period and unit
-
Not assessed
- Realization
-
Not assessed
- Recipients and payers
-
Not assessed
- Gross or net
-
Not assessed
- Included costs
-
Not assessed
- Comparison
-
Not assessed
- Method
-
Not assessed
- Return and payback
-
Not assessed
People and places
- Participants
-
Developer:
OpenAI. - Jurisdictions
-
Benefit: Cardiff,
United Kingdom. Developer:
United States. - Ownership and control
-
Not assessed
- Dependencies
-
Not assessed
- Cross-border connections
-
Not assessed
- Geopolitical implications
-
Not assessed
Follow-up
- Conditions for replication
-
The true condition is among the candidates the model lists and the patient pursues it. Clinicians confirm by genetic testing rather than accepting the suggestion.
- Replication attempts
-
Not assessed
- Later findings
-
Nothing dated after the April 2026 reports was found; WalesOnline says she is fundraising for a specialist wheelchair and there is no treatment.
- Availability
-
Not assessed
- Institutional decision
-
Not assessed
- Grounds
-
Not assessed
- Action and result
-
Not assessed
- Success criterion
-
Not assessed
Evidence
- Source numbers
-
AIBD-0305-source-0001–0003
- Citations
-
Numbered references below.
- Language
-
Not assessed
- Source relationships
-
Independent
- Original evidence
-
Not assessed
- Access and versions
-
Not assessed
- Supported findings
-
Not assessed
- Evidence links
-
Not assessed
- Evidence strength
-
Not assessed
- Missing evidence
-
Not assessed
Grades
- Assessed benefits
-
People.
- Depth
-
People: 2.
- Reasons
-
People: A confirmed diagnosis replaced “anxiety” on her records and lets her plan care and equipment. The condition is progressive with no treatment. So the gain is certainty and appropriate management rather than a changed prognosis.
- Observed or intended
-
Not assessed
- Rubric
-
Not assessed
- Assessor and date
-
Not assessed
- Alternative assessments
-
Not assessed
- Fill
-
Independently reported
Entry details
- Kind
-
Not assessed
- Related entries
-
Not assessed
- Field
-
Healthcare (rare-disease diagnosis). Patient-initiated use of a consumer LLM.
- Purpose
-
ChatGPT is a general-purpose chatbot not built or cleared for diagnosis. The patient used it to generate candidate conditions from her symptom list.
- Dates
-
Date basis unassessed: 2025 (precision unassessed). Updated: 21 October 2026.
- Stage
-
Not assessed
- Version
-
SHA-256: d355588efc47…
References
- Other identifiers
-
Not assessed
- Category mappings
-
Not assessed
- Brief
-
Not assessed
- Revisions
-
6 revisions. Latest: 21 October 2026.
Sources
-
News report Independent author
Herbert D (2026). ChatGPT 'uncovered woman's rare condition' after years of misdiagnosis. BBC Wales, 10 April 2026.
The chatbot came back with a list of possible conditions, including hereditary spastic paraplegia.
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board said: "We are sorry to hear about Phoebe's experience while in our care."
-
News report Independent author
Phillips E / SWNS (2026). Cardiff woman uses Chat GPT to uncover rare condition doctor thought was anxiety. WalesOnline, 6 April 2026.
Phoebe underwent genetic testing which confirmed in August 2025 that she had the complex quadriplegic type of the condition
Collections: Cross-border cases.