AI system
- System
-
Smartwatch low-heart-rate alert (brand and model not stated)
- Model
-
Not assessed
- Release
-
Not assessed
- Application developer
-
Not stated (the report does not name the device's maker)
- Role
-
Not assessed
- Configuration
-
Not assessed
- Inputs and outputs
-
Not assessed
- Autonomy
-
Not assessed
- Workflow
-
A wearer on a newly prescribed drug whose smartwatch has a low-heart-rate alert enabled. Symptoms vague enough that the alert, not the symptoms alone, prompted presentation. Clinicians who excluded other causes and withdrew the suspected drug.
- Human oversight
-
Not assessed
- Relation to AI
-
The watch's sustained low-heart-rate alert, combined with her symptoms, is what the authors say prompted the hospital visit. Telemetry confirmed the rate and clinicians identified ciprofloxacin by exclusion and re-challenge-free withdrawal. The threshold alert is a simple rule on a photoplethysmographic heart-rate estimate, and the brand is unknown, so no learned model can be credited.
- AI contribution
-
The watch's sustained low-heart-rate alert, combined with her symptoms, is what the authors say prompted the hospital visit. Telemetry confirmed the rate and clinicians identified ciprofloxacin by exclusion and re-challenge-free withdrawal. The threshold alert is a simple rule on a photoplethysmographic heart-rate estimate, and the brand is unknown, so no learned model can be credited.
Benefits
- Outcome identifiers
-
Not assessed
- Benefit
-
by the next day her heart rate was 60–70 bpm
- Category
-
Improved Physical Health
- Status
-
Not assessed
- Beneficiary groups
-
People.
- Beneficiaries
-
Not assessed
- Reach
-
Not assessed
- Distribution and access
-
Not assessed
- Duration
-
Not assessed
- Expected?
-
Yes
- Costs and harms
-
Not assessed
Measurement
- Studies
-
Not assessed
- Study design
-
Not assessed
- Measurement
-
Not assessed
- Setting and sample
-
Not assessed
- Measures
-
by the next day her heart rate was 60–70 bpm
- Comparison
-
Assumed alternative: presentation without the smartwatch alert
- Results
-
Assumed comparison. Reference: a potential adverse event. Result: Early recognition of bradycardia.
- Additional value from AI
-
Not assessed
- Limitations
-
Not assessed
- Denominators
-
Not assessed
- Materials for replication
-
Not assessed
Money
- Kind of value
-
Not assessed
- Amount
-
Not assessed
- Currency and prices
-
Not assessed
- Period and unit
-
Not assessed
- Realization
-
Not assessed
- Recipients and payers
-
Not assessed
- Gross or net
-
Not assessed
- Included costs
-
Not assessed
- Comparison
-
Not assessed
- Method
-
Not assessed
- Return and payback
-
Not assessed
People and places
- Participants
-
Developer: Not stated (the report does not name the device's maker).
- Jurisdictions
-
Benefit: Syracuse,
United States. - Ownership and control
-
Not assessed
- Dependencies
-
Not assessed
- Cross-border connections
-
Not assessed
- Geopolitical implications
-
Not assessed
Follow-up
- Conditions for replication
-
The bradycardia is sustained long enough to trip the watch's threshold. The wearer treats the alert as a reason to seek care.
- Replication attempts
-
Not assessed
- Later findings
-
Nothing after discharge on cefpodoxime and metronidazole was found.
- Availability
-
Not assessed
- Institutional decision
-
Not assessed
- Grounds
-
Not assessed
- Action and result
-
Not assessed
- Success criterion
-
Not assessed
Evidence
- Source numbers
-
AIBD-0289-source-0001–0003
- Citations
-
Numbered references below.
- Language
-
Not assessed
- Source relationships
-
Independent
- Original evidence
-
Not assessed
- Access and versions
-
Not assessed
- Supported findings
-
Not assessed
- Evidence links
-
Not assessed
- Evidence strength
-
Not assessed
- Missing evidence
-
Not assessed
Grades
- Assessed benefits
-
People.
- Depth
-
People: 2.
- Reasons
-
People: The alert led to recognition of symptomatic drug-induced bradycardia and a change of antibiotic, after which her heart rate normalized. The authors say a potential adverse event was prevented but document no event that was imminent.
- Observed or intended
-
Not assessed
- Rubric
-
Not assessed
- Assessor and date
-
Not assessed
- Alternative assessments
-
Not assessed
- Fill
-
Independently studied
Entry details
- Kind
-
Not assessed
- Related entries
-
Not assessed
- Field
-
Healthcare (cardiology; adverse drug reaction). Consumer wearables.
- Purpose
-
Smartwatch low-heart-rate alerts are built to prompt the wearer to seek review; this alert was that purpose. The authors add that consumer wearables may surface less commonly reported medication side effects.
- Dates
-
Date basis unassessed: 2022 (precision unassessed). Updated: 21 October 2026.
- Stage
-
Not assessed
- Version
-
SHA-256: ca30118c9445…
References
- Other identifiers
-
Not assessed
- Category mappings
-
Not assessed
- Brief
-
Not assessed
- Revisions
-
4 revisions. Latest: 21 October 2026.
Sources
-
Case report Independent author
Cordova Sanchez A, Chohan M, Olatunde O, White C (2022). A Rare Case of Ciprofloxacin-Induced Bradycardia Recognized by a Smartwatch. Journal of Investigative Medicine High Impact Case Reports 10:23247096211069761. doi:10.1177/23247096211069761 (PMC8793425).
Her smartwatch had triggered an alert for a sustained heart rate of less than 40 beats per minute (bpm), prompting her to present to the Emergency Department
She was placed on continuous telemetry and ciprofloxacin was replaced with ceftriaxone.
Early recognition of bradycardia prevented a potential adverse event.