Face2Gene's DeepGestalt changes geneticists' testing in 17 cases

Rudy et al. (Am J Med Genet A, online 4 July 2025) report 17 cases/19 patients in which DeepGestalt changed geneticists' testing decisions; full text inaccessible, so no per-patient detail.

21ⓘ

AI system

System

Face2Gene (DeepGestalt facial phenotyping)

Model

Not assessed

Release

Not assessed

Application developer

FDNA

Role

Not assessed

Configuration

Not assessed

Inputs and outputs

Not assessed

Autonomy

Not assessed

Workflow

Geneticists uploading facial photographs and clinical features to Face2Gene during consultations. Cases where recognition was hard: atypical presentation, overlapping dysmorphology or phenotypes across ancestries, per the abstract.

Human oversight

Not assessed

Relation to AI

The authors state that DeepGestalt's suggestions changed geneticists' testing decisions in real time in all 17 cases. The clinicians, not the software, made the diagnoses. The assessment rests on the abstract alone because the full text was unreadable. One co-author is an FDNA employee. The other 15 are at clinical institutions.

AI contribution

The authors state that DeepGestalt's suggestions changed geneticists' testing decisions in real time in all 17 cases. The clinicians, not the software, made the diagnoses. The assessment rests on the abstract alone because the full text was unreadable. One co-author is an FDNA employee. The other 15 are at clinical institutions.

Benefits

Outcome identifiers

Not assessed

Benefit

17 cases involving 19 patients

Category

Improved Physical Health

Status

Not assessed

Beneficiary groups

People. Organizations.

Beneficiaries

Not assessed

Reach

Not assessed

Distribution and access

Not assessed

Duration

Not assessed

Expected?

Yes

Costs and harms

Not assessed

Measurement

Studies

Not assessed

Study design

Not assessed

Measurement

Not assessed

Setting and sample

Not assessed

Measures

17 cases involving 19 patients

Comparison

the testing strategy the medical geneticists had planned before the software's suggestion

Results

Result: changed medical geneticists' testing decisions in 17 cases involving 19 patients.

Additional value from AI

Not assessed

Limitations

Not assessed

Denominators

Not assessed

Materials for replication

Not assessed

Money

Kind of value

Not assessed

Amount

Not assessed

Currency and prices

Not assessed

Period and unit

Not assessed

Realization

Not assessed

Recipients and payers

Not assessed

Gross or net

Not assessed

Included costs

Not assessed

Comparison

Not assessed

Method

Not assessed

Return and payback

Not assessed

People and places

Participants

Developer: FDNA. Operator: Clinical genetics services at the authors' institutions in the United States, Georgia, Italy and Canada (per Crossref affiliations).

Jurisdictions

Benefit: United States, Georgia, Italy and Canada (authors' institutions; case locations not readable). Developer: United States.

Ownership and control

Not assessed

Dependencies

Not assessed

Cross-border connections

Not assessed

Geopolitical implications

Not assessed

Follow-up

Conditions for replication

The true syndrome is represented in DeepGestalt's training data. Clinicians act on the suggestion by changing the test ordered and confirm by molecular testing.

Replication attempts

1 follow-up entries. Benefit recurred: 1.

Later findings

The abstract provides no later development.

Availability

Not assessed

Institutional decision

Not assessed

Grounds

Not assessed

Action and result

Not assessed

Success criterion

Not assessed

Evidence

Source numbers

AIBD-0281-source-0001–0002

Citations

Numbered references below.

Language

Not assessed

Source relationships

Developer, Independent

Original evidence

Not assessed

Access and versions

Not assessed

Supported findings

Not assessed

Evidence strength

Not assessed

Missing evidence

Not assessed

Grades

Assessed benefits

People. Organizations.

Depth

People: 2. Organizations: 1.

Reasons

People: DeepGestalt changed medical geneticists' testing decisions in 17 cases involving 19 patients, per the abstract read on Europe PMC. That is a measurable change in the test strategy itself. What diagnoses or treatment followed is not stated. The full text is inaccessible. Organizations: The authors claim “a more efficient test strategy”. No counts of tests avoided or time saved are readable in the abstract.

Observed or intended

Not assessed

Rubric

Not assessed

Assessor and date

Not assessed

Alternative assessments

Not assessed

Fill

The makers' claim

Entry details

Kind

Not assessed

Field

Healthcare / clinical genetics. Rare disease diagnosis.

Purpose

Face2Gene is built to suggest candidate syndromes from facial photographs and clinical features so that geneticists can direct testing. Changed testing decisions were that purpose.

Dates

Date basis unassessed: 2025 (precision unassessed). Updated: 21 October 2026.

Stage

Not assessed

Version

SHA-256: 1c55708b4240…

References

Other identifiers

Not assessed

Category mappings

Not assessed

Brief

Not assessed

Revisions

7 revisions. Latest: 21 October 2026.

Sources

  1. Case report Developer

    Rudy NL, Gomes A, Tkemaladze T, Abdul-Rahman O, Cratsenberg D, Pascolini G, Di Zenzo G, Castiglia D, Black E, Washington C, Chad L, Curry C, Del Campo M, Fleischer N, Bird LM, Hurst ACE (2025). Artificial Intelligence Software Changes Rare Disease Testing Strategy in Real Time: An International Case Series Using Face2Gene. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 197(11); online 4 July 2025. Abstract read on Europe PMC (PMID 40613735); one author at FDNA Inc.

  2. Other Independent author

    Crossref metadata for doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.64171 (author affiliations, online date 4 July 2025, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence); the publisher page itself returned a security block.