Pindrop traces the Biden New Hampshire robocall to ElevenLabs

After a deepfake Biden robocall targeted New Hampshire's Jan 2024 primary, Pindrop's analysis against 120+ voice engines pointed to ElevenLabs; Hany Farid's Berkeley team reached the same conclusion.

AI system

System

Pindrop deepfake audio analysis (voice-engine attribution)

Model

Not assessed

Release

Not assessed

Application developer

Pindrop

Role

Not assessed

Configuration

Not assessed

Inputs and outputs

Not assessed

Autonomy

Not assessed

Workflow

A clean audio sample of the deepfake. A library of fingerprints for many commercial voice-synthesis engines. A second, independent model run on the same sample.

Human oversight

Not assessed

Relation to AI

The attribution is the vendor's own analysis, reported by WIRED with named sources and independently replicated by Farid's team. ElevenLabs did not comment on the incident. The sources document no harm stopped and do not link the later charges against Kramer or the FCC fine to Pindrop's finding.

AI contribution

The attribution is the vendor's own analysis, reported by WIRED with named sources and independently replicated by Farid's team. ElevenLabs did not comment on the incident. The sources document no harm stopped and do not link the later charges against Kramer or the FCC fine to Pindrop's finding.

Benefits

Outcome identifiers

Not assessed

Benefit

the result came back well north of 99 percent for ElevenLabs

Category

Improved Knowledge Discovery

Status

Not assessed

Beneficiary groups

Society.

Beneficiaries

Not assessed

Reach

Not assessed

Distribution and access

Not assessed

Duration

Not assessed

Expected?

Yes

Costs and harms

Not assessed

Measurement

Studies

Not assessed

Study design

Not assessed

Measurement

Not assessed

Setting and sample

Not assessed

Measures

the result came back well north of 99 percent for ElevenLabs

Comparison

Not assessed

Results

the result came back well north of 99 percent for ElevenLabs

Additional value from AI

Not assessed

Limitations

Not assessed

Denominators

Not assessed

Materials for replication

Not assessed

Money

Kind of value

Not assessed

Amount

Not assessed

Currency and prices

Not assessed

Period and unit

Not assessed

Realization

Not assessed

Recipients and payers

Not assessed

Gross or net

Not assessed

Included costs

Not assessed

Comparison

Not assessed

Method

Not assessed

Return and payback

Not assessed

People and places

Participants

Developer: Pindrop. Operator: Pindrop (developer and deployer are the same company); independent corroboration by Hany Farid's UC Berkeley model.

Jurisdictions

Developer: United States. Operator: United States.

Ownership and control

Not assessed

Dependencies

Not assessed

Cross-border connections

Not assessed

Geopolitical implications

Not assessed

Follow-up

Conditions for replication

The generating engine must be among those fingerprinted. Sample length and quality sufficient for attribution.

Replication attempts

Not assessed

Later findings

23 May 2024. Four months later Steven Kramer was indicted in New Hampshire on 26 charges and the FCC proposed a $6 million fine; the cited sources do not tie those actions to Pindrop's analysis.

Availability

Not assessed

Institutional decision

Not assessed

Grounds

Not assessed

Action and result

Not assessed

Success criterion

Not assessed

Evidence

Source numbers

AIBD-0229-source-0001–0002

Citations

Numbered references below.

Language

Not assessed

Source relationships

Independent

Original evidence

Not assessed

Access and versions

Not assessed

Supported findings

Not assessed

Evidence strength

Not assessed

Missing evidence

Not assessed

Grades

Assessed benefits

Society.

Depth

Society: 1.

Reasons

Society: Public attribution of the robocall's toolchain, corroborated by an academic team. No enforcement outcome in the sources is traced to the analysis.

Observed or intended

Not assessed

Rubric

Not assessed

Assessor and date

Not assessed

Alternative assessments

Not assessed

Fill

Independently reported

Entry details

Kind

Not assessed

Field

Election integrity / deepfake detection. Technology.

Purpose

Identify synthetic (deepfake) audio and attribute it to the generating system.

Dates

Date basis unassessed: 2024 (precision unassessed). Updated: 22 October 2026.

Stage

Not assessed

Version

SHA-256: 8214b8556bab…

References

Other identifiers

Not assessed

Category mappings

Not assessed

Brief

Not assessed

Revisions

5 revisions. Latest: 22 October 2026.

Sources

  1. News report Independent author

    Kate Knibbs, WIRED, 26 Jan 2024

  2. News report Independent author

    Todd Bookman, New Hampshire Public Radio, 23 May 2024