AI system
- System
-
Team AI algorithms in the Autonomous Greenhouse Challenge (2020: Automatoes, AiCU, DIGILOG, IUA.CAAS, The Automators)
- Model
-
Not assessed
- Release
-
Not assessed
- Application developer
-
International competing teams; challenge organized by Wageningen University & Research and funded by Tencent
- Role
-
Not assessed
- Configuration
-
Not assessed
- Inputs and outputs
-
Not assessed
- Autonomy
-
Not assessed
- Workflow
-
Six identical 96 m² compartments with heating, ventilation, screening, lighting, fogging, CO2, water and nutrient actuators. Teams combining horticultural and AI expertise setting setpoints via a digital interface. A reference compartment run manually by Dutch growers.
- Human oversight
-
Not assessed
- Relation to AI
-
Teams' algorithms set climate and crop setpoints remotely and their compartments out-earned a single manually run reference compartment in both editions. The organizers (WUR) authored the peer-reviewed reports and are independent of the competing teams. Results come from a sponsored competition, not a production deployment.
- AI contribution
-
Teams' algorithms set climate and crop setpoints remotely and their compartments out-earned a single manually run reference compartment in both editions. The organizers (WUR) authored the peer-reviewed reports and are independent of the competing teams. Results come from a sponsored competition, not a production deployment.
Benefits
- Outcome identifiers
-
Not assessed
- Benefit
-
winning algorithm raised sellable yield 6% and net profit 17% over reference growers
- Category
-
Increased Product Revenue
- Status
-
Not assessed
- Beneficiary groups
-
Organizations. Society.
- Beneficiaries
-
Not assessed
- Reach
-
Not assessed
- Distribution and access
-
Not assessed
- Duration
-
Not assessed
- Expected?
-
Yes
- Costs and harms
-
Not assessed
Measurement
- Studies
-
Not assessed
- Study design
-
Not assessed
- Measurement
-
Not assessed
- Setting and sample
-
Not assessed
- Measures
-
winning algorithm raised sellable yield 6% and net profit 17% over reference growers
- Comparison
-
Not assessed
- Results
-
winning algorithm raised sellable yield 6% and net profit 17% over reference growers
- Additional value from AI
-
Not assessed
- Limitations
-
Not assessed
- Denominators
-
Not assessed
- Materials for replication
-
Not assessed
Money
- Kind of value
-
Not assessed
- Amount
-
Not assessed
- Currency and prices
-
Not assessed
- Period and unit
-
Not assessed
- Realization
-
Not assessed
- Recipients and payers
-
Not assessed
- Gross or net
-
Not assessed
- Included costs
-
Not assessed
- Comparison
-
Not assessed
- Method
-
Not assessed
- Return and payback
-
Not assessed
People and places
- Participants
-
Developer: International competing teams; challenge organized by Wageningen University & Research and funded by Tencent. Operator: Wageningen University & Research greenhouse compartments, Bleiswijk.
- Jurisdictions
-
Benefit: Bleiswijk,
Netherlands. Operator:
Netherlands. - Ownership and control
-
Not assessed
- Dependencies
-
Not assessed
- Cross-border connections
-
Not assessed
- Geopolitical implications
-
Not assessed
Follow-up
- Conditions for replication
-
The organizers' simulated price and cost model for net profit. Sensor data exchanged with teams throughout the season.
- Replication attempts
-
1 follow-up entries. Outcome unresolved: 1.
- Later findings
-
Not assessed
- Availability
-
Not assessed
- Institutional decision
-
Not assessed
- Grounds
-
Not assessed
- Action and result
-
Not assessed
- Success criterion
-
Not assessed
Evidence
- Source numbers
-
AIBD-0200-source-0001–0002
- Citations
-
Numbered references below.
- Language
-
Not assessed
- Source relationships
-
Operator
- Original evidence
-
Not assessed
- Access and versions
-
Not assessed
- Supported findings
-
Not assessed
- Evidence links
-
Not assessed
- Evidence strength
-
Not assessed
- Missing evidence
-
Not assessed
Grades
- Assessed benefits
-
Organizations. Society.
- Depth
-
Not assessed
- Reasons
-
Organizations: Net-profit gains (17% in 2018; 3.10–6.86 €/m² versus a lower reference in 2020) are from 96 m² experimental compartments. They use the organizers' price and cost model, not a grower's accounts. Society: Resource-use differences are reported per compartment; no wider outcome is documented.
- Observed or intended
-
Not assessed
- Rubric
-
Not assessed
- Assessor and date
-
Not assessed
- Alternative assessments
-
Not assessed
- Fill
-
The deployer's account
Entry details
- Kind
-
Not assessed
- Related entries
-
Not assessed
- Field
-
Horticulture / greenhouse production. Greenhouse climate and irrigation control.
- Purpose
-
Control greenhouse climate, irrigation and crop management remotely with AI algorithms to maximize net profit with fewer resources.
- Dates
-
Date basis unassessed: 2020 (precision unassessed). Updated: 21 October 2026.
- Stage
-
Not assessed
- Version
-
SHA-256: b86f09c18fa3…
References
- Other identifiers
-
Not assessed
- Category mappings
-
Not assessed
- Brief
-
Not assessed
- Revisions
-
4 revisions. Latest: 21 October 2026.
Sources
-
Peer-reviewed study Deployer
Hemming S, de Zwart F, Elings A, Petropoulou A, Righini I. Cherry Tomato Production in Intelligent Greenhouses - Sensors and AI for Control of Climate, Irrigation, Crop Yield, and Quality. Sensors 20(22):6430 (2020). doi:10.3390/s20226430
Net profit ranged from 3.10 to 6.86 €/m². All AI operated greenhouses were able to reach higher net profits than the reference.
-
Peer-reviewed study Deployer
Hemming S, de Zwart F, Elings A, Righini I, Petropoulou A. Remote Control of Greenhouse Vegetable Production with Artificial Intelligence - Greenhouse Climate, Irrigation, and Crop Production. Sensors 19(8):1807 (2019). doi:10.3390/s19081807
We can conclude that in general AI performed well in controlling a greenhouse. One team outperformed the manually-grown reference.