AI teams out-earn growers in Wageningen's greenhouse challenges

2018 cucumber challenge: winning algorithm raised sellable yield 6% and net profit 17% over reference growers; 2020 cherry-tomato challenge: all five AI compartments beat the growers' net profit.

AI system

System

Team AI algorithms in the Autonomous Greenhouse Challenge (2020: Automatoes, AiCU, DIGILOG, IUA.CAAS, The Automators)

Model

Not assessed

Release

Not assessed

Application developer

International competing teams; challenge organized by Wageningen University & Research and funded by Tencent

Role

Not assessed

Configuration

Not assessed

Inputs and outputs

Not assessed

Autonomy

Not assessed

Workflow

Six identical 96 m² compartments with heating, ventilation, screening, lighting, fogging, CO2, water and nutrient actuators. Teams combining horticultural and AI expertise setting setpoints via a digital interface. A reference compartment run manually by Dutch growers.

Human oversight

Not assessed

Relation to AI

Teams' algorithms set climate and crop setpoints remotely and their compartments out-earned a single manually run reference compartment in both editions. The organizers (WUR) authored the peer-reviewed reports and are independent of the competing teams. Results come from a sponsored competition, not a production deployment.

AI contribution

Teams' algorithms set climate and crop setpoints remotely and their compartments out-earned a single manually run reference compartment in both editions. The organizers (WUR) authored the peer-reviewed reports and are independent of the competing teams. Results come from a sponsored competition, not a production deployment.

Benefits

Outcome identifiers

Not assessed

Benefit

winning algorithm raised sellable yield 6% and net profit 17% over reference growers

Category

Increased Product Revenue

Status

Not assessed

Beneficiary groups

Organizations. Society.

Beneficiaries

Not assessed

Reach

Not assessed

Distribution and access

Not assessed

Duration

Not assessed

Expected?

Yes

Costs and harms

Not assessed

Measurement

Studies

Not assessed

Study design

Not assessed

Measurement

Not assessed

Setting and sample

Not assessed

Measures

winning algorithm raised sellable yield 6% and net profit 17% over reference growers

Comparison

Not assessed

Results

winning algorithm raised sellable yield 6% and net profit 17% over reference growers

Additional value from AI

Not assessed

Limitations

Not assessed

Denominators

Not assessed

Materials for replication

Not assessed

Money

Kind of value

Not assessed

Amount

Not assessed

Currency and prices

Not assessed

Period and unit

Not assessed

Realization

Not assessed

Recipients and payers

Not assessed

Gross or net

Not assessed

Included costs

Not assessed

Comparison

Not assessed

Method

Not assessed

Return and payback

Not assessed

People and places

Participants

Developer: International competing teams; challenge organized by Wageningen University & Research and funded by Tencent. Operator: Wageningen University & Research greenhouse compartments, Bleiswijk.

Jurisdictions

Benefit: Bleiswijk, Netherlands. Operator: Netherlands.

Ownership and control

Not assessed

Dependencies

Not assessed

Cross-border connections

Not assessed

Geopolitical implications

Not assessed

Follow-up

Conditions for replication

The organizers' simulated price and cost model for net profit. Sensor data exchanged with teams throughout the season.

Replication attempts

1 follow-up entries. Outcome unresolved: 1.

Later findings

Not assessed

Availability

Not assessed

Institutional decision

Not assessed

Grounds

Not assessed

Action and result

Not assessed

Success criterion

Not assessed

Evidence

Source numbers

AIBD-0200-source-0001–0002

Citations

Numbered references below.

Language

Not assessed

Source relationships

Operator

Original evidence

Not assessed

Access and versions

Not assessed

Supported findings

Not assessed

Evidence strength

Not assessed

Missing evidence

Not assessed

Grades

Assessed benefits

Organizations. Society.

Depth

Not assessed

Reasons

Organizations: Net-profit gains (17% in 2018; 3.10–6.86 €/m² versus a lower reference in 2020) are from 96 m² experimental compartments. They use the organizers' price and cost model, not a grower's accounts. Society: Resource-use differences are reported per compartment; no wider outcome is documented.

Observed or intended

Not assessed

Rubric

Not assessed

Assessor and date

Not assessed

Alternative assessments

Not assessed

Fill

The deployer's account

Entry details

Kind

Not assessed

Field

Horticulture / greenhouse production. Greenhouse climate and irrigation control.

Purpose

Control greenhouse climate, irrigation and crop management remotely with AI algorithms to maximize net profit with fewer resources.

Dates

Date basis unassessed: 2020 (precision unassessed). Updated: 21 October 2026.

Stage

Not assessed

Version

SHA-256: b86f09c18fa3…

References

Other identifiers

Not assessed

Category mappings

Not assessed

Brief

Not assessed

Revisions

4 revisions. Latest: 21 October 2026.

Sources

  1. Peer-reviewed study Deployer

    Hemming S, de Zwart F, Elings A, Petropoulou A, Righini I. Cherry Tomato Production in Intelligent Greenhouses - Sensors and AI for Control of Climate, Irrigation, Crop Yield, and Quality. Sensors 20(22):6430 (2020). doi:10.3390/s20226430

  2. Peer-reviewed study Deployer

    Hemming S, de Zwart F, Elings A, Righini I, Petropoulou A. Remote Control of Greenhouse Vegetable Production with Artificial Intelligence - Greenhouse Climate, Irrigation, and Crop Production. Sensors 19(8):1807 (2019). doi:10.3390/s19081807