AI system
- System
-
GLAD (Global Land Analysis and Discovery) Landsat deforestation alerts on Global Forest Watch
- Model
-
Not assessed
- Release
-
Not assessed
- Application developer
-
University of Maryland GLAD laboratory (Hansen et al.)
- Role
-
Not assessed
- Configuration
-
Not assessed
- Inputs and outputs
-
Not assessed
- Autonomy
-
Not assessed
- Workflow
-
Weekly Landsat coverage and a conservative classifier. Free public platform with subscription-based alert delivery. Subscribers with enforcement or management capacity.
- Human oversight
-
Not assessed
- Relation to AI
-
The alerts are a machine-learning product (bagged decision trees). The evaluation attributes the 18 percent reduction to subscriptions to those alerts rather than to their mere availability. The evaluation's lead authors are independent economists, but co-authors are from WRI (operator) and the University of Maryland (producer).
- AI contribution
-
The alerts are a machine-learning product (bagged decision trees). The evaluation attributes the 18 percent reduction to subscriptions to those alerts rather than to their mere availability. The evaluation's lead authors are independent economists, but co-authors are from WRI (operator) and the University of Maryland (producer).
Benefits
- Outcome identifiers
-
Not assessed
- Benefit
-
decreased the probability of deforestation in Africa by 18 percent
- Category
-
Improved Environmental Sustainability
- Status
-
Not assessed
- Beneficiary groups
-
People. Organizations. Society.
- Beneficiaries
-
Not assessed
- Reach
-
Not assessed
- Distribution and access
-
Not assessed
- Duration
-
Not assessed
- Expected?
-
Yes
- Costs and harms
-
Not assessed
Measurement
- Studies
-
Not assessed
- Study design
-
Not assessed
- Measurement
-
Not assessed
- Setting and sample
-
Not assessed
- Measures
-
decreased the probability of deforestation in Africa by 18 percent
- Comparison
-
average 2011–2016 deforestation levels, with areas lacking alert subscribers as the counterfactual across 22 tropical countries
- Results
-
Reference: average 2011–2016 levels. Result: probability of deforestation in Africa decreased by 18%; no effect on other continents.
- Additional value from AI
-
Not assessed
- Limitations
-
Not assessed
- Denominators
-
Not assessed
- Materials for replication
-
Not assessed
Money
- Kind of value
-
value of avoided deforestation in Africa, priced at the social cost of carbon
- Amount
-
Estimate: between US$149 million and US$696 million
- Currency and prices
-
USD, stated in the source. Social-cost-of-carbon valuation; valuation and price year are not specified in the checked abstract.
- Period and unit
-
Comparison with pre-2016 deforestation; the checked abstract does not specify the valuation horizon. Modeled value of avoided deforestation in the African study sample.
- Realization
-
Modeled valuation.
- Recipients and payers
-
Recipient: People benefiting from avoided climate damage; no direct cash recipient. Payer: Not applicable to a social-cost valuation.
- Gross or net
-
Modeled climate value, not cash income, market revenue, or a fully costed net-benefit estimate.
- Included costs
-
Not assessed
- Comparison
-
Deforestation associated with subscriptions versus the study counterfactual. Alert availability alone had no significant effect.
- Method
-
Not assessed
- Return and payback
-
Not assessed
People and places
- Participants
-
Developer: University of Maryland GLAD laboratory (Hansen et al.). Operator: World Resources Institute (Global Forest Watch) and alert subscribers.
- Jurisdictions
-
Developer:
United States. Operator:
United States. - Ownership and control
-
Not assessed
- Dependencies
-
Not assessed
- Cross-border connections
-
Not assessed
- Geopolitical implications
-
Not assessed
Follow-up
- Conditions for replication
-
Alerts reach actors who can respond. Cloud cover does not suppress detections for long periods. Protected-area or concession managers retain enforcement authority.
- Replication attempts
-
1 follow-up entries. Benefit did not recur: 1.
- Later findings
-
13 January 2026. Global Forest Watch kept the Landsat-based GLAD alerts (GLAD-L) running and in 2022 folded them into an integrated disturbance alerts layer with GLAD-S2, RADD and, from January 2026, DIST-ALERT.
- Availability
-
Not assessed
- Institutional decision
-
Not assessed
- Grounds
-
Not assessed
- Action and result
-
Not assessed
- Success criterion
-
Not assessed
Evidence
- Source numbers
-
AIBD-0105-source-0001–0003
- Citations
-
Numbered references below.
- Language
-
Not assessed
- Source relationships
-
Independent, Developer, Operator
- Original evidence
-
Not assessed
- Access and versions
-
Not assessed
- Supported findings
-
Not assessed
- Evidence links
-
Not assessed
- Evidence strength
-
Not assessed
- Missing evidence
-
Not assessed
Grades
- Assessed benefits
-
People. Organizations. Society.
- Depth
-
Not assessed
- Reasons
-
People: Aggregate statistical effect across subscribed areas, no discrete attributable event. Organizations: Effect measured at the level of subscribed administrative areas and concessions. Society: Continent-level reduction estimate with no single identifiable beneficiary.
- Observed or intended
-
Not assessed
- Rubric
-
Not assessed
- Assessor and date
-
Not assessed
- Alternative assessments
-
Not assessed
- Fill
-
Independently studied
Entry details
- Kind
-
Not assessed
- Related entries
-
Natural England's ML land-cover mapping from imagery misclassified granite and quarries as peat, misdirecting conservation; GLAD's Landsat classifier maps forest loss for the same users.
Government‑Backed AI4Peat Mapping Tool Allegedly Misidentifies Granite Outcrops and Quarries as Peat
- Field
-
Conservation and biodiversity. Forest monitoring and enforcement.
- Purpose
-
Detect humid tropical forest disturbance in near real time from Landsat imagery to support land management and enforcement.
- Dates
-
Date basis unassessed: 2021 (precision unassessed). Updated: 21 October 2026.
- Stage
-
Not assessed
- Version
-
SHA-256: 37e5d9f524fe…
References
- Other identifiers
-
AI Incident Database: 1159.
- Category mappings
-
Not assessed
- Brief
-
Not assessed
- Revisions
-
5 revisions. Latest: 21 October 2026.
Sources
-
Peer-reviewed study Independent author
Moffette, F., Alix-Garcia, J., Shea, K., & Pickens, A. H. (2021). The impact of near-real-time deforestation alerts across the tropics. Nature Climate Change.
subscriptions to alerts in 22 tropical countries decrease the probability of deforestation in Africa by 18%
-
Peer-reviewed study Developer
Hansen, M. C., Krylov, A., Tyukavina, A., Potapov, P. V., et al. (2016). Humid tropical forest disturbance alerts using Landsat data. Environmental Research Letters 11(3).
A set of bagged decision trees was applied to each new Landsat observation and antecedent Landsat metrics.
-
Press release Deployer
Berger, A., Carter, S., Schofield, T., Pickens, A., Reiche, J. (2026). Explore GFW's Updated Integrated Disturbance Alerts. Global Forest Watch / Global Nature Watch blog, 13 January 2026.
Collections: Monetary outcomes.