AI system
- System
-
SUVAS (Supreme Court Vidhik Anuvaad Software), AI-assisted legal translation with human verification
- Model
-
Not assessed
- Release
-
Not assessed
- Provider
-
Not assessed
- Role
-
Not assessed
- Configuration
-
Not assessed
- Inputs and outputs
-
Not assessed
- Autonomy
-
Not assessed
- Workflow
-
Machine translation of English judgments by SUVAS. Review by High Court AI-assisted translation committees before upload. Publication on the e-SCR portal and High Court websites.
- Human oversight
-
Not assessed
- Relation to AI
-
Court documents attribute the translations to SUVAS with human review by translation committees. The sources do not evaluate accuracy or separate machine from human contribution. The PIB release behind the 36,271/17,142 figures is not itself among the sources. So it is cited via the peer-reviewed article that quotes it.
- AI contribution
-
Not assessed
Benefits
- Outcome identifiers
-
Not assessed
- Benefit
-
translated 36,271 Supreme Court judgments into Hindi and 17,142 into 16 languages
- Category
-
Improved Knowledge Discovery
- Status
-
Not assessed
- Beneficiary groups
-
People. Organizations. Society.
- Beneficiaries
-
Not assessed
- Reach
-
Not assessed
- Distribution and access
-
Not assessed
- Duration
-
Not assessed
- Expected?
-
Yes
- Costs and harms
-
Not assessed
Measurement
- Studies
-
Not assessed
- Study design
-
Not assessed
- Measurement
-
Not assessed
- Setting and sample
-
Not assessed
- Measures
-
translated 36,271 Supreme Court judgments into Hindi and 17,142 into 16 languages
- Comparison
-
Not assessed
- Results
-
translated 36,271 Supreme Court judgments into Hindi and 17,142 into 16 languages
- Additional value from AI
-
Not assessed
- Limitations
-
Not assessed
- Denominators
-
Not assessed
- Materials for replication
-
Not assessed
Money
- Kind of value
-
Not assessed
- Amount
-
Not assessed
- Currency and prices
-
Not assessed
- Period and unit
-
Not assessed
- Realization
-
Not assessed
- Recipients and payers
-
Not assessed
- Gross or net
-
Not assessed
- Included costs
-
Not assessed
- Comparison
-
Not assessed
- Method
-
Not assessed
- Return and payback
-
Not assessed
People and places
- Participants
-
Operator:
Supreme Court of India; High Courts' SUVAS Cells and AI-assisted translation committees. - Jurisdictions
-
Benefit: New Delhi,
India. Operator:
India. - Ownership and control
-
Not assessed
- Dependencies
-
Not assessed
- Cross-border connections
-
Not assessed
- Geopolitical implications
-
Not assessed
Follow-up
- Conditions for replication
-
Digitized English judgments as input. Committees with capacity to verify output in each language. Hosting portals for the translated texts.
- Replication attempts
-
1 follow-up entries. Benefit recurred: 1.
- Later findings
-
6 June 2025. Ten months after the 5 August 2024 count, the Chief Justice of India told a Microsoft audience that SUVAS had translated over 100,000 judgments into 18 regional languages, per the Supreme Court's 2024-25 annual report.
- Availability
-
Not assessed
- Institutional decision
-
Not assessed
- Grounds
-
Not assessed
- Action and result
-
Not assessed
- Success criterion
-
Not assessed
Evidence
- Source numbers
-
AIBD-0086-source-0001–0003
- Citations
-
Numbered references below.
- Language
-
Not assessed
- Source relationships
-
Independent, Operator
- Original evidence
-
Not assessed
- Access and versions
-
Not assessed
- Supported findings
-
Not assessed
- Evidence links
-
Not assessed
- Evidence strength
-
Not assessed
- Missing evidence
-
Not assessed
Grades
- Assessed benefits
-
People. Organizations. Society.
- Depth
-
Not assessed
- Reasons
-
People: Aggregate translation counts; no identifiable beneficiary event. Organizations: Court-reported totals rather than a discrete outcome. Society: National aggregate; no evaluation of use or comprehension by litigants.
- Observed or intended
-
Not assessed
- Rubric
-
Not assessed
- Assessor and date
-
Not assessed
- Alternative assessments
-
Not assessed
- Fill
-
Independently studied
Entry details
- Kind
-
Not assessed
- Related entries
-
Government legal translation by an automated tool, as with SUVAS, swapped pronouns in a refugee's written statement and her asylum claim was denied.
- Field
-
Courts: access to judgments. Judicial translation.
- Purpose
-
Translate Supreme Court and High Court judgments from English into Indian languages to widen access
- Dates
-
Date basis unassessed: 2024 (precision unassessed). Updated: 21 October 2026.
- Stage
-
Not assessed
- Version
-
SHA-256: 674b62b27c5b…
References
- Other identifiers
-
AI Incident Database: 532.
- Category mappings
-
Not assessed
- Brief
-
Not assessed
- Revisions
-
8 revisions. Latest: 21 October 2026.
Sources
-
Peer-reviewed study Independent author
As on 05.08.2024, 36,271 Supreme Court Judgments have been translated in Hindi language and 17,142 Judgments of Supreme Court have been translated in other 16 regional languages.
-
Report Deployer
Supreme Court of India (2025). Indian Judiciary: Annual Report 2024-25, Volume 1 (Supreme Court), printed p. 147 (conference summary, 6 Jun 2025); hosted January 2026.
SUVAS (Supreme Court Vidhik Anuvaad Software) translating over 100,000 judgments into 18 regional languages
-
Report Deployer
Supreme Court of India (2025). Indian Judiciary: Annual Report 2024-25, Volume 2 (High Courts), High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh section, printed p. 135; hosted January 2026.
The Supreme Court Vidhik Anuvaad Software (SUVAS) is being effectively utilized to translate judgments into local languages like Urdu, enhancing accessibility for a wider audience. To date, 4,426 Supreme Court judgments and 60 High Court judgments have been translated into vernacular (Urdu) language.