AI system
- System
-
CapisciAMe speaker-dependent ASR (compact convolutional neural network, cnn-trad-fpool3) in a voice-input voice-output communication aid
- Model
-
cnn-trad-fpool3.
- Release
-
Exact release not established.
- Application developer
-
University of Messina and IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo research team (CapisciAMe app developed in Italy as a research tool) - Role
-
The personalized network recognized spoken words for a communication aid.
- Configuration
-
The speech-recognition model was trained on 1,120 patient utterances.
- Inputs and outputs
-
Not assessed
- Autonomy
-
Not assessed
- Workflow
-
Speaker-dependent training on hundreds of the patient's own utterances. Closed, small target vocabulary. Multiple prompting modalities during recording.
- Human oversight
-
Not assessed
- Relation to AI
-
The personalized network is the entire intervention. Its 72.65% word accuracy exceeded the 56.75% mean of familiar listeners. The comparison used a 13-word closed set. The authors state the single-case design and limited vocabulary constrain generalization.
- AI contribution
-
The personalized network is the entire intervention. Its 72.65% word accuracy exceeded the 56.75% mean of familiar listeners. The comparison used a 13-word closed set. The authors state the single-case design and limited vocabulary constrain generalization.
Benefits
- Outcome identifiers
-
Not assessed
- Benefit
-
recognized 72.65% of her words versus 56.75% for 12 familiar professionals
- Category
-
Improved Task Accuracy
- Status
-
Not assessed
- Beneficiary groups
-
People. Society.
- Beneficiaries
-
Not assessed
- Reach
-
Not assessed
- Distribution and access
-
Not assessed
- Duration
-
Not assessed
- Expected?
-
Yes
- Costs and harms
-
Not assessed
Measurement
- Studies
-
Not assessed
- Study design
-
Not assessed
- Measurement
-
Not assessed
- Setting and sample
-
Not assessed
- Measures
-
recognized 72.65% of her words versus 56.75% for 12 familiar professionals
- Comparison
-
12 familiar rehabilitation professionals listening to the same utterances
- Results
-
Reference: mean = 56.75 %, SD = 12.91. Result: 72.65 % accuracy.
- Additional value from AI
-
Not assessed
- Limitations
-
Not assessed
- Denominators
-
Not assessed
- Materials for replication
-
Not assessed
Money
- Kind of value
-
Not assessed
- Amount
-
Not assessed
- Currency and prices
-
Not assessed
- Period and unit
-
Not assessed
- Realization
-
Not assessed
- Recipients and payers
-
Not assessed
- Gross or net
-
Not assessed
- Included costs
-
Not assessed
- Comparison
-
Not assessed
- Method
-
Not assessed
- Return and payback
-
Not assessed
People and places
- Participants
-
Developer:
University of Messina and IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo research team (CapisciAMe app developed in Italy as a research tool). Operator:
University of Messina (therapy-room sessions). - Jurisdictions
-
Benefit: Messina,
Italy. Developer:
Italy. Operator:
Italy. - Ownership and control
-
Not assessed
- Dependencies
-
Not assessed
- Cross-border connections
-
Not assessed
- Geopolitical implications
-
Not assessed
Follow-up
- Conditions for replication
-
Patient can produce consistent vocalizations for each target word. Quiet recording environment with a headset microphone. Clinician time to collect and label training data.
- Replication attempts
-
Not assessed
- Later findings
-
No later development found.
- Availability
-
Not assessed
- Institutional decision
-
Not assessed
- Grounds
-
Not assessed
- Action and result
-
Not assessed
- Success criterion
-
Not assessed
Evidence
- Source numbers
-
AIBD-0059-source-0001–0002
- Citations
-
Numbered references below.
- Language
-
Not assessed
- Source relationships
-
Developer
- Original evidence
-
Not assessed
- Access and versions
-
Not assessed
- Supported findings
-
Not assessed
- Evidence links
-
Not assessed
- Evidence strength
-
Not assessed
- Missing evidence
-
Not assessed
Grades
- Assessed benefits
-
People. Society.
- Depth
-
Not assessed
- Reasons
-
People: The result is a recognition-accuracy capability measured in test sessions. The paper documents no use of the system for the patient's real communication. Society: Single-case proof of concept with a 13-word vocabulary.
- Observed or intended
-
Not assessed
- Rubric
-
Not assessed
- Assessor and date
-
Not assessed
- Alternative assessments
-
Not assessed
- Fill
-
The makers' claim
Entry details
- Kind
-
Not assessed
- Related entries
-
Both decode speech for people with impaired speech; Whisper fabricated words and violent phrases when transcribing impaired speech.
Whisper Speech-to-Text AI Reportedly Found to Create Violent Hallucinations
- Field
-
Speech-language rehabilitation / augmentative communication. Adults with post-stroke aphasia and dysarthria.
- Purpose
-
Recognize the impaired speech of a person with aphasia and dysarthria so a communication aid can voice her intended words
- Dates
-
Date basis unassessed: 2022 (precision unassessed). Updated: 22 October 2026.
- Stage
-
Not assessed
- Version
-
SHA-256: c7c5373cc759…
References
- Other identifiers
-
AI Incident Database: 732.
- Category mappings
-
Not assessed
- Brief
-
Not assessed
- Revisions
-
8 revisions. Latest: 22 October 2026.
Sources
-
Case report Developer
University of Messina and IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino-Pulejo authors (2026). Case Report: Tailored automatic speech recognition in global aphasia with dysarthria - a single case proof of concept. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences.
The tailored ASR correctly identified 680 of 936 test utterances, yielding an overall word-level accuracy of 72.65%
Individual listener accuracy ranged from 38.5% to 73.1% (mean = 56.75%, SD = 12.91%)