{"id":"AIBD-1138","title":"Paraná's Court of Justice upheld IBAMA action against Atlantic Forest clearing flagged by MapBiomas Alerta in decisions of 2021 and 2024","summary":"Paraná's Court of Justice kept a regeneration injunction in 2021 and upheld a repair order in 2024 for clearings of 49.41 ha and 17.40 ha that IBAMA pursued with MapBiomas alerts.","date_observed":"2024-12-16","date_basis":"source publication","date_precision":"day","benefit_status":"reported","source_collection":null,"source_entry":null,"account":"MapBiomas compiles deforestation alerts, has analysts validate them on Planet images and refines each outline with a supervised Random Forest classifier. IBAMA, Brazil's federal environmental agency, used such alerts against Atlantic Forest clearing in southern Paraná. Its 2019 report on one clearing cites a MapBiomas alert that put the area at 40.86 ha. Agents walked the edge with GPS and measured 49.41 ha, and the report called the alert experimental. On 10 May 2021 the Court of Justice of Paraná kept an injunction that requires the defendants to let the 49.41 ha regrow. State prosecutors had sought it. In 2021 IBAMA staff combined multitemporal satellite analysis with a MapBiomas alert and issued a notice for destroying 17.40 ha. On 16 December 2024 the court upheld an order to repair that area and found no defect in the notice. The landowner had not defended the case at first instance. Neither decision examined the alerts, and neither rejected the satellite evidence.","category":"protective response","unexpected":false,"purpose":"MapBiomas built MapBiomas Alerta to compile, validate and refine deforestation alerts from detection systems across Brazil and to publish each confirmed clearing with a report.","system":"MapBiomas Alerta (the decisions call it 'alerta do MapBiomas', 'Alerta MapBiomas' or 'alerta do Mapbiomas')","model_version":null,"developer":"MapBiomas (MapBiomas Alerta), which compiles source alerts from other detection systems","deployer":"IBAMA (Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis), Brazil's federal environmental agency, in southern Paraná. The Ministério Público do Paraná brought the civil actions.","location":"Palmas and União da Vitória, Paraná, Brazil","domain":"Environmental enforcement: Atlantic Forest clearing","segment":null,"benefit_type":"Improved Environmental Sustainability","work_activities":["4.A.1.b.1","4.A.1.a.2"],"taxonomy_note":"The decisions document enforcement against illegal clearing. They do not show whether any forest was restored.","registry_ids":{},"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":2,"reason":"IBAMA acted on two clearings found with alerts, and the court kept a regeneration injunction for 49.41 ha and upheld a repair order for 17.40 ha."},{"group":"societal","depth":null,"reason":"The decisions order regeneration and repair, but neither reports whether the forest grew back."}],"ai_role":{"status":"unassessed","statement":"Neither decision compares enforcement with and without the alerts or tests their accuracy. In 2019 IBAMA called the alert experimental and relied on its own field measurement, which gave a larger area than the alert. MapBiomas states that analysts validate each alert on Planet images and that a supervised Random Forest classifier refines its outline."},"evidence":[{"kind":"court document","citation":"Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Paraná (TJPR), 4ª Câmara Cível. Apelação Cível nº 0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174 (União da Vitória), Rel. Des. Astrid Maranhão de Carvalho Ruthes. Judgment of 16 December 2024. Appeal denied: the repair order was upheld.","title":"Apelação Cível nº 0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174 (União da Vitória), Rel. Des. Astrid Maranhão de Carvalho Ruthes","url":"https://portal.tjpr.jus.br/jurisprudencia/j/4100000028753631/Ac%C3%B3rd%C3%A3o-0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174","date":"2024-12-16","written_by":"independent","quote":"Inexistência de vícios no auto de infração do IBAMA. Fundamentos da sentença que são lastreados nas provas documentais produzidas pelo órgão federal (incluindo diversas imagens comparativas). Sentença mantida."},{"kind":"court document","citation":"Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Paraná (TJPR), 4ª Câmara Cível. Apelação Cível nº 0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174 (União da Vitória), Rel. Des. Astrid Maranhão de Carvalho Ruthes. Judgment of 16 December 2024. Appeal denied: the repair order was upheld.","title":"Apelação Cível nº 0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174 (União da Vitória), Rel. Des. Astrid Maranhão de Carvalho Ruthes","url":"https://portal.tjpr.jus.br/jurisprudencia/j/4100000028753631/Ac%C3%B3rd%C3%A3o-0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174","date":"2024-12-16","written_by":"independent","quote":"a partir de realização de análise multitemporal de imagens por satélite e alerta do Mapbiomas, os servidores do IBAMA"},{"kind":"court document","citation":"Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Paraná (TJPR), 5ª Câmara Cível. Agravo de Instrumento nº 0066987-02.2020.8.16.0000 (Palmas), Rel. Des. Carlos Mansur Arida. Judgment of 10 May 2021, published 14 May 2021. Interlocutory appeal partly granted: the injunction was kept and limited to the 49.41 ha measured in the field.","title":"Agravo de Instrumento nº 0066987-02.2020.8.16.0000 (Palmas), Rel. Des. Carlos Mansur Arida","url":"https://portal.tjpr.jus.br/jurisprudencia/j/4100000015808551/Ac%C3%B3rd%C3%A3o-0066987-02.2020.8.16.0000","date":"2021-05-10","written_by":"independent","quote":"Pelo alerta do MapBiomas (em anexo - doc 4856552), a área desmatada é de 40,86 ha, atingindo parte da reserva legal informada no CAR. Porém, inicialmente a medição a campo, feita com deslocamento pela borda da área desmatada com GPS e aferida pelas imagens de satélite, chegou a 49,41 ha"},{"kind":"other","citation":"MapBiomas. Método MapBiomas Alerta (method page of the MapBiomas Alerta platform), Etapa 3: Refinamento nas imagens de alta e média resolução. Accessed 1 November 2026.","title":"Método MapBiomas Alerta","url":"https://alerta.mapbiomas.org/metodo","date":null,"written_by":"makers","quote":"A geração do polígono refinado é feita com uso de um algoritmo de classificação supervisionada (Random Forest), que é processado na plataforma Google Earth Engine por meio do Workspace (aplicativo de processamento desenvolvido pelo MapBiomas).","supports_benefit":false}],"replication":{"produced_by":["IBAMA staff used MapBiomas alerts with multitemporal satellite analysis to find clearings.","Agents measured one clearing in the field with GPS and corrected the area in their notice.","State prosecutors sought injunctions and repair orders on IBAMA's findings."],"must_hold":["Field measurement must confirm the area, since one alert understated a clearing.","Courts must accept IBAMA's notices and comparative satellite images as proof of the damage."],"echoes":[]},"paired_incident":null,"headline":"Paraná court backs two IBAMA forest cases that used *MapBiomas Alerta*","metric":"clearings of 49.41 ha and 17.40 ha","comparator":null,"later":null,"value":null,"developer_country":"Brazil","deployer_country":"Brazil","unrated_because":null,"brief_notes":null,"brief":null,"revisions":[{"date":"2026-11-01","change":"Added the record from the finding of the Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Paraná.","source":"https://portal.tjpr.jus.br/jurisprudencia/j/4100000028753631/Ac%C3%B3rd%C3%A3o-0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174","editor":"AIBD"}],"confidence":"found","shade":"high","claim_status":"Found by a court","claim_basis":"Sources: two independent court documents and the makers' other source. For the benefit itself, the cited sources include no independent study or report.","case_jurisdictions":["Brazil"],"profile":{"case_id":"AIBD-1138","catalog_version":"1.0.0","source_fingerprint":"2afc0f1b5237609d9f24b8a8b9bf6c8bc35ed4c3bcd61a10e8178a9f4331fc4b","collection_refs":[{"collection_id":"aibd","version":"2026-10-31"},{"collection_id":"querist","version":"2026-10-25"},{"collection_id":"adyt","version":"2026-10-25"}],"source_ids":["AIBD-1138-source-0001","AIBD-1138-source-0002","AIBD-1138-source-0003","AIBD-1138-source-0004"],"families":{"strategic assessments":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"evaluations":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"monetary observations":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"institutional decisions":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]}},"fields":{"actors[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"developer":"MapBiomas (MapBiomas Alerta), which compiles source alerts from other detection systems","deployer":"IBAMA (Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis), Brazil's federal environmental agency, in southern Paraná. The Ministério Público do Paraná brought the civil actions."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["developer","deployer"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"actors[].ownership_control":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"ai_contribution":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"ai_relationship":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"category":"protective response","ai_role":{"status":"unassessed","statement":"Neither decision compares enforcement with and without the alerts or tests their accuracy. In 2019 IBAMA called the alert experimental and relied on its own field measurement, which gave a larger area than the alert. MapBiomas states that analysts validate each alert on Planet images and that a supervised Random Forest classifier refines its outline."}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ai_role","category"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].alternatives":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].assessor_date":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].depth":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":2,"reason":"IBAMA acted on two clearings found with alerts, and the court kept a regeneration injunction for 49.41 ha and upheld a repair order for 17.40 ha."},{"group":"societal","reason":"The decisions order regeneration and repair, but neither reports whether the forest grew back."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].display_confidence":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"confidence":"high","evidence_word":"found","claim_status":"Found by a court","basis":"Sources: two independent court documents and the makers' other source. For the benefit itself, the cited sources include no independent study or report.","interpretation":"Existing display rule preserved; the richer outcome-specific confidence question still needs review."}},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].rationale":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":2,"reason":"IBAMA acted on two clearings found with alerts, and the court kept a regeneration injunction for 49.41 ha and upheld a repair order for 17.40 ha."},{"group":"societal","reason":"The decisions order regeneration and repair, but neither reports whether the forest grew back."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].rubric_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].status_basis":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].target":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":2,"reason":"IBAMA acted on two clearings found with alerts, and the court kept a regeneration injunction for 49.41 ha and upheld a repair order for 17.40 ha."},{"group":"societal","reason":"The decisions order regeneration and repair, but neither reports whether the forest grew back."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"availability":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"brief":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"case_kind":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"case_links[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].evidence_links":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].evidence_strength":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"answer":"Found by a court. Sources: two independent court documents and the makers' other source. For the benefit itself, the cited sources include no independent study or report.","evidence_word":"found","claim_status":"Found by a court"}},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-1138-source-0001","AIBD-1138-source-0002","AIBD-1138-source-0003","AIBD-1138-source-0004"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"Found by a court. Sources: two independent court documents and the makers' other source. For the benefit itself, the cited sources include no independent study or report.","inferred":false}},"claims[].missingness":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].proposition":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"cross_border_flows[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"decisions[].action_outcome":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].grounds":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].institution_task":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].success_criterion":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"deployment_stage":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"classification":"routine use","answer":"The system was in routine use. IBAMA used the alerts in inspections of 2019 and 2021, though in 2019 its report called the alert resource experimental.","scope":"The period and activity described in the case."}},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-1138-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"The system was in routine use. IBAMA used the alerts in inspections of 2019 and 2021, though in 2019 its report called the alert resource experimental.","inferred":false}},"economics[].amount":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].costs[]":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].counterfactual":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].currency_price_basis":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].gross_net":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].measure_type":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].period_unit":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].realization":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].recipient_payer":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].return_payback":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].valuation_method":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"evaluations[].ai_uplift":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].comparator":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].design":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].effect":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].exposure":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].id":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].measurement_method":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].metric":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].reproduction_materials":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].setting_sample":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].uncertainty_limitations":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"external_references[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"follow_up[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"human_oversight":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"id":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"id":"AIBD-1138"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["id"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"infrastructure_dependencies[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].beneficiaries":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].beneficiary_count":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].benefit_type":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"benefit_type":"Improved Environmental Sustainability","taxonomy_note":"The decisions document enforcement against illegal clearing. They do not show whether any forest was restored."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["benefit_type","taxonomy_note"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].claim":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"account":"MapBiomas compiles deforestation alerts, has analysts validate them on Planet images and refines each outline with a supervised Random Forest classifier. IBAMA, Brazil's federal environmental agency, used such alerts against Atlantic Forest clearing in southern Paraná. Its 2019 report on one clearing cites a MapBiomas alert that put the area at 40.86 ha. Agents walked the edge with GPS and measured 49.41 ha, and the report called the alert experimental. On 10 May 2021 the Court of Justice of Paraná kept an injunction that requires the defendants to let the 49.41 ha regrow. State prosecutors had sought it. In 2021 IBAMA staff combined multitemporal satellite analysis with a MapBiomas alert and issued a notice for destroying 17.40 ha. On 16 December 2024 the court upheld an order to repair that area and found no defect in the notice. The landowner had not defended the case at first instance. Neither decision examined the alerts, and neither rejected the satellite evidence.","benefit_type":"Improved Environmental Sustainability"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","benefit_type"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].distribution":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].duration":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].id":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].stakeholder_group":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":2,"reason":"IBAMA acted on two clearings found with alerts, and the court kept a regeneration injunction for 49.41 ha and upheld a repair order for 17.40 ha."},{"group":"societal","reason":"The decisions order regeneration and repair, but neither reports whether the forest grew back."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].status":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"benefit_status":"reported"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["benefit_status"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].tradeoffs":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].unexpected":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"unexpected":false,"purpose":"MapBiomas built MapBiomas Alerta to compile, validate and refine deforestation alerts from detection systems across Brazil and to publish each confirmed clearing with a report."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["unexpected","purpose"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"places[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"location":"Palmas and União da Vitória, Paraná, Brazil","developer_country":"Brazil","deployer_country":"Brazil"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["location","developer_country","deployer_country"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"purpose":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"purpose":"MapBiomas built MapBiomas Alerta to compile, validate and refine deforestation alerts from detection systems across Brazil and to publish each confirmed clearing with a report."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["purpose"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"record_dates":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"date_observed":"2024-12-16","date_basis":"source publication","date_precision":"day","revisions":[{"date":"2026-11-01","change":"Added the record from the finding of the Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Paraná.","source":"https://portal.tjpr.jus.br/jurisprudencia/j/4100000028753631/Ac%C3%B3rd%C3%A3o-0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174","editor":"AIBD"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["date_observed","date_basis","date_precision","revisions"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"replication.attempts[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"replication.conditions":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"replication":{"produced_by":["IBAMA staff used MapBiomas alerts with multitemporal satellite analysis to find clearings.","Agents measured one clearing in the field with GPS and corrected the area in their notice.","State prosecutors sought injunctions and repair orders on IBAMA's findings."],"must_hold":["Field measurement must confirm the area, since one alert understated a clearing.","Courts must accept IBAMA's notices and comparative satellite images as proof of the damage."],"echoes":[]}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["replication"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"revision_history[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"revisions":[{"date":"2026-11-01","change":"Added the record from the finding of the Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Paraná.","source":"https://portal.tjpr.jus.br/jurisprudencia/j/4100000028753631/Ac%C3%B3rd%C3%A3o-0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174","editor":"AIBD"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["revisions"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sector":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"domain":"Environmental enforcement: Atlantic Forest clearing"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["domain"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].access_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].citation_locator":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"evidence":[{"kind":"court document","citation":"Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Paraná (TJPR), 4ª Câmara Cível. Apelação Cível nº 0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174 (União da Vitória), Rel. Des. Astrid Maranhão de Carvalho Ruthes. Judgment of 16 December 2024. Appeal denied: the repair order was upheld.","title":"Apelação Cível nº 0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174 (União da Vitória), Rel. Des. Astrid Maranhão de Carvalho Ruthes","url":"https://portal.tjpr.jus.br/jurisprudencia/j/4100000028753631/Ac%C3%B3rd%C3%A3o-0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174","date":"2024-12-16","written_by":"independent","quote":"Inexistência de vícios no auto de infração do IBAMA. Fundamentos da sentença que são lastreados nas provas documentais produzidas pelo órgão federal (incluindo diversas imagens comparativas). Sentença mantida."},{"kind":"court document","citation":"Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Paraná (TJPR), 4ª Câmara Cível. Apelação Cível nº 0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174 (União da Vitória), Rel. Des. Astrid Maranhão de Carvalho Ruthes. Judgment of 16 December 2024. Appeal denied: the repair order was upheld.","title":"Apelação Cível nº 0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174 (União da Vitória), Rel. Des. Astrid Maranhão de Carvalho Ruthes","url":"https://portal.tjpr.jus.br/jurisprudencia/j/4100000028753631/Ac%C3%B3rd%C3%A3o-0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174","date":"2024-12-16","written_by":"independent","quote":"a partir de realização de análise multitemporal de imagens por satélite e alerta do Mapbiomas, os servidores do IBAMA"},{"kind":"court document","citation":"Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Paraná (TJPR), 5ª Câmara Cível. Agravo de Instrumento nº 0066987-02.2020.8.16.0000 (Palmas), Rel. Des. Carlos Mansur Arida. Judgment of 10 May 2021, published 14 May 2021. Interlocutory appeal partly granted: the injunction was kept and limited to the 49.41 ha measured in the field.","title":"Agravo de Instrumento nº 0066987-02.2020.8.16.0000 (Palmas), Rel. Des. Carlos Mansur Arida","url":"https://portal.tjpr.jus.br/jurisprudencia/j/4100000015808551/Ac%C3%B3rd%C3%A3o-0066987-02.2020.8.16.0000","date":"2021-05-10","written_by":"independent","quote":"Pelo alerta do MapBiomas (em anexo - doc 4856552), a área desmatada é de 40,86 ha, atingindo parte da reserva legal informada no CAR. Porém, inicialmente a medição a campo, feita com deslocamento pela borda da área desmatada com GPS e aferida pelas imagens de satélite, chegou a 49,41 ha"},{"kind":"other","citation":"MapBiomas. Método MapBiomas Alerta (method page of the MapBiomas Alerta platform), Etapa 3: Refinamento nas imagens de alta e média resolução. Accessed 1 November 2026.","title":"Método MapBiomas Alerta","url":"https://alerta.mapbiomas.org/metodo","written_by":"makers","quote":"A geração do polígono refinado é feita com uso de um algoritmo de classificação supervisionada (Random Forest), que é processado na plataforma Google Earth Engine por meio do Workspace (aplicativo de processamento desenvolvido pelo MapBiomas).","supports_benefit":false}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].id":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["AIBD-1138-source-0001","AIBD-1138-source-0002","AIBD-1138-source-0003","AIBD-1138-source-0004"],"role":"Existing evidence items, in their original order"},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"complete"},"sources[].language":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].relationship":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"evidence":[{"kind":"court document","citation":"Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Paraná (TJPR), 4ª Câmara Cível. Apelação Cível nº 0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174 (União da Vitória), Rel. Des. Astrid Maranhão de Carvalho Ruthes. Judgment of 16 December 2024. Appeal denied: the repair order was upheld.","title":"Apelação Cível nº 0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174 (União da Vitória), Rel. Des. Astrid Maranhão de Carvalho Ruthes","url":"https://portal.tjpr.jus.br/jurisprudencia/j/4100000028753631/Ac%C3%B3rd%C3%A3o-0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174","date":"2024-12-16","written_by":"independent","quote":"Inexistência de vícios no auto de infração do IBAMA. Fundamentos da sentença que são lastreados nas provas documentais produzidas pelo órgão federal (incluindo diversas imagens comparativas). Sentença mantida."},{"kind":"court document","citation":"Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Paraná (TJPR), 4ª Câmara Cível. Apelação Cível nº 0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174 (União da Vitória), Rel. Des. Astrid Maranhão de Carvalho Ruthes. Judgment of 16 December 2024. Appeal denied: the repair order was upheld.","title":"Apelação Cível nº 0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174 (União da Vitória), Rel. Des. Astrid Maranhão de Carvalho Ruthes","url":"https://portal.tjpr.jus.br/jurisprudencia/j/4100000028753631/Ac%C3%B3rd%C3%A3o-0008151-91.2023.8.16.0174","date":"2024-12-16","written_by":"independent","quote":"a partir de realização de análise multitemporal de imagens por satélite e alerta do Mapbiomas, os servidores do IBAMA"},{"kind":"court document","citation":"Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Paraná (TJPR), 5ª Câmara Cível. Agravo de Instrumento nº 0066987-02.2020.8.16.0000 (Palmas), Rel. Des. Carlos Mansur Arida. Judgment of 10 May 2021, published 14 May 2021. Interlocutory appeal partly granted: the injunction was kept and limited to the 49.41 ha measured in the field.","title":"Agravo de Instrumento nº 0066987-02.2020.8.16.0000 (Palmas), Rel. Des. Carlos Mansur Arida","url":"https://portal.tjpr.jus.br/jurisprudencia/j/4100000015808551/Ac%C3%B3rd%C3%A3o-0066987-02.2020.8.16.0000","date":"2021-05-10","written_by":"independent","quote":"Pelo alerta do MapBiomas (em anexo - doc 4856552), a área desmatada é de 40,86 ha, atingindo parte da reserva legal informada no CAR. Porém, inicialmente a medição a campo, feita com deslocamento pela borda da área desmatada com GPS e aferida pelas imagens de satélite, chegou a 49,41 ha"},{"kind":"other","citation":"MapBiomas. Método MapBiomas Alerta (method page of the MapBiomas Alerta platform), Etapa 3: Refinamento nas imagens de alta e média resolução. Accessed 1 November 2026.","title":"Método MapBiomas Alerta","url":"https://alerta.mapbiomas.org/metodo","written_by":"makers","quote":"A geração do polígono refinado é feita com uso de um algoritmo de classificação supervisionada (Random Forest), que é processado na plataforma Google Earth Engine por meio do Workspace (aplicativo de processamento desenvolvido pelo MapBiomas).","supports_benefit":false}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].upstream_sources":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"strategic_assessments[]":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"strategic assessments"},"summary":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"summary":"Paraná's Court of Justice kept a regeneration injunction in 2021 and upheld a repair order in 2024 for clearings of 49.41 ha and 17.40 ha that IBAMA pursued with MapBiomas alerts.","account":"MapBiomas compiles deforestation alerts, has analysts validate them on Planet images and refines each outline with a supervised Random Forest classifier. IBAMA, Brazil's federal environmental agency, used such alerts against Atlantic Forest clearing in southern Paraná. Its 2019 report on one clearing cites a MapBiomas alert that put the area at 40.86 ha. Agents walked the edge with GPS and measured 49.41 ha, and the report called the alert experimental. On 10 May 2021 the Court of Justice of Paraná kept an injunction that requires the defendants to let the 49.41 ha regrow. State prosecutors had sought it. In 2021 IBAMA staff combined multitemporal satellite analysis with a MapBiomas alert and issued a notice for destroying 17.40 ha. On 16 December 2024 the court upheld an order to repair that area and found no defect in the notice. The landowner had not defended the case at first instance. Neither decision examined the alerts, and neither rejected the satellite evidence."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["summary","account"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].autonomy_permissions":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].component_role":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].deployment_configuration":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].inputs_outputs":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].model_name":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].model_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].product_name":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"system":"MapBiomas Alerta (the decisions call it 'alerta do MapBiomas', 'Alerta MapBiomas' or 'alerta do Mapbiomas')"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["system"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].provider":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"taxonomy_crosswalks[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"title":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"title":"Paraná's Court of Justice upheld IBAMA action against Atlantic Forest clearing flagged by MapBiomas Alerta in decisions of 2021 and 2024","headline":"Paraná court backs two IBAMA forest cases that used *MapBiomas Alerta*"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["title","headline"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"version":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["7be5893fb97f003408917b7c7bf20105cd3b47678e5bb21a7dd841fdfbe362dd"],"role":"SHA-256 of the complete public record and its assessments"},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"SHA-256 of the public record, its assessments, and its displayed answers and notes, excluding its own identifier and the derived coverage summary.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"complete"},"workflow":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"account":"MapBiomas compiles deforestation alerts, has analysts validate them on Planet images and refines each outline with a supervised Random Forest classifier. IBAMA, Brazil's federal environmental agency, used such alerts against Atlantic Forest clearing in southern Paraná. Its 2019 report on one clearing cites a MapBiomas alert that put the area at 40.86 ha. Agents walked the edge with GPS and measured 49.41 ha, and the report called the alert experimental. On 10 May 2021 the Court of Justice of Paraná kept an injunction that requires the defendants to let the 49.41 ha regrow. State prosecutors had sought it. In 2021 IBAMA staff combined multitemporal satellite analysis with a MapBiomas alert and issued a notice for destroying 17.40 ha. On 16 December 2024 the court upheld an order to repair that area and found no defect in the notice. The landowner had not defended the case at first instance. Neither decision examined the alerts, and neither rejected the satellite evidence.","replication":{"produced_by":["IBAMA staff used MapBiomas alerts with multitemporal satellite analysis to find clearings.","Agents measured one clearing in the field with GPS and corrected the area in their notice.","State prosecutors sought injunctions and repair orders on IBAMA's findings."],"must_hold":["Field measurement must confirm the area, since one alert understated a clearing.","Courts must accept IBAMA's notices and comparative satellite images as proof of the damage."],"echoes":[]}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","replication"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"}},"summary":{"total":91,"addressed":91,"known":28,"reviewed":2,"reviewed_complete":2,"reviewed_partial":0,"record_mapped":26,"review_not_assessed":63,"not_assessed":0,"complete":false,"by_state":{"value_present":28,"not_reported":0,"unresolved":63,"not_assessed":0,"not_applicable":0,"withheld":0,"source_unavailable":0}}},"presentation_version":"d3201276db6f24da74fd5970044e4ea18ce3ddb0283b6367767615758803b963"}