{"id":"AIBD-1039","title":"The ANAO reports that new ATO superannuation guarantee models raised the share of compliance cases finding a liability from about 60–70% to 90%","summary":"The ANAO reports that the ATO's real-time superannuation guarantee models lifted the average share of compliance cases that raise a liability from about 60–70% to 90%.","date_observed":"2022-04-28","date_basis":"source publication","date_precision":"day","benefit_status":"mixed","source_collection":null,"source_entry":null,"account":"Australian employers must pay a superannuation guarantee (SG) into employees' retirement funds. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) selects employers for SG compliance cases. Its two earlier risk models drew on historical fund and income tax data. In 2018–19 it replaced them with two real-time data models. The Employer Simulation and Evaluation Model compares employers' behavior across similar groups of employees. The SG Under Reporting model identifies under-reporting from Single Touch Payroll and Member Account Transaction Service data. The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) published an audit of SG compliance on 28 April 2022. It states that the new models increased the average strike rate from approximately 60–70 percent to 90 percent. The strike rate is the share of SG compliance cases that raise a liability. The ANAO adds that the models need heavy data validation, use limited samples and depend on Excel work by a few experienced staff. The ATO told the ANAO in September 2021 that it used real-time data to select only around 200 cases in 2021–22. The report gives no source or method for the strike rates.","category":"aggregate result","unexpected":false,"purpose":"The Australian Taxation Office built the real-time data models to select employers who are likely to have underpaid the superannuation guarantee for compliance cases.","system":"ATO superannuation guarantee real-time data models (Employer Simulation and Evaluation Model and SG Under Reporting model)","model_version":null,"developer":"Australian Taxation Office (the report names no other developer)","deployer":"Australian Taxation Office (ATO)","location":"Australia (national)","domain":"Tax administration: superannuation guarantee compliance","segment":null,"benefit_type":"Improved Task Accuracy","work_activities":["4.A.2.a.3","4.A.2.a.2"],"taxonomy_note":null,"registry_ids":{},"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":2,"reason":"The ANAO reports that the share of SG compliance cases raising a liability rose from about 60–70 percent to 90 percent with the new models."},{"group":"personal","depth":null,"reason":"Employees gain when unpaid super is raised as a liability, but the report gives no amounts recovered through these models."}],"ai_role":{"status":"unassessed","statement":"The report says that one model compares employers with similar groups of employees and that the other uses payroll and fund data to identify under-reporting. It does not say that either learns from data, and it says that both rely on Excel work by a few staff. The strike rates compare the new models with the old ones, and the report does not say how they were measured. Elsewhere it notes that high strike rates in SG Taskforce audits may partly reflect the choice of high-risk employers."},"evidence":[{"kind":"descriptive report","citation":"Australian National Audit Office. Addressing Superannuation Guarantee Non-Compliance. Auditor-General Report No. 24 of 2021–22, published 28 April 2022. Chapter 2, paras 2.45-2.55 (report web page, Internet Archive copy).","title":"Addressing Superannuation Guarantee Non-Compliance","url":"https://web.archive.org/web/2026/https://www.anao.gov.au/work/performance-audit/addressing-superannuation-guarantee-non-compliance","date":"2022-04-28","written_by":"independent","quote":"The new models increased the average strike rate from approximately 60–70  per cent to 90 per cent. However, the new models require a high level of data validation, involve limited sampled data sets and compliance cases, are manually intensive, and require intensive use of Microsoft Excel by a few experienced staff."}],"replication":{"produced_by":["Employers reported pay through Single Touch Payroll and super funds reported contributions through the Member Account Transaction Service.","The Employer Simulation and Evaluation Model compared each employer with similar groups of employees, and the SG Under Reporting model used payroll and fund data to identify under-reporting.","Running the models took heavy data validation, manual work and intensive use of Microsoft Excel by a few experienced staff."],"must_hold":["Payroll and fund data must be matched reliably, and the ATO estimated that data integrity issues affected 10 to 15 percent of the data.","Enough experienced staff must be available, since the models are manually intensive and use limited samples."],"echoes":[]},"paired_incident":null,"headline":"ATO's *real-time data models* find unpaid super in 90% of cases","metric":"from about 60–70% to 90%","comparator":{"against":"The ATO's earlier SG case selection with the High Risk Employer and Stratified Sampling Nearest Neighbour models","before":"approximately 60–70 per cent","after":"90 per cent","basis":"measured","quote":"The new models increased the average strike rate from approximately 60–70 per cent to 90 per cent.","url":"https://web.archive.org/web/2026/https://www.anao.gov.au/work/performance-audit/addressing-superannuation-guarantee-non-compliance"},"later":null,"value":null,"developer_country":"Australia","deployer_country":"Australia","unrated_because":null,"brief_notes":null,"brief":null,"revisions":[{"date":"2026-11-01","change":"Added the record from the report of the Australian National Audit Office.","source":"https://web.archive.org/web/2026/https://www.anao.gov.au/work/performance-audit/addressing-superannuation-guarantee-non-compliance","editor":"AIBD"}],"confidence":"reported","shade":"medium","claim_status":"Independently reported","claim_basis":"Sources: one independent descriptive report. The cited evidence includes no independent study of the benefit and no finding by an external body.","case_jurisdictions":["Australia"],"profile":{"case_id":"AIBD-1039","catalog_version":"1.0.0","source_fingerprint":"d37a0b847193093f9e6022fd6c1ad1477eba659616e55d0674b109f31f27464b","collection_refs":[{"collection_id":"aibd","version":"2026-10-31"}],"source_ids":["AIBD-1039-source-0001"],"families":{"strategic assessments":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"evaluations":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"monetary observations":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"institutional decisions":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]}},"fields":{"actors[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"developer":"Australian Taxation Office (the report names no other developer)","deployer":"Australian Taxation Office (ATO)"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["developer","deployer"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"actors[].ownership_control":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"ai_contribution":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"ai_relationship":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"category":"aggregate result","ai_role":{"status":"unassessed","statement":"The report says that one model compares employers with similar groups of employees and that the other uses payroll and fund data to identify under-reporting. It does not say that either learns from data, and it says that both rely on Excel work by a few staff. The strike rates compare the new models with the old ones, and the report does not say how they were measured. Elsewhere it notes that high strike rates in SG Taskforce audits may partly reflect the choice of high-risk employers."}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ai_role","category"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].alternatives":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].assessor_date":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].depth":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":2,"reason":"The ANAO reports that the share of SG compliance cases raising a liability rose from about 60–70 percent to 90 percent with the new models."},{"group":"personal","reason":"Employees gain when unpaid super is raised as a liability, but the report gives no amounts recovered through these models."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].display_confidence":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"confidence":"medium","evidence_word":"reported","claim_status":"Independently reported","basis":"Sources: one independent descriptive report. The cited evidence includes no independent study of the benefit and no finding by an external body.","interpretation":"Existing display rule preserved; the richer outcome-specific confidence question still needs review."}},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].rationale":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":2,"reason":"The ANAO reports that the share of SG compliance cases raising a liability rose from about 60–70 percent to 90 percent with the new models."},{"group":"personal","reason":"Employees gain when unpaid super is raised as a liability, but the report gives no amounts recovered through these models."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].rubric_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].status_basis":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].target":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":2,"reason":"The ANAO reports that the share of SG compliance cases raising a liability rose from about 60–70 percent to 90 percent with the new models."},{"group":"personal","reason":"Employees gain when unpaid super is raised as a liability, but the report gives no amounts recovered through these models."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"availability":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"brief":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"case_kind":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"case_links[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].evidence_links":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].evidence_strength":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"answer":"Independently reported. Sources: one independent descriptive report. The cited evidence includes no independent study of the benefit and no finding by an external body.","evidence_word":"reported","claim_status":"Independently reported"}},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-1039-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"Independently reported. Sources: one independent descriptive report. The cited evidence includes no independent study of the benefit and no finding by an external body.","inferred":false}},"claims[].missingness":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].proposition":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"cross_border_flows[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"decisions[].action_outcome":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].grounds":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].institution_task":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].success_criterion":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"deployment_stage":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"classification":"pilot","answer":"The system was used in a pilot. The ATO had replaced its older models with them in 2018–19, but it used real-time data to select only around 200 cases in 2021–22, with manual work in Excel.","scope":"The period and activity described in the case."}},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-1039-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"The system was used in a pilot. The ATO had replaced its older models with them in 2018–19, but it used real-time data to select only around 200 cases in 2021–22, with manual work in Excel.","inferred":false}},"economics[].amount":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].costs[]":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].counterfactual":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].currency_price_basis":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].gross_net":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].measure_type":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].period_unit":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].realization":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].recipient_payer":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].return_payback":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].valuation_method":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"evaluations[].ai_uplift":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].comparator":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].design":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].effect":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].exposure":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].id":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].measurement_method":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].metric":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].reproduction_materials":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].setting_sample":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].uncertainty_limitations":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"external_references[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"follow_up[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"human_oversight":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"id":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"id":"AIBD-1039"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["id"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"infrastructure_dependencies[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].beneficiaries":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].beneficiary_count":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].benefit_type":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"benefit_type":"Improved Task Accuracy"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["benefit_type"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].claim":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"account":"Australian employers must pay a superannuation guarantee (SG) into employees' retirement funds. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) selects employers for SG compliance cases. Its two earlier risk models drew on historical fund and income tax data. In 2018–19 it replaced them with two real-time data models. The Employer Simulation and Evaluation Model compares employers' behavior across similar groups of employees. The SG Under Reporting model identifies under-reporting from Single Touch Payroll and Member Account Transaction Service data. The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) published an audit of SG compliance on 28 April 2022. It states that the new models increased the average strike rate from approximately 60–70 percent to 90 percent. The strike rate is the share of SG compliance cases that raise a liability. The ANAO adds that the models need heavy data validation, use limited samples and depend on Excel work by a few experienced staff. The ATO told the ANAO in September 2021 that it used real-time data to select only around 200 cases in 2021–22. The report gives no source or method for the strike rates.","benefit_type":"Improved Task Accuracy"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","benefit_type"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].distribution":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].duration":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].id":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].stakeholder_group":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":2,"reason":"The ANAO reports that the share of SG compliance cases raising a liability rose from about 60–70 percent to 90 percent with the new models."},{"group":"personal","reason":"Employees gain when unpaid super is raised as a liability, but the report gives no amounts recovered through these models."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].status":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"benefit_status":"mixed"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["benefit_status"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].tradeoffs":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].unexpected":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"unexpected":false,"purpose":"The Australian Taxation Office built the real-time data models to select employers who are likely to have underpaid the superannuation guarantee for compliance cases."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["unexpected","purpose"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"places[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"location":"Australia (national)","developer_country":"Australia","deployer_country":"Australia"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["location","developer_country","deployer_country"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"purpose":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"purpose":"The Australian Taxation Office built the real-time data models to select employers who are likely to have underpaid the superannuation guarantee for compliance cases."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["purpose"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"record_dates":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"date_observed":"2022-04-28","date_basis":"source publication","date_precision":"day","revisions":[{"date":"2026-11-01","change":"Added the record from the report of the Australian National Audit Office.","source":"https://web.archive.org/web/2026/https://www.anao.gov.au/work/performance-audit/addressing-superannuation-guarantee-non-compliance","editor":"AIBD"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["date_observed","date_basis","date_precision","revisions"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"replication.attempts[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"replication.conditions":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"replication":{"produced_by":["Employers reported pay through Single Touch Payroll and super funds reported contributions through the Member Account Transaction Service.","The Employer Simulation and Evaluation Model compared each employer with similar groups of employees, and the SG Under Reporting model used payroll and fund data to identify under-reporting.","Running the models took heavy data validation, manual work and intensive use of Microsoft Excel by a few experienced staff."],"must_hold":["Payroll and fund data must be matched reliably, and the ATO estimated that data integrity issues affected 10 to 15 percent of the data.","Enough experienced staff must be available, since the models are manually intensive and use limited samples."],"echoes":[]}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["replication"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"revision_history[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"revisions":[{"date":"2026-11-01","change":"Added the record from the report of the Australian National Audit Office.","source":"https://web.archive.org/web/2026/https://www.anao.gov.au/work/performance-audit/addressing-superannuation-guarantee-non-compliance","editor":"AIBD"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["revisions"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sector":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"domain":"Tax administration: superannuation guarantee compliance"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["domain"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].access_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].citation_locator":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"evidence":[{"kind":"descriptive report","citation":"Australian National Audit Office. Addressing Superannuation Guarantee Non-Compliance. Auditor-General Report No. 24 of 2021–22, published 28 April 2022. Chapter 2, paras 2.45-2.55 (report web page, Internet Archive copy).","title":"Addressing Superannuation Guarantee Non-Compliance","url":"https://web.archive.org/web/2026/https://www.anao.gov.au/work/performance-audit/addressing-superannuation-guarantee-non-compliance","date":"2022-04-28","written_by":"independent","quote":"The new models increased the average strike rate from approximately 60–70  per cent to 90 per cent. However, the new models require a high level of data validation, involve limited sampled data sets and compliance cases, are manually intensive, and require intensive use of Microsoft Excel by a few experienced staff."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].id":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["AIBD-1039-source-0001"],"role":"Existing evidence items, in their original order"},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"complete"},"sources[].language":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].relationship":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"evidence":[{"kind":"descriptive report","citation":"Australian National Audit Office. Addressing Superannuation Guarantee Non-Compliance. Auditor-General Report No. 24 of 2021–22, published 28 April 2022. Chapter 2, paras 2.45-2.55 (report web page, Internet Archive copy).","title":"Addressing Superannuation Guarantee Non-Compliance","url":"https://web.archive.org/web/2026/https://www.anao.gov.au/work/performance-audit/addressing-superannuation-guarantee-non-compliance","date":"2022-04-28","written_by":"independent","quote":"The new models increased the average strike rate from approximately 60–70  per cent to 90 per cent. However, the new models require a high level of data validation, involve limited sampled data sets and compliance cases, are manually intensive, and require intensive use of Microsoft Excel by a few experienced staff."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].upstream_sources":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"strategic_assessments[]":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"strategic assessments"},"summary":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"summary":"The ANAO reports that the ATO's real-time superannuation guarantee models lifted the average share of compliance cases that raise a liability from about 60–70% to 90%.","account":"Australian employers must pay a superannuation guarantee (SG) into employees' retirement funds. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) selects employers for SG compliance cases. Its two earlier risk models drew on historical fund and income tax data. In 2018–19 it replaced them with two real-time data models. The Employer Simulation and Evaluation Model compares employers' behavior across similar groups of employees. The SG Under Reporting model identifies under-reporting from Single Touch Payroll and Member Account Transaction Service data. The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) published an audit of SG compliance on 28 April 2022. It states that the new models increased the average strike rate from approximately 60–70 percent to 90 percent. The strike rate is the share of SG compliance cases that raise a liability. The ANAO adds that the models need heavy data validation, use limited samples and depend on Excel work by a few experienced staff. The ATO told the ANAO in September 2021 that it used real-time data to select only around 200 cases in 2021–22. The report gives no source or method for the strike rates."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["summary","account"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].autonomy_permissions":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].component_role":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].deployment_configuration":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].inputs_outputs":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].model_name":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].model_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].product_name":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"system":"ATO superannuation guarantee real-time data models (Employer Simulation and Evaluation Model and SG Under Reporting model)"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["system"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].provider":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"taxonomy_crosswalks[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"title":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"title":"The ANAO reports that new ATO superannuation guarantee models raised the share of compliance cases finding a liability from about 60–70% to 90%","headline":"ATO's *real-time data models* find unpaid super in 90% of cases"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["title","headline"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"version":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["8754fc28fd232b83bb36a5f507d49106c222147aab893e1700ea528186e3c41d"],"role":"SHA-256 of the complete public record and its assessments"},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"SHA-256 of the public record, its assessments, and its displayed answers and notes, excluding its own identifier and the derived coverage summary.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"complete"},"workflow":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"account":"Australian employers must pay a superannuation guarantee (SG) into employees' retirement funds. The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) selects employers for SG compliance cases. Its two earlier risk models drew on historical fund and income tax data. In 2018–19 it replaced them with two real-time data models. The Employer Simulation and Evaluation Model compares employers' behavior across similar groups of employees. The SG Under Reporting model identifies under-reporting from Single Touch Payroll and Member Account Transaction Service data. The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) published an audit of SG compliance on 28 April 2022. It states that the new models increased the average strike rate from approximately 60–70 percent to 90 percent. The strike rate is the share of SG compliance cases that raise a liability. The ANAO adds that the models need heavy data validation, use limited samples and depend on Excel work by a few experienced staff. The ATO told the ANAO in September 2021 that it used real-time data to select only around 200 cases in 2021–22. The report gives no source or method for the strike rates.","replication":{"produced_by":["Employers reported pay through Single Touch Payroll and super funds reported contributions through the Member Account Transaction Service.","The Employer Simulation and Evaluation Model compared each employer with similar groups of employees, and the SG Under Reporting model used payroll and fund data to identify under-reporting.","Running the models took heavy data validation, manual work and intensive use of Microsoft Excel by a few experienced staff."],"must_hold":["Payroll and fund data must be matched reliably, and the ATO estimated that data integrity issues affected 10 to 15 percent of the data.","Enough experienced staff must be available, since the models are manually intensive and use limited samples."],"echoes":[]}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","replication"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"}},"summary":{"total":91,"addressed":91,"known":28,"reviewed":2,"reviewed_complete":2,"reviewed_partial":0,"record_mapped":26,"review_not_assessed":63,"not_assessed":0,"complete":false,"by_state":{"value_present":28,"not_reported":0,"unresolved":63,"not_assessed":0,"not_applicable":0,"withheld":0,"source_unavailable":0}}},"presentation_version":"a1e86a6453c487efce0024de6e41e06ad12110842ca8ac211b3fa20925612894"}