{"id":"AIBD-1036","title":"GAO finds that FHA's TOTAL Scorecard gave lenders less paperwork and more consistent underwriting decisions than the scorecards it replaced","summary":"In April 2006 GAO found that FHA's TOTAL Scorecard had brought lenders and borrowers less paperwork and more consistent underwriting decisions than the two scorecards it replaced.","date_observed":"2006-04-13","date_basis":"source publication","date_precision":"day","benefit_status":"reported","source_collection":null,"source_entry":null,"account":"The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insures home loans made mostly to low-income, minority and first-time buyers. From 1998 to 2004 it worked with the contractor Unicon Research Corporation to build the TOTAL Scorecard. Unicon fitted a logit model to 1992 data on 9,867 FHA loans that ended without an insurance claim and 4,818 that ended with one. From 2004, lenders ran FHA applications through TOTAL, which accepted 65 to 70 percent automatically and referred the rest for manual underwriting. In a report dated 13 April 2006, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that TOTAL had produced more consistent underwriting results. The two scorecards that it replaced had sometimes disagreed, with one accepting a loan that the other referred. GAO also found that lenders using TOTAL needed less documentation for accepted loans and that some lenders had a faster approval process. GAO drew on agency documents and interviews and measured no time or cost saved. It also found that the development data were 12 years old by 2004 and that FHA had no formal plan to update the scorecard.","category":"program","unexpected":false,"purpose":"FHA and its contractor Unicon Research Corporation built the TOTAL Scorecard to rank applications for FHA-insured loans by the likelihood of default and to accept most of them automatically.","system":"Technology Open to Approved Lenders (TOTAL) Scorecard","model_version":null,"developer":"Federal Housing Administration (HUD), with contractor Unicon Research Corporation and subcontractor Fair Isaac Corporation","deployer":"Federal Housing Administration and its direct endorsement lenders","location":"United States (national)","domain":"Housing finance: mortgage insurance underwriting","segment":null,"benefit_type":"Improved Organizational Efficiency","work_activities":["4.A.2.a.1","4.A.2.b.1"],"taxonomy_note":null,"registry_ids":{},"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":1,"reason":"GAO found that lenders needed less documentation for accepted loans and that one scorecard gave consistent decisions, but it measured no time or cost saved."},{"group":"personal","depth":1,"reason":"GAO found that borrowers shared in the lighter paperwork, since lenders no longer had to obtain verification of rent for accepted loans."}],"ai_role":{"status":"unassessed","statement":"GAO compared TOTAL's features with those of the scorecards it replaced, using documents and interviews. It did not measure time, cost or default rates with and without the scorecard. TOTAL is a logit model whose variable weights were estimated from 1992 FHA loan data. It is a statistical scorecard that FHA had not updated by 2006."},"evidence":[{"kind":"audit report","citation":"U.S. Government Accountability Office. Mortgage Financing: HUD Could Realize Additional Benefits from Its Mortgage Scorecard. GAO-06-435, report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity, House Committee on Financial Services, 13 April 2006. Section 'HUD Could Benefit Significantly More from TOTAL', pp. 15-16, and Table 1.","title":"Mortgage Financing: HUD Could Realize Additional Benefits from Its Mortgage Scorecard","url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-435/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-435.pdf","date":"2006-04-13","written_by":"independent","quote":"TOTAL has produced more consistent underwriting results and, for some lenders, has streamlined the approval process and reduced paperwork."}],"replication":{"produced_by":["Unicon fitted a logit model to a 1992 sample of FHA-endorsed loans, with credit score, loan-to-value ratio and cash reserves among its variables.","Lenders' automated underwriting systems pulled credit data and sent each application to TOTAL, which returned accept or refer.","FHA set a cut point that accepts 65 to 70 percent of applications automatically."],"must_hold":["Lenders must manually underwrite every loan that TOTAL refers.","Accepted loans must still pass FHA's additional credit checks, which can downgrade them to refer.","The scorecard must be updated as borrowers and products change, and GAO found that FHA had no formal plan to do so."],"echoes":[]},"paired_incident":null,"headline":"*TOTAL Scorecard* cuts paperwork and evens out FHA underwriting","metric":null,"comparator":{"against":"The FHA versions of Freddie Mac's Loan Prospector and Fannie Mae's Desktop Underwriter scorecards, used before 2004","before":"at times the results of their assessments differed, which resulted in the same loan being accepted by one scorecard and referred by the other","after":"TOTAL limits the number of loans that need to be approved manually because it provides consistent automatic underwriting decisions","basis":"assumed","quote":"As described in table 1, FHA’s current use of TOTAL has provided additional benefits over previous scorecards, such as less paperwork for lenders and more consistent underwriting decisions.","url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-435/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-435.pdf"},"later":null,"value":null,"developer_country":"United States","deployer_country":"United States","unrated_because":null,"brief_notes":null,"brief":null,"revisions":[{"date":"2026-11-01","change":"Added the record from the finding of the U.S. Government Accountability Office.","source":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-435/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-435.pdf","editor":"AIBD"}],"confidence":"found","shade":"high","claim_status":"Found by an auditor","claim_basis":"Sources: one independent audit report. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","case_jurisdictions":["United States"],"profile":{"case_id":"AIBD-1036","catalog_version":"1.0.0","source_fingerprint":"3ba952004864afc6a7deb6c04f351cc21beabb13ab1e465e7e2b65b795b65006","collection_refs":[{"collection_id":"aibd","version":"2026-10-31"},{"collection_id":"querist","version":"2026-10-25"}],"source_ids":["AIBD-1036-source-0001"],"families":{"strategic assessments":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"evaluations":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"monetary observations":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"institutional decisions":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]}},"fields":{"actors[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"developer":"Federal Housing Administration (HUD), with contractor Unicon Research Corporation and subcontractor Fair Isaac Corporation","deployer":"Federal Housing Administration and its direct endorsement lenders"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["developer","deployer"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"actors[].ownership_control":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"ai_contribution":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"ai_relationship":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"category":"program","ai_role":{"status":"unassessed","statement":"GAO compared TOTAL's features with those of the scorecards it replaced, using documents and interviews. It did not measure time, cost or default rates with and without the scorecard. TOTAL is a logit model whose variable weights were estimated from 1992 FHA loan data. It is a statistical scorecard that FHA had not updated by 2006."}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ai_role","category"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].alternatives":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].assessor_date":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].depth":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":1,"reason":"GAO found that lenders needed less documentation for accepted loans and that one scorecard gave consistent decisions, but it measured no time or cost saved."},{"group":"personal","depth":1,"reason":"GAO found that borrowers shared in the lighter paperwork, since lenders no longer had to obtain verification of rent for accepted loans."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].display_confidence":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"confidence":"high","evidence_word":"found","claim_status":"Found by an auditor","basis":"Sources: one independent audit report. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","interpretation":"Existing display rule preserved; the richer outcome-specific confidence question still needs review."}},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].rationale":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":1,"reason":"GAO found that lenders needed less documentation for accepted loans and that one scorecard gave consistent decisions, but it measured no time or cost saved."},{"group":"personal","depth":1,"reason":"GAO found that borrowers shared in the lighter paperwork, since lenders no longer had to obtain verification of rent for accepted loans."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].rubric_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].status_basis":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].target":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":1,"reason":"GAO found that lenders needed less documentation for accepted loans and that one scorecard gave consistent decisions, but it measured no time or cost saved."},{"group":"personal","depth":1,"reason":"GAO found that borrowers shared in the lighter paperwork, since lenders no longer had to obtain verification of rent for accepted loans."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"availability":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"brief":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"case_kind":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"case_links[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].evidence_links":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].evidence_strength":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"answer":"Found by an auditor. Sources: one independent audit report. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","evidence_word":"found","claim_status":"Found by an auditor"}},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-1036-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"Found by an auditor. Sources: one independent audit report. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","inferred":false}},"claims[].missingness":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].proposition":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"cross_border_flows[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"decisions[].action_outcome":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].grounds":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].institution_task":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].success_criterion":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"deployment_stage":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"classification":"routine use","answer":"The system was in routine use. FHA's direct endorsement lenders had used TOTAL to evaluate most new FHA-insured loan applications since 2004.","scope":"The period and activity described in the case."}},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-1036-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"The system was in routine use. FHA's direct endorsement lenders had used TOTAL to evaluate most new FHA-insured loan applications since 2004.","inferred":false}},"economics[].amount":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].costs[]":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].counterfactual":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].currency_price_basis":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].gross_net":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].measure_type":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].period_unit":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].realization":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].recipient_payer":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].return_payback":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].valuation_method":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"evaluations[].ai_uplift":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].comparator":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].design":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].effect":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].exposure":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].id":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].measurement_method":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].metric":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].reproduction_materials":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].setting_sample":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].uncertainty_limitations":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"external_references[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"follow_up[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"human_oversight":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"id":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"id":"AIBD-1036"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["id"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"infrastructure_dependencies[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].beneficiaries":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].beneficiary_count":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].benefit_type":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"benefit_type":"Improved Organizational Efficiency"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["benefit_type"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].claim":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"account":"The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insures home loans made mostly to low-income, minority and first-time buyers. From 1998 to 2004 it worked with the contractor Unicon Research Corporation to build the TOTAL Scorecard. Unicon fitted a logit model to 1992 data on 9,867 FHA loans that ended without an insurance claim and 4,818 that ended with one. From 2004, lenders ran FHA applications through TOTAL, which accepted 65 to 70 percent automatically and referred the rest for manual underwriting. In a report dated 13 April 2006, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that TOTAL had produced more consistent underwriting results. The two scorecards that it replaced had sometimes disagreed, with one accepting a loan that the other referred. GAO also found that lenders using TOTAL needed less documentation for accepted loans and that some lenders had a faster approval process. GAO drew on agency documents and interviews and measured no time or cost saved. It also found that the development data were 12 years old by 2004 and that FHA had no formal plan to update the scorecard.","benefit_type":"Improved Organizational Efficiency"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","benefit_type"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].distribution":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].duration":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].id":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].stakeholder_group":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":1,"reason":"GAO found that lenders needed less documentation for accepted loans and that one scorecard gave consistent decisions, but it measured no time or cost saved."},{"group":"personal","depth":1,"reason":"GAO found that borrowers shared in the lighter paperwork, since lenders no longer had to obtain verification of rent for accepted loans."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].status":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"benefit_status":"reported"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["benefit_status"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].tradeoffs":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].unexpected":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"unexpected":false,"purpose":"FHA and its contractor Unicon Research Corporation built the TOTAL Scorecard to rank applications for FHA-insured loans by the likelihood of default and to accept most of them automatically."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["unexpected","purpose"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"places[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"location":"United States (national)","developer_country":"United States","deployer_country":"United States"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["location","developer_country","deployer_country"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"purpose":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"purpose":"FHA and its contractor Unicon Research Corporation built the TOTAL Scorecard to rank applications for FHA-insured loans by the likelihood of default and to accept most of them automatically."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["purpose"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"record_dates":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"date_observed":"2006-04-13","date_basis":"source publication","date_precision":"day","revisions":[{"date":"2026-11-01","change":"Added the record from the finding of the U.S. Government Accountability Office.","source":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-435/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-435.pdf","editor":"AIBD"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["date_observed","date_basis","date_precision","revisions"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"replication.attempts[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"replication.conditions":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"replication":{"produced_by":["Unicon fitted a logit model to a 1992 sample of FHA-endorsed loans, with credit score, loan-to-value ratio and cash reserves among its variables.","Lenders' automated underwriting systems pulled credit data and sent each application to TOTAL, which returned accept or refer.","FHA set a cut point that accepts 65 to 70 percent of applications automatically."],"must_hold":["Lenders must manually underwrite every loan that TOTAL refers.","Accepted loans must still pass FHA's additional credit checks, which can downgrade them to refer.","The scorecard must be updated as borrowers and products change, and GAO found that FHA had no formal plan to do so."],"echoes":[]}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["replication"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"revision_history[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"revisions":[{"date":"2026-11-01","change":"Added the record from the finding of the U.S. Government Accountability Office.","source":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-435/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-435.pdf","editor":"AIBD"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["revisions"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sector":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"domain":"Housing finance: mortgage insurance underwriting"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["domain"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].access_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].citation_locator":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"evidence":[{"kind":"audit report","citation":"U.S. Government Accountability Office. Mortgage Financing: HUD Could Realize Additional Benefits from Its Mortgage Scorecard. GAO-06-435, report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity, House Committee on Financial Services, 13 April 2006. Section 'HUD Could Benefit Significantly More from TOTAL', pp. 15-16, and Table 1.","title":"Mortgage Financing: HUD Could Realize Additional Benefits from Its Mortgage Scorecard","url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-435/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-435.pdf","date":"2006-04-13","written_by":"independent","quote":"TOTAL has produced more consistent underwriting results and, for some lenders, has streamlined the approval process and reduced paperwork."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].id":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["AIBD-1036-source-0001"],"role":"Existing evidence items, in their original order"},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"complete"},"sources[].language":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].relationship":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"evidence":[{"kind":"audit report","citation":"U.S. Government Accountability Office. Mortgage Financing: HUD Could Realize Additional Benefits from Its Mortgage Scorecard. GAO-06-435, report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Housing and Community Opportunity, House Committee on Financial Services, 13 April 2006. Section 'HUD Could Benefit Significantly More from TOTAL', pp. 15-16, and Table 1.","title":"Mortgage Financing: HUD Could Realize Additional Benefits from Its Mortgage Scorecard","url":"https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-435/pdf/GAOREPORTS-GAO-06-435.pdf","date":"2006-04-13","written_by":"independent","quote":"TOTAL has produced more consistent underwriting results and, for some lenders, has streamlined the approval process and reduced paperwork."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].upstream_sources":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"strategic_assessments[]":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"strategic assessments"},"summary":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"summary":"In April 2006 GAO found that FHA's TOTAL Scorecard had brought lenders and borrowers less paperwork and more consistent underwriting decisions than the two scorecards it replaced.","account":"The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insures home loans made mostly to low-income, minority and first-time buyers. From 1998 to 2004 it worked with the contractor Unicon Research Corporation to build the TOTAL Scorecard. Unicon fitted a logit model to 1992 data on 9,867 FHA loans that ended without an insurance claim and 4,818 that ended with one. From 2004, lenders ran FHA applications through TOTAL, which accepted 65 to 70 percent automatically and referred the rest for manual underwriting. In a report dated 13 April 2006, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that TOTAL had produced more consistent underwriting results. The two scorecards that it replaced had sometimes disagreed, with one accepting a loan that the other referred. GAO also found that lenders using TOTAL needed less documentation for accepted loans and that some lenders had a faster approval process. GAO drew on agency documents and interviews and measured no time or cost saved. It also found that the development data were 12 years old by 2004 and that FHA had no formal plan to update the scorecard."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["summary","account"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].autonomy_permissions":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].component_role":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].deployment_configuration":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].inputs_outputs":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].model_name":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].model_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].product_name":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"system":"Technology Open to Approved Lenders (TOTAL) Scorecard"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["system"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].provider":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"taxonomy_crosswalks[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"title":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"title":"GAO finds that FHA's TOTAL Scorecard gave lenders less paperwork and more consistent underwriting decisions than the scorecards it replaced","headline":"*TOTAL Scorecard* cuts paperwork and evens out FHA underwriting"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["title","headline"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"version":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["d4a0d459034ab25b256ec8f1ddf45ee3aa0479fc88db20a22250fc0ab17e0e18"],"role":"SHA-256 of the complete public record and its assessments"},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"SHA-256 of the public record, its assessments, and its displayed answers and notes, excluding its own identifier and the derived coverage summary.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"complete"},"workflow":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"account":"The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insures home loans made mostly to low-income, minority and first-time buyers. From 1998 to 2004 it worked with the contractor Unicon Research Corporation to build the TOTAL Scorecard. Unicon fitted a logit model to 1992 data on 9,867 FHA loans that ended without an insurance claim and 4,818 that ended with one. From 2004, lenders ran FHA applications through TOTAL, which accepted 65 to 70 percent automatically and referred the rest for manual underwriting. In a report dated 13 April 2006, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that TOTAL had produced more consistent underwriting results. The two scorecards that it replaced had sometimes disagreed, with one accepting a loan that the other referred. GAO also found that lenders using TOTAL needed less documentation for accepted loans and that some lenders had a faster approval process. GAO drew on agency documents and interviews and measured no time or cost saved. It also found that the development data were 12 years old by 2004 and that FHA had no formal plan to update the scorecard.","replication":{"produced_by":["Unicon fitted a logit model to a 1992 sample of FHA-endorsed loans, with credit score, loan-to-value ratio and cash reserves among its variables.","Lenders' automated underwriting systems pulled credit data and sent each application to TOTAL, which returned accept or refer.","FHA set a cut point that accepts 65 to 70 percent of applications automatically."],"must_hold":["Lenders must manually underwrite every loan that TOTAL refers.","Accepted loans must still pass FHA's additional credit checks, which can downgrade them to refer.","The scorecard must be updated as borrowers and products change, and GAO found that FHA had no formal plan to do so."],"echoes":[]}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","replication"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"}},"summary":{"total":91,"addressed":91,"known":28,"reviewed":2,"reviewed_complete":2,"reviewed_partial":0,"record_mapped":26,"review_not_assessed":63,"not_assessed":0,"complete":false,"by_state":{"value_present":28,"not_reported":0,"unresolved":63,"not_assessed":0,"not_applicable":0,"withheld":0,"source_unavailable":0}}},"presentation_version":"f401172ed84fb4c36b0fb1c154a2ac227960efa591ac6a62b0c7cc4dfcc4efec"}