{"id":"AIBD-0899","title":"CQC reports that Sunderland City Council staff said that an AI application was improving the administration of safeguarding concerns","summary":"In its May 2025 assessment of Sunderland City Council, CQC reports that staff said that an AI application they had started to use helped with the administration of safeguarding concerns.","date_observed":"2025-05-09","date_basis":"source publication","date_precision":"day","benefit_status":"reported","source_collection":null,"source_entry":null,"account":"The Care Quality Commission (CQC) published its assessment of Sunderland City Council's adult social care on 9 May 2025 and rated the council good. Under safeguarding, CQC reports that staff said that an AI application they had started to use was having a positive impact. The impact was on the administration of safeguarding concerns. According to council data, no safeguarding concerns were awaiting an initial review, but CQC does not link this to the application. The safeguarding page does not name the application. CQC's summary states that the council was progressing technology such as magic notes and telephony applications, improving efficiency and communication. CQC gives no measure of the application's effect.","category":"program","unexpected":false,"purpose":"An unnamed developer built the AI application that Sunderland staff used to administer safeguarding concerns.","system":"AI application used in the administration of safeguarding concerns (not named in the safeguarding finding)","model_version":null,"developer":"Not named in the assessment","deployer":"Sunderland City Council (adult social care)","location":"Sunderland, England, United Kingdom","domain":"Adult social care","segment":null,"benefit_type":"Improved Organizational Efficiency","work_activities":["4.A.4.c.1","4.A.3.b.6"],"taxonomy_note":null,"registry_ids":{},"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":null,"reason":"Staff told CQC that the application had a positive impact on safeguarding administration, but CQC gives no measure of it."}],"ai_role":{"status":"unassessed","statement":"CQC relays staff views and gives no comparison with and without the application. It does not name or describe the application, so it is unclear whether it uses machine learning."},"evidence":[{"kind":"descriptive report","citation":"Care Quality Commission. Sunderland City Council local authority assessment (May 2025), Theme 3: Safeguarding. Published 9 May 2025, updated 11 August 2025.","title":"Sunderland City Council local authority assessment: Safeguarding","url":"https://www.cqc.org.uk/care-services/local-authority-assessment-reports/sunderland-council/sunderland-0525/theme3/safeguarding","date":"2025-05-09","written_by":"independent","quote":"Staff told us an artificial intelligence application they had started to use was having a positive impact on the administration of safeguarding concerns."},{"kind":"descriptive report","citation":"Care Quality Commission. Sunderland City Council local authority assessment (May 2025), summary page. Published 9 May 2025. It names the council's technology in general and does not tie it to the safeguarding finding.","title":"Sunderland City Council local authority assessment: summary","url":"https://www.cqc.org.uk/care-services/local-authority-assessment-reports/sunderland-council/sunderland-0525/summary","date":"2025-05-09","written_by":"independent","quote":"The local authority was progressing innovative technology use, such as magic notes and telephony applications, improving efficiency and communication.","supports_benefit":false}],"replication":{"produced_by":["Staff had started to use an AI application in the administration of safeguarding concerns."],"must_hold":["The council keeps its standards and quality assurance for safeguarding enquiries in place."],"echoes":[]},"paired_incident":null,"headline":"Sunderland staff credit an *AI application* in safeguarding work","metric":null,"comparator":null,"later":null,"value":null,"developer_country":null,"deployer_country":"United Kingdom","unrated_because":"CQC relays staff views without a measure of the effect.","brief_notes":null,"brief":null,"revisions":[{"date":"2026-10-31","change":"Added the record from the report of the Care Quality Commission.","source":"https://www.cqc.org.uk/care-services/local-authority-assessment-reports/sunderland-council/sunderland-0525/theme3/safeguarding","editor":"AIBD"}],"confidence":"reported","shade":"medium","claim_status":"Independently reported","claim_basis":"Sources: two independent descriptive reports. For the benefit itself, the cited sources include no independent study of the benefit and no finding by an external body.","case_jurisdictions":["United Kingdom"],"profile":{"case_id":"AIBD-0899","catalog_version":"1.0.0","source_fingerprint":"ba430c69a84cf5945f36b5c74d31e76933ffa5428e250f58c1e9464324e8bfba","collection_refs":[{"collection_id":"aibd","version":"2026-10-31"}],"source_ids":["AIBD-0899-source-0001","AIBD-0899-source-0002"],"families":{"strategic assessments":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"evaluations":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"monetary observations":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"institutional decisions":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]}},"fields":{"actors[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"developer":"Not named in the assessment","deployer":"Sunderland City Council (adult social care)"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["developer","deployer"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"actors[].ownership_control":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"ai_contribution":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"ai_relationship":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"category":"program","ai_role":{"status":"unassessed","statement":"CQC relays staff views and gives no comparison with and without the application. It does not name or describe the application, so it is unclear whether it uses machine learning."}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ai_role","category"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].alternatives":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].assessor_date":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].depth":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].display_confidence":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"confidence":"medium","evidence_word":"reported","claim_status":"Independently reported","basis":"Sources: two independent descriptive reports. For the benefit itself, the cited sources include no independent study of the benefit and no finding by an external body.","interpretation":"Existing display rule preserved; the richer outcome-specific confidence question still needs review."}},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].rationale":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","reason":"Staff told CQC that the application had a positive impact on safeguarding administration, but CQC gives no measure of it."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].rubric_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].status_basis":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].target":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","reason":"Staff told CQC that the application had a positive impact on safeguarding administration, but CQC gives no measure of it."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"availability":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"brief":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"case_kind":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"case_links[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].evidence_links":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].evidence_strength":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"answer":"Independently reported. Sources: two independent descriptive reports. For the benefit itself, the cited sources include no independent study of the benefit and no finding by an external body.","evidence_word":"reported","claim_status":"Independently reported"}},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0899-source-0001","AIBD-0899-source-0002"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"Independently reported. Sources: two independent descriptive reports. For the benefit itself, the cited sources include no independent study of the benefit and no finding by an external body.","inferred":false}},"claims[].missingness":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].proposition":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"cross_border_flows[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"decisions[].action_outcome":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].grounds":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].institution_task":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].success_criterion":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"deployment_stage":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"classification":"routine use","answer":"The system was in routine use. Staff told CQC that they had started to use the application in safeguarding work.","scope":"The period and activity described in the case."}},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0899-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"The system was in routine use. Staff told CQC that they had started to use the application in safeguarding work.","inferred":false}},"economics[].amount":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].costs[]":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].counterfactual":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].currency_price_basis":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].gross_net":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].measure_type":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].period_unit":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].realization":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].recipient_payer":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].return_payback":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].valuation_method":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"evaluations[].ai_uplift":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].comparator":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].design":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].effect":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].exposure":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].id":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].measurement_method":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].metric":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].reproduction_materials":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].setting_sample":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].uncertainty_limitations":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"external_references[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"follow_up[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"human_oversight":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"id":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"id":"AIBD-0899"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["id"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"infrastructure_dependencies[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].beneficiaries":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].beneficiary_count":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].benefit_type":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"benefit_type":"Improved Organizational Efficiency"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["benefit_type"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].claim":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"account":"The Care Quality Commission (CQC) published its assessment of Sunderland City Council's adult social care on 9 May 2025 and rated the council good. Under safeguarding, CQC reports that staff said that an AI application they had started to use was having a positive impact. The impact was on the administration of safeguarding concerns. According to council data, no safeguarding concerns were awaiting an initial review, but CQC does not link this to the application. The safeguarding page does not name the application. CQC's summary states that the council was progressing technology such as magic notes and telephony applications, improving efficiency and communication. CQC gives no measure of the application's effect.","benefit_type":"Improved Organizational Efficiency"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","benefit_type"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].distribution":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].duration":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].id":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].stakeholder_group":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","reason":"Staff told CQC that the application had a positive impact on safeguarding administration, but CQC gives no measure of it."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].status":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"benefit_status":"reported"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["benefit_status"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].tradeoffs":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].unexpected":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"unexpected":false,"purpose":"An unnamed developer built the AI application that Sunderland staff used to administer safeguarding concerns."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["unexpected","purpose"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"places[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"location":"Sunderland, England, United Kingdom","deployer_country":"United Kingdom"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["location","deployer_country"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"purpose":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"purpose":"An unnamed developer built the AI application that Sunderland staff used to administer safeguarding concerns."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["purpose"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"record_dates":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"date_observed":"2025-05-09","date_basis":"source publication","date_precision":"day","revisions":[{"date":"2026-10-31","change":"Added the record from the report of the Care Quality Commission.","source":"https://www.cqc.org.uk/care-services/local-authority-assessment-reports/sunderland-council/sunderland-0525/theme3/safeguarding","editor":"AIBD"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["date_observed","date_basis","date_precision","revisions"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"replication.attempts[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"replication.conditions":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"replication":{"produced_by":["Staff had started to use an AI application in the administration of safeguarding concerns."],"must_hold":["The council keeps its standards and quality assurance for safeguarding enquiries in place."],"echoes":[]}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["replication"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"revision_history[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"revisions":[{"date":"2026-10-31","change":"Added the record from the report of the Care Quality Commission.","source":"https://www.cqc.org.uk/care-services/local-authority-assessment-reports/sunderland-council/sunderland-0525/theme3/safeguarding","editor":"AIBD"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["revisions"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sector":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"domain":"Adult social care"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["domain"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].access_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].citation_locator":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"evidence":[{"kind":"descriptive report","citation":"Care Quality Commission. Sunderland City Council local authority assessment (May 2025), Theme 3: Safeguarding. Published 9 May 2025, updated 11 August 2025.","title":"Sunderland City Council local authority assessment: Safeguarding","url":"https://www.cqc.org.uk/care-services/local-authority-assessment-reports/sunderland-council/sunderland-0525/theme3/safeguarding","date":"2025-05-09","written_by":"independent","quote":"Staff told us an artificial intelligence application they had started to use was having a positive impact on the administration of safeguarding concerns."},{"kind":"descriptive report","citation":"Care Quality Commission. Sunderland City Council local authority assessment (May 2025), summary page. Published 9 May 2025. It names the council's technology in general and does not tie it to the safeguarding finding.","title":"Sunderland City Council local authority assessment: summary","url":"https://www.cqc.org.uk/care-services/local-authority-assessment-reports/sunderland-council/sunderland-0525/summary","date":"2025-05-09","written_by":"independent","quote":"The local authority was progressing innovative technology use, such as magic notes and telephony applications, improving efficiency and communication.","supports_benefit":false}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].id":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["AIBD-0899-source-0001","AIBD-0899-source-0002"],"role":"Existing evidence items, in their original order"},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"complete"},"sources[].language":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].relationship":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"evidence":[{"kind":"descriptive report","citation":"Care Quality Commission. Sunderland City Council local authority assessment (May 2025), Theme 3: Safeguarding. Published 9 May 2025, updated 11 August 2025.","title":"Sunderland City Council local authority assessment: Safeguarding","url":"https://www.cqc.org.uk/care-services/local-authority-assessment-reports/sunderland-council/sunderland-0525/theme3/safeguarding","date":"2025-05-09","written_by":"independent","quote":"Staff told us an artificial intelligence application they had started to use was having a positive impact on the administration of safeguarding concerns."},{"kind":"descriptive report","citation":"Care Quality Commission. Sunderland City Council local authority assessment (May 2025), summary page. Published 9 May 2025. It names the council's technology in general and does not tie it to the safeguarding finding.","title":"Sunderland City Council local authority assessment: summary","url":"https://www.cqc.org.uk/care-services/local-authority-assessment-reports/sunderland-council/sunderland-0525/summary","date":"2025-05-09","written_by":"independent","quote":"The local authority was progressing innovative technology use, such as magic notes and telephony applications, improving efficiency and communication.","supports_benefit":false}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].upstream_sources":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"strategic_assessments[]":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"strategic assessments"},"summary":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"summary":"In its May 2025 assessment of Sunderland City Council, CQC reports that staff said that an AI application they had started to use helped with the administration of safeguarding concerns.","account":"The Care Quality Commission (CQC) published its assessment of Sunderland City Council's adult social care on 9 May 2025 and rated the council good. Under safeguarding, CQC reports that staff said that an AI application they had started to use was having a positive impact. The impact was on the administration of safeguarding concerns. According to council data, no safeguarding concerns were awaiting an initial review, but CQC does not link this to the application. The safeguarding page does not name the application. CQC's summary states that the council was progressing technology such as magic notes and telephony applications, improving efficiency and communication. CQC gives no measure of the application's effect."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["summary","account"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].autonomy_permissions":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].component_role":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].deployment_configuration":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].inputs_outputs":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].model_name":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].model_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].product_name":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"system":"AI application used in the administration of safeguarding concerns (not named in the safeguarding finding)"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["system"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].provider":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"taxonomy_crosswalks[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"title":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"title":"CQC reports that Sunderland City Council staff said that an AI application was improving the administration of safeguarding concerns","headline":"Sunderland staff credit an *AI application* in safeguarding work"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["title","headline"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"version":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["3f98b9d13386b922576a39b13b5b37c00ca6f90bad8d8c2deda260f18fd62267"],"role":"SHA-256 of the complete public record and its assessments"},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"SHA-256 of the public record, its assessments, and its displayed answers and notes, excluding its own identifier and the derived coverage summary.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"complete"},"workflow":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"account":"The Care Quality Commission (CQC) published its assessment of Sunderland City Council's adult social care on 9 May 2025 and rated the council good. Under safeguarding, CQC reports that staff said that an AI application they had started to use was having a positive impact. The impact was on the administration of safeguarding concerns. According to council data, no safeguarding concerns were awaiting an initial review, but CQC does not link this to the application. The safeguarding page does not name the application. CQC's summary states that the council was progressing technology such as magic notes and telephony applications, improving efficiency and communication. CQC gives no measure of the application's effect.","replication":{"produced_by":["Staff had started to use an AI application in the administration of safeguarding concerns."],"must_hold":["The council keeps its standards and quality assurance for safeguarding enquiries in place."],"echoes":[]}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","replication"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"}},"summary":{"total":91,"addressed":91,"known":27,"reviewed":2,"reviewed_complete":2,"reviewed_partial":0,"record_mapped":25,"review_not_assessed":64,"not_assessed":0,"complete":false,"by_state":{"value_present":27,"not_reported":0,"unresolved":64,"not_assessed":0,"not_applicable":0,"withheld":0,"source_unavailable":0}}},"presentation_version":"baf9f82fc43e2c58b8792ed7e8372c0f9abc2d32a75c1dee4e7cf2b13267627d"}