{"id":"AIBD-0846","title":"EPA finds that a software NOx monitor on Braintree's Potter II Unit 3 matched reference measurements on gas and on oil and approves it","summary":"EPA found that a predictive emission monitor on Braintree's Potter II Unit 3 matched reference NOx measurements on gas and oil. It estimated that it would cost less than half as much as an analyzer.","date_observed":"2006-05-31","date_basis":"source publication","date_precision":"day","benefit_status":"reported","source_collection":null,"source_entry":null,"account":"Braintree Electric Light Department (BELD) runs Unit 3, a combined-cycle unit with a 76-megawatt gas turbine, at its Norton P. Potter II Station in Massachusetts. Since May 2002 it has monitored the unit's NOx with a predictive emission monitoring system (PEMS) under a test protocol that EPA approved. EPA describes the PEMS as software that converts turbine operating readings into NOx through relationships developed for each fuel. A temporary reference method system gave hourly data from May 2002 to December 2004, covering 676 hours on natural gas and 419 hours on fuel oil. EPA found that the PEMS output passed all three statistical tests for both fuels and approved it on 31 May 2006. EPA estimated that the PEMS, with the extra audits it required, would cost less than half as much a year as an analyzer. The letter does not name the vendor. It mentions training and retraining the PEMS but does not say whether the relationships are learned models or fixed equations.","category":"aggregate result","unexpected":false,"purpose":"An unnamed vendor built the PEMS to compute Unit 3's NOx emission rate from turbine operating readings so that it can serve as the unit's emissions monitor.","system":"Predictive emission monitoring system (PEMS) on Potter II Unit 3","model_version":null,"developer":"Not named in the letter","deployer":"Braintree Electric Light Department (BELD), Norton P. Potter II Station Unit 3","location":"Braintree, Massachusetts, United States","domain":"Environment and climate","segment":null,"benefit_type":"Improved Task Accuracy","work_activities":["4.A.1.b.3","4.A.1.a.2"],"taxonomy_note":"The software matched reference measurements in EPA's tests and was approved to stand in for an analyzer. EPA did not find that it was more accurate. EPA estimated that it would cost less than half as much to run.","registry_ids":{},"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":1,"reason":"EPA approved the software as Unit 3's NOx monitor and estimated that it would cost less than half as much a year as an analyzer."}],"ai_role":{"status":"unassessed","statement":"EPA measured the software's accuracy against reference measurements over the same hours, and the cost comparison is an estimate. The letter describes relationships developed for each fuel and conditions for retraining the PEMS, but it does not say whether those relationships are learned statistical models or fixed equations."},"evidence":[{"kind":"regulatory document","citation":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Clean Air Markets Division. Approval of the Predictive Emission Monitoring System Installed on Unit 3 at Braintree Electric Light Department's Norton P. Potter II Station (ORISPL 01660). Letter to Braintree Electric Light Department, 31 May 2006.","title":"Approval of the Predictive Emission Monitoring System Installed on Unit 3 at Braintree Electric Light Department's Norton P. Potter II Station (ORISPL 01660)","url":"https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-05/documents/potter.pdf","date":"2006-05-31","written_by":"independent","quote":"The PEMS NOx lb/mmBtu output passed each of the three statistical tests for both fuels."}],"replication":{"produced_by":["The PEMS read fuel flow and properties, combustion air, steam injection and exhaust conditions.","Relationships developed for each fuel converted the readings into a NOx emission rate.","Redundant sensors and hourly manual readings of gauges checked the inputs."],"must_hold":["Inputs must stay within the range of the training data, or BELD must report the unit's maximum potential NOx rate.","During startup, shutdown or loss of steam injection, BELD must report the maximum potential NOx rate."],"echoes":[]},"paired_incident":null,"headline":"Braintree's *predictive emission monitor* passes EPA's NOx tests","metric":"cost less than half as much as an analyzer","comparator":{"against":"Hourly NOx readings from a temporary reference method system over the same hours, judged by EPA's three statistical tests","before":"A linear correlation coefficient (r) above 0.8 required","after":"r = 0.8524 on natural gas and r = 0.9211 on fuel oil","basis":"measured","quote":"Three statistical tests must be passed, i.e., a linear correlation coefficient (r) > 0.8, an F-test, and a one-tailed t-test for bias described in Appendix A to Part 75.","url":"https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-05/documents/potter.pdf"},"later":null,"value":{"amount":"$12,950","what":"Estimated yearly saving of the PEMS over an analyzer even if outside contractors run the extra audits","who":"Braintree Electric Light Department","estimate":true,"quote":"Even if outside contractors are used instead of in-house staff, the annual PEMS cost would be about 21 percent less ($12,950 less) than the annual cost associated with a CEMS.","url":"https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-05/documents/potter.pdf"},"developer_country":null,"deployer_country":"United States","unrated_because":null,"brief_notes":null,"brief":null,"revisions":[{"date":"2026-10-31","change":"Added the record from the finding of EPA.","source":"https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-05/documents/potter.pdf","editor":"AIBD"}],"confidence":"found","shade":"high","claim_status":"Found by a regulator","claim_basis":"Sources: one independent regulatory document. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","case_jurisdictions":["United States"],"profile":{"case_id":"AIBD-0846","catalog_version":"1.0.0","source_fingerprint":"d7b1f46dccb4b2787961f76fe68003635ee04c70a081743579dbb1d8af0e7c20","collection_refs":[{"collection_id":"aibd","version":"2026-10-31"},{"collection_id":"querist","version":"2026-10-25"}],"source_ids":["AIBD-0846-source-0001"],"families":{"strategic assessments":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"evaluations":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"monetary observations":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"text","text":"An existing source-stated monetary observation is present in the original value object."},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["value"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial","record_ids":["AIBD-0846-legacy-value"]},"institutional decisions":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]}},"fields":{"actors[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"developer":"Not named in the letter","deployer":"Braintree Electric Light Department (BELD), Norton P. Potter II Station Unit 3"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["developer","deployer"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"actors[].ownership_control":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"ai_contribution":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"ai_relationship":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"category":"aggregate result","ai_role":{"status":"unassessed","statement":"EPA measured the software's accuracy against reference measurements over the same hours, and the cost comparison is an estimate. The letter describes relationships developed for each fuel and conditions for retraining the PEMS, but it does not say whether those relationships are learned statistical models or fixed equations."}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ai_role","category"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].alternatives":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].assessor_date":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].depth":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":1,"reason":"EPA approved the software as Unit 3's NOx monitor and estimated that it would cost less than half as much a year as an analyzer."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].display_confidence":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"confidence":"high","evidence_word":"found","claim_status":"Found by a regulator","basis":"Sources: one independent regulatory document. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","interpretation":"Existing display rule preserved; the richer outcome-specific confidence question still needs review."}},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].rationale":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":1,"reason":"EPA approved the software as Unit 3's NOx monitor and estimated that it would cost less than half as much a year as an analyzer."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].rubric_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].status_basis":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].target":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":1,"reason":"EPA approved the software as Unit 3's NOx monitor and estimated that it would cost less than half as much a year as an analyzer."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"availability":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"brief":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"case_kind":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"case_links[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].evidence_links":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].evidence_strength":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"answer":"Found by a regulator. Sources: one independent regulatory document. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","evidence_word":"found","claim_status":"Found by a regulator"}},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0846-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"Found by a regulator. Sources: one independent regulatory document. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","inferred":false}},"claims[].missingness":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].proposition":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"cross_border_flows[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"decisions[].action_outcome":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].grounds":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].institution_task":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].success_criterion":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"deployment_stage":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"classification":"routine use","answer":"The system was in routine use. BELD had monitored the unit's NOx with the PEMS since May 2002, and EPA approved it as the unit's monitor in 2006.","scope":"The period and activity described in the case."}},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0846-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"The system was in routine use. BELD had monitored the unit's NOx with the PEMS since May 2002, and EPA approved it as the unit's monitor in 2006.","inferred":false}},"economics[].amount":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"value":{"amount":"$12,950","what":"Estimated yearly saving of the PEMS over an analyzer even if outside contractors run the extra audits","who":"Braintree Electric Light Department","estimate":true,"quote":"Even if outside contractors are used instead of in-house staff, the annual PEMS cost would be about 21 percent less ($12,950 less) than the annual cost associated with a CEMS.","url":"https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-05/documents/potter.pdf"}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["value"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"economics[].costs[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"economics[].counterfactual":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"economics[].currency_price_basis":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"economics[].gross_net":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"economics[].measure_type":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"value":{"amount":"$12,950","what":"Estimated yearly saving of the PEMS over an analyzer even if outside contractors run the extra audits","who":"Braintree Electric Light Department","estimate":true,"quote":"Even if outside contractors are used instead of in-house staff, the annual PEMS cost would be about 21 percent less ($12,950 less) than the annual cost associated with a CEMS.","url":"https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-05/documents/potter.pdf"}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["value"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"economics[].period_unit":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"economics[].realization":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"economics[].recipient_payer":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"value":{"amount":"$12,950","what":"Estimated yearly saving of the PEMS over an analyzer even if outside contractors run the extra audits","who":"Braintree Electric Light Department","estimate":true,"quote":"Even if outside contractors are used instead of in-house staff, the annual PEMS cost would be about 21 percent less ($12,950 less) than the annual cost associated with a CEMS.","url":"https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-05/documents/potter.pdf"}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["value"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"economics[].return_payback":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"economics[].valuation_method":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"evaluations[].ai_uplift":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].comparator":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].design":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].effect":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].exposure":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].id":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].measurement_method":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].metric":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].reproduction_materials":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].setting_sample":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].uncertainty_limitations":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"external_references[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"follow_up[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"human_oversight":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"id":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"id":"AIBD-0846"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["id"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"infrastructure_dependencies[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].beneficiaries":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].beneficiary_count":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].benefit_type":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"benefit_type":"Improved Task Accuracy","taxonomy_note":"The software matched reference measurements in EPA's tests and was approved to stand in for an analyzer. EPA did not find that it was more accurate. EPA estimated that it would cost less than half as much to run."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["benefit_type","taxonomy_note"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].claim":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"account":"Braintree Electric Light Department (BELD) runs Unit 3, a combined-cycle unit with a 76-megawatt gas turbine, at its Norton P. Potter II Station in Massachusetts. Since May 2002 it has monitored the unit's NOx with a predictive emission monitoring system (PEMS) under a test protocol that EPA approved. EPA describes the PEMS as software that converts turbine operating readings into NOx through relationships developed for each fuel. A temporary reference method system gave hourly data from May 2002 to December 2004, covering 676 hours on natural gas and 419 hours on fuel oil. EPA found that the PEMS output passed all three statistical tests for both fuels and approved it on 31 May 2006. EPA estimated that the PEMS, with the extra audits it required, would cost less than half as much a year as an analyzer. The letter does not name the vendor. It mentions training and retraining the PEMS but does not say whether the relationships are learned models or fixed equations.","benefit_type":"Improved Task Accuracy"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","benefit_type"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].distribution":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].duration":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].id":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].stakeholder_group":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":1,"reason":"EPA approved the software as Unit 3's NOx monitor and estimated that it would cost less than half as much a year as an analyzer."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].status":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"benefit_status":"reported"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["benefit_status"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].tradeoffs":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].unexpected":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"unexpected":false,"purpose":"An unnamed vendor built the PEMS to compute Unit 3's NOx emission rate from turbine operating readings so that it can serve as the unit's emissions monitor."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["unexpected","purpose"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"places[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"location":"Braintree, Massachusetts, United States","deployer_country":"United States"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["location","deployer_country"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"purpose":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"purpose":"An unnamed vendor built the PEMS to compute Unit 3's NOx emission rate from turbine operating readings so that it can serve as the unit's emissions monitor."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["purpose"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"record_dates":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"date_observed":"2006-05-31","date_basis":"source publication","date_precision":"day","revisions":[{"date":"2026-10-31","change":"Added the record from the finding of EPA.","source":"https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-05/documents/potter.pdf","editor":"AIBD"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["date_observed","date_basis","date_precision","revisions"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"replication.attempts[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"replication.conditions":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"replication":{"produced_by":["The PEMS read fuel flow and properties, combustion air, steam injection and exhaust conditions.","Relationships developed for each fuel converted the readings into a NOx emission rate.","Redundant sensors and hourly manual readings of gauges checked the inputs."],"must_hold":["Inputs must stay within the range of the training data, or BELD must report the unit's maximum potential NOx rate.","During startup, shutdown or loss of steam injection, BELD must report the maximum potential NOx rate."],"echoes":[]}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["replication"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"revision_history[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"revisions":[{"date":"2026-10-31","change":"Added the record from the finding of EPA.","source":"https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-05/documents/potter.pdf","editor":"AIBD"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["revisions"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sector":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"domain":"Environment and climate"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["domain"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].access_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].citation_locator":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"evidence":[{"kind":"regulatory document","citation":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Clean Air Markets Division. Approval of the Predictive Emission Monitoring System Installed on Unit 3 at Braintree Electric Light Department's Norton P. Potter II Station (ORISPL 01660). Letter to Braintree Electric Light Department, 31 May 2006.","title":"Approval of the Predictive Emission Monitoring System Installed on Unit 3 at Braintree Electric Light Department's Norton P. Potter II Station (ORISPL 01660)","url":"https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-05/documents/potter.pdf","date":"2006-05-31","written_by":"independent","quote":"The PEMS NOx lb/mmBtu output passed each of the three statistical tests for both fuels."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].id":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["AIBD-0846-source-0001"],"role":"Existing evidence items, in their original order"},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"complete"},"sources[].language":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].relationship":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"evidence":[{"kind":"regulatory document","citation":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Clean Air Markets Division. Approval of the Predictive Emission Monitoring System Installed on Unit 3 at Braintree Electric Light Department's Norton P. Potter II Station (ORISPL 01660). Letter to Braintree Electric Light Department, 31 May 2006.","title":"Approval of the Predictive Emission Monitoring System Installed on Unit 3 at Braintree Electric Light Department's Norton P. Potter II Station (ORISPL 01660)","url":"https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-05/documents/potter.pdf","date":"2006-05-31","written_by":"independent","quote":"The PEMS NOx lb/mmBtu output passed each of the three statistical tests for both fuels."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].upstream_sources":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"strategic_assessments[]":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"strategic assessments"},"summary":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"summary":"EPA found that a predictive emission monitor on Braintree's Potter II Unit 3 matched reference NOx measurements on gas and oil. It estimated that it would cost less than half as much as an analyzer.","account":"Braintree Electric Light Department (BELD) runs Unit 3, a combined-cycle unit with a 76-megawatt gas turbine, at its Norton P. Potter II Station in Massachusetts. Since May 2002 it has monitored the unit's NOx with a predictive emission monitoring system (PEMS) under a test protocol that EPA approved. EPA describes the PEMS as software that converts turbine operating readings into NOx through relationships developed for each fuel. A temporary reference method system gave hourly data from May 2002 to December 2004, covering 676 hours on natural gas and 419 hours on fuel oil. EPA found that the PEMS output passed all three statistical tests for both fuels and approved it on 31 May 2006. EPA estimated that the PEMS, with the extra audits it required, would cost less than half as much a year as an analyzer. The letter does not name the vendor. It mentions training and retraining the PEMS but does not say whether the relationships are learned models or fixed equations."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["summary","account"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].autonomy_permissions":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].component_role":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].deployment_configuration":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].inputs_outputs":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].model_name":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].model_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].product_name":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"system":"Predictive emission monitoring system (PEMS) on Potter II Unit 3"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["system"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].provider":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"taxonomy_crosswalks[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"title":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"title":"EPA finds that a software NOx monitor on Braintree's Potter II Unit 3 matched reference measurements on gas and on oil and approves it","headline":"Braintree's *predictive emission monitor* passes EPA's NOx tests"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["title","headline"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"version":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["50dc87511cfe0ff3bf814dd71a23927ea3faea928cdc0d31301b4f9f6c8c35df"],"role":"SHA-256 of the complete public record and its assessments"},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"SHA-256 of the public record, its assessments, and its displayed answers and notes, excluding its own identifier and the derived coverage summary.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"complete"},"workflow":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"account":"Braintree Electric Light Department (BELD) runs Unit 3, a combined-cycle unit with a 76-megawatt gas turbine, at its Norton P. Potter II Station in Massachusetts. Since May 2002 it has monitored the unit's NOx with a predictive emission monitoring system (PEMS) under a test protocol that EPA approved. EPA describes the PEMS as software that converts turbine operating readings into NOx through relationships developed for each fuel. A temporary reference method system gave hourly data from May 2002 to December 2004, covering 676 hours on natural gas and 419 hours on fuel oil. EPA found that the PEMS output passed all three statistical tests for both fuels and approved it on 31 May 2006. EPA estimated that the PEMS, with the extra audits it required, would cost less than half as much a year as an analyzer. The letter does not name the vendor. It mentions training and retraining the PEMS but does not say whether the relationships are learned models or fixed equations.","replication":{"produced_by":["The PEMS read fuel flow and properties, combustion air, steam injection and exhaust conditions.","Relationships developed for each fuel converted the readings into a NOx emission rate.","Redundant sensors and hourly manual readings of gauges checked the inputs."],"must_hold":["Inputs must stay within the range of the training data, or BELD must report the unit's maximum potential NOx rate.","During startup, shutdown or loss of steam injection, BELD must report the maximum potential NOx rate."],"echoes":[]}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","replication"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"}},"summary":{"total":91,"addressed":91,"known":31,"reviewed":2,"reviewed_complete":2,"reviewed_partial":0,"record_mapped":29,"review_not_assessed":60,"not_assessed":0,"complete":false,"by_state":{"value_present":31,"not_reported":0,"unresolved":60,"not_assessed":0,"not_applicable":0,"withheld":0,"source_unavailable":0}}},"presentation_version":"a65ed56b8ae071acbef2b1ec28b3518c72a982b7fa83359b47f812640b7457c4"}