{"id":"AIBD-0803","title":"FDA found that SigTuple's AI100 with Shonit matched manual microscopy on 882 blood smears in a method comparison at four sites","summary":"In FDA's review of AI100 with Shonit, results on 882 blood smears agreed with manual microscopy, with 92.7% sensitivity and 95.4% specificity for abnormal white cells.","date_observed":"2023-09-19","date_basis":"source publication","date_precision":"day","benefit_status":"intended","source_collection":null,"source_entry":null,"account":"SigTuple Technologies of India makes AI100 with Shonit, an automated microscope that scans stained blood smears. A convolutional neural network locates and classifies white cells, red cells and platelets for review by a skilled operator. In a method comparison at four sites, 882 samples from healthy people and patients were read on the device and by manual microscopy. Two examiners at each site evaluated randomly selected, blinded slides. FDA reviewers report that the device's results caught abnormal white-cell findings with 92.7% sensitivity and 95.4% specificity against manual microscopy. They write that the study met the pre-defined acceptance criteria. FDA cleared the device on 19 September 2023. The study measured agreement with manual microscopy and did not measure time saved. An operator still identifies and classifies each cell.","category":"aggregate result","unexpected":false,"purpose":"SigTuple built AI100 with Shonit to locate blood cells on peripheral blood smears and present their images for a trained operator to classify.","system":"AI100 with Shonit","model_version":null,"developer":"SigTuple Technologies Pvt. Ltd.","deployer":"SigTuple (method comparison against manual microscopy at four sites)","location":null,"domain":"Healthcare","segment":null,"benefit_type":"Repetitive Task Automation","work_activities":["4.A.1.b.1","4.A.2.a.2"],"taxonomy_note":null,"registry_ids":{},"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":null,"reason":"The study measured agreement with manual microscopy, and no gain in time or accuracy at any laboratory is reported."}],"ai_role":{"status":"unassessed","statement":"The study compared the device's results with manual microscopy. It did not compare laboratory work with and without the device."},"evidence":[{"kind":"regulatory document","citation":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. 510(k) substantial equivalence determination decision summary for AI100 with Shonit (K221309). Cleared 2023-09-19.","title":"510(k) Substantial Equivalence Determination Decision Summary, K221309: AI100 with Shonit","url":"https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/K221309.pdf","date":"2023-09-19","written_by":"independent","quote":"A method comparison study was conducted at four (4) sites comparing the AI100 with Shonit to manual microscopy. A total of 882 samples were collected encompassing healthy subjects and patients with specific disease conditions. Blood samples (K2EDTA) were collected, and one peripheral blood smear (PBS) slide was prepared for each sample (Romanowsky stain). The slides were randomly selected, blinded and evaluated by two examiners at each site. Passing-Bablok Regression analysis was performed for WBC differential and overall agreement, sensitivity and specificity were measured for WBC Distributional and Morphological abnormalities. Overall agreement, sensitivity and specificity were evaluated for RBC and PLT morphology. Calculations of 95% confidence intervals are also provided. The study met the pre-defined acceptance criteria."}],"replication":{"produced_by":["Each sample was smeared on a slide and stained with a Romanowsky stain.","The device scanned the smear and classified white cells, red cells and platelets on each image."],"must_hold":["A skilled operator trained on the device reviews the cells and classifies each one.","The device is used in a clinical laboratory."],"echoes":[]},"paired_incident":null,"headline":"*AI100 with Shonit* matched manual microscopy on 882 blood smears","metric":"92.7% sensitivity and 95.4% specificity for abnormal white cells","comparator":{"against":"Manual microscopy of the same 882 smears","before":"Manual differential (reference)","after":"Sensitivity 92.7% and specificity 95.4% for abnormal white-cell results","basis":"measured","quote":"A method comparison study was conducted at four (4) sites comparing the AI100 with Shonit to manual microscopy.","url":"https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/K221309.pdf"},"later":null,"value":null,"developer_country":"India","deployer_country":"India","unrated_because":"The study measured agreement with manual microscopy, so no realized outcome is reported for any group.","brief_notes":null,"brief":null,"revisions":[{"date":"2026-10-31","change":"Added the record from the finding of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.","source":"https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/K221309.pdf","editor":"AIBD"}],"confidence":"found","shade":"high","claim_status":"Found by a regulator","claim_basis":"Sources: one independent regulatory document. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","case_jurisdictions":[],"profile":{"case_id":"AIBD-0803","catalog_version":"1.0.0","source_fingerprint":"ac077f504ea570607919d22bd44cba363b70b03591e587440090eafb405af23a","collection_refs":[{"collection_id":"aibd","version":"2026-10-31"},{"collection_id":"querist","version":"2026-10-25"}],"source_ids":["AIBD-0803-source-0001"],"families":{"strategic assessments":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"evaluations":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"monetary observations":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"institutional decisions":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]}},"fields":{"actors[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"developer":"SigTuple Technologies Pvt. Ltd.","deployer":"SigTuple (method comparison against manual microscopy at four sites)"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["developer","deployer"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"actors[].ownership_control":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"ai_contribution":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"ai_relationship":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"category":"aggregate result","ai_role":{"status":"unassessed","statement":"The study compared the device's results with manual microscopy. It did not compare laboratory work with and without the device."}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ai_role","category"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].alternatives":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].assessor_date":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].depth":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].display_confidence":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"confidence":"high","evidence_word":"found","claim_status":"Found by a regulator","basis":"Sources: one independent regulatory document. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","interpretation":"Existing display rule preserved; the richer outcome-specific confidence question still needs review."}},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].rationale":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","reason":"The study measured agreement with manual microscopy, and no gain in time or accuracy at any laboratory is reported."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].rubric_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].status_basis":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].target":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","reason":"The study measured agreement with manual microscopy, and no gain in time or accuracy at any laboratory is reported."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"availability":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"brief":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"case_kind":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"case_links[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].evidence_links":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].evidence_strength":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"answer":"Found by a regulator. Sources: one independent regulatory document. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","evidence_word":"found","claim_status":"Found by a regulator"}},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0803-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"Found by a regulator. Sources: one independent regulatory document. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","inferred":false}},"claims[].missingness":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].proposition":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"cross_border_flows[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"decisions[].action_outcome":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].grounds":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].institution_task":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].success_criterion":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"deployment_stage":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"classification":"laboratory test","answer":"The system was tested in a laboratory. A method comparison on 882 blood samples at four sites before clearance.","scope":"The period and activity described in the case."}},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0803-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"The system was tested in a laboratory. A method comparison on 882 blood samples at four sites before clearance.","inferred":false}},"economics[].amount":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].costs[]":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].counterfactual":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].currency_price_basis":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].gross_net":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].measure_type":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].period_unit":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].realization":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].recipient_payer":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].return_payback":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].valuation_method":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"evaluations[].ai_uplift":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].comparator":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].design":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].effect":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].exposure":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].id":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].measurement_method":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].metric":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].reproduction_materials":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].setting_sample":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].uncertainty_limitations":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"external_references[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"follow_up[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"human_oversight":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"id":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"id":"AIBD-0803"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["id"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"infrastructure_dependencies[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].beneficiaries":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].beneficiary_count":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].benefit_type":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"benefit_type":"Repetitive Task Automation"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["benefit_type"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].claim":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"account":"SigTuple Technologies of India makes AI100 with Shonit, an automated microscope that scans stained blood smears. A convolutional neural network locates and classifies white cells, red cells and platelets for review by a skilled operator. In a method comparison at four sites, 882 samples from healthy people and patients were read on the device and by manual microscopy. Two examiners at each site evaluated randomly selected, blinded slides. FDA reviewers report that the device's results caught abnormal white-cell findings with 92.7% sensitivity and 95.4% specificity against manual microscopy. They write that the study met the pre-defined acceptance criteria. FDA cleared the device on 19 September 2023. The study measured agreement with manual microscopy and did not measure time saved. An operator still identifies and classifies each cell.","benefit_type":"Repetitive Task Automation"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","benefit_type"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].distribution":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].duration":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].id":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].stakeholder_group":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","reason":"The study measured agreement with manual microscopy, and no gain in time or accuracy at any laboratory is reported."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].status":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"benefit_status":"intended"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["benefit_status"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].tradeoffs":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].unexpected":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"unexpected":false,"purpose":"SigTuple built AI100 with Shonit to locate blood cells on peripheral blood smears and present their images for a trained operator to classify."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["unexpected","purpose"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"places[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"developer_country":"India","deployer_country":"India"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["developer_country","deployer_country"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"purpose":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"purpose":"SigTuple built AI100 with Shonit to locate blood cells on peripheral blood smears and present their images for a trained operator to classify."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["purpose"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"record_dates":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"date_observed":"2023-09-19","date_basis":"source publication","date_precision":"day","revisions":[{"date":"2026-10-31","change":"Added the record from the finding of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.","source":"https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/K221309.pdf","editor":"AIBD"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["date_observed","date_basis","date_precision","revisions"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"replication.attempts[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"replication.conditions":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"replication":{"produced_by":["Each sample was smeared on a slide and stained with a Romanowsky stain.","The device scanned the smear and classified white cells, red cells and platelets on each image."],"must_hold":["A skilled operator trained on the device reviews the cells and classifies each one.","The device is used in a clinical laboratory."],"echoes":[]}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["replication"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"revision_history[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"revisions":[{"date":"2026-10-31","change":"Added the record from the finding of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.","source":"https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/K221309.pdf","editor":"AIBD"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["revisions"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sector":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"domain":"Healthcare"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["domain"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].access_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].citation_locator":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"evidence":[{"kind":"regulatory document","citation":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. 510(k) substantial equivalence determination decision summary for AI100 with Shonit (K221309). Cleared 2023-09-19.","title":"510(k) Substantial Equivalence Determination Decision Summary, K221309: AI100 with Shonit","url":"https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/K221309.pdf","date":"2023-09-19","written_by":"independent","quote":"A method comparison study was conducted at four (4) sites comparing the AI100 with Shonit to manual microscopy. A total of 882 samples were collected encompassing healthy subjects and patients with specific disease conditions. Blood samples (K2EDTA) were collected, and one peripheral blood smear (PBS) slide was prepared for each sample (Romanowsky stain). The slides were randomly selected, blinded and evaluated by two examiners at each site. Passing-Bablok Regression analysis was performed for WBC differential and overall agreement, sensitivity and specificity were measured for WBC Distributional and Morphological abnormalities. Overall agreement, sensitivity and specificity were evaluated for RBC and PLT morphology. Calculations of 95% confidence intervals are also provided. The study met the pre-defined acceptance criteria."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].id":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["AIBD-0803-source-0001"],"role":"Existing evidence items, in their original order"},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"complete"},"sources[].language":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].relationship":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"evidence":[{"kind":"regulatory document","citation":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. 510(k) substantial equivalence determination decision summary for AI100 with Shonit (K221309). Cleared 2023-09-19.","title":"510(k) Substantial Equivalence Determination Decision Summary, K221309: AI100 with Shonit","url":"https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/K221309.pdf","date":"2023-09-19","written_by":"independent","quote":"A method comparison study was conducted at four (4) sites comparing the AI100 with Shonit to manual microscopy. A total of 882 samples were collected encompassing healthy subjects and patients with specific disease conditions. Blood samples (K2EDTA) were collected, and one peripheral blood smear (PBS) slide was prepared for each sample (Romanowsky stain). The slides were randomly selected, blinded and evaluated by two examiners at each site. Passing-Bablok Regression analysis was performed for WBC differential and overall agreement, sensitivity and specificity were measured for WBC Distributional and Morphological abnormalities. Overall agreement, sensitivity and specificity were evaluated for RBC and PLT morphology. Calculations of 95% confidence intervals are also provided. The study met the pre-defined acceptance criteria."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].upstream_sources":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"strategic_assessments[]":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"strategic assessments"},"summary":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"summary":"In FDA's review of AI100 with Shonit, results on 882 blood smears agreed with manual microscopy, with 92.7% sensitivity and 95.4% specificity for abnormal white cells.","account":"SigTuple Technologies of India makes AI100 with Shonit, an automated microscope that scans stained blood smears. A convolutional neural network locates and classifies white cells, red cells and platelets for review by a skilled operator. In a method comparison at four sites, 882 samples from healthy people and patients were read on the device and by manual microscopy. Two examiners at each site evaluated randomly selected, blinded slides. FDA reviewers report that the device's results caught abnormal white-cell findings with 92.7% sensitivity and 95.4% specificity against manual microscopy. They write that the study met the pre-defined acceptance criteria. FDA cleared the device on 19 September 2023. The study measured agreement with manual microscopy and did not measure time saved. An operator still identifies and classifies each cell."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["summary","account"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].autonomy_permissions":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].component_role":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].deployment_configuration":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].inputs_outputs":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].model_name":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].model_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].product_name":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"system":"AI100 with Shonit"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["system"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].provider":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"taxonomy_crosswalks[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"title":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"title":"FDA found that SigTuple's AI100 with Shonit matched manual microscopy on 882 blood smears in a method comparison at four sites","headline":"*AI100 with Shonit* matched manual microscopy on 882 blood smears"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["title","headline"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"version":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["e93eb9699643a0d6025488b3af6ffa859c5a5c88fd082e18ce48e9a599e2e381"],"role":"SHA-256 of the complete public record and its assessments"},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"SHA-256 of the public record, its assessments, and its displayed answers and notes, excluding its own identifier and the derived coverage summary.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"complete"},"workflow":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"account":"SigTuple Technologies of India makes AI100 with Shonit, an automated microscope that scans stained blood smears. A convolutional neural network locates and classifies white cells, red cells and platelets for review by a skilled operator. In a method comparison at four sites, 882 samples from healthy people and patients were read on the device and by manual microscopy. Two examiners at each site evaluated randomly selected, blinded slides. FDA reviewers report that the device's results caught abnormal white-cell findings with 92.7% sensitivity and 95.4% specificity against manual microscopy. They write that the study met the pre-defined acceptance criteria. FDA cleared the device on 19 September 2023. The study measured agreement with manual microscopy and did not measure time saved. An operator still identifies and classifies each cell.","replication":{"produced_by":["Each sample was smeared on a slide and stained with a Romanowsky stain.","The device scanned the smear and classified white cells, red cells and platelets on each image."],"must_hold":["A skilled operator trained on the device reviews the cells and classifies each one.","The device is used in a clinical laboratory."],"echoes":[]}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","replication"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"}},"summary":{"total":91,"addressed":91,"known":27,"reviewed":2,"reviewed_complete":2,"reviewed_partial":0,"record_mapped":25,"review_not_assessed":64,"not_assessed":0,"complete":false,"by_state":{"value_present":27,"not_reported":0,"unresolved":64,"not_assessed":0,"not_applicable":0,"withheld":0,"source_unavailable":0}}},"presentation_version":"db27e1e0086a128323c8deaf420c6333736f9e5392b74631be0b99b3a5528df8"}