{"id":"AIBD-0720","title":"The What Works Clearinghouse finds promising evidence that Project LISTEN's Reading Tutor raised literacy scores in a randomized trial","summary":"The What Works Clearinghouse found promising (Tier 3) evidence for Project LISTEN's Reading Tutor. Students in grades 1 to 4 who read aloud to it gained more in literacy than peers in silent reading.","date_observed":"2013-09-01","date_basis":"source publication","date_precision":"month","benefit_status":"reported","source_collection":null,"source_entry":null,"account":"Project LISTEN's Reading Tutor uses speech recognition to listen as children read aloud. It gives spoken or visual help when a student asks, pauses, gets stuck, skips a word or misreads one. In a seven-month randomized trial in two schools of an affluent suburban district, students in grades 1 to 4 used it in a supervised lab. They averaged 19 hours in sessions of about 20 minutes. The comparison group did sustained silent reading in class at the same time. Reading specialists chose the participants and left out the weakest readers. The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) reviewed the trial, published in 2013, in June 2026. It found that the trial meets its standards without reservations, with 178 students analyzed. Users scored higher on a total reading composite (improvement index 27) and on a basic skills composite (38). The WWC rated both domains Tier 3, promising. Effects on comprehension, fluency and attitudes to reading were uncertain. The trial's authors report that students used the 2000-2001 version of the tutor.","category":"aggregate result","unexpected":false,"purpose":"Project LISTEN built the Reading Tutor to give children individual practice in reading aloud, with a computer that listens and helps.","system":"Project LISTEN's Reading Tutor (speech-recognition reading tutor)","model_version":"2000-2001 version","developer":"Project LISTEN, Carnegie Mellon University","deployer":"Two elementary schools in an affluent suburban school district (not named)","location":"United States (suburban school district, not named)","domain":"Education","segment":null,"benefit_type":"Improved Learning","work_activities":["4.A.4.b.3"],"taxonomy_note":null,"registry_ids":{},"ratings":[{"group":"personal","depth":2,"reason":"Users gained more than peers in silent reading on standardized reading tests, with improvement indexes of 27 for literacy and 38 for basic skills."}],"ai_role":{"status":"assessed","statement":"The randomized trial compares the tutor with sustained silent reading in the same time slot, so it isolates the tutor's effect. The WWC describes the tutor's speech recognition but not how it was built. The makers write on their project page that the tutor adapts Carnegie Mellon's Sphinx speech recognizer."},"evidence":[{"kind":"assessment report","citation":"U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse. Single study review of Mostow, Nelson-Taylor and Beck (2013), Computer-Guided Oral Reading versus Independent Practice. Reviewed June 2026.","title":"WWC review of this study: Computer-Guided Oral Reading versus Independent Practice","url":"https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/WWC/Study/95240","date":"2026-06-01","written_by":"independent","quote":"Literacy Achievement outcomes—Tier 3 (promising evidence) found for the domain"},{"kind":"peer-reviewed study","citation":"Mostow, Jack, Jessica Nelson-Taylor and Joseph E. Beck. Computer-Guided Oral Reading versus Independent Practice: Comparison of Sustained Silent Reading to an Automated Reading Tutor That Listens. Journal of Educational Computing Research 49, no. 2 (2013): 249-276. ERIC EJ1076364, abstract as provided by the authors.","title":"Computer-Guided Oral Reading versus Independent Practice: Comparison of Sustained Silent Reading to an Automated Reading Tutor That Listens","url":"https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1076364","date":"2013-09-01","written_by":"makers","quote":"Eighty-eight students used the 2000-2001 version of Project LISTEN's Reading Tutor (www.cs.cmu.edu/~listen) in 10-computer labs, averaging 19 hours over the course of the year."},{"kind":"descriptive report","citation":"Project LISTEN, Carnegie Mellon University. Project LISTEN Summary (the project's home page), last updated 5 June 2013.","title":"Project LISTEN Summary","url":"https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~listen/","date":"2013-06-05","written_by":"makers","quote":"Adapts Carnegie Mellon’s Sphinx speech recognizer to analyze the child’s oral reading"}],"replication":{"produced_by":["Students read stories aloud to the tutor in a supervised computer lab for about 20 minutes a session.","The tutor gave spoken or visual help when students asked, paused, got stuck, skipped a word or misread a word."],"must_hold":["A school-provided monitor supervises students in the lab.","The trial excluded the weakest readers, who were with reading specialists during the sessions."],"echoes":[]},"paired_incident":null,"headline":"A listening *Reading Tutor* beats silent reading in a trial","metric":"improvement index 27","comparator":{"against":"Sustained silent reading in class during the same daily period","before":"471.49 (comparison group mean, Woodcock Reading Mastery Test total reading composite)","after":"480.01 (Reading Tutor group mean)","basis":"measured","quote":"Students used the Reading Tutor in a supervised computer lab during the time when they otherwise would have participated in sustained silent reading.","url":"https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/WWC/Study/95240"},"later":null,"value":null,"developer_country":"United States","deployer_country":"United States","unrated_because":null,"brief_notes":null,"brief":null,"revisions":[{"date":"2026-10-31","change":"Added the record from the finding of the What Works Clearinghouse.","source":"https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/WWC/Study/95240","editor":"AIBD"},{"date":"2026-10-31","change":"Rewrote the prose in plain sentences, with its facts, figures and quotations unchanged.","source":null,"editor":"AIBD"}],"confidence":"found","shade":"high","claim_status":"Found by an assessment body","claim_basis":"Sources: one independent assessment report, the makers' peer-reviewed study and the makers' descriptive report. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","case_jurisdictions":["United States"],"profile":{"case_id":"AIBD-0720","catalog_version":"1.0.0","source_fingerprint":"93199896413db05bcff777acc322c914da88dea1ae0fcfd96ca8b5e86619471c","collection_refs":[{"collection_id":"aibd","version":"2026-10-31"},{"collection_id":"querist","version":"2026-10-25"}],"source_ids":["AIBD-0720-source-0001","AIBD-0720-source-0002","AIBD-0720-source-0003"],"families":{"strategic assessments":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"evaluations":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"monetary observations":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"institutional decisions":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]}},"fields":{"actors[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"developer":"Project LISTEN, Carnegie Mellon University","deployer":"Two elementary schools in an affluent suburban school district (not named)"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["developer","deployer"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"actors[].ownership_control":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"ai_contribution":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ai_role":{"status":"assessed","statement":"The randomized trial compares the tutor with sustained silent reading in the same time slot, so it isolates the tutor's effect. The WWC describes the tutor's speech recognition but not how it was built. The makers write on their project page that the tutor adapts Carnegie Mellon's Sphinx speech recognizer."}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ai_role"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"ai_relationship":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"category":"aggregate result","ai_role":{"status":"assessed","statement":"The randomized trial compares the tutor with sustained silent reading in the same time slot, so it isolates the tutor's effect. The WWC describes the tutor's speech recognition but not how it was built. The makers write on their project page that the tutor adapts Carnegie Mellon's Sphinx speech recognizer."}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ai_role","category"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].alternatives":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].assessor_date":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].depth":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"personal","depth":2,"reason":"Users gained more than peers in silent reading on standardized reading tests, with improvement indexes of 27 for literacy and 38 for basic skills."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].display_confidence":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"confidence":"high","evidence_word":"found","claim_status":"Found by an assessment body","basis":"Sources: one independent assessment report, the makers' peer-reviewed study and the makers' descriptive report. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","interpretation":"Existing display rule preserved; the richer outcome-specific confidence question still needs review."}},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].rationale":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"personal","depth":2,"reason":"Users gained more than peers in silent reading on standardized reading tests, with improvement indexes of 27 for literacy and 38 for basic skills."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].rubric_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].status_basis":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].target":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"personal","depth":2,"reason":"Users gained more than peers in silent reading on standardized reading tests, with improvement indexes of 27 for literacy and 38 for basic skills."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"availability":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"brief":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"case_kind":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"case_links[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].evidence_links":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].evidence_strength":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"answer":"Found by an assessment body. Sources: one independent assessment report, the makers' peer-reviewed study and the makers' descriptive report. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","evidence_word":"found","claim_status":"Found by an assessment body"}},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0720-source-0001","AIBD-0720-source-0002","AIBD-0720-source-0003"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"Found by an assessment body. Sources: one independent assessment report, the makers' peer-reviewed study and the makers' descriptive report. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","inferred":false}},"claims[].missingness":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].proposition":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"cross_border_flows[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"decisions[].action_outcome":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].grounds":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].institution_task":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].success_criterion":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"deployment_stage":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"classification":"pilot","answer":"The system was used in a pilot. The tutor was used for seven months in two schools as part of a randomized trial.","scope":"The period and activity described in the case."}},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0720-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"The system was used in a pilot. The tutor was used for seven months in two schools as part of a randomized trial.","inferred":false}},"economics[].amount":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].costs[]":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].counterfactual":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].currency_price_basis":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].gross_net":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].measure_type":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].period_unit":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].realization":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].recipient_payer":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].return_payback":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].valuation_method":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"evaluations[].ai_uplift":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].comparator":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].design":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].effect":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].exposure":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].id":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].measurement_method":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].metric":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].reproduction_materials":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].setting_sample":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].uncertainty_limitations":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"external_references[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"follow_up[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"human_oversight":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"id":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"id":"AIBD-0720"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["id"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"infrastructure_dependencies[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].beneficiaries":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].beneficiary_count":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].benefit_type":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"benefit_type":"Improved Learning"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["benefit_type"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].claim":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"account":"Project LISTEN's Reading Tutor uses speech recognition to listen as children read aloud. It gives spoken or visual help when a student asks, pauses, gets stuck, skips a word or misreads one. In a seven-month randomized trial in two schools of an affluent suburban district, students in grades 1 to 4 used it in a supervised lab. They averaged 19 hours in sessions of about 20 minutes. The comparison group did sustained silent reading in class at the same time. Reading specialists chose the participants and left out the weakest readers. The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) reviewed the trial, published in 2013, in June 2026. It found that the trial meets its standards without reservations, with 178 students analyzed. Users scored higher on a total reading composite (improvement index 27) and on a basic skills composite (38). The WWC rated both domains Tier 3, promising. Effects on comprehension, fluency and attitudes to reading were uncertain. The trial's authors report that students used the 2000-2001 version of the tutor.","benefit_type":"Improved Learning"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","benefit_type"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].distribution":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].duration":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].id":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].stakeholder_group":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"personal","depth":2,"reason":"Users gained more than peers in silent reading on standardized reading tests, with improvement indexes of 27 for literacy and 38 for basic skills."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].status":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"benefit_status":"reported"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["benefit_status"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].tradeoffs":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].unexpected":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"unexpected":false,"purpose":"Project LISTEN built the Reading Tutor to give children individual practice in reading aloud, with a computer that listens and helps."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["unexpected","purpose"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"places[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"location":"United States (suburban school district, not named)","developer_country":"United States","deployer_country":"United States"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["location","developer_country","deployer_country"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"purpose":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"purpose":"Project LISTEN built the Reading Tutor to give children individual practice in reading aloud, with a computer that listens and helps."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["purpose"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"record_dates":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"date_observed":"2013-09-01","date_basis":"source publication","date_precision":"month","revisions":[{"date":"2026-10-31","change":"Added the record from the finding of the What Works Clearinghouse.","source":"https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/WWC/Study/95240","editor":"AIBD"},{"date":"2026-10-31","change":"Rewrote the prose in plain sentences, with its facts, figures and quotations unchanged.","editor":"AIBD"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["date_observed","date_basis","date_precision","revisions"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"replication.attempts[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"replication.conditions":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"replication":{"produced_by":["Students read stories aloud to the tutor in a supervised computer lab for about 20 minutes a session.","The tutor gave spoken or visual help when students asked, paused, got stuck, skipped a word or misread a word."],"must_hold":["A school-provided monitor supervises students in the lab.","The trial excluded the weakest readers, who were with reading specialists during the sessions."],"echoes":[]}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["replication"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"revision_history[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"revisions":[{"date":"2026-10-31","change":"Added the record from the finding of the What Works Clearinghouse.","source":"https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/WWC/Study/95240","editor":"AIBD"},{"date":"2026-10-31","change":"Rewrote the prose in plain sentences, with its facts, figures and quotations unchanged.","editor":"AIBD"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["revisions"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sector":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"domain":"Education"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["domain"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].access_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].citation_locator":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"evidence":[{"kind":"assessment report","citation":"U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse. Single study review of Mostow, Nelson-Taylor and Beck (2013), Computer-Guided Oral Reading versus Independent Practice. Reviewed June 2026.","title":"WWC review of this study: Computer-Guided Oral Reading versus Independent Practice","url":"https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/WWC/Study/95240","date":"2026-06-01","written_by":"independent","quote":"Literacy Achievement outcomes—Tier 3 (promising evidence) found for the domain"},{"kind":"peer-reviewed study","citation":"Mostow, Jack, Jessica Nelson-Taylor and Joseph E. Beck. Computer-Guided Oral Reading versus Independent Practice: Comparison of Sustained Silent Reading to an Automated Reading Tutor That Listens. Journal of Educational Computing Research 49, no. 2 (2013): 249-276. ERIC EJ1076364, abstract as provided by the authors.","title":"Computer-Guided Oral Reading versus Independent Practice: Comparison of Sustained Silent Reading to an Automated Reading Tutor That Listens","url":"https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1076364","date":"2013-09-01","written_by":"makers","quote":"Eighty-eight students used the 2000-2001 version of Project LISTEN's Reading Tutor (www.cs.cmu.edu/~listen) in 10-computer labs, averaging 19 hours over the course of the year."},{"kind":"descriptive report","citation":"Project LISTEN, Carnegie Mellon University. Project LISTEN Summary (the project's home page), last updated 5 June 2013.","title":"Project LISTEN Summary","url":"https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~listen/","date":"2013-06-05","written_by":"makers","quote":"Adapts Carnegie Mellon’s Sphinx speech recognizer to analyze the child’s oral reading"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].id":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["AIBD-0720-source-0001","AIBD-0720-source-0002","AIBD-0720-source-0003"],"role":"Existing evidence items, in their original order"},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"complete"},"sources[].language":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].relationship":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"evidence":[{"kind":"assessment report","citation":"U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse. Single study review of Mostow, Nelson-Taylor and Beck (2013), Computer-Guided Oral Reading versus Independent Practice. Reviewed June 2026.","title":"WWC review of this study: Computer-Guided Oral Reading versus Independent Practice","url":"https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/WWC/Study/95240","date":"2026-06-01","written_by":"independent","quote":"Literacy Achievement outcomes—Tier 3 (promising evidence) found for the domain"},{"kind":"peer-reviewed study","citation":"Mostow, Jack, Jessica Nelson-Taylor and Joseph E. Beck. Computer-Guided Oral Reading versus Independent Practice: Comparison of Sustained Silent Reading to an Automated Reading Tutor That Listens. Journal of Educational Computing Research 49, no. 2 (2013): 249-276. ERIC EJ1076364, abstract as provided by the authors.","title":"Computer-Guided Oral Reading versus Independent Practice: Comparison of Sustained Silent Reading to an Automated Reading Tutor That Listens","url":"https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1076364","date":"2013-09-01","written_by":"makers","quote":"Eighty-eight students used the 2000-2001 version of Project LISTEN's Reading Tutor (www.cs.cmu.edu/~listen) in 10-computer labs, averaging 19 hours over the course of the year."},{"kind":"descriptive report","citation":"Project LISTEN, Carnegie Mellon University. Project LISTEN Summary (the project's home page), last updated 5 June 2013.","title":"Project LISTEN Summary","url":"https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~listen/","date":"2013-06-05","written_by":"makers","quote":"Adapts Carnegie Mellon’s Sphinx speech recognizer to analyze the child’s oral reading"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].upstream_sources":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"strategic_assessments[]":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"strategic assessments"},"summary":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"summary":"The What Works Clearinghouse found promising (Tier 3) evidence for Project LISTEN's Reading Tutor. Students in grades 1 to 4 who read aloud to it gained more in literacy than peers in silent reading.","account":"Project LISTEN's Reading Tutor uses speech recognition to listen as children read aloud. It gives spoken or visual help when a student asks, pauses, gets stuck, skips a word or misreads one. In a seven-month randomized trial in two schools of an affluent suburban district, students in grades 1 to 4 used it in a supervised lab. They averaged 19 hours in sessions of about 20 minutes. The comparison group did sustained silent reading in class at the same time. Reading specialists chose the participants and left out the weakest readers. The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) reviewed the trial, published in 2013, in June 2026. It found that the trial meets its standards without reservations, with 178 students analyzed. Users scored higher on a total reading composite (improvement index 27) and on a basic skills composite (38). The WWC rated both domains Tier 3, promising. Effects on comprehension, fluency and attitudes to reading were uncertain. The trial's authors report that students used the 2000-2001 version of the tutor."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["summary","account"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].autonomy_permissions":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].component_role":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].deployment_configuration":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].inputs_outputs":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].model_name":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].model_version":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"model_version":"2000-2001 version"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["model_version"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].product_name":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"system":"Project LISTEN's Reading Tutor (speech-recognition reading tutor)"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["system"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].provider":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"taxonomy_crosswalks[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"title":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"title":"The What Works Clearinghouse finds promising evidence that Project LISTEN's Reading Tutor raised literacy scores in a randomized trial","headline":"A listening *Reading Tutor* beats silent reading in a trial"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["title","headline"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"version":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["3cbabc0d7e3e2df2235c57cc8e2590e8663ff92c0884933a9e3a2d84670adadb"],"role":"SHA-256 of the complete public record and its assessments"},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"SHA-256 of the public record, its assessments, and its displayed answers and notes, excluding its own identifier and the derived coverage summary.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"complete"},"workflow":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"account":"Project LISTEN's Reading Tutor uses speech recognition to listen as children read aloud. It gives spoken or visual help when a student asks, pauses, gets stuck, skips a word or misreads one. In a seven-month randomized trial in two schools of an affluent suburban district, students in grades 1 to 4 used it in a supervised lab. They averaged 19 hours in sessions of about 20 minutes. The comparison group did sustained silent reading in class at the same time. Reading specialists chose the participants and left out the weakest readers. The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) reviewed the trial, published in 2013, in June 2026. It found that the trial meets its standards without reservations, with 178 students analyzed. Users scored higher on a total reading composite (improvement index 27) and on a basic skills composite (38). The WWC rated both domains Tier 3, promising. Effects on comprehension, fluency and attitudes to reading were uncertain. The trial's authors report that students used the 2000-2001 version of the tutor.","replication":{"produced_by":["Students read stories aloud to the tutor in a supervised computer lab for about 20 minutes a session.","The tutor gave spoken or visual help when students asked, paused, got stuck, skipped a word or misread a word."],"must_hold":["A school-provided monitor supervises students in the lab.","The trial excluded the weakest readers, who were with reading specialists during the sessions."],"echoes":[]}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","replication"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"}},"summary":{"total":91,"addressed":91,"known":30,"reviewed":2,"reviewed_complete":2,"reviewed_partial":0,"record_mapped":28,"review_not_assessed":61,"not_assessed":0,"complete":false,"by_state":{"value_present":30,"not_reported":0,"unresolved":61,"not_assessed":0,"not_applicable":0,"withheld":0,"source_unavailable":0}}},"presentation_version":"062c923841d817e554fe7cbef9cad46bf3873cc880ed84f24fe1287075efc20f"}