{"id":"AIBD-0680","title":"Cour des comptes finds that LLaMandement let teams at France's finance ministry absorb 85,345 parliamentary amendments without extra staff","summary":"The Cour des comptes found that the DGFiP's LLaMandement frees staff from sorting and summarizing amendments, so teams absorbed 85,345 amendments without extra staff.","date_observed":"2024-10-22","date_basis":"source publication","date_precision":"day","benefit_status":"reported","source_collection":null,"source_entry":null,"account":"The Direction générale des Finances publiques (DGFiP) developed LLaMandement to help French ministries handle amendments that members of Parliament table. In a January 2024 paper, its developers describe a large language model that the government fine-tuned to write neutral summaries of legislative proposals. The Cour des comptes reviewed the economy and finance ministry's use of artificial intelligence from 2018 to 2023. In observations published on 22 October 2024, the Cour found that the system frees staff from sorting and summarizing amendments. It found that staff put the time saved into better and faster answers. The tool let teams absorb the 85,345 amendments tabled between June 2022 and January 2024 without extra staff. The Cour gives no measure of time saved or of summary quality. The only amendment tool in its annex is listed as envisaged or under feasibility study, which does not match the main text.","category":"aggregate result","unexpected":false,"purpose":"The DGFiP built LLaMandement to sort parliamentary amendments and write neutral summaries of them for ministry staff.","system":"LLaMendements (LLaMandement), the DGFiP's tool for sorting and summarizing parliamentary amendments","model_version":null,"developer":"Direction générale des Finances publiques (DGFiP)","deployer":"DGFiP teams handling parliamentary amendments for the economy and finance ministry","location":"France (national)","domain":"Public administration (legislative work)","segment":null,"benefit_type":"Repetitive Task Automation","work_activities":["4.A.2.a.2","4.A.4.a.1"],"taxonomy_note":null,"registry_ids":{},"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":1,"reason":"Staff were freed from sorting and summarizing amendments, and teams handled 85,345 amendments without extra staff."}],"ai_role":{"status":"unassessed","statement":"The Cour credits the system with the time saved but gives no measurement and no comparison of work with and without it. The Cour does not describe the model. In their own paper, the developers describe a large language model fine-tuned by the French government."},"evidence":[{"kind":"audit report","citation":"Cour des comptes. L’intelligence artificielle dans les politiques publiques : l’exemple du ministère de l’économie et des finances. Observations définitives S2024-1165, adopted 18 July 2024 and published 22 October 2024, p. 35.","title":"L’intelligence artificielle dans les politiques publiques : l’exemple du ministère de l’économie et des finances","url":"https://www.ccomptes.fr/sites/default/files/2024-10/20241022-S2024-1165-L-intelligence-artificielle-dans-les-poltiques-publiques-exemple-du-MEF.pdf","date":"2024-10-22","written_by":"independent","quote":"LLaMendements permet donc aux équipes d’absorber la charge de travail (85 345 amendements déposés entre juin 2022 et janvier 2024) sans recourir à des moyens humains supplémentaires."},{"kind":"preprint","citation":"Gesnouin J, Tannier Y, Gomes Da Silva C, et al. LLaMandement: Large Language Models for Summarization of French Legislative Proposals. arXiv:2401.16182, 29 January 2024.","title":"LLaMandement: Large Language Models for Summarization of French Legislative Proposals","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16182","date":"2024-01-29","written_by":"makers","quote":"This report introduces LLaMandement, a state-of-the-art Large Language Model, fine-tuned by the French government and designed to enhance the efficiency and efficacy of processing parliamentary sessions (including the production of bench memoranda and documents required for interministerial meetings) by generating neutral summaries of legislative proposals.","supports_benefit":false}],"replication":{"produced_by":["The system took over the sorting and summarizing of parliamentary amendments.","Staff put the time saved into the quality and speed of the ministry's answers."],"must_hold":["Teams must absorb a growing volume of amendments at constant staffing."],"echoes":[]},"paired_incident":null,"headline":"*LLaMandement* sorts and summarizes amendments for French officials","metric":"85,345 amendments tabled between June 2022 and January 2024","comparator":null,"later":null,"value":null,"developer_country":"France","deployer_country":"France","unrated_because":null,"brief_notes":null,"brief":null,"revisions":[{"date":"2026-10-31","change":"Added the record from the finding of the Cour des comptes.","source":"https://www.ccomptes.fr/sites/default/files/2024-10/20241022-S2024-1165-L-intelligence-artificielle-dans-les-poltiques-publiques-exemple-du-MEF.pdf","editor":"AIBD"}],"confidence":"found","shade":"high","claim_status":"Found by an auditor","claim_basis":"Sources: one independent audit report and the makers' preprint. For the benefit itself, the cited sources include no independent study or report.","case_jurisdictions":["France"],"profile":{"case_id":"AIBD-0680","catalog_version":"1.0.0","source_fingerprint":"0cdfad5ddd0eafa82d014dc0da0638e3088281ae3a46e7a898d00bac044dfd48","collection_refs":[{"collection_id":"aibd","version":"2026-10-31"},{"collection_id":"querist","version":"2026-10-25"}],"source_ids":["AIBD-0680-source-0001","AIBD-0680-source-0002"],"families":{"strategic assessments":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"evaluations":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"monetary observations":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"institutional decisions":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]}},"fields":{"actors[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"developer":"Direction générale des Finances publiques (DGFiP)","deployer":"DGFiP teams handling parliamentary amendments for the economy and finance ministry"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["developer","deployer"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"actors[].ownership_control":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"ai_contribution":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"ai_relationship":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"category":"aggregate result","ai_role":{"status":"unassessed","statement":"The Cour credits the system with the time saved but gives no measurement and no comparison of work with and without it. The Cour does not describe the model. In their own paper, the developers describe a large language model fine-tuned by the French government."}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ai_role","category"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].alternatives":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].assessor_date":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].depth":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":1,"reason":"Staff were freed from sorting and summarizing amendments, and teams handled 85,345 amendments without extra staff."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].display_confidence":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"confidence":"high","evidence_word":"found","claim_status":"Found by an auditor","basis":"Sources: one independent audit report and the makers' preprint. For the benefit itself, the cited sources include no independent study or report.","interpretation":"Existing display rule preserved; the richer outcome-specific confidence question still needs review."}},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].rationale":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":1,"reason":"Staff were freed from sorting and summarizing amendments, and teams handled 85,345 amendments without extra staff."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].rubric_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].status_basis":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].target":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":1,"reason":"Staff were freed from sorting and summarizing amendments, and teams handled 85,345 amendments without extra staff."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"availability":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"brief":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"case_kind":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"case_links[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].evidence_links":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].evidence_strength":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"answer":"Found by an auditor. Sources: one independent audit report and the makers' preprint. For the benefit itself, the cited sources include no independent study or report.","evidence_word":"found","claim_status":"Found by an auditor"}},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0680-source-0001","AIBD-0680-source-0002"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"Found by an auditor. Sources: one independent audit report and the makers' preprint. For the benefit itself, the cited sources include no independent study or report.","inferred":false}},"claims[].missingness":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].proposition":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"cross_border_flows[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"decisions[].action_outcome":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].grounds":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].institution_task":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].success_criterion":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"deployment_stage":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"classification":"routine use","answer":"The system was in routine use. The Cour describes the tool as in use for the amendments tabled between June 2022 and January 2024.","scope":"The period and activity described in the case."}},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0680-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"The system was in routine use. The Cour describes the tool as in use for the amendments tabled between June 2022 and January 2024.","inferred":false}},"economics[].amount":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].costs[]":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].counterfactual":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].currency_price_basis":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].gross_net":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].measure_type":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].period_unit":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].realization":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].recipient_payer":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].return_payback":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].valuation_method":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"evaluations[].ai_uplift":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].comparator":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].design":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].effect":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].exposure":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].id":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].measurement_method":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].metric":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].reproduction_materials":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].setting_sample":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"evaluations[].uncertainty_limitations":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"evaluations"},"external_references[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"follow_up[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"human_oversight":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"id":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"id":"AIBD-0680"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["id"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"infrastructure_dependencies[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].beneficiaries":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].beneficiary_count":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].benefit_type":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"benefit_type":"Repetitive Task Automation"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["benefit_type"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].claim":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"account":"The Direction générale des Finances publiques (DGFiP) developed LLaMandement to help French ministries handle amendments that members of Parliament table. In a January 2024 paper, its developers describe a large language model that the government fine-tuned to write neutral summaries of legislative proposals. The Cour des comptes reviewed the economy and finance ministry's use of artificial intelligence from 2018 to 2023. In observations published on 22 October 2024, the Cour found that the system frees staff from sorting and summarizing amendments. It found that staff put the time saved into better and faster answers. The tool let teams absorb the 85,345 amendments tabled between June 2022 and January 2024 without extra staff. The Cour gives no measure of time saved or of summary quality. The only amendment tool in its annex is listed as envisaged or under feasibility study, which does not match the main text.","benefit_type":"Repetitive Task Automation"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","benefit_type"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].distribution":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].duration":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].id":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].stakeholder_group":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":1,"reason":"Staff were freed from sorting and summarizing amendments, and teams handled 85,345 amendments without extra staff."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].status":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"benefit_status":"reported"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["benefit_status"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].tradeoffs":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].unexpected":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"unexpected":false,"purpose":"The DGFiP built LLaMandement to sort parliamentary amendments and write neutral summaries of them for ministry staff."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["unexpected","purpose"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"places[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"location":"France (national)","developer_country":"France","deployer_country":"France"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["location","developer_country","deployer_country"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"purpose":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"purpose":"The DGFiP built LLaMandement to sort parliamentary amendments and write neutral summaries of them for ministry staff."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["purpose"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"record_dates":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"date_observed":"2024-10-22","date_basis":"source publication","date_precision":"day","revisions":[{"date":"2026-10-31","change":"Added the record from the finding of the Cour des comptes.","source":"https://www.ccomptes.fr/sites/default/files/2024-10/20241022-S2024-1165-L-intelligence-artificielle-dans-les-poltiques-publiques-exemple-du-MEF.pdf","editor":"AIBD"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["date_observed","date_basis","date_precision","revisions"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"replication.attempts[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"replication.conditions":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"replication":{"produced_by":["The system took over the sorting and summarizing of parliamentary amendments.","Staff put the time saved into the quality and speed of the ministry's answers."],"must_hold":["Teams must absorb a growing volume of amendments at constant staffing."],"echoes":[]}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["replication"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"revision_history[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"revisions":[{"date":"2026-10-31","change":"Added the record from the finding of the Cour des comptes.","source":"https://www.ccomptes.fr/sites/default/files/2024-10/20241022-S2024-1165-L-intelligence-artificielle-dans-les-poltiques-publiques-exemple-du-MEF.pdf","editor":"AIBD"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["revisions"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sector":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"domain":"Public administration (legislative work)"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["domain"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].access_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].citation_locator":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"evidence":[{"kind":"audit report","citation":"Cour des comptes. L’intelligence artificielle dans les politiques publiques : l’exemple du ministère de l’économie et des finances. Observations définitives S2024-1165, adopted 18 July 2024 and published 22 October 2024, p. 35.","title":"L’intelligence artificielle dans les politiques publiques : l’exemple du ministère de l’économie et des finances","url":"https://www.ccomptes.fr/sites/default/files/2024-10/20241022-S2024-1165-L-intelligence-artificielle-dans-les-poltiques-publiques-exemple-du-MEF.pdf","date":"2024-10-22","written_by":"independent","quote":"LLaMendements permet donc aux équipes d’absorber la charge de travail (85 345 amendements déposés entre juin 2022 et janvier 2024) sans recourir à des moyens humains supplémentaires."},{"kind":"preprint","citation":"Gesnouin J, Tannier Y, Gomes Da Silva C, et al. LLaMandement: Large Language Models for Summarization of French Legislative Proposals. arXiv:2401.16182, 29 January 2024.","title":"LLaMandement: Large Language Models for Summarization of French Legislative Proposals","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16182","date":"2024-01-29","written_by":"makers","quote":"This report introduces LLaMandement, a state-of-the-art Large Language Model, fine-tuned by the French government and designed to enhance the efficiency and efficacy of processing parliamentary sessions (including the production of bench memoranda and documents required for interministerial meetings) by generating neutral summaries of legislative proposals.","supports_benefit":false}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].id":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["AIBD-0680-source-0001","AIBD-0680-source-0002"],"role":"Existing evidence items, in their original order"},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"complete"},"sources[].language":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].relationship":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"evidence":[{"kind":"audit report","citation":"Cour des comptes. L’intelligence artificielle dans les politiques publiques : l’exemple du ministère de l’économie et des finances. Observations définitives S2024-1165, adopted 18 July 2024 and published 22 October 2024, p. 35.","title":"L’intelligence artificielle dans les politiques publiques : l’exemple du ministère de l’économie et des finances","url":"https://www.ccomptes.fr/sites/default/files/2024-10/20241022-S2024-1165-L-intelligence-artificielle-dans-les-poltiques-publiques-exemple-du-MEF.pdf","date":"2024-10-22","written_by":"independent","quote":"LLaMendements permet donc aux équipes d’absorber la charge de travail (85 345 amendements déposés entre juin 2022 et janvier 2024) sans recourir à des moyens humains supplémentaires."},{"kind":"preprint","citation":"Gesnouin J, Tannier Y, Gomes Da Silva C, et al. LLaMandement: Large Language Models for Summarization of French Legislative Proposals. arXiv:2401.16182, 29 January 2024.","title":"LLaMandement: Large Language Models for Summarization of French Legislative Proposals","url":"https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16182","date":"2024-01-29","written_by":"makers","quote":"This report introduces LLaMandement, a state-of-the-art Large Language Model, fine-tuned by the French government and designed to enhance the efficiency and efficacy of processing parliamentary sessions (including the production of bench memoranda and documents required for interministerial meetings) by generating neutral summaries of legislative proposals.","supports_benefit":false}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].upstream_sources":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"strategic_assessments[]":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"strategic assessments"},"summary":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"summary":"The Cour des comptes found that the DGFiP's LLaMandement frees staff from sorting and summarizing amendments, so teams absorbed 85,345 amendments without extra staff.","account":"The Direction générale des Finances publiques (DGFiP) developed LLaMandement to help French ministries handle amendments that members of Parliament table. In a January 2024 paper, its developers describe a large language model that the government fine-tuned to write neutral summaries of legislative proposals. The Cour des comptes reviewed the economy and finance ministry's use of artificial intelligence from 2018 to 2023. In observations published on 22 October 2024, the Cour found that the system frees staff from sorting and summarizing amendments. It found that staff put the time saved into better and faster answers. The tool let teams absorb the 85,345 amendments tabled between June 2022 and January 2024 without extra staff. The Cour gives no measure of time saved or of summary quality. The only amendment tool in its annex is listed as envisaged or under feasibility study, which does not match the main text."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["summary","account"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].autonomy_permissions":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].component_role":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].deployment_configuration":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].inputs_outputs":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].model_name":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].model_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].product_name":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"system":"LLaMendements (LLaMandement), the DGFiP's tool for sorting and summarizing parliamentary amendments"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["system"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].provider":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"taxonomy_crosswalks[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"title":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"title":"Cour des comptes finds that LLaMandement let teams at France's finance ministry absorb 85,345 parliamentary amendments without extra staff","headline":"*LLaMandement* sorts and summarizes amendments for French officials"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["title","headline"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"version":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["d526e370dac9d2f0703addd9e6145db88306d896b24d34c2a8172e538d3bdbfa"],"role":"SHA-256 of the complete public record and its assessments"},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"SHA-256 of the public record, its assessments, and its displayed answers and notes, excluding its own identifier and the derived coverage summary.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"complete"},"workflow":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"account":"The Direction générale des Finances publiques (DGFiP) developed LLaMandement to help French ministries handle amendments that members of Parliament table. In a January 2024 paper, its developers describe a large language model that the government fine-tuned to write neutral summaries of legislative proposals. The Cour des comptes reviewed the economy and finance ministry's use of artificial intelligence from 2018 to 2023. In observations published on 22 October 2024, the Cour found that the system frees staff from sorting and summarizing amendments. It found that staff put the time saved into better and faster answers. The tool let teams absorb the 85,345 amendments tabled between June 2022 and January 2024 without extra staff. The Cour gives no measure of time saved or of summary quality. The only amendment tool in its annex is listed as envisaged or under feasibility study, which does not match the main text.","replication":{"produced_by":["The system took over the sorting and summarizing of parliamentary amendments.","Staff put the time saved into the quality and speed of the ministry's answers."],"must_hold":["Teams must absorb a growing volume of amendments at constant staffing."],"echoes":[]}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","replication"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"}},"summary":{"total":91,"addressed":91,"known":28,"reviewed":2,"reviewed_complete":2,"reviewed_partial":0,"record_mapped":26,"review_not_assessed":63,"not_assessed":0,"complete":false,"by_state":{"value_present":28,"not_reported":0,"unresolved":63,"not_assessed":0,"not_applicable":0,"withheld":0,"source_unavailable":0}}},"presentation_version":"2cd059b819395cd941308bc20867b81f59f1bf956d84a01fc7ebb08747f78138"}