{"id":"AIBD-0628","title":"FDA De Novo review of QuantX: radiologists' breast MRI accuracy rises modestly with AI analysis","summary":"In the reader study that FDA reviewed for QuantX, 19 radiologists reading 111 breast MRI cases raised their AUC from 0.7055 to 0.7575 with the software.","date_observed":"2017-07-19","date_basis":"source publication","date_precision":"day","benefit_status":"reported","source_collection":null,"source_entry":null,"account":"Quantitative Insights of Chicago developed QuantX, software that analyzes a breast lesion on MRI and combines its features through an artificial intelligence algorithm into a single score. In a sequential reader study, 19 radiologists read 111 breast MRI cases first without the score and then with it. FDA reviewers report that the summary area under the ROC curve rose from 0.7055 to 0.7575, a difference of 0.0520 with a p-value of 0.0408. The reviewers write that the study marginally met its primary endpoint. A second method of estimating the AUC gave a confidence interval that crossed zero. Training materials gave readers an optimistic view of the software, and the case set was enriched. FDA granted the De Novo request on 19 July 2017 and found that the probable benefits outweigh the probable risks.","category":"general benefit","unexpected":false,"purpose":"QuantX was built to help radiologists assess and characterize breast abnormalities on MRI. Better characterization is that purpose.","system":"QuantX","model_version":null,"developer":"Quantitative Insights, Inc.","deployer":"Quantitative Insights (reader study with 19 radiologists)","location":"United States","domain":"Healthcare","segment":null,"benefit_type":"Improved Task Accuracy","taxonomy_note":null,"registry_ids":{},"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":2,"reason":"Radiologist AUC rose from 0.7055 to 0.7575 with the score in the reader study."}],"ai_role":{"status":"assessed","statement":"Each radiologist read every case first without and then with the score, so the change is attributed to the software."},"evidence":[{"kind":"regulatory document","citation":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. De Novo classification request for QuantX (DEN170022): decision summary. Granted 2017-07-19.","title":"De Novo classification request for QuantX (DEN170022)","url":"https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/DEN170022.pdf","date":"2017-07-19","written_by":"independent","quote":"The clinical MRMC study demonstrated a marginally statistically significant improvement in reader performance diagnosing breast cancer when QuantX is used during breast MRI interpretation compared with conventional MRI interpretation without the use of QuantX."}],"replication":{"produced_by":["Readers selected the lesion and the software segmented and scored it.","Readers saw no prior images or patient history."],"must_hold":["The radiologist uses the score as a concurrent aid.","MR images meet the acquisition parameters in the labeling."],"echoes":[]},"paired_incident":null,"headline":"*QuantX* gave radiologists a small lift on breast MRI","metric":"rose from 0.7055 to 0.7575","comparator":{"against":"The same radiologists reading the same cases without QuantX","before":"AUC 0.7055","after":"AUC 0.7575","basis":"measured","quote":"The results of the reader study indicate that the study marginally met the primary endpoint.","url":"https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/DEN170022.pdf"},"later":null,"value":null,"developer_country":"United States","deployer_country":"United States","unrated_because":null,"brief_notes":null,"brief":null,"revisions":[{"date":"2026-10-29","change":"Added the case.","source":"https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/DEN170022.pdf","editor":"AIBD"}],"confidence":"found","shade":"high","claim_status":"Found by a regulator","claim_basis":"Sources: one independent regulatory document. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","case_jurisdictions":["United States"],"profile":{"case_id":"AIBD-0628","catalog_version":"1.0.0","source_fingerprint":"2e0903709baa1a20b357db6863ca73af51033aef2626299f55f84895546d1a33","collection_refs":[{"collection_id":"aibd","version":"2026-10-29"},{"collection_id":"querist","version":"2026-10-25"}],"source_ids":["AIBD-0628-source-0001"],"families":{"strategic assessments":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"evaluations":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["AIBD-0628-evaluation-1"],"role":"Evaluations of the benefit"},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":["AIBD-0628-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":["AIBD-0628-evaluation-1"]},"monetary observations":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]},"institutional decisions":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"Editorial assignment.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","record_ids":[]}},"fields":{"actors[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"developer":"Quantitative Insights, Inc.","deployer":"Quantitative Insights (reader study with 19 radiologists)"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["developer","deployer"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"actors[].ownership_control":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"ai_contribution":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ai_role":{"status":"assessed","statement":"Each radiologist read every case first without and then with the score, so the change is attributed to the software."}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ai_role"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"ai_relationship":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"category":"general benefit","ai_role":{"status":"assessed","statement":"Each radiologist read every case first without and then with the score, so the change is attributed to the software."}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ai_role","category"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].alternatives":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].assessor_date":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].depth":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":2,"reason":"Radiologist AUC rose from 0.7055 to 0.7575 with the score in the reader study."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].display_confidence":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"confidence":"high","evidence_word":"found","claim_status":"Found by a regulator","basis":"Sources: one independent regulatory document. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","interpretation":"Existing display rule preserved; the richer outcome-specific confidence question still needs review."}},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].rationale":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":2,"reason":"Radiologist AUC rose from 0.7055 to 0.7575 with the score in the reader study."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].rubric_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].status_basis":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"assessments[].target":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":2,"reason":"Radiologist AUC rose from 0.7055 to 0.7575 with the score in the reader study."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"availability":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"brief":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"case_kind":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"classification":"evaluation or study","answer":"The case describes an evaluation or a study. A regulatory review of a multi-reader study.","scope":"The period and activity described in the case."}},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0628-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"The case describes an evaluation or a study. A regulatory review of a multi-reader study.","inferred":false}},"case_links[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Compared with the incidents in the AI Incident Database snapshot of 26 October 2026.","record_fields":["paired_incident"],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"No incident in the AI Incident Database snapshot of 26 October 2026 concerns the same kind of system harming the same kind of stakeholder.","review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].evidence_links":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].evidence_strength":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"answer":"Found by a regulator. Sources: one independent regulatory document. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","evidence_word":"found","claim_status":"Found by a regulator"}},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0628-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"Found by a regulator. Sources: one independent regulatory document. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report.","inferred":false}},"claims[].missingness":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"claims[].proposition":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"cross_border_flows[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"decisions[].action_outcome":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].grounds":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].institution_task":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"decisions[].success_criterion":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"institutional decisions"},"deployment_stage":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"structured","data":{"classification":"laboratory test","answer":"The system was tested in a laboratory. A reader study on an enriched set of archived MRI cases.","scope":"The period and activity described in the case."}},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0628-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"The system was tested in a laboratory. A reader study on an enriched set of archived MRI cases.","inferred":false}},"economics[].amount":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].costs[]":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].counterfactual":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].currency_price_basis":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].gross_net":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].measure_type":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].period_unit":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].realization":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].recipient_payer":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].return_payback":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"economics[].valuation_method":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"monetary observations"},"evaluations[].ai_uplift":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"text","text":"AUC difference 0.0520 (95% CI 0.0022 to 0.1018)."},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0628-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"AUC difference 0.0520 (95% CI 0.0022 to 0.1018).","inferred":false}},"evaluations[].comparator":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"text","text":"First read without the score."},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0628-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"First read without the score.","inferred":false}},"evaluations[].design":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"text","text":"Quasi-experimental."},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0628-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"Quasi-experimental.","inferred":false}},"evaluations[].effect":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"text","text":"AUC 0.7055 to 0.7575 (proper-binormal)."},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0628-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"AUC 0.7055 to 0.7575 (proper-binormal).","inferred":false}},"evaluations[].exposure":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"text","text":"Two reads per case."},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0628-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"Two reads per case.","inferred":false}},"evaluations[].id":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["AIBD-0628-evaluation-1"],"role":"Evaluations of the benefit"},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0628-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"Quasi-experimental.","inferred":false}},"evaluations[].measurement_method":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"text","text":"Sequential first read then second read with the score; DBM MRMC analysis."},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0628-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"Sequential first read then second read with the score; DBM MRMC analysis.","inferred":false}},"evaluations[].metric":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"text","text":"Reader AUC."},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0628-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"Reader AUC.","inferred":false}},"evaluations[].reproduction_materials":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"text","text":"None public."},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0628-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"None public.","inferred":false}},"evaluations[].setting_sample":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"text","text":"19 radiologists; 111 breast MRI cases."},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0628-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"19 radiologists; 111 breast MRI cases.","inferred":false}},"evaluations[].uncertainty_limitations":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"text","text":"Marginal result; trapezoidal estimate CI crossed zero; enriched cases; optimistic training material."},"provenance":{"kind":"source_review","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":["AIBD-0628-source-0001"],"reviewed_on":"2026-10-29"},"review_state":"reviewed","coverage":"complete","display":{"answer":"Marginal result; trapezoidal estimate CI crossed zero; enriched cases; optimistic training material.","inferred":false}},"external_references[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"follow_up[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"human_oversight":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"id":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"id":"AIBD-0628"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["id"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"infrastructure_dependencies[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].beneficiaries":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].beneficiary_count":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].benefit_type":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"benefit_type":"Improved Task Accuracy"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["benefit_type"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].claim":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"account":"Quantitative Insights of Chicago developed QuantX, software that analyzes a breast lesion on MRI and combines its features through an artificial intelligence algorithm into a single score. In a sequential reader study, 19 radiologists read 111 breast MRI cases first without the score and then with it. FDA reviewers report that the summary area under the ROC curve rose from 0.7055 to 0.7575, a difference of 0.0520 with a p-value of 0.0408. The reviewers write that the study marginally met its primary endpoint. A second method of estimating the AUC gave a confidence interval that crossed zero. Training materials gave readers an optimistic view of the software, and the case set was enriched. FDA granted the De Novo request on 19 July 2017 and found that the probable benefits outweigh the probable risks.","benefit_type":"Improved Task Accuracy"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","benefit_type"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].distribution":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].duration":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].id":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].stakeholder_group":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"ratings":[{"group":"organizational","depth":2,"reason":"Radiologist AUC rose from 0.7055 to 0.7575 with the score in the reader study."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["ratings"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].status":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"benefit_status":"reported"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["benefit_status"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].tradeoffs":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"outcomes[].unexpected":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"unexpected":false,"purpose":"QuantX was built to help radiologists assess and characterize breast abnormalities on MRI. Better characterization is that purpose."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["unexpected","purpose"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"places[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"location":"United States","developer_country":"United States","deployer_country":"United States"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["location","developer_country","deployer_country"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"purpose":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"purpose":"QuantX was built to help radiologists assess and characterize breast abnormalities on MRI. Better characterization is that purpose."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["purpose"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"record_dates":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"date_observed":"2017-07-19","date_basis":"source publication","date_precision":"day","revisions":[{"date":"2026-10-29","change":"Added the case.","source":"https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/DEN170022.pdf","editor":"AIBD"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["date_observed","date_basis","date_precision","revisions"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"replication.attempts[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"replication.conditions":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"replication":{"produced_by":["Readers selected the lesion and the software segmented and scored it.","Readers saw no prior images or patient history."],"must_hold":["The radiologist uses the score as a concurrent aid.","MR images meet the acquisition parameters in the labeling."],"echoes":[]}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["replication"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"revision_history[]":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"revisions":[{"date":"2026-10-29","change":"Added the case.","source":"https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/DEN170022.pdf","editor":"AIBD"}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["revisions"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sector":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"domain":"Healthcare"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["domain"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].access_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].citation_locator":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"evidence":[{"kind":"regulatory document","citation":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. De Novo classification request for QuantX (DEN170022): decision summary. Granted 2017-07-19.","title":"De Novo classification request for QuantX (DEN170022)","url":"https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/DEN170022.pdf","date":"2017-07-19","written_by":"independent","quote":"The clinical MRMC study demonstrated a marginally statistically significant improvement in reader performance diagnosing breast cancer when QuantX is used during breast MRI interpretation compared with conventional MRI interpretation without the use of QuantX."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].id":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["AIBD-0628-source-0001"],"role":"Existing evidence items, in their original order"},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"complete"},"sources[].language":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].relationship":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"evidence":[{"kind":"regulatory document","citation":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. De Novo classification request for QuantX (DEN170022): decision summary. Granted 2017-07-19.","title":"De Novo classification request for QuantX (DEN170022)","url":"https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/DEN170022.pdf","date":"2017-07-19","written_by":"independent","quote":"The clinical MRMC study demonstrated a marginally statistically significant improvement in reader performance diagnosing breast cancer when QuantX is used during breast MRI interpretation compared with conventional MRI interpretation without the use of QuantX."}]}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["evidence"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"sources[].upstream_sources":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"strategic_assessments[]":{"state":"unresolved","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial","family":"strategic assessments"},"summary":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"summary":"In the reader study that FDA reviewed for QuantX, 19 radiologists reading 111 breast MRI cases raised their AUC from 0.7055 to 0.7575 with the software.","account":"Quantitative Insights of Chicago developed QuantX, software that analyzes a breast lesion on MRI and combines its features through an artificial intelligence algorithm into a single score. In a sequential reader study, 19 radiologists read 111 breast MRI cases first without the score and then with it. FDA reviewers report that the summary area under the ROC curve rose from 0.7055 to 0.7575, a difference of 0.0520 with a p-value of 0.0408. The reviewers write that the study marginally met its primary endpoint. A second method of estimating the AUC gave a confidence interval that crossed zero. Training materials gave readers an optimistic view of the software, and the case set was enriched. FDA granted the De Novo request on 19 July 2017 and found that the probable benefits outweigh the probable risks."}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["summary","account"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].autonomy_permissions":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].component_role":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].deployment_configuration":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].inputs_outputs":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].model_name":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].model_version":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].product_name":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"system":"QuantX"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["system"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"systems[].provider":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"taxonomy_crosswalks[]":{"state":"unresolved","provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"reason":"This is an explicit unresolved assignment: the sources on record do not settle this question.","review_state":"not_assessed","coverage":"partial"},"title":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"title":"FDA De Novo review of QuantX: radiologists' breast MRI accuracy rises modestly with AI analysis","headline":"*QuantX* gave radiologists a small lift on breast MRI"}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["title","headline"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"},"version":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"identifiers","identifiers":["c51ca04801d5e4a40cb5b670b95f44f75dd0c8a9f0333cb311336501fa8be468"],"role":"SHA-256 of the complete public case and its assessments"},"provenance":{"kind":"curatorial","basis":"SHA-256 of the public case, its assessments, and its displayed answers and notes, excluding its own identifier and the derived coverage summary.","record_fields":[],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"complete"},"workflow":{"state":"value_present","value":{"kind":"record_fields","fields":{"account":"Quantitative Insights of Chicago developed QuantX, software that analyzes a breast lesion on MRI and combines its features through an artificial intelligence algorithm into a single score. In a sequential reader study, 19 radiologists read 111 breast MRI cases first without the score and then with it. FDA reviewers report that the summary area under the ROC curve rose from 0.7055 to 0.7575, a difference of 0.0520 with a p-value of 0.0408. The reviewers write that the study marginally met its primary endpoint. A second method of estimating the AUC gave a confidence interval that crossed zero. Training materials gave readers an optimistic view of the software, and the case set was enriched. FDA granted the De Novo request on 19 July 2017 and found that the probable benefits outweigh the probable risks.","replication":{"produced_by":["Readers selected the lesion and the software segmented and scored it.","Readers saw no prior images or patient history."],"must_hold":["The radiologist uses the score as a concurrent aid.","MR images meet the acquisition parameters in the labeling."],"echoes":[]}}},"provenance":{"kind":"legacy_record","basis":"Editorial assignment.","record_fields":["account","replication"],"source_refs":[]},"review_state":"record_mapped","coverage":"partial"}},"summary":{"total":91,"addressed":91,"known":41,"reviewed":15,"reviewed_complete":14,"reviewed_partial":1,"record_mapped":27,"review_not_assessed":49,"not_assessed":0,"complete":false,"by_state":{"value_present":41,"not_reported":0,"unresolved":50,"not_assessed":0,"not_applicable":0,"withheld":0,"source_unavailable":0}}},"presentation_version":"b655ef23f1b81c4b946b384851b921bb6eb3d9252ad709f022be893585af596d"}