{
  "id": "AIBD-0203",
  "title": "FDA uses AI to choose where to concentrate food inspections; an imported-seafood pilot ran for years",
  "summary": "Commissioner Marty Makary told a Senate committee in May 2025 that FDA uses AI to target food inspections; a multi-year imported-seafood AI pilot is mentioned; no outcome figures in the source.",
  "date_observed": "2025-05-27",
  "date_basis": "unassessed",
  "date_precision": "unassessed",
  "benefit_status": null,
  "source_collection": null,
  "source_entry": null,
  "account": "Civil Eats reported on 27 May 2025 that FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, appearing before a Senate committee the previous week, said the agency was using AI to identify where to concentrate food inspections and that AI can sometimes find patterns faster than people, adding that a human reviews the information. The article notes that FDA had been working for several years on a pilot focused on imported seafood and had announced an agency-wide generative AI rollout, with an FDA spokesperson saying all centers would run on a unified platform by 30 June; a 2 June update records the launch of FDA's generative tool Elsa, said to be used in part to identify high-priority inspection targets. Jaydee Hanson of the Center for Food Safety is quoted on the risks of using AI amid staff cuts. No inspection outcome, detection or recall attributable to the AI is given. FDA's own pilot page was not available, so no official report is among the sources.",
  "category": "general benefit",
  "unexpected": false,
  "purpose": "Prioritize food inspection targets, including imported seafood, using pattern recognition over agency data.",
  "system": "FDA AI inspection-targeting tools (imported seafood pilot; Elsa generative AI)",
  "model_version": null,
  "developer": "U.S. Food and Drug Administration (details not in the cited source)",
  "deployer": "U.S. Food and Drug Administration",
  "location": null,
  "domain": "Food safety regulation",
  "segment": "Import and facility inspection targeting",
  "benefit_type": "Improved Organizational Efficiency",
  "taxonomy_note": "Statements of use only; the type names better-targeted inspections, not a documented outcome.",
  "registry_ids": {},
  "ratings": [
    {
      "group": "organizational",
      "depth": null,
      "reason": "No figure on inspections targeted, violations found or seafood shipments flagged appears in the source."
    },
    {
      "group": "societal",
      "depth": null,
      "reason": "No contamination detection or recall is attributed to the AI."
    }
  ],
  "ai_role": {
    "status": "unassessed",
    "statement": "Only the Commissioner's testimony and an FDA spokesperson's statements, as reported by Civil Eats, describe the AI's use. No evaluation, outcome or official report is among the sources, and FDA's pilot page was not available."
  },
  "evidence": [
    {
      "kind": "news report",
      "citation": "Held L. FDA Expanding Use of AI in Food Safety Inspection. Civil Eats, 27 May 2025 (updated 2 June 2025).",
      "title": "FDA Expanding Use of AI in Food Safety Inspection",
      "url": "https://civileats.com/2025/05/27/fda-expanding-use-of-ai-in-food-safety-inspection/",
      "date": "2025-05-27",
      "written_by": "independent",
      "quote": "We’re using AI to identify where we should be concentrating our food inspections"
    }
  ],
  "replication": {
    "produced_by": [
      "An agency-wide generative AI rollout announced in May 2025",
      "A multi-year imported-seafood pilot"
    ],
    "must_hold": [
      "Human review of AI outputs, as the Commissioner stated"
    ],
    "echoes": []
  },
  "paired_incident": null,
  "headline": "FDA uses AI to target food inspections",
  "metric": null,
  "comparator": null,
  "later": {
    "status": "scaled",
    "date": "2025-06-02",
    "note": "On 2 June 2025 FDA announced the agency-wide rollout of its generative AI tool Elsa, which it said was already being used to identify high-priority inspection targets.",
    "quote": "June 2, 2025 Update: Today, the FDA announced the rollout of Elsa, its own generative AI tool. According to the news release, the agency “is already using Elsa to accelerate clinical protocol reviews, shorten the time needed for scientific evaluations, and identify high-priority inspection targets.”",
    "url": "https://civileats.com/2025/05/27/fda-expanding-use-of-ai-in-food-safety-inspection/"
  },
  "value": null,
  "developer_country": "United States",
  "deployer_country": "United States",
  "unrated_because": null,
  "brief_notes": null,
  "brief": null,
  "revisions": [
    {
      "date": "2026-10-20",
      "change": "Record drafted from the cited sources.",
      "source": null,
      "editor": "AIBD"
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-10-21",
      "change": "Headline reworded to state the event without naming who claims it.",
      "source": null,
      "editor": "AIBD"
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-10-21",
      "change": "Title reworded to state the event without naming who claims it.",
      "source": null,
      "editor": "AIBD"
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-10-21",
      "change": "Added what happened since from the cited sources.",
      "source": "https://civileats.com/2025/05/27/fda-expanding-use-of-ai-in-food-safety-inspection/",
      "editor": "AIBD"
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-10-21",
      "change": "Country of the developer and the deployer added from the organization's own site or a registry.",
      "source": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_and_Drug_Administration; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_and_Drug_Administration",
      "editor": "AIBD"
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-10-21",
      "change": "Prose pass: purpose, the system's part rewritten in shorter sentences with abbreviations expanded; facts, figures and quotations unchanged.",
      "source": null,
      "editor": "AIBD"
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-10-21",
      "change": "Notes about which sources could be read were reworded for readers; facts, figures and quotations unchanged.",
      "source": null,
      "editor": "AIBD"
    }
  ],
  "confidence": "reported",
  "shade": "medium",
  "claim_status": "Independently reported",
  "claim_basis": "Sources: one independent news report. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report and no finding by a regulator or court.",
  "profile": {
    "case_id": "AIBD-0203",
    "catalog_version": "1.0.0",
    "source_fingerprint": "d479c5a5bdccb684cd707bf8df0c6f108182ed1adcc31b8736a30af08b34214f",
    "collection_refs": [
      {
        "collection_id": "aibd",
        "version": "snapshot-8bf7cfec9cb185aa"
      },
      {
        "collection_id": "aibd",
        "version": "2026-10-25"
      }
    ],
    "source_ids": [
      "AIBD-0203-source-0001"
    ],
    "families": {
      "strategic assessments": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "record_ids": []
      },
      "evaluations": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "record_ids": []
      },
      "monetary observations": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "record_ids": []
      },
      "institutional decisions": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "record_ids": []
      }
    },
    "fields": {
      "actors[]": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "developer": "U.S. Food and Drug Administration (details not in the cited source)",
            "deployer": "U.S. Food and Drug Administration"
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "developer",
            "deployer"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "actors[].ownership_control": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "ai_contribution": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "ai_relationship": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "category": "general benefit",
            "ai_role": {
              "status": "unassessed",
              "statement": "Only the Commissioner's testimony and an FDA spokesperson's statements, as reported by Civil Eats, describe the AI's use. No evaluation, outcome or official report is among the sources, and FDA's pilot page was not available."
            }
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "ai_role",
            "category"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "assessments[].alternatives": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "assessments[].assessor_date": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "assessments[].depth": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "assessments[].display_confidence": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "structured",
          "data": {
            "confidence": "medium",
            "evidence_word": "reported",
            "claim_status": "Independently reported",
            "basis": "Sources: one independent news report. The cited evidence includes no independent study or report and no finding by a regulator or court.",
            "interpretation": "Existing display rule preserved; the richer outcome-specific confidence question still needs review."
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "curatorial",
          "basis": "Derived from the existing case display properties; not a new evidentiary judgment.",
          "record_fields": [],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "assessments[].rationale": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "ratings": [
              {
                "group": "organizational",
                "reason": "No figure on inspections targeted, violations found or seafood shipments flagged appears in the source."
              },
              {
                "group": "societal",
                "reason": "No contamination detection or recall is attributed to the AI."
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "ratings"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "assessments[].rubric_version": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "assessments[].status_basis": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "assessments[].target": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "ratings": [
              {
                "group": "organizational",
                "reason": "No figure on inspections targeted, violations found or seafood shipments flagged appears in the source."
              },
              {
                "group": "societal",
                "reason": "No contamination detection or recall is attributed to the AI."
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "ratings"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "availability": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "brief": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "case_kind": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "case_links[]": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "claims[].evidence_links": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "claims[].evidence_strength": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "claims[].missingness": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "claims[].proposition": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "cross_border_flows[]": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "decisions[].action_outcome": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "institutional decisions"
      },
      "decisions[].grounds": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "institutional decisions"
      },
      "decisions[].institution_task": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "institutional decisions"
      },
      "decisions[].success_criterion": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "institutional decisions"
      },
      "deployment_stage": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "economics[].amount": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].costs[]": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].counterfactual": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].currency_price_basis": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].gross_net": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].measure_type": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].period_unit": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].realization": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].recipient_payer": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].return_payback": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].valuation_method": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "evaluations[].ai_uplift": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "evaluations[].comparator": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "evaluations[].design": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "evaluations[].effect": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "evaluations[].exposure": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "evaluations[].id": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "evaluations[].measurement_method": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "evaluations[].metric": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "evaluations[].reproduction_materials": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "evaluations[].setting_sample": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "evaluations[].uncertainty_limitations": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "external_references[]": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "follow_up[]": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "later": {
              "status": "scaled",
              "date": "2025-06-02",
              "note": "On 2 June 2025 FDA announced the agency-wide rollout of its generative AI tool Elsa, which it said was already being used to identify high-priority inspection targets.",
              "quote": "June 2, 2025 Update: Today, the FDA announced the rollout of Elsa, its own generative AI tool. According to the news release, the agency “is already using Elsa to accelerate clinical protocol reviews, shorten the time needed for scientific evaluations, and identify high-priority inspection targets.”",
              "url": "https://civileats.com/2025/05/27/fda-expanding-use-of-ai-in-food-safety-inspection/"
            }
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "later"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "human_oversight": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "id": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "id": "AIBD-0203"
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "id"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "infrastructure_dependencies[]": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].beneficiaries": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].beneficiary_count": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].benefit_type": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "benefit_type": "Improved Organizational Efficiency",
            "taxonomy_note": "Statements of use only; the type names better-targeted inspections, not a documented outcome."
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "benefit_type",
            "taxonomy_note"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].claim": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "account": "Civil Eats reported on 27 May 2025 that FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, appearing before a Senate committee the previous week, said the agency was using AI to identify where to concentrate food inspections and that AI can sometimes find patterns faster than people, adding that a human reviews the information. The article notes that FDA had been working for several years on a pilot focused on imported seafood and had announced an agency-wide generative AI rollout, with an FDA spokesperson saying all centers would run on a unified platform by 30 June; a 2 June update records the launch of FDA's generative tool Elsa, said to be used in part to identify high-priority inspection targets. Jaydee Hanson of the Center for Food Safety is quoted on the risks of using AI amid staff cuts. No inspection outcome, detection or recall attributable to the AI is given. FDA's own pilot page was not available, so no official report is among the sources.",
            "benefit_type": "Improved Organizational Efficiency"
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "account",
            "benefit_type"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].distribution": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].duration": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].id": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].stakeholder_group": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "ratings": [
              {
                "group": "organizational",
                "reason": "No figure on inspections targeted, violations found or seafood shipments flagged appears in the source."
              },
              {
                "group": "societal",
                "reason": "No contamination detection or recall is attributed to the AI."
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "ratings"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].status": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].tradeoffs": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].unexpected": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "unexpected": false,
            "purpose": "Prioritize food inspection targets, including imported seafood, using pattern recognition over agency data."
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "unexpected",
            "purpose"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "places[]": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "developer_country": "United States",
            "deployer_country": "United States"
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "developer_country",
            "deployer_country"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "purpose": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "purpose": "Prioritize food inspection targets, including imported seafood, using pattern recognition over agency data."
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "purpose"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "record_dates": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "date_observed": "2025-05-27",
            "revisions": [
              {
                "date": "2026-10-20",
                "change": "Record drafted from the cited sources.",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              },
              {
                "date": "2026-10-21",
                "change": "Headline reworded to state the event without naming who claims it.",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              },
              {
                "date": "2026-10-21",
                "change": "Title reworded to state the event without naming who claims it.",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              },
              {
                "date": "2026-10-21",
                "change": "Added what happened since from the cited sources.",
                "source": "https://civileats.com/2025/05/27/fda-expanding-use-of-ai-in-food-safety-inspection/",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              },
              {
                "date": "2026-10-21",
                "change": "Country of the developer and the deployer added from the organization's own site or a registry.",
                "source": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_and_Drug_Administration; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_and_Drug_Administration",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              },
              {
                "date": "2026-10-21",
                "change": "Prose pass: purpose, the system's part rewritten in shorter sentences with abbreviations expanded; facts, figures and quotations unchanged.",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              },
              {
                "date": "2026-10-21",
                "change": "Notes about which sources could be read were reworded for readers; facts, figures and quotations unchanged.",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "date_observed",
            "revisions"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "replication.attempts[]": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "replication.conditions": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "replication": {
              "produced_by": [
                "An agency-wide generative AI rollout announced in May 2025",
                "A multi-year imported-seafood pilot"
              ],
              "must_hold": [
                "Human review of AI outputs, as the Commissioner stated"
              ],
              "echoes": []
            }
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "replication"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "revision_history[]": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "revisions": [
              {
                "date": "2026-10-20",
                "change": "Record drafted from the cited sources.",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              },
              {
                "date": "2026-10-21",
                "change": "Headline reworded to state the event without naming who claims it.",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              },
              {
                "date": "2026-10-21",
                "change": "Title reworded to state the event without naming who claims it.",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              },
              {
                "date": "2026-10-21",
                "change": "Added what happened since from the cited sources.",
                "source": "https://civileats.com/2025/05/27/fda-expanding-use-of-ai-in-food-safety-inspection/",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              },
              {
                "date": "2026-10-21",
                "change": "Country of the developer and the deployer added from the organization's own site or a registry.",
                "source": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_and_Drug_Administration; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_and_Drug_Administration",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              },
              {
                "date": "2026-10-21",
                "change": "Prose pass: purpose, the system's part rewritten in shorter sentences with abbreviations expanded; facts, figures and quotations unchanged.",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              },
              {
                "date": "2026-10-21",
                "change": "Notes about which sources could be read were reworded for readers; facts, figures and quotations unchanged.",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "revisions"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "sector": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "domain": "Food safety regulation",
            "segment": "Import and facility inspection targeting"
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "domain",
            "segment"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "sources[].access_version": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "sources[].citation_locator": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "evidence": [
              {
                "kind": "news report",
                "citation": "Held L. FDA Expanding Use of AI in Food Safety Inspection. Civil Eats, 27 May 2025 (updated 2 June 2025).",
                "title": "FDA Expanding Use of AI in Food Safety Inspection",
                "url": "https://civileats.com/2025/05/27/fda-expanding-use-of-ai-in-food-safety-inspection/",
                "date": "2025-05-27",
                "written_by": "independent",
                "quote": "We’re using AI to identify where we should be concentrating our food inspections"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "evidence"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "sources[].id": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "identifiers",
          "identifiers": [
            "AIBD-0203-source-0001"
          ],
          "role": "Existing evidence items, in their original order"
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "curatorial",
          "basis": "Stable within the fingerprinted record version; no source content or source review has been added.",
          "record_fields": [],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "complete"
      },
      "sources[].language": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "sources[].relationship": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "evidence": [
              {
                "kind": "news report",
                "citation": "Held L. FDA Expanding Use of AI in Food Safety Inspection. Civil Eats, 27 May 2025 (updated 2 June 2025).",
                "title": "FDA Expanding Use of AI in Food Safety Inspection",
                "url": "https://civileats.com/2025/05/27/fda-expanding-use-of-ai-in-food-safety-inspection/",
                "date": "2025-05-27",
                "written_by": "independent",
                "quote": "We’re using AI to identify where we should be concentrating our food inspections"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "evidence"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "sources[].upstream_sources": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "strategic_assessments[]": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "strategic assessments"
      },
      "summary": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "summary": "Commissioner Marty Makary told a Senate committee in May 2025 that FDA uses AI to target food inspections; a multi-year imported-seafood AI pilot is mentioned; no outcome figures in the source.",
            "account": "Civil Eats reported on 27 May 2025 that FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, appearing before a Senate committee the previous week, said the agency was using AI to identify where to concentrate food inspections and that AI can sometimes find patterns faster than people, adding that a human reviews the information. The article notes that FDA had been working for several years on a pilot focused on imported seafood and had announced an agency-wide generative AI rollout, with an FDA spokesperson saying all centers would run on a unified platform by 30 June; a 2 June update records the launch of FDA's generative tool Elsa, said to be used in part to identify high-priority inspection targets. Jaydee Hanson of the Center for Food Safety is quoted on the risks of using AI amid staff cuts. No inspection outcome, detection or recall attributable to the AI is given. FDA's own pilot page was not available, so no official report is among the sources."
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "summary",
            "account"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "systems[].autonomy_permissions": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "systems[].component_role": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "systems[].deployment_configuration": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "systems[].inputs_outputs": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "systems[].model_name": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "systems[].model_version": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "systems[].product_name": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "system": "FDA AI inspection-targeting tools (imported seafood pilot; Elsa generative AI)"
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "system"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "systems[].provider": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "structured",
          "data": {
            "application_developer": "U.S. Food and Drug Administration (details not in the cited source)"
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Mapped from the existing case description without a new external source review.",
          "record_fields": [
            "developer"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "taxonomy_crosswalks[]": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "title": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "title": "FDA uses AI to choose where to concentrate food inspections; an imported-seafood pilot ran for years",
            "headline": "FDA uses AI to target food inspections"
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "title",
            "headline"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "version": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "identifiers",
          "identifiers": [
            "d479c5a5bdccb684cd707bf8df0c6f108182ed1adcc31b8736a30af08b34214f"
          ],
          "role": "SHA-256 of normalized original case data"
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "curatorial",
          "basis": "Deterministic content version assigned by the local migration.",
          "record_fields": [],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "complete"
      },
      "workflow": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "account": "Civil Eats reported on 27 May 2025 that FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, appearing before a Senate committee the previous week, said the agency was using AI to identify where to concentrate food inspections and that AI can sometimes find patterns faster than people, adding that a human reviews the information. The article notes that FDA had been working for several years on a pilot focused on imported seafood and had announced an agency-wide generative AI rollout, with an FDA spokesperson saying all centers would run on a unified platform by 30 June; a 2 June update records the launch of FDA's generative tool Elsa, said to be used in part to identify high-priority inspection targets. Jaydee Hanson of the Center for Food Safety is quoted on the risks of using AI amid staff cuts. No inspection outcome, detection or recall attributable to the AI is given. FDA's own pilot page was not available, so no official report is among the sources.",
            "replication": {
              "produced_by": [
                "An agency-wide generative AI rollout announced in May 2025",
                "A multi-year imported-seafood pilot"
              ],
              "must_hold": [
                "Human review of AI outputs, as the Commissioner stated"
              ],
              "echoes": []
            }
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "account",
            "replication"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      }
    },
    "summary": {
      "total": 91,
      "addressed": 91,
      "known": 26,
      "reviewed": 0,
      "record_mapped": 26,
      "not_assessed": 65,
      "complete": false,
      "by_state": {
        "value_present": 26,
        "not_reported": 0,
        "unresolved": 0,
        "not_assessed": 65,
        "not_applicable": 0,
        "withheld": 0,
        "source_unavailable": 0
      }
    }
  }
}