{
  "id": "AIBD-0188",
  "title": "nEmesis-guided inspections find 64% more C-or-worse venues than standard inspections in Las Vegas",
  "summary": "SNHD double-blind trial from 2 January 2015: Twitter-mined nEmesis flags yielded 9 vs 6 demerits per inspection and 11 vs 7 venues graded C or worse (64% more).",
  "date_observed": "2015-03-31",
  "date_basis": "unassessed",
  "date_precision": "unassessed",
  "benefit_status": null,
  "source_collection": null,
  "source_entry": null,
  "account": "On 2 January 2015 the Southern Nevada Health District (SNHD) began a controlled experiment with nEmesis, a University of Rochester system. It applies a support-vector-machine language model to geotagged tweets to rank Las Vegas food venues by foodborne-illness risk. During the first three months environmental health specialists inspected 142 venues, half chosen by nEmesis, half under the standard protocol. Inspectors were blind to which was which. Adaptive inspections uncovered 9 demerits per inspection versus 6 (p = 0.019). They found 11 venues graded C or worse versus 7 for controls, a 64% improvement. The abstract summarizes this as 63% more effective. Side findings included an unpermitted seafood establishment and a food handler working with an influenza-like illness. The authors estimate, from CDC outbreak averages, that adaptive inspections saved 71 infections and 4.4 hospitalizations over the three months. They estimate all of Las Vegas's 35,000+ annual inspections made adaptive could prevent over 9,126 cases and 557 hospitalizations a year. SNHD performed 5 foodborne-illness investigations between 2 January and 31 March 2015, against 11 in the same window the year before.",
  "category": "benefit created",
  "unexpected": false,
  "purpose": "Rank Las Vegas food venues by predicted foodborne-illness risk, inferred from Twitter posts, so that health inspectors can prioritize the riskiest venues.",
  "system": "nEmesis (SVM language model over geotagged tweets with a web interface for inspectors)",
  "model_version": null,
  "developer": "University of Rochester (Adam Sadilek, Henry Kautz and colleagues)",
  "deployer": "Southern Nevada Health District",
  "location": "Las Vegas, United States",
  "domain": "Food safety / public health",
  "segment": "Restaurant inspection targeting",
  "benefit_type": "Improved Task Accuracy",
  "taxonomy_note": null,
  "registry_ids": {},
  "ratings": [
    {
      "group": "organizational",
      "depth": 2,
      "reason": "In 142 blinded inspections the nEmesis arm found 9 vs 6 demerits per inspection (p = 0.019). It found 11 vs 7 venues graded C or worse, an unpermitted seafood establishment and a sick food handler."
    },
    {
      "group": "societal",
      "depth": null,
      "reason": "The 71 infections and 4.4 hospitalizations said to be saved are estimates from CDC outbreak averages. The drop in foodborne-illness investigations (5 vs 11) is an uncontrolled year-on-year comparison, not a measured outcome."
    }
  ],
  "ai_role": {
    "status": "assessed",
    "statement": "The AI chose which venues to inspect. The comparison was a controlled double-blind design with 142 venues split between nEmesis and standard protocol. So the difference in findings is attributable to the AI's venue selection. The developers (Rochester) are distinct from the deployer (SNHD), though SNHD staff co-authored the paper. The paper was peer-reviewed as an IAAI deployed paper."
  },
  "evidence": [
    {
      "kind": "peer-reviewed study",
      "citation": "Sadilek A, Kautz H, DiPrete L, Labus B, Portman E, Teitel J, Silenzio V. Deploying nEmesis: Preventing Foodborne Illness by Data Mining Social Media. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 30(2):3982-3989 (2016). doi:10.1609/aaai.v30i2.19072",
      "title": "Deploying nEmesis: Preventing Foodborne Illness by Data Mining Social Media",
      "url": "https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/19072",
      "date": "2016-02-18",
      "written_by": "makers",
      "quote": "We determined that adaptive inspections uncover significantly more demerits: 9 vs. 6 per inspection (p-value of 0.019)."
    }
  ],
  "replication": {
    "produced_by": [
      "Dense geotagged social-media posting across a metropolitan area",
      "A health department willing to assign half of a matched inspection sample to algorithm-flagged venues",
      "A graded inspection protocol (demerits, letter grades) that makes arms comparable"
    ],
    "must_hold": [
      "Access to geotagged public posts and venue locations as available through the Twitter and Google Places APIs in 2015",
      "Inspectors blinded to the source of the assignment",
      "Enough flagged venues per day to schedule adaptive inspections"
    ],
    "echoes": [
      {
        "date": "2018-11-06",
        "setting": "Las Vegas (May-August 2016) and Chicago (November 2016-March 2017), Google's FINDER using aggregated web search and location data",
        "model_version": "FINDER (successor model by the same lead author, not nEmesis)",
        "outcome": "recurred",
        "source": "Sadilek et al. 2018, npj Digital Medicine, doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0045-1"
      }
    ]
  },
  "paired_incident": null,
  "headline": "nEmesis-guided inspections find 64% more C-or-worse venues",
  "metric": "found 11 venues graded C or worse versus 7 for the control arm, a 64% improvement",
  "comparator": null,
  "later": {
    "status": "unknown",
    "date": null,
    "note": "No later report of SNHD continuing or expanding nEmesis after the 2015 experiment was found; the 2016 FINDER deployment is a different model.",
    "quote": null,
    "url": null
  },
  "value": null,
  "developer_country": "United States",
  "deployer_country": "United States",
  "unrated_because": null,
  "brief_notes": null,
  "brief": null,
  "revisions": [
    {
      "date": "2026-10-20",
      "change": "Record drafted from the cited sources.",
      "source": null,
      "editor": "AIBD"
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-10-21",
      "change": "Benefit type set to Improved Task Accuracy under Trustible's full taxonomy of 23 types; it was Improved Organizational Efficiency among the six first used.",
      "source": "https://trustible.ai/post/a-framework-for-measuring-the-benefits-of-ai/",
      "editor": "AIBD"
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-10-21",
      "change": "Country of the developer and the deployer added from the organization's own site or a registry.",
      "source": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Rochester; https://www.southernnevadahealthdistrict.org/about-us/maps/southern-nevada-health-district-main-facility/",
      "editor": "AIBD"
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-10-21",
      "change": "Prose pass: a rating reason, account, the system's part rewritten in shorter sentences with abbreviations expanded; facts, figures and quotations unchanged.",
      "source": null,
      "editor": "AIBD"
    }
  ],
  "confidence": "claimed",
  "shade": "low",
  "claim_status": "The makers' claim",
  "claim_basis": "Sources: the makers' peer-reviewed study. The cited evidence includes no independent source and no finding by a regulator or court.",
  "profile": {
    "case_id": "AIBD-0188",
    "catalog_version": "1.0.0",
    "source_fingerprint": "aafd5697d61c99c9fe0e31a6cf902f49ff00fc20b62dbca9c28f15d8de93b9db",
    "collection_refs": [
      {
        "collection_id": "aibd",
        "version": "snapshot-8bf7cfec9cb185aa"
      },
      {
        "collection_id": "aibd",
        "version": "2026-10-25"
      }
    ],
    "source_ids": [
      "AIBD-0188-source-0001"
    ],
    "families": {
      "strategic assessments": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "record_ids": []
      },
      "evaluations": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "record_ids": []
      },
      "monetary observations": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "record_ids": []
      },
      "institutional decisions": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "record_ids": []
      }
    },
    "fields": {
      "actors[]": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "developer": "University of Rochester (Adam Sadilek, Henry Kautz and colleagues)",
            "deployer": "Southern Nevada Health District"
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "developer",
            "deployer"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "actors[].ownership_control": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "ai_contribution": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "ai_role": {
              "status": "assessed",
              "statement": "The AI chose which venues to inspect. The comparison was a controlled double-blind design with 142 venues split between nEmesis and standard protocol. So the difference in findings is attributable to the AI's venue selection. The developers (Rochester) are distinct from the deployer (SNHD), though SNHD staff co-authored the paper. The paper was peer-reviewed as an IAAI deployed paper."
            }
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "ai_role"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "ai_relationship": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "category": "benefit created",
            "ai_role": {
              "status": "assessed",
              "statement": "The AI chose which venues to inspect. The comparison was a controlled double-blind design with 142 venues split between nEmesis and standard protocol. So the difference in findings is attributable to the AI's venue selection. The developers (Rochester) are distinct from the deployer (SNHD), though SNHD staff co-authored the paper. The paper was peer-reviewed as an IAAI deployed paper."
            }
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "ai_role",
            "category"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "assessments[].alternatives": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "assessments[].assessor_date": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "assessments[].depth": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "ratings": [
              {
                "group": "organizational",
                "depth": 2,
                "reason": "In 142 blinded inspections the nEmesis arm found 9 vs 6 demerits per inspection (p = 0.019). It found 11 vs 7 venues graded C or worse, an unpermitted seafood establishment and a sick food handler."
              },
              {
                "group": "societal",
                "reason": "The 71 infections and 4.4 hospitalizations said to be saved are estimates from CDC outbreak averages. The drop in foodborne-illness investigations (5 vs 11) is an uncontrolled year-on-year comparison, not a measured outcome."
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "ratings"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "assessments[].display_confidence": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "structured",
          "data": {
            "confidence": "low",
            "evidence_word": "claimed",
            "claim_status": "The makers' claim",
            "basis": "Sources: the makers' peer-reviewed study. The cited evidence includes no independent source and no finding by a regulator or court.",
            "interpretation": "Existing display rule preserved; the richer outcome-specific confidence question still needs review."
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "curatorial",
          "basis": "Derived from the existing case display properties; not a new evidentiary judgment.",
          "record_fields": [],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "assessments[].rationale": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "ratings": [
              {
                "group": "organizational",
                "depth": 2,
                "reason": "In 142 blinded inspections the nEmesis arm found 9 vs 6 demerits per inspection (p = 0.019). It found 11 vs 7 venues graded C or worse, an unpermitted seafood establishment and a sick food handler."
              },
              {
                "group": "societal",
                "reason": "The 71 infections and 4.4 hospitalizations said to be saved are estimates from CDC outbreak averages. The drop in foodborne-illness investigations (5 vs 11) is an uncontrolled year-on-year comparison, not a measured outcome."
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "ratings"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "assessments[].rubric_version": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "assessments[].status_basis": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "assessments[].target": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "ratings": [
              {
                "group": "organizational",
                "depth": 2,
                "reason": "In 142 blinded inspections the nEmesis arm found 9 vs 6 demerits per inspection (p = 0.019). It found 11 vs 7 venues graded C or worse, an unpermitted seafood establishment and a sick food handler."
              },
              {
                "group": "societal",
                "reason": "The 71 infections and 4.4 hospitalizations said to be saved are estimates from CDC outbreak averages. The drop in foodborne-illness investigations (5 vs 11) is an uncontrolled year-on-year comparison, not a measured outcome."
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "ratings"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "availability": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "brief": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "case_kind": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "case_links[]": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "claims[].evidence_links": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "claims[].evidence_strength": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "claims[].missingness": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "claims[].proposition": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "cross_border_flows[]": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "decisions[].action_outcome": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "institutional decisions"
      },
      "decisions[].grounds": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "institutional decisions"
      },
      "decisions[].institution_task": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "institutional decisions"
      },
      "decisions[].success_criterion": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "institutional decisions"
      },
      "deployment_stage": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "economics[].amount": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].costs[]": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].counterfactual": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].currency_price_basis": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].gross_net": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].measure_type": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].period_unit": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].realization": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].recipient_payer": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].return_payback": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "economics[].valuation_method": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "monetary observations"
      },
      "evaluations[].ai_uplift": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "evaluations[].comparator": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "evaluations[].design": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "evaluations[].effect": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "evaluations[].exposure": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "evaluations[].id": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "evaluations[].measurement_method": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "evaluations[].metric": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Mapped from the existing case description without a new external source review.",
          "record_fields": [
            "metric"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations",
        "display": {
          "answer": "found 11 venues graded C or worse versus 7 for the control arm, a 64% improvement",
          "editor_note": ""
        }
      },
      "evaluations[].reproduction_materials": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "evaluations[].setting_sample": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "evaluations[].uncertainty_limitations": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "evaluations"
      },
      "external_references[]": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "follow_up[]": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "later": {
              "status": "unknown",
              "note": "No later report of SNHD continuing or expanding nEmesis after the 2015 experiment was found; the 2016 FINDER deployment is a different model."
            }
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "later"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "human_oversight": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "id": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "id": "AIBD-0188"
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "id"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "infrastructure_dependencies[]": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].beneficiaries": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].beneficiary_count": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].benefit_type": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "benefit_type": "Improved Task Accuracy"
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "benefit_type"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].claim": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "account": "On 2 January 2015 the Southern Nevada Health District (SNHD) began a controlled experiment with nEmesis, a University of Rochester system. It applies a support-vector-machine language model to geotagged tweets to rank Las Vegas food venues by foodborne-illness risk. During the first three months environmental health specialists inspected 142 venues, half chosen by nEmesis, half under the standard protocol. Inspectors were blind to which was which. Adaptive inspections uncovered 9 demerits per inspection versus 6 (p = 0.019). They found 11 venues graded C or worse versus 7 for controls, a 64% improvement. The abstract summarizes this as 63% more effective. Side findings included an unpermitted seafood establishment and a food handler working with an influenza-like illness. The authors estimate, from CDC outbreak averages, that adaptive inspections saved 71 infections and 4.4 hospitalizations over the three months. They estimate all of Las Vegas's 35,000+ annual inspections made adaptive could prevent over 9,126 cases and 557 hospitalizations a year. SNHD performed 5 foodborne-illness investigations between 2 January and 31 March 2015, against 11 in the same window the year before.",
            "benefit_type": "Improved Task Accuracy"
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "account",
            "benefit_type"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].distribution": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].duration": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].id": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].stakeholder_group": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "ratings": [
              {
                "group": "organizational",
                "depth": 2,
                "reason": "In 142 blinded inspections the nEmesis arm found 9 vs 6 demerits per inspection (p = 0.019). It found 11 vs 7 venues graded C or worse, an unpermitted seafood establishment and a sick food handler."
              },
              {
                "group": "societal",
                "reason": "The 71 infections and 4.4 hospitalizations said to be saved are estimates from CDC outbreak averages. The drop in foodborne-illness investigations (5 vs 11) is an uncontrolled year-on-year comparison, not a measured outcome."
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "ratings"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].status": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].tradeoffs": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "outcomes[].unexpected": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "unexpected": false,
            "purpose": "Rank Las Vegas food venues by predicted foodborne-illness risk, inferred from Twitter posts, so that health inspectors can prioritize the riskiest venues."
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "unexpected",
            "purpose"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "places[]": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "location": "Las Vegas, United States",
            "developer_country": "United States",
            "deployer_country": "United States"
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "location",
            "developer_country",
            "deployer_country"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "purpose": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "purpose": "Rank Las Vegas food venues by predicted foodborne-illness risk, inferred from Twitter posts, so that health inspectors can prioritize the riskiest venues."
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "purpose"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "record_dates": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "date_observed": "2015-03-31",
            "revisions": [
              {
                "date": "2026-10-20",
                "change": "Record drafted from the cited sources.",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              },
              {
                "date": "2026-10-21",
                "change": "Benefit type set to Improved Task Accuracy under Trustible's full taxonomy of 23 types; it was Improved Organizational Efficiency among the six first used.",
                "source": "https://trustible.ai/post/a-framework-for-measuring-the-benefits-of-ai/",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              },
              {
                "date": "2026-10-21",
                "change": "Country of the developer and the deployer added from the organization's own site or a registry.",
                "source": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Rochester; https://www.southernnevadahealthdistrict.org/about-us/maps/southern-nevada-health-district-main-facility/",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              },
              {
                "date": "2026-10-21",
                "change": "Prose pass: a rating reason, account, the system's part rewritten in shorter sentences with abbreviations expanded; facts, figures and quotations unchanged.",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "date_observed",
            "revisions"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "replication.attempts[]": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "replication": {
              "produced_by": [
                "Dense geotagged social-media posting across a metropolitan area",
                "A health department willing to assign half of a matched inspection sample to algorithm-flagged venues",
                "A graded inspection protocol (demerits, letter grades) that makes arms comparable"
              ],
              "must_hold": [
                "Access to geotagged public posts and venue locations as available through the Twitter and Google Places APIs in 2015",
                "Inspectors blinded to the source of the assignment",
                "Enough flagged venues per day to schedule adaptive inspections"
              ],
              "echoes": [
                {
                  "date": "2018-11-06",
                  "setting": "Las Vegas (May-August 2016) and Chicago (November 2016-March 2017), Google's FINDER using aggregated web search and location data",
                  "model_version": "FINDER (successor model by the same lead author, not nEmesis)",
                  "outcome": "recurred",
                  "source": "Sadilek et al. 2018, npj Digital Medicine, doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0045-1"
                }
              ]
            }
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "replication"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "replication.conditions": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "replication": {
              "produced_by": [
                "Dense geotagged social-media posting across a metropolitan area",
                "A health department willing to assign half of a matched inspection sample to algorithm-flagged venues",
                "A graded inspection protocol (demerits, letter grades) that makes arms comparable"
              ],
              "must_hold": [
                "Access to geotagged public posts and venue locations as available through the Twitter and Google Places APIs in 2015",
                "Inspectors blinded to the source of the assignment",
                "Enough flagged venues per day to schedule adaptive inspections"
              ],
              "echoes": [
                {
                  "date": "2018-11-06",
                  "setting": "Las Vegas (May-August 2016) and Chicago (November 2016-March 2017), Google's FINDER using aggregated web search and location data",
                  "model_version": "FINDER (successor model by the same lead author, not nEmesis)",
                  "outcome": "recurred",
                  "source": "Sadilek et al. 2018, npj Digital Medicine, doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0045-1"
                }
              ]
            }
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "replication"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "revision_history[]": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "revisions": [
              {
                "date": "2026-10-20",
                "change": "Record drafted from the cited sources.",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              },
              {
                "date": "2026-10-21",
                "change": "Benefit type set to Improved Task Accuracy under Trustible's full taxonomy of 23 types; it was Improved Organizational Efficiency among the six first used.",
                "source": "https://trustible.ai/post/a-framework-for-measuring-the-benefits-of-ai/",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              },
              {
                "date": "2026-10-21",
                "change": "Country of the developer and the deployer added from the organization's own site or a registry.",
                "source": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Rochester; https://www.southernnevadahealthdistrict.org/about-us/maps/southern-nevada-health-district-main-facility/",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              },
              {
                "date": "2026-10-21",
                "change": "Prose pass: a rating reason, account, the system's part rewritten in shorter sentences with abbreviations expanded; facts, figures and quotations unchanged.",
                "editor": "AIBD"
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "revisions"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "sector": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "domain": "Food safety / public health",
            "segment": "Restaurant inspection targeting"
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "domain",
            "segment"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "sources[].access_version": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "sources[].citation_locator": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "evidence": [
              {
                "kind": "peer-reviewed study",
                "citation": "Sadilek A, Kautz H, DiPrete L, Labus B, Portman E, Teitel J, Silenzio V. Deploying nEmesis: Preventing Foodborne Illness by Data Mining Social Media. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 30(2):3982-3989 (2016). doi:10.1609/aaai.v30i2.19072",
                "title": "Deploying nEmesis: Preventing Foodborne Illness by Data Mining Social Media",
                "url": "https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/19072",
                "date": "2016-02-18",
                "written_by": "makers",
                "quote": "We determined that adaptive inspections uncover significantly more demerits: 9 vs. 6 per inspection (p-value of 0.019)."
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "evidence"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "sources[].id": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "identifiers",
          "identifiers": [
            "AIBD-0188-source-0001"
          ],
          "role": "Existing evidence items, in their original order"
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "curatorial",
          "basis": "Stable within the fingerprinted record version; no source content or source review has been added.",
          "record_fields": [],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "complete"
      },
      "sources[].language": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "sources[].relationship": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "evidence": [
              {
                "kind": "peer-reviewed study",
                "citation": "Sadilek A, Kautz H, DiPrete L, Labus B, Portman E, Teitel J, Silenzio V. Deploying nEmesis: Preventing Foodborne Illness by Data Mining Social Media. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 30(2):3982-3989 (2016). doi:10.1609/aaai.v30i2.19072",
                "title": "Deploying nEmesis: Preventing Foodborne Illness by Data Mining Social Media",
                "url": "https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/19072",
                "date": "2016-02-18",
                "written_by": "makers",
                "quote": "We determined that adaptive inspections uncover significantly more demerits: 9 vs. 6 per inspection (p-value of 0.019)."
              }
            ]
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "evidence"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "sources[].upstream_sources": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "strategic_assessments[]": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial",
        "family": "strategic assessments"
      },
      "summary": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "summary": "SNHD double-blind trial from 2 January 2015: Twitter-mined nEmesis flags yielded 9 vs 6 demerits per inspection and 11 vs 7 venues graded C or worse (64% more).",
            "account": "On 2 January 2015 the Southern Nevada Health District (SNHD) began a controlled experiment with nEmesis, a University of Rochester system. It applies a support-vector-machine language model to geotagged tweets to rank Las Vegas food venues by foodborne-illness risk. During the first three months environmental health specialists inspected 142 venues, half chosen by nEmesis, half under the standard protocol. Inspectors were blind to which was which. Adaptive inspections uncovered 9 demerits per inspection versus 6 (p = 0.019). They found 11 venues graded C or worse versus 7 for controls, a 64% improvement. The abstract summarizes this as 63% more effective. Side findings included an unpermitted seafood establishment and a food handler working with an influenza-like illness. The authors estimate, from CDC outbreak averages, that adaptive inspections saved 71 infections and 4.4 hospitalizations over the three months. They estimate all of Las Vegas's 35,000+ annual inspections made adaptive could prevent over 9,126 cases and 557 hospitalizations a year. SNHD performed 5 foodborne-illness investigations between 2 January and 31 March 2015, against 11 in the same window the year before."
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "summary",
            "account"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "systems[].autonomy_permissions": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "systems[].component_role": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "systems[].deployment_configuration": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "systems[].inputs_outputs": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "systems[].model_name": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "systems[].model_version": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "systems[].product_name": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "system": "nEmesis (SVM language model over geotagged tweets with a web interface for inspectors)"
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "system"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "systems[].provider": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "structured",
          "data": {
            "application_developer": "University of Rochester (Adam Sadilek, Henry Kautz and colleagues)"
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Mapped from the existing case description without a new external source review.",
          "record_fields": [
            "developer"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "taxonomy_crosswalks[]": {
        "state": "not_assessed",
        "review_state": "not_assessed",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "title": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "title": "nEmesis-guided inspections find 64% more C-or-worse venues than standard inspections in Las Vegas",
            "headline": "nEmesis-guided inspections find 64% more C-or-worse venues"
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "title",
            "headline"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      },
      "version": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "identifiers",
          "identifiers": [
            "aafd5697d61c99c9fe0e31a6cf902f49ff00fc20b62dbca9c28f15d8de93b9db"
          ],
          "role": "SHA-256 of normalized original case data"
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "curatorial",
          "basis": "Deterministic content version assigned by the local migration.",
          "record_fields": [],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "complete"
      },
      "workflow": {
        "state": "value_present",
        "value": {
          "kind": "record_fields",
          "fields": {
            "account": "On 2 January 2015 the Southern Nevada Health District (SNHD) began a controlled experiment with nEmesis, a University of Rochester system. It applies a support-vector-machine language model to geotagged tweets to rank Las Vegas food venues by foodborne-illness risk. During the first three months environmental health specialists inspected 142 venues, half chosen by nEmesis, half under the standard protocol. Inspectors were blind to which was which. Adaptive inspections uncovered 9 demerits per inspection versus 6 (p = 0.019). They found 11 venues graded C or worse versus 7 for controls, a 64% improvement. The abstract summarizes this as 63% more effective. Side findings included an unpermitted seafood establishment and a food handler working with an influenza-like illness. The authors estimate, from CDC outbreak averages, that adaptive inspections saved 71 infections and 4.4 hospitalizations over the three months. They estimate all of Las Vegas's 35,000+ annual inspections made adaptive could prevent over 9,126 cases and 557 hospitalizations a year. SNHD performed 5 foodborne-illness investigations between 2 January and 31 March 2015, against 11 in the same window the year before.",
            "replication": {
              "produced_by": [
                "Dense geotagged social-media posting across a metropolitan area",
                "A health department willing to assign half of a matched inspection sample to algorithm-flagged venues",
                "A graded inspection protocol (demerits, letter grades) that makes arms comparable"
              ],
              "must_hold": [
                "Access to geotagged public posts and venue locations as available through the Twitter and Google Places APIs in 2015",
                "Inspectors blinded to the source of the assignment",
                "Enough flagged venues per day to schedule adaptive inspections"
              ],
              "echoes": [
                {
                  "date": "2018-11-06",
                  "setting": "Las Vegas (May-August 2016) and Chicago (November 2016-March 2017), Google's FINDER using aggregated web search and location data",
                  "model_version": "FINDER (successor model by the same lead author, not nEmesis)",
                  "outcome": "recurred",
                  "source": "Sadilek et al. 2018, npj Digital Medicine, doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0045-1"
                }
              ]
            }
          }
        },
        "provenance": {
          "kind": "legacy_record",
          "basis": "Preserved from the existing AIBD record; external sources were not rechecked.",
          "record_fields": [
            "account",
            "replication"
          ],
          "source_refs": []
        },
        "review_state": "record_mapped",
        "coverage": "partial"
      }
    },
    "summary": {
      "total": 91,
      "addressed": 91,
      "known": 29,
      "reviewed": 0,
      "record_mapped": 29,
      "not_assessed": 62,
      "complete": false,
      "by_state": {
        "value_present": 29,
        "not_reported": 0,
        "unresolved": 0,
        "not_assessed": 62,
        "not_applicable": 0,
        "withheld": 0,
        "source_unavailable": 0
      }
    }
  }
}
